Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2020

19.04.2020 | Pancreatic Tumors

Does Site Matter? Impact of Tumor Location on Pathologic Characteristics, Recurrence, and Survival of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

verfasst von: Giuseppe Malleo, MD, PhD, Laura Maggino, MD, Cristina R. Ferrone, MD, FACS, Giovanni Marchegiani, MD, PhD, Claudio Luchini, MD, Mari Mino-Kenudson, MD, Salvatore Paiella, MD, PhD, Motaz Qadan, MD, PhD, FACS, Aldo Scarpa, MD, Keith D. Lillemoe, MD, FACS, Claudio Bassi, MD, FACS, Carlos Fernàndez-del Castillo, MD, FACS, Roberto Salvia, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The authors hypothesized that in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), pathologic characteristics, oncologic outcomes, prognostic factors, and the accuracy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system might differ based on tumor location.

Methods

Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for PDAC at two academic institutions from 2000 to 2015 were retrieved. A comparative analysis between head (H-PDAC) and body–tail (BT-PDAC) tumors was performed using uni- and multivariable models. The accuracy of the eighth AJCC staging system was analyzed using C-statistics.

Results

Among 1466 patients, 264 (18%) had BT-PDAC, which displayed greater tumor size but significantly lower rates of perineural invasion and G3/4 grading. Furthermore, BT-PDAC was associated with a lower frequency of nodal involvement and a greater representation of earlier stages. The recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival times were longer for BT-PDAC (16 vs 14 months [p = 0.020] and 33 vs 26 months [p = 0.026], respectively), but tumor location was not an independent predictor of recurrence or survival in the multivariable analyses. The recurrence patterns did not differ. Certain prognostic factors (i.e., CA 19.9, grading, R-status, and adjuvant treatment) were common, whereas others were site-specific (i.e., preoperative pain, diabetes, and multivisceral resection). The performances of the AJCC staging system were similar (C-statistics of 0.573 for H-PDAC and 0.597 for BT-PDAC, respectively).

