Erschienen in:
07.11.2016 | Pancreatic Tumors
Pancreatic Duct Involvement in Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors is an Independent Poor Prognostic Factor
verfasst von:
Yoshihide Nanno, MD, Ippei Matsumoto, MD, PhD, Yoh Zen, MD, PhD, FRCPath, Kyoko Otani, MD, Jun Uemura, MD, Hirochika Toyama, MD, PhD, Sadaki Asari, MD, PhD, Tadahiro Goto, MD, PhD, Tetsuo Ajiki, MD, PhD, Keiichi Okano, MD, PhD, Yasuyuki Suzuki, MD, PhD, Yoshifumi Takeyama, MD, PhD, Takumi Fukumoto, MD, PhD, Yonson Ku, MD, PhD
Erschienen in:
Annals of Surgical Oncology
|
Ausgabe 4/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
The biological behavior of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas (PNETs) is difficult to predict. This study was designed to determine whether involvement of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) serves as a poor prognostic factor for PNETs.
Methods
The involvement of the MPD in PNETs was defined as ductal stenosis inside the tumor mass associated with distal MPDs more than twofold larger in diameter than the proximal ducts. We examined the correlation between MPD involvement and other clinicopathological parameters, including nodal metastasis and recurrence-free survival, in 101 patients treated consecutively at three referral centers in Japan. All patients underwent surgical resection.
Results
MPD involvement was observed in 13 of the 101 cases (13%) and was associated with multiple unfavorable clinicopathological features (e.g., larger tumor size, higher histological grade, more frequent nodal metastasis, and higher recurrence rates). Patients with MPD involvement also showed significantly worse recurrence-free survival than did those without ductal involvement (P < 0.001), with a 5 years recurrence-free rate of 41%. On multivariate analysis, MPD involvement was significantly associated with nodal metastasis [odds ratio (OR) 16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8–89; P < 0.001] and recurrence (OR 8.0; 95% CI 1.7–46; P = 0.009). The radiology–pathology correlation revealed that stenosis of the MPD was due to periductal and/or intraductal tumor invasion. Cases with MPD involvement had microscopic venous invasion (P = 0.010) and perineural infiltration (P = 0.002) more frequently than did those with no ductal infiltration.
Conclusions
MPD involvement in PNETs may serve as an imaging sign indicating an aggressive clinical course.