Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2016

17.08.2016 | Healthcare Policy and Outcomes

Comparison of Comorbid Medical Conditions in the National Cancer Database and the SEER–Medicare Database

verfasst von: Chun Chieh Lin, PhD, MBA, Katherine S. Virgo, PhD, MBA, Anthony S. Robbins, MD, PhD, Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD, Elizabeth M. Ward, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 13/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Physicians routinely factor comorbidities into diagnostic and treatment decisions. Analyses of treatment patterns and outcomes using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) usually adjust for comorbidities; however, the completeness of comorbidity ascertainment in the NCDB has never been assessed. We compared the prevalence of comorbidities captured in the NCDB and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare among female breast, non-small-cell lung, and colorectal cancer patients aged ≥66.

Methods

In the NCDB, ten fields were searched for comorbidities. In the SEER–Medicare dataset, Medicare claims were used to identify comorbidities for two time periods: 12 months prior to diagnosis (Prior) and Index claim alone. Chi-square tests were used to compare comorbidity prevalence using propensity score-matched subsamples from each dataset. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses by Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score and data source were conducted.

Results

Comorbidity prevalence in NCDB did not differ significantly from that identified in SEER–Medicare Index claims across all three cancer sites, except for congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, and renal disease. However, when compared to the prevalence identified through SEER–Medicare Prior claims, comorbidity prevalence in the NCDB was lower. Overall survival rates by NCDB comorbidity scores were nearly identical to those based on SEER–Medicare Index claims but were lower than those based on SEER–Medicare Prior claims, particularly in higher comorbidity score categories.

