Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 2/2011

01.02.2011 | Review Article

Febuxostat for the Management of Hyperuricaemia in Patients with Gout

A NICE Single Technology Appraisal

verfasst von: Dr Matt Stevenson, Abdullah Pandor

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 2/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

As part of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) single technology appraisal (STA) process, the manufacturer of febuxostat (Adenuric®; Ipsen, UK) was invited to submit evidence for the clinical and cost effectiveness of febuxostat for the management of hyperuricaemia in patients with gout. The School of Health and Related Research Technology Appraisal Group (ScHARR-TAG) at the University of Sheffield were commissioned to act as the independent Evidence Review Group (ERG).
This article provides details of the company’s initial submission, the ERG’s clarification questions and the ERG report submitted to NICE. The decision made by NICE is provided alongside a brief comment on additional results produced by a substantially different model, which were presented by the manufacturer after the production of the appraisal consultation document.
The ERG produced a critical review of the evidence for the clinical evidence and cost effectiveness of the technology based upon the manufacturer’s submission to NICE.
The clinical evidence was derived from two head-to-head, phase III, multiarm, randomized, double blind, controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of febuxostat with fixed-dose allopurinol (300/100mg/day) in patients with hyperuricaemia and gout. The ERG considered that the trials were of reasonable methodological quality and measured a clinically relevant range of outcomes. Although a simple pooled analysis of the individual patientlevel data from the two trials was undertaken, the statistical approach for combining the data was considered inappropriate by the ERG as it failed to preserve randomization and introduced bias and confounding. There was substantial uncertainty in the relationships reported by the manufacturer regarding serum uric acid levels and the incidence of gout flares and underlying patient utility. The mathematical model developed was flawed and was not corrected despite ERG comments. It focused only on patients receiving febuxostat (80mg/day titrated to 120mg/day if necessary) with fixed-dose allopurinol (300/100mg/day). Sequential treatment was not modeled, nor was titrating allopurinol to 900mg/day, which is regarded as best practice. Numerous other errors were identified, which included the uncertain price of febuxostat being sampled within the probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Supplementary exploratory modelling addressing the position of febuxostat where patients were intolerant or contraindicated to allopurinol was provided to the NICE Appraisal Committee following the release of the appraisal consultation document.
The NICE Appraisal Committee concluded that febuxostat be recommended as an option for the management of chronic hyperuricaemia in gout only for people who are intolerant to allopurinol or for whom allopurinol is contraindicated.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Teng GG, Nair R, Saag KG. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment of gout. Drugs 2006; 66: 1547–63PubMedCrossRef Teng GG, Nair R, Saag KG. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation and treatment of gout. Drugs 2006; 66: 1547–63PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mikuls TR, Farrar JT, Bilker WB, et al. Gout epidemiology: results from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1990–1999. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 267–72PubMedCrossRef Mikuls TR, Farrar JT, Bilker WB, et al. Gout epidemiology: results from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1990–1999. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 267–72PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Annemans L, Spaepen E, Gaskin M, et al. Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000–2005. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67 (7): 960–6PubMedCrossRef Annemans L, Spaepen E, Gaskin M, et al. Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000–2005. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67 (7): 960–6PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamanaka H, Togashi R, Hakoda M, et al. Optimal range of serum urate concentrations to minimize risk of gouty attacks during anti-hyperuricemic treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998; 431: 13–8PubMedCrossRef Yamanaka H, Togashi R, Hakoda M, et al. Optimal range of serum urate concentrations to minimize risk of gouty attacks during anti-hyperuricemic treatment. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998; 431: 13–8PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoji A, Yamanaka H, Kamatani N. A retrospective study of the relationship between serum urate level and recurrent attacks of gouty arthritis: evidence for reduction of recurrent gouty arthritis with antihyperuricemic therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51 (3): 321–5PubMedCrossRef Shoji A, Yamanaka H, Kamatani N. A retrospective study of the relationship between serum urate level and recurrent attacks of gouty arthritis: evidence for reduction of recurrent gouty arthritis with antihyperuricemic therapy. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51 (3): 321–5PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout: part II. Management: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 1312–24PubMedCrossRef Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout: part II. Management: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 1312–24PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan KM, Cameron JS, Snaith M, et al., on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 1372–4 Jordan KM, Cameron JS, Snaith M, et al., on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. British Society for Rheumatology and British Health Professionals in Rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007; 46: 1372–4
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker MA, Schumacher R, Wortmann RL, et al. Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricaemia and gout. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2450–61PubMedCrossRef Becker MA, Schumacher R, Wortmann RL, et al. Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricaemia and gout. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2450–61PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schumacher HR, Becker MA, Wortmann RL, et al. Febuxostat vs allopurinol and placebo in subjects with hyperuricaemia and gout: the 28-week APEX study [poster]. The Annual Scientific meeting of the American College of Rheumatology; 2005 Nov 16–17; San Diego (CA) Schumacher HR, Becker MA, Wortmann RL, et al. Febuxostat vs allopurinol and placebo in subjects with hyperuricaemia and gout: the 28-week APEX study [poster]. The Annual Scientific meeting of the American College of Rheumatology; 2005 Nov 16–17; San Diego (CA)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Borstad GC, Bryant LR, Abel MP, et al. Colchicine for prophylaxis of acute flares when initiating allopurinol for chronic gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 2429–32PubMed Borstad GC, Bryant LR, Abel MP, et al. Colchicine for prophylaxis of acute flares when initiating allopurinol for chronic gouty arthritis. J Rheumatol 2004; 31: 2429–32PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Febuxostat for the Management of Hyperuricaemia in Patients with Gout
A NICE Single Technology Appraisal
verfasst von
Dr Matt Stevenson
Abdullah Pandor
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2011
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11535770-000000000-00000

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2011

PharmacoEconomics 2/2011 Zur Ausgabe