Skip to main content
main-content

28.05.2018 | Low Vision | Ausgabe 9/2018

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2018

Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded

Zeitschrift:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology > Ausgabe 9/2018
Autoren:
František Pluháček, John Siderov

Abstract

Purpose

The decrease in visual acuity under low luminance conditions is well known. Recent laboratory evidence showed that crowding under low luminance (mesopic) light levels is less robust than under photopic conditions. The present study examines whether such differences in crowding influence clinical measurements of mesopic visual acuity, including test-retest repeatability.

Methods

Twenty adult subjects with normal or corrected to normal visual acuity were recruited for the study. Monocular visual acuity was measured under photopic (228 cd/m2) and mesopic (0.164 cd/m2) luminance conditions using a letter chart, similar in principle to the ETDRS logMAR chart, presented on a computer monitor. Three rows of five letters, each row differing in size by 0.05 logMAR from largest to smallest were displayed at the center of the monitor. The level of crowding was varied by varying the separation between horizontally adjacent letters from 100% optotype size to 50, 20, and 10% optotype size. Inter-row spacing was proportional to optotype size. Observers read the letters on the middle row only. Measurements continued by reducing the size of the letters, until three or more errors on the middle row were made. Each correctly identified letter contributed 0.01 to the recorded logMAR score. All measurements were repeated for each subject on two separate days.

Results

Visual acuity (logMAR) was significantly better under photopic than mesopic luminance conditions with a mean difference of 0.48 logMAR. Visual acuity also decreased with decreasing letter separation (i.e. increase in crowding). However, the decrease in visual acuity for the smallest letter separation was less under the mesopic luminance condition, even after accounting for the increased size of threshold acuity letters. Test-retest repeatability for mesopic and photopic conditions was not significantly different.

Conclusions

Crowding under mesopic luminance conditions has less impact on visual acuity than under photopic luminance.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Bis zum 22.10. bestellen und 100 € sparen!

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2018Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

06.07.2018 | Leitthema | Ausgabe 9/2018 Open Access

Screening und Management retinaler Erkrankungen mittels digitaler Medizin

06.07.2018 | Leitlinien, Stellungnahmen und Empfehlungen | Ausgabe 8/2018

Empfehlungen der DOG für die Planung klinischer Studien im Auftrage Dritter

März 2018

29.06.2018 | Das therapeutische und diagnostische Prinzip | Ausgabe 8/2018

Neuer Glaskörperersatz mit Hydrogel?

 

 

 
 

Bildnachweise