nach oben

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Erschienen in:

29.03.2022 | Review

Management of Difficult Choledocholithiasis

verfasst von: Alexander Podboy, Srinivas Gaddam, Kenneth Park, Kapil Gupta, Quin Liu, Simon K. Lo

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Over 30% of all endoscopic retrograde cholangiography procedures in the US are associated with biliary stone extraction, and over 10–15% of these cases are noted to be complex or difficult. The aim of this review is to define the characteristics of difficult common bile duct stones and provide an algorithmic therapeutic approach to these difficult cases. We describe additional special clinical circumstances in which difficult biliary stones are identified and provide additional management strategies to aid endoscopic stone extraction efforts.

Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of Digestive Diseases in the United States. Part III: Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1134–1144.CrossRef

Ko CW, Lee SP. Epidemiology and Natural History of Common Bile Duct Stones and Prediction of Disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:S165–S169.CrossRef

Kim TH, Kim JH, Seo DW et al. International Consensus Guidelines for Endoscopic Papillary Large-Balloon Dilation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:37–47.CrossRef

Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L et al. Endoscopic Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019;51:472–491.CrossRef

Zimmon DS, Falkenstein DB, Kessler RE. Endoscopic Papillotomy for Choledocholithiasis. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:1181–1182.CrossRef

Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. Endoscopic Management of Difficult Common Bile Duct Stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:165–173.CrossRef

ASGE Technology Committee, Watson RR, Parsi MA, et al. Biliary and Pancreatic Lithotripsy Devices. VideoGIE. 2018;3:329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2018.07.010

Teoh AY, Cheung FK, Hu B et al. Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone for Removal of Bile Duct Stones. Gastroenterology 2013;144:341–345.CrossRef

Park CH, Jung JH, Nam E et al. Comparative Efficacy of Various Endoscopic Techniques for the Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones: A Network Meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:43.CrossRef

10.

Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic Balloon Sphincter Dilation (Sphincteroplasty) versus Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004890.pub2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Chang WH, Chu CH, Wang TE et al. Outcome of Simple Use of Mechanical Lithotripsy of Difficult Common Bile Duct Stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:593–596.CrossRef

12.

Lee SH, Park JK, Yoon WJ et al. How to Predict the Outcome of Endoscopic Mechanical Lithotripsy in Patients with Difficult Bile Duct Stones? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:1006–1010.CrossRef

13.

Thomas M, Howell DA, Carr-Locke D et al. Mechanical Lithotripsy of Pancreatic and Biliary Stones: Complications and Available Treatment Options Collected from Expert Centers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1896–1902.CrossRef

14.

Buxbaum JL, Fehmi SMA, Sultan S et al. ASGE Guideline on the Role of Endoscopy in the Evaluation and Management of Choledocholithiasis. GIE. 2019;89:1075–1105.

15.

Shah RJ Itoi T. Chapter 27: Cholangioscopy. ERCP. 2019. 3rd Edition. P 249–258.e2

16.

Sharma SS, Jhajharia A, Maharshi S. Short-Term Biliary Stenting Before Mechanical Lithotripsy for Difficult Bile Duct Stones. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014;33:237–240.CrossRef

17.

Yang D, Buscaglia J. Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy for Difficult Bile Duct Stones: Out with the Old in with the New? CGH. 2018;16:819–820.

18.

Binmoeller KF, Brückner M, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Treatment of Difficult Bile Duct Stones Using Mechanical, Electrohydraulic and Extracorporeal Shock wave Lithotripsy. Endoscopy 1993;25:201–206.CrossRef

19.

Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G et al. Combination of Endoprostheses and Oral Ursodeoxycholic Acid or Placebo in the Treatment of Difficult to Extract Common Bile Duct Stones. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:453–459.CrossRef

20.

Buxbaum J et al. Randomized Trial of Cholangioscopy-Guided Laser Lithotripsy versus Conventional Therapy for Large Bile Duct Stones (with Videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.021.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Neuhaus H, Zillinger C, Born P et al. Randomized Study of Intracorporeal Laser Lithotripsy versus Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Difficult Bile Duct Stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;7:327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70214-7.CrossRef

22.