Conclusions

Despite differences in pathologic profile found to be in favor of BT-PDAC, tumor location was not an independent predictor of recurrence or survival after pancreatectomy. An array of site-specific prognostic factors was identified, but the AJCC staging system displayed similar prognostic power regardless of primary tumor location.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265:185–91.CrossRef Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2017;265:185–91.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamarajah SK, Burns WR, Frankel TL, et al. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th-edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2023–30.CrossRef Kamarajah SK, Burns WR, Frankel TL, et al. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th-edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2023–30.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, et al. International validation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:e183617.CrossRef van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, et al. International validation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:e183617.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlitter AM, Jesinghaus M, Jäger C, et al. pT but not pN stage of the 8th TNM classification significantly improves prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2017;84:121–9.CrossRef Schlitter AM, Jesinghaus M, Jäger C, et al. pT but not pN stage of the 8th TNM classification significantly improves prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2017;84:121–9.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempero MA, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma V.1.2020. © 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. Available at https://www.nccn.org/. Accessed 15 Apr 2020. Tempero MA, et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma V.1.2020. © 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. Available at https://​www.​nccn.​org/​. Accessed 15 Apr 2020.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanda M, Fujii T, Nagai S, et al. Pattern of lymph node metastasis spread in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2011;40:951–5.CrossRef Kanda M, Fujii T, Nagai S, et al. Pattern of lymph node metastasis spread in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2011;40:951–5.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Futagami F, et al. Lymphatic flow and neural plexus invasion associated with carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Cancer. 1996;78:2485–91.CrossRef Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Futagami F, et al. Lymphatic flow and neural plexus invasion associated with carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Cancer. 1996;78:2485–91.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Makino I, Kitagawa H, Ohta T, et al. Nerve plexus invasion in pancreatic cancer: spread patterns on histopathologic and embryological analyses. Pancreas. 2008;37:358–65.CrossRef Makino I, Kitagawa H, Ohta T, et al. Nerve plexus invasion in pancreatic cancer: spread patterns on histopathologic and embryological analyses. Pancreas. 2008;37:358–65.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartwig W, Vollmer CM, Fingerhut A, et al. Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156:1–14.CrossRef Hartwig W, Vollmer CM, Fingerhut A, et al. Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156:1–14.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:1–7.CrossRef Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:1–7.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau MK, Davila JA, Shaib YH. Incidence and survival of pancreatic head and body and tail cancers: a population-based study in the United States. Pancreas. 2010;39:458–62.CrossRef Lau MK, Davila JA, Shaib YH. Incidence and survival of pancreatic head and body and tail cancers: a population-based study in the United States. Pancreas. 2010;39:458–62.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackay TM, van Erning FN, van der Geest LGM, et al. Association between primary origin (head, body, and tail) of metastasised pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and oncologic outcome: a population-based analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2019;106:99–105.CrossRef Mackay TM, van Erning FN, van der Geest LGM, et al. Association between primary origin (head, body, and tail) of metastasised pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and oncologic outcome: a population-based analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2019;106:99–105.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Erning FN, Mackay TM, van der Geest LGM, et al. Association of the location of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (head, body, tail) with tumor stage, treatment, and survival: a population-based analysis. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:1655–62.CrossRef van Erning FN, Mackay TM, van der Geest LGM, et al. Association of the location of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (head, body, tail) with tumor stage, treatment, and survival: a population-based analysis. Acta Oncol. 2018;57:1655–62.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1039–49.CrossRef Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1039–49.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:567–79.CrossRef Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:567–79.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Artinyan A, Soriano PA, Prendergast C, et al. The anatomic location of pancreatic cancer is a prognostic factor for survival. HPB. 2008;10:371–6.CrossRef Artinyan A, Soriano PA, Prendergast C, et al. The anatomic location of pancreatic cancer is a prognostic factor for survival. HPB. 2008;10:371–6.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dreyer SB, Jamieson NB, Upstill-Goddard R, et al. Defining the molecular pathology of pancreatic body and tail adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:e183–91.CrossRef Dreyer SB, Jamieson NB, Upstill-Goddard R, et al. Defining the molecular pathology of pancreatic body and tail adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2018;105:e183–91.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Winer LK, Dhar VK, Wima K, et al. The Impact of tumor location on resection and survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Res. 2019;239:60–6.CrossRef Winer LK, Dhar VK, Wima K, et al. The Impact of tumor location on resection and survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Res. 2019;239:60–6.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomasello G, Ghidini M, Costanzo A, et al. Outcome of head compared to body and tail pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93 studies. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10:259–69.CrossRef Tomasello G, Ghidini M, Costanzo A, et al. Outcome of head compared to body and tail pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 93 studies. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019;10:259–69.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Toomey P, Hernandez J, Golkar F, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: complete tumor extirpation improves survival benefit despite larger tumors for patients who undergo distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:376–81.CrossRef Toomey P, Hernandez J, Golkar F, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: complete tumor extirpation improves survival benefit despite larger tumors for patients who undergo distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:376–81.