nach oben

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Erschienen in:

03.01.2021 | Review

Meta-analysis of biological mesh reconstruction versus primary perineal closure after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer

verfasst von: Nasir Zaheer Ahmad, Muhammad Hasan Abbas, Noof Mohammed A. B. Al-Naimi, Amjad Parvaiz

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) of rectal cancer has been proposed to achieve better oncological outcomes. The resultant wide perineal wound, however, presents a challenge for primary closure and subsequent wound healing. This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of primary perineal closure with those of biological mesh reconstruction.

Methods

The Medline and Embase search was performed for the publications comparing primary perineal closure to biological mesh reconstruction. Early perineal wound complications (seroma, infection, dehiscence) and late perineal wound complications (perineal hernia, chronic pain, and chronic sinus) were analyzed as primary endpoints. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay were compared as secondary endpoints.

Results

There was no significant difference in the overall early wound complications after primary closure or biological mesh reconstruction (odds ratio (OR) of 0.575 with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.241 to 1.373 and a P value of 0.213). The incidence of perineal hernia after 1 year was significantly high after primary closure of the perineal wounds (OR of 0.400 with 95% CI of 0.240 to 0.665 and a P value of 0.001). No significant differences were observed among other early and late perineal wound complications. The operation time and hospital stay were shorter after primary perineal closure (p 0.001).

Conclusion

A lower incidence of perineal hernia and comparable early perineal wound complications after biological mesh reconstruction show a relative superiority over primary closure. More randomized studies are required before a routine biological mesh reconstruction can be recommended for closure of perineal wounds after ELAPE.

Miles WE (1913) A lecture on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer of the rectum: delivered at the Cancer Hospital, Brompton, on January 22nd, 1913. Br Med J 1:166–168PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94:232–238PubMedCrossRef

Irvin TT, Goligher JC (1975) A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectum. Br J Surg 62:287–291PubMedCrossRef

Robles Campos R et al (1992) Management of the perineal wound following abdominoperineal resection: prospective study of three methods. Br J Surg 79:29–31PubMedCrossRef

Oates GD, Williams JA (1970) Primary closure of the perineal wound in excision of the rectum. Proc R Soc Med 63(Suppl 1):128PubMedPubMedCentral

Abbott DE, Halverson AL, Wayne JD, Kim JYS, Talamonti MS, Dumanian GA (2008) The oblique rectus abdominal myocutaneous flap for complex pelvic wound reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1237–1241PubMedCrossRef

Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM, Mazumdar M, Cordeiro P, Disa J, Mehrara B, Minsky BD, Paty P, Weiser M, Wong WD, Guillem JG (2005) Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 12:104–110PubMedCrossRef

Ito E, Yoshida M, Ohdaira H et al (2019) Case series of in situ pelvic floor reconstruction combining levator ani suture and negative pressure wound therapy for abdominoperineal resection. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 43:64–67

Cahill C, Fowler A, Williams LJ (2018) The application of incisional negative pressure wound therapy for perineal wounds: a systematic review. Int Wound J 15:740–748PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

10.

Boereboom CL, Watson NFS, Sivakumar R, Hurst NG, Speake WJ (2009) Biological tissue graft for pelvic floor reconstruction after cylindrical abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and anal canal. Tech Coloproctol 13:257–258PubMedCrossRef

11.

Wille-Jørgensen P, Pilsgaard B, Møller P (2009) Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis 24:323–325CrossRef

12.

Peacock O, Simpson JA, Tou SI, Hurst NG, Speake WJ, Tierney GM, Lund JN (2014) Outcomes after biological mesh reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). Tech Coloproctol 18:571–577PubMedCrossRef

13.

Yang XY, Wei MT, Yang XT, He YZ, Hao Y, Zhang XB, Deng XB, Wang ZQ, Zhou ZQ (2019) Primary vs myocutaneous flap closure of perineal defects following abdominoperineal resection for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 21:138–155CrossRef

14.

Christensen HK et al (2011) Perineal repair after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54:711–717PubMedCrossRef

15.

Rutegård M, Rutegård J, Haapamäki MM (2019) Multicentre, randomised trial comparing acellular porcine collagen implant versus gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of the pelvic floor after extended abdominoperineal excision of rectum: study protocol for the Nordic Extended Abdominoperineal Excision (NEAPE) study. BMJ Open 9:e027255PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

16.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, for the PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

17.

Mjoli M, Sloothaak DAM, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2012) Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection: a pooled analysis. Color Dis 14:e400–e406CrossRef

18.

Sunesen KG, Buntzen S, Tei T, Lindegaard JC, Nørgaard M, Laurberg S (2009) Perineal healing and survival after anal cancer salvage surgery: 10-year experience with primary perineal reconstruction using the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. Ann Surg Oncol 16:68–77PubMedCrossRef

19.

Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12PubMedCrossRef

20.

Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

21.

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Han J et al (2012) Randomized clinical trial of conventional versus cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced lower rectal cancer. Am J Surg 204:274–282PubMedCrossRef

23.

Han JG, Wang ZJ, Qian Q, Dai Y, Zhang ZQ, Yang JS, Li F, Li XB (2014) A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1333–1340PubMedCrossRef

24.

Han JG, Wang ZJ, Gao ZG, Wei GH, Yang Y, Zhai ZW, Zhao BC, Yi BQ (2019) Perineal wound complications after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 62:1477–1484PubMedCrossRef

25.

Sumrien H, Newman P, Burt C, McCarthy K, Dixon A, Pullyblank A, Lyons A (2016) The use of a negative pressure wound management system in perineal wound closure after extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20:627–631PubMedCrossRef

26.

Musters GD, Klaver CEL, Bosker RJI, Burger JWA, van Duijvendijk P, van Etten B, van Geloven AAW, de Graaf EJR, Hoff C, Leijtens JWA, Rutten HJT, Singh B, Vuylsteke RJCLM, de Wilt JHW, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2017) Biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the BIOPEX-study). Ann Surg 265:1074–1081PubMedCrossRef

27.

Jones H, Moran B, Crane S, Hompes R, Cunningham C, on behalf of LOREC group (2017) The LOREC APE registry: operative technique, oncological outcome and perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision. Color Dis 19:172–180CrossRef

28.

Sayers AE, Patel RK, Hunter IA (2015) Perineal hernia formation following extralevator abdominoperineal excision. Color Dis 17:351–355CrossRef

29.

Wang YL, Zhang X, Mao JJ, Zhang WQ, Dong H, Zhang FP, Dong SH, Zhang WJ, Dai Y (2018) Application of modified primary closure of the pelvic floor in laparoscopic extralevator abdominal perineal excision for low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 24:3440–3447PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Sancho-Muriel J, Ocaña J, Cholewa H, Nuñez J, Muñoