Background
Objectives
Methods
Types of participants
Types of interventions
Types of comparisons
Types of outcomes
Types of studies
Search strategy
Study selection and data extraction
Quality appraisal
Data analysis and synthesis
Results
Study ID Country Related publications | Study design, duration of the intervention | Population and setting Number of participants (n) Age (years) Female/male | Description of the intervention Intervention group (IG) Control group (CG) | Outcome measures (primary outcome, secondary outcome) | Key findings | Effect size for physical activity (PA) [95% confidence interval] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ballesteros 2014 [42] Spain, Sweden, Greece | RCT, 12 months | Communities in Spain, Sweden, and Greece n = 41 Age range 65–85 GI: mean age 74, GC mean age 75 Female/male: IG 16/9 CG 11/5 | ICT-mediated social network: AGNES IG: AGNES CG: chat and coffee with the research team | Wellbeing (SPF-IL scale) | IG improved affective dimension (p < 0.05) at post-test. IG improved affective dimension 8.92 (SD 1.93) and 10.20 (SD 1.44), at pre- and post-test, respectively | No data on PA |
Cook 2015 [24] USA | RCT, 3 months | Workers aged 50 years and older n = 278 Age range 50 to 68 Female/male: IG 40/98, CG 50/89 | Web-based multimedia program (information and guidance) IG: web-based multimedia program CG: waitlist | Diet change, mild exercise, self-efficacy Eating practices, exercise planning, beliefs about aging | IG performed better on diet change (p 0.048), planning healthy eating (p 0.03), and mild exercise (p 0.01). IG vs CG showed effects on eating practices (p 0.03), exercise self-efficacy (p 0.03), exercise planning (p 0.03), and aging beliefs (p 0.01) | Not possible to calculate effect size |
Homma 2016 [52] Japan | Pilot RCT, 3 months | Two districts of Kurihara city n = 68 Mean age: IG 65.1, GC 67.2 Female/male: IG 22/13, CG 22/11 | IG: videophone group (interactive interviews) CG: document group (printed communication) Telemonitoring of health conducted in both groups | Physical activity, behavioral change self-assessment (PA and Diet) Clinical parameters (body weight, BMI, blood pressure, albumin) Perceived health condition and improved lifestyle | Both CG and IG improved average step per day: CG 5046 vs. 5992 (p < 0.01), IG 5829 vs. 7324 (p < 0.01); between group (p = 0.16). IG improved behavioral change for PA (p 0.004), diet (p 0.002), and lifestyles (p < 0.01). IG improved significantly in most clinical parameters such as blood pressure, HbA1c, albumin, BMI. IG perceived higher improvement in health condition and lifestyle (72.7% vs. 97.1% (p < 0.01). | 0.21 [− 0.28–0.70] |
Irvine 2013 [43] USA | RCT, 12 weeks | Sedentary men and women 55 years and over, community n = 368 Mean age 60.3 (SD 4.9) Female/male: IG 127/51, CG 129/61 | Web-based intervention to promote physical activity IG: web-based intervention CG: no access to website | Physical activity Body mass index Quality of life SF-12 health survey | IG improved on 13 of 14 outcome measures. IG maintained large gains on all 14 outcomes measures after 6 months. | 0.28 [0.05–0.51] |
Kim 2013 [44] USA | RCT, 6 weeks | African-American community n = 46 Mean age: GI 69.3 (SD 7.3), GC 70.5 (SD 7.5) Female/male: IG 21/5, CG 8/2 | Text messaging to motivate walking IG: pedometer, walking instructional manual and text messaging CG: without text messaging | Physical activity Step count Perceived activity levels Leisure, time, exercise, questionnaire (LTEQ) | IG improved steps vs. CG (679 vs. 398; p < 0.05), as well as LTEQ score (p < 0.05). Both groups increased their LTEQ score at 6 weeks (p < 0.001). | 0.12 [− 0.63–0.88] |
Kurti 2013 [45] USA | Quasi experimental (controlled trial), 2 months | Community members over 50 years in Florida n = 12 Mean age 65.5 Female/male: IG 5/1, CG 5/1 | Internet-based intervention (successive 5-day blocks) to increase physical activity in sedentary adults IG: monetary consequences CG: no monetary consequences | Physical activity | IG and CG reached the 10,000-step goal. IG vs. CG increased steps (182% vs. 108%) and met steps goals (87% vs. 52%). | Not possible to calculate effect size |
Lara 2016 [33] UK | RCT, 8 weeks | Workplaces in Northeast England n = 75 Mean age 61 (SD 4) Female/male: IG 38/12, CG 19/6 | Web-based intervention (LEAP) IG: LEAP CG: use NHS choices website, UK Department of Health | Physical activity, Mediterranean diet (MD adherence) | Both IG and CG improved outcomes and no significant differences were detected. | Not possible to calculate effect size |
Mouton 2015 [46] Belgium | RCT, 4 arms | One municipality in Belgium n = 204 Mean age 65 Female/male: IG1 20/13, IG2 27/13, IG3 25/13, CG 23/15 | Web-based, center-based or combined physical activity (PA) intervention IG1: web-based intervention IG2: center-based intervention IG3: mixed (center- and web-based) intervention CG: no intervention | Physical activity (PA) level Readiness for PA, awareness of PA (general), awareness of PA (opportunities in municipality) | IG3 improved in PA level (p 0.041), readiness for PA (p 0.001). IG3 improved on awareness of PA (p 0.003) and awareness of PA opportunities in municipality (p 0.001). | 0.06 No data available to calculate CI |
