Introduction
Epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of CCA
Details about EVs
Classification of EVs
Characteristics of exosomes
Characterization of EVs associated with CCA
The source of EVs | (TEM)/ (NTA) | Biomarkers | References |
---|---|---|---|
CCA bile
| Rounded, cup-shaped, double-membrane-bound vesicles, 50–750 nm in diameter | TSG101, ALIX, CD9, HSP70.1 | [42] |
Spherical structures of vesicles,30–110 nm in diameter, the mode of exosomes sizes is 72.2 nm | CD63, CD81 | [99] | |
Spherical structures, the mode of EVs sizes is 84 nm, 30–110 nm in diameter, 3 × 1011 EVs/ml bile | TSG101, CD63 | [98] | |
CCA serum
| Round morphology, ~ 180 nm in diameter | CD9, CD63, CD81 | [104] |
50–750 nm in diameter | TSG101, ALIX, CD9, HSP70.1 | [42] | |
KKU-M213
KKU-100
| Crescent shaped membrane invagination, 40–100 nm in diameter | Flotillin-1, TSG101, CD81, CD63 | [64] |
50–150 nm in diameter | Flotillin-1, CD81, TSG101 | [73] | |
KMBC
| Spherical structures of vesicles, a mean size of 137 ± 960 nm | ALIX, CD9, CD81 | [61] |
KKU-M213D5
| 40–100 nm in diameter | ALIX, TSG101 | [105] |
RBE
| 30–120 nm in diameter | ALIX, TSG101, CD63 | [65] |
HuCCA-1
| 50–150 nm in diameter | Flotillin-1, CD81, TSG101 | [73] |
H69
| 50–150 nm in diameter | Flotillin-1, CD81, TSG101 | [73] |
EVs regulate the progression of CCA
EVs contents | Source | Downstream target or recipient cells | Function | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
DAMPs
| Actived cholangiocytes | Macrophage | Upregulate proinflammatory cytokines and profibrogenic factors | [59] |
Exosomes
| HUCCT1 and KMBC | MSCs | Contribute to tumor cell growth and stromal development | [61] |
Exosomes
| KKU-M213 | H69 cell | Induce the expression of β-catenin and reduce the expression of E-cadherin | [64] |
Exosomes
| RBE | CIK cell | Inhibit the antitumor activity of CIK cells | [65] |
MiR-205-5p
| KKU-M213 | CCA cell | Down-regulation of miR-205-5p can inhibit invasion and migration of CCA cells | [73] |
MiR-195
| LX2 | A rat model of CCA | Inhibit CCA growth and improve survival in a rat model of CCA | [77] |
MiR-30e
| HuCCT1 | CCA cell | Inhibit CCA cell invasion and migration via inhibit EMT | [81] |
Circ-0000284
| HuCCT1 and RBE | Gene LY6E | Enhancing the migration, invasion and proliferation of CCA cells | [86] |
The function of EVs in tumor microenvironment
Exosomal noncoding RNAs in CCA
Exosomal microRNAs in CCA
Exosomal circRNAs in CCA
EVs as novel biomarkers for CCA
The isolation of EVs
Bile EVs
Serum EVs
Summary of the role of EVs in diagnosing CCA
Biomarkers | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
CCA vs. PSC BBO | [98] | |||
Bile: miR-based panel | Null | 67% | 96% | |
CCA vs. BBD | [103] | |||
Bile: miR-30d-5p | 0.730 | 81.1 | 60.5 | |
miR-92a-3p | 0.652 | 65.7 | 66.7 | |
Serum: CA19-9 | 0.675 | 70.3 | 64.6 | |
CEA | 0.603 | 64.9 | 60.4 | |
CCA vs. BBO | [99] | |||
Bile lncRNAs: ENST00000588480.1 and ENST00000517758.1 | 0.709 | 82.9 | 58.9 | |
Serum: CA19-9 | 0.729 | 74.3 | 71.4 | |
CCA: TNMs I, II vs. TNMs III, IV | [105] | |||
Serum: HSP90B-s255 | 0.936 | 87.27 | 97.62 | |
MCBDS vs. NMCBDS | [42] | |||
Concentration of EVs | 1.000 | Null | Null | |
Serum: CA19-9 | 0.733 | Null | Null | |
CCA vs. HC | [82] | |||
Serum: miR-200c-3p | 0.930 | Null | Null | |
Serum: CA19-9 | 0.780 | Null | Null | |
CCA vs. PSC | [104] | |||
FIBG | 0.796 | Null | Null | |
A1AG1 | 0.794 | Null | Null | |
S10A8 | 0.759 | Null | Null | |
Serum: CA19-9 | 0.819 | Null | Null | |
CCA vs. HC | ||||
AMPN | 0.878 | Null | Null | |
VNN1 | 0.876 | Null |
Null
| |
PIGR | 0.844 | Null | Null | |
Serum: CA19-9 | 0.907 | Null | Null |