Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2020

28.08.2019 | Mini Review

Medical Genetics for Practicing Obstetrician

verfasst von: K. N. Sreelakshmi

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Medical genetics has evolved over a decade, and hence, all investigations are available for clinical practice. Many diseases are diagnosed accurately today because of new investigations. These advanced investigations are affordable, accessible and available in day-to-day practice. Hence, there is a need and it is a time for us to understand these advanced technologies. Karyotyping and rapid aneuploidy tests are basic tests, while chromosomal microarray and next-generation sequencing are advanced technologies. It is time to update the knowledge and utilize them in day-to-day practice. These tests are utilized both in prenatal diagnosis and in some clinical scenarios, which are elaborated in detail. Karyotyping is the basic tool to detect both numerical and structural abnormalities. It is advantageous in that it is accurate with error of 0.001% but has a resolution of up to 5 MB. Rapid aneuploidy detection tests are equally accurate and detect as good as 99%. They are FISH, QF-PCR and MLPA. They have high sensitivity and specificity, and results are available within 3 days of time. Hence, these tests are apt for Indian scenarios, where late detection of anomalies (18–20 weeks) is common. Chromosomal microarray is the hybridization technique which detects aneuploidy of all chromosomes. This is useful for detection of deletion and duplication in chromosomes. This is not available for prenatal diagnosis in India now, whereas this is available for prenatal diagnosis in developed countries. Whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing are advanced techniques which have been described and discussed at length.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Seabright M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet. 1971;2:971–2.CrossRef Seabright M. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet. 1971;2:971–2.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Allingham-Hawkins DJ, Chitayat D, Cirigliano V, et al. Prospective validation of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of common aneuploidies. Genet Med. 2011;13:140–7.CrossRef Allingham-Hawkins DJ, Chitayat D, Cirigliano V, et al. Prospective validation of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of common aneuploidies. Genet Med. 2011;13:140–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Armengol L, Nevado J, Serra-Juhé C, et al. Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in invasive prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet. 2012;131:513–23.CrossRef Armengol L, Nevado J, Serra-Juhé C, et al. Clinical utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in invasive prenatal diagnosis. Hum Genet. 2012;131:513–23.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann K, Donaghue C, Fox SP, et al. Strategies for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:907–15.CrossRef Mann K, Donaghue C, Fox SP, et al. Strategies for the rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:907–15.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Opstal D, Boter M, de Daneille J, et al. Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:112–21.CrossRef Van Opstal D, Boter M, de Daneille J, et al. Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:112–21.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright D, Carey L, Battersby S, et al. Validation of a chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis using a prospective cohort of pregnancies with increased risk for chromosome abnormalities. Genet Test Mol Biomark. 2016;20:791–8.CrossRef Wright D, Carey L, Battersby S, et al. Validation of a chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis using a prospective cohort of pregnancies with increased risk for chromosome abnormalities. Genet Test Mol Biomark. 2016;20:791–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajshekar M, Sreelakshmi K, Gopinath PM, et al. Cytogenetics study in recurrent pregnancy loss. An experience from tertiary care centre. Genet Couns. 2013;24(3):347–9. Rajshekar M, Sreelakshmi K, Gopinath PM, et al. Cytogenetics study in recurrent pregnancy loss. An experience from tertiary care centre. Genet Couns. 2013;24(3):347–9.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–11.CrossRef Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–11.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dutta UR, Rajitha ARP, Pidugu VK, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in 1162 couples with recurrent miscarriages in Southern region of India: report and review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:145–9.CrossRef Dutta UR, Rajitha ARP, Pidugu VK, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in 1162 couples with recurrent miscarriages in Southern region of India: report and review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:145–9.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fryns JP, Van Buggenhout G. Structural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81:171–6.CrossRef Fryns JP, Van Buggenhout G. Structural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81:171–6.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodandapani S, Pai MV, Nambiar J, et al. Premature ovarian aging in primary infertility: triple X syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(3):153–4.CrossRef Kodandapani S, Pai MV, Nambiar J, et al. Premature ovarian aging in primary infertility: triple X syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(3):153–4.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barad DH, Weghofer A, Gleicher N. Age-specific levels for basal follicle-stimulating hormone assessment of ovarian function. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1404–10.CrossRef Barad DH, Weghofer A, Gleicher N. Age-specific levels for basal follicle-stimulating hormone assessment of ovarian function. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1404–10.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Oktay K, et al. Do etiologies of premature ovarian ageing (POA) mimic those of premature ovarian failure (POF). Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2395–400.CrossRef Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Oktay K, et al. Do etiologies of premature ovarian ageing (POA) mimic those of premature ovarian failure (POF). Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2395–400.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Goswami D, Conway SG. Premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:391–410.CrossRef Goswami D, Conway SG. Premature ovarian failure. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:391–410.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Otter M, Constance TR, Schrander S, et al. Triple X syndrome: a review of the literature. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:265–71.CrossRef Otter M, Constance TR, Schrander S, et al. Triple X syndrome: a review of the literature. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:265–71.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Resta C, Ferrari M. Next generation sequencing: from research area to clinical practice. EJIFCC. 2018;29(3):215–20.PubMedPubMedCentral Di Resta C, Ferrari M. Next generation sequencing: from research area to clinical practice. EJIFCC. 2018;29(3):215–20.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Medical Genetics for Practicing Obstetrician
verfasst von
K. N. Sreelakshmi
Publikationsdatum
28.08.2019
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-019-01257-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.