Myhre 2013 USA | RCT, 3 arms, 8 weeks | 2 cohorts from retirement communities in Arizona n = 41 Mean age 79.4 Female/male: IG1 9/5, IG2 9/4, CG 11/3 | Micro-blogging shared with others or kept private IG1: Facebook IG2: online diary CG: waitlist | Knowledge, letter memory, keep track | IG1: knowledge, memory task improved at time 2 vs. baseline (p < 0.01); keep track slightly improved (p < 0.10) | No data on PA |
Nyman 2009 [47] UK | RCT, no duration specified | Community in Southampton n = 302 Mean age 70.41 (SD 7.07) Female/male 187/115 | Website with tailored advice to undertake strength and balance training (SBT) IG: website with tailored advice CG: generic website | Attitudes to falls-related intervention scale (AFRIS) | No significant differences in attitudes toward SBT. IG participants indicated that advice was relevant (p 0.017) and activities good (p 0.047). | No data on PA |
Peels 2013a [48] Netherlands | Cluster-RCT, 5 arms, 1 year | Community members n = 1729 Mean age 62 Female/male: IG1 127/51, IG2 144/112, IG3 111/113, IG4 93/100, CG 158/152 | Printed or web-based tailored physical activity intervention IG1: printed basic IG2: print-delivered with environmental information IG3: web-based basic IG4: web-based with environmental information CG: No advice | Process outcomes (appreciation, understanding of information) | IG1-IG2: printed intervention vs web-based intervention was significantly higher 92.7–98.2% read, 70.1–76.5% kept, and 39.9–56.8% discussed, and better appreciated (6.06–6.91 vs 5.05–6.11 on a scale of 1–10) | 0.10 [− 0.04–0.24] |
Slegers 2008 [49] Netherland | Feasibility RCT, 4 arms, 12 months | Community in Maastricht n = 236 Age range 64–75 Female/male: ? | Computer training and Internet usage IG 1: training and intervention IG 2: training, no intervention CG1: no training, no intervention CG2: not interested (passive control) | Physical and psychological well-being (SF-36) Social well-being and social network | Most outcomes were not significant. IG participants spent more time on learning new things. | 0.24 [− 0.14–0.63] |
van het Reve 2014 [50] Switzerland | Preclinical exploratory trial, 12 weeks | 2 institutions for older people and 1 organization providing home nursing care for seniors n = 44 Mean age (years) 75 (SD 6) Female/male: IG1 8/5, IG2 10/4, CG 10/7 | A tablet with ActiveLifestyle IG1: social group with tablet IG2: individual group with tablet GC: brochure group | Gait performance (dual-task walking) Physical performance Short physical performance battery (SPPB) Fall efficacy Fall efficacy scale international (FES-I) | IG1 and IG2 improved significantly in single and dual task walking. IG1, IG2, GC showed SPPB improvement (p 0.02) between pre- and post-test. Group difference for FES-I between GC and IG1et IG2 (p 0.04). | No data on PA |
Wijsman 2013 [55] Netherlands | RCT, 3 months | Community in Leiden n = 235 Age range 60–70 Mean age: GI 64.7 (SD 3.0), CG 64.9 (SD 2.8) Female/male: IG 47/72, CG 49/67 | Internet-based physical activity intervention: Philips DirectLife IG: Philips DirectLife CG: no intervention | Physical activity Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) Metabolic parameters Quality of life (RAND-36) | IG improved PA, weight, waist circumference, insulin and HbA1c (p < 0.001), and MVPA (p < 0.001). IG improved emotional and mental health (p < 0.03) and health change (p < 0.01). | 0.58 [0.31–0.85] |
Focus area of the technology
Effects of e-Health on healthy behavior outcomes
Effects of e-Health on clinical parameter outcomes
Effects of e-Health on psychological outcomes
Effects of e-Health on other outcomes
Outcome synthesis and assessment of the certainty of the evidence
Outcome | Number of studies | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Certainty |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical activity | 11 | Seriousa | Not seriousb | Seriousd | Seriousf | Seriousg |
Very low |
Healthy eating | 2 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Seriousd | Seriousf | Seriousg | Very low |
Clinical parameters (body mass index, HbAIc, cholesterol) | 5 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Seriousd | Seriousf | Seriousg | Very low |
Quality of life | 3 | Seriousa | Not seriousb | Not seriouse | Seriousf | Seriousg | Very low |
Cognitive outcomes | 2 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Seriousd | Seriousf | Seriousg | Very low |
Psychological outcomes (wellbeing, depression, loneliness) | 4 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Seriousd | Seriousf | Seriousg | Very low |
Social outcomes (social support, social functioning) | 2 | Seriousa | Seriousc | Not seriousd | Seriousf | Seriousg | Very low |