Jakobs R, Adamek HE, Maier M et al. Fluoroscopically Guided Laser Lithotripsy versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Retained Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Randomised Study. Gut. 1997;40:678–682.CrossRef

23.

Garcia-Cano J, Reyes-Guevara AK, Martinez-Perez T et al. Fully Covered Self-expanding Metal Stents in the Management of Difficult Common Bile Duct Stones. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2013;105:7–12.CrossRef

24.

Lee TH, Han JH, Kim HJ et al. Is the Addition of Choleretic Agents in Multiple Double-Pigtail Biliary Stents Effective for Difficult Common Bile Duct Stones in Elderly Patients? A Prospective, Multicenter Study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:96–102.CrossRef

25.

Huang C, Cai XB, Guo LL, Qi XS, Gao Q, Wan XJ. Drug-Eluting Fully Covered Self-expanding Metal Stent for Dissolution of Bile Duct Stones in Vitro. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:3370–3379. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3370.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Cai XB, Zhang WX, Zhang RL et al. Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Plastic Stent Coated with Stone-Dissolving Agents for the Treatment of Biliary Stones in a Porcine Model. Endoscopy. 2015;47:457–461. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1390772.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Tsui WM, Chan YK, Wong CT, Lo YF, Yeung YW, Lee YW. Hepatolithiasis and the Syndrome of Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Features. Semin Liver Dis. 2011;31:33–48. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1272833.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Chen H, Siwo EA, Khu M, Tian Y. Current Trends in the Management of Mirizzi Syndrome: A Review of Literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e9691. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Binmoeller KF, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Endoscopic Treatment of Mirizzi’s Syndrome. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:532–536.CrossRef

30.

Khashab MA, El Zein MH, Sharzehi K et al. EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage or Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP in Patients with Surgical Anatomy and Biliary Obstruction: An International Comparative Study. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E1322–E1327. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-110790.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Bukhari M, Kowalski T, Nieto J et al. An International, Multicenter, Comparative Trial of EUS-Guided Gastrogastrostomy-Assisted ERCP versus Enteroscopy-Assisted ERCP in Patients with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88:486–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2356.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Ayoub F, Brar TS, Banerjee D et al. Laparoscopy-Assisted versus Enteroscopy-assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8:E423–E436. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1070-9132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Weyant MJ, Maluccio MA, Bertagnolli MM, Daly JM. Choledochal Cysts in Adults: A Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:2580–2583.PubMed

34.

Ko CW, Beresford SA, Schulte SJ et al. Incidence, Natural History, and Risk Factors for Biliary Sludge and Stones During Pregnancy. Hepatology. 2005;41:359–365.CrossRef

35.

Magno-Pereira V, Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Macedo G. Demystifying Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) During Pregnancy. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2017;2019:35–39.CrossRef

36.

Azab M, Bharadwaj S, Jayaraj M et al. Safety of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:341–354. https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_92_19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Ahmed M, Kanotra R, Savani GT et al. Utilization Trends in Inpatient Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A Cross-sectional US Experience. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E261–E271. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-102402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Management of Difficult Choledocholithiasis
verfasst von: Alexander Podboy
Srinivas Gaddam
Kenneth Park
Kapil Gupta
Quin Liu
Simon K. Lo
Publikationsdatum: 29.03.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07424-9

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Periodic Colonoscopies Are Associated with Improved Survival and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer in Ulcerative Colitis

Endoscopic Management of Luminal Strictures: Beyond Dilation

Experimental Intestinal Stenosis Alters Crohn’s Disease-Like Intestinal Inflammation in Ileitis-Prone Mice

Gastrointestinal Computed Tomography Findings in Chronic Granulomatous Disease with Subgroup Clinicopathologic Analysis

A True Positive and a False Negative? The Dilemma of Negative Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test