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruess DA, Makowiec F, Chikhladze S, et al. The prognostic influence of intrapancreatic tumor location on survival after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Surg. 2015;15:123.CrossRef Ruess DA, Makowiec F, Chikhladze S, et al. The prognostic influence of intrapancreatic tumor location on survival after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Surg. 2015;15:123.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin, MB, Edge S, Greene, F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2017.CrossRef Amin, MB, Edge S, Greene, F, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2017.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Malleo G, Maggino L, Marchegiani G, et al. Pancreatectomy with venous resection for pT3 head adenocarcinoma: perioperative outcomes, recurrence pattern, and prognostic implications of histologically confirmed vascular infiltration. Pancreatology. 2017;17:847–57.CrossRef Malleo G, Maggino L, Marchegiani G, et al. Pancreatectomy with venous resection for pT3 head adenocarcinoma: perioperative outcomes, recurrence pattern, and prognostic implications of histologically confirmed vascular infiltration. Pancreatology. 2017;17:847–57.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JAMG, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, et al. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156:591–600.CrossRef Tol JAMG, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, et al. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156:591–600.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Malleo G, Maggino L, Capelli P, et al. Reappraisal of nodal staging and study of lymph node station involvement in pancreaticoduodenectomy with the Standard International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of lymphadenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:367–79.e4.CrossRef Malleo G, Maggino L, Capelli P, et al. Reappraisal of nodal staging and study of lymph node station involvement in pancreaticoduodenectomy with the Standard International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of lymphadenectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:367–79.e4.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández-Cruz L, Johnson C, Dervenis C. Locoregional dissemination and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg. 1999;16:313–9.CrossRef Fernández-Cruz L, Johnson C, Dervenis C. Locoregional dissemination and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg. 1999;16:313–9.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Malleo G, Maggino L, Ferrone CR, et al. Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in distal pancreatectomy for body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;270:1138–46.CrossRef Malleo G, Maggino L, Ferrone CR, et al. Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in distal pancreatectomy for body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;270:1138–46.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ling Q, Xu X, Zheng SS, Kalthoff H. The diversity between pancreatic head and body/tail cancers: clinical parameters and in vitro models. Hepatobil Pancreat Dis Int. 2013;12:480–87.CrossRef Ling Q, Xu X, Zheng SS, Kalthoff H. The diversity between pancreatic head and body/tail cancers: clinical parameters and in vitro models. Hepatobil Pancreat Dis Int. 2013;12:480–87.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Court CM, Ankeny JS, Sho S, et al. Circulating tumor cells predict occult metastatic disease and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1000–8.CrossRef Court CM, Ankeny JS, Sho S, et al. Circulating tumor cells predict occult metastatic disease and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1000–8.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sohal DPS, Tullio K, Khorana AA. Do patients with pancreatic body or tail cancer benefit from adjuvant therapy? A cohort study. Surg Oncol. 2018;27:245–50.PubMed Sohal DPS, Tullio K, Khorana AA. Do patients with pancreatic body or tail cancer benefit from adjuvant therapy? A cohort study. Surg Oncol. 2018;27:245–50.PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi S, Hua J, Liang C, et al. Proposed modification of the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;269:944–950.CrossRef Shi S, Hua J, Liang C, et al. Proposed modification of the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;269:944–950.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen YT, Huang ZP, Zhou ZW, et al. Equipping the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor grade: a recursive partitioning analysis. Med Oncol. 2016;33:122.CrossRef Chen YT, Huang ZP, Zhou ZW, et al. Equipping the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with tumor grade: a recursive partitioning analysis. Med Oncol. 2016;33:122.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiang Y, Su Y, Chen Y, et al. Refining the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging scheme for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using recursive partitioning analysis. J Cancer. 2017;8:2765–73.CrossRef Jiang Y, Su Y, Chen Y, et al. Refining the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging scheme for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using recursive partitioning analysis. J Cancer. 2017;8:2765–73.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Roland CL, Yang AD, Katz MHG, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a reduced lymph node ratio in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1168–75.CrossRef Roland CL, Yang AD, Katz MHG, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with a reduced lymph node ratio in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:1168–75.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Michelakos T, Pergolini I, Castillo CF, et al. Predictors of resectability and survival in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Ann Surg. 2019;269:733–40.CrossRef Michelakos T, Pergolini I, Castillo CF, et al. Predictors of resectability and survival in patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX. Ann Surg. 2019;269:733–40.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:515–22.CrossRef Mokdad AA, Minter RM, Zhu H, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:515–22.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirono S, Kawai M, Okada K, et al. Pancreatic neck cancer has specific and oncologic characteristics regarding portal vein invasion and lymph node metastasis. Surgery. 2016;159:426–40.CrossRef Hirono S, Kawai M, Okada K, et al. Pancreatic neck cancer has specific and oncologic characteristics regarding portal vein invasion and lymph node metastasis. Surgery. 2016;159:426–40.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Does Site Matter? Impact of Tumor Location on Pathologic Characteristics, Recurrence, and Survival of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
verfasst von
Giuseppe Malleo, MD, PhD
Laura Maggino, MD
Cristina R. Ferrone, MD, FACS
Giovanni Marchegiani, MD, PhD
Claudio Luchini, MD
Mari Mino-Kenudson, MD
Salvatore Paiella, MD, PhD
Motaz Qadan, MD, PhD, FACS
Aldo Scarpa, MD
Keith D. Lillemoe, MD, FACS
Claudio Bassi, MD, FACS
Carlos Fernàndez-del Castillo, MD, FACS
Roberto Salvia, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
19.04.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08354-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.