Conclusions

The study found overall similarity of comorbidity prevalence between NCDB and SEER–Medicare Index claims, but much less similarity between NCDB and SEER–Medicare Prior claims. Future researchers should understand the limitation of comorbidities ascertained in the NCDB and interpret results accordingly.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerro CC, Robbins AS, Phillips JL, Stewart AK. Comparison of cases captured in the National Cancer Data Base with those in population-based central cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1759–65.CrossRefPubMed Lerro CC, Robbins AS, Phillips JL, Stewart AK. Comparison of cases captured in the National Cancer Data Base with those in population-based central cancer registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1759–65.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria K, Stewart A, Winchester D, Ko C. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria K, Stewart A, Winchester D, Ko C. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Robbins AS, Pavluck AL, Fedewa SA, Chen AY, Ward EM. Insurance status, comorbidity level, and survival among colorectal cancer patients age 18 to 64 years in the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3627–33.CrossRefPubMed Robbins AS, Pavluck AL, Fedewa SA, Chen AY, Ward EM. Insurance status, comorbidity level, and survival among colorectal cancer patients age 18 to 64 years in the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3627–33.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Esnaola NF, Stewart AK, Feig BW, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Age-, race-, and ethnicity-related differences in the treatment of nonmetastatic rectal cancer: a patterns of care study from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(11):3036–47.CrossRefPubMed Esnaola NF, Stewart AK, Feig BW, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA. Age-, race-, and ethnicity-related differences in the treatment of nonmetastatic rectal cancer: a patterns of care study from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(11):3036–47.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Piccirillo JF, Costas I, Claybour P, Borah AJ, Grove L, Jeffe D. The measurement of comorbidity by cancer registries. J Registry Manage. 2003;30(1):8–14. Piccirillo JF, Costas I, Claybour P, Borah AJ, Grove L, Jeffe D. The measurement of comorbidity by cancer registries. J Registry Manage. 2003;30(1):8–14.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gourin CG, McAfee WJ, Neyman KM, Howington JW, Podolsky RH, Terris DJ. Effect of comorbidity on quality of life and treatment selection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(8):1371–5.CrossRefPubMed Gourin CG, McAfee WJ, Neyman KM, Howington JW, Podolsky RH, Terris DJ. Effect of comorbidity on quality of life and treatment selection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(8):1371–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu J, Fedewa S, Chen AY. The impact of comorbidity on treatment (chemoradiation and laryngectomy) of advanced, nondistant metastatic laryngeal cancer: a review of 16,849 cases from the national cancer database (2003–2008). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(12):1120–8.CrossRefPubMed Zhu J, Fedewa S, Chen AY. The impact of comorbidity on treatment (chemoradiation and laryngectomy) of advanced, nondistant metastatic laryngeal cancer: a review of 16,849 cases from the national cancer database (2003–2008). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(12):1120–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, Baldwin LM, Schrag D. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(8):584–90.CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Legler JM, Warren JL, Baldwin LM, Schrag D. A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(8):584–90.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(12):1258–67.CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(12):1258–67.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan Y, Birman-Deych E, Radford MJ, Nilasena DS, Gage BF. Comorbidity indices to predict mortality from medicare data: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1073–7.CrossRefPubMed Yan Y, Birman-Deych E, Radford MJ, Nilasena DS, Gage BF. Comorbidity indices to predict mortality from medicare data: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1073–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Malenka D, McLerran D, Roos N, Fisher E, Wennberg J. Using administrative data to describe casemix: a comparison with the medical record. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(9):1027–32.CrossRefPubMed Malenka D, McLerran D, Roos N, Fisher E, Wennberg J. Using administrative data to describe casemix: a comparison with the medical record. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(9):1027–32.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Parsons L. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. Paper presented at the 26th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference: 22–25 Apr 2001; West Sacramento, CA. Parsons L. Reducing bias in a propensity score matched-pair sample using greedy matching techniques. Paper presented at the 26th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference: 22–25 Apr 2001; West Sacramento, CA.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, Mackenzie C. A new method for classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.CrossRefPubMed Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, Mackenzie C. A new method for classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanabria A, Carvalho AL, Vartanian JG, Magrin J, Ikeda MK, Kowalski LP. Comorbidity is a prognostic factor in elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(4):1449–57.CrossRefPubMed Sanabria A, Carvalho AL, Vartanian JG, Magrin J, Ikeda MK, Kowalski LP. Comorbidity is a prognostic factor in elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(4):1449–57.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sperling C, Noer MC, Christensen IJ, Nielsen MLS, Lidegaard Ø, Høgdall C. Comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor for the survival of ovarian cancer: a Danish register-based cohort study from a clinical database. Gynecol Oncol.2013;129(1):97–102.CrossRefPubMed Sperling C, Noer MC, Christensen IJ, Nielsen MLS, Lidegaard Ø, Høgdall C. Comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor for the survival of ovarian cancer: a Danish register-based cohort study from a clinical database. Gynecol Oncol.2013;129(1):97–102.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Skillington S, Kallogjeri D, Lewis JS Jr, Piccirillo JF. Prognostic importance of comorbidity and the association between comorbidity and p16 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(6):568–75.CrossRefPubMed Skillington S, Kallogjeri D, Lewis JS Jr, Piccirillo JF. Prognostic importance of comorbidity and the association between comorbidity and p16 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(6):568–75.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarfati D, Koczwara B, Jackson C. The impact of comorbidity on cancer and its treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):337–50.CrossRefPubMed Sarfati D, Koczwara B, Jackson C. The impact of comorbidity on cancer and its treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):337–50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandler BJ, Wang Z, Hancock JG, Boffa DJ, Detterbeck FC, Kim AW. Gender, age, and comorbidity status predict improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy following lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancers larger than 4 cm. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):638–45.CrossRefPubMed Sandler BJ, Wang Z, Hancock JG, Boffa DJ, Detterbeck FC, Kim AW. Gender, age, and comorbidity status predict improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy following lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancers larger than 4 cm. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):638–45.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards BK, Noone A-M, Mariotto AB, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer. 2014;120(9):1290–314.CrossRefPubMed Edwards BK, Noone A-M, Mariotto AB, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer. 2014;120(9):1290–314.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Patnaik JL, Byers T, DiGuiseppi C, Denberg TD, Dabelea D. The influence of comorbidities on overall survival among older women diagnosed with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(14): 1101–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patnaik JL, Byers T, DiGuiseppi C, Denberg TD, Dabelea D. The influence of comorbidities on overall survival among older women diagnosed with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(14): 1101–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Piccirillo J, Tierney R, Costas I, Grove L, Spitznagel E. Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2441–7.CrossRefPubMed Piccirillo J, Tierney R, Costas I, Grove L, Spitznagel E. Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA. 2004;291(20):2441–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of Comorbid Medical Conditions in the National Cancer Database and the SEER–Medicare Database
verfasst von
Chun Chieh Lin, PhD, MBA
Katherine S. Virgo, PhD, MBA
Anthony S. Robbins, MD, PhD
Ahmedin Jemal, DVM, PhD
Elizabeth M. Ward, PhD
Publikationsdatum
17.08.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 13/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5508-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 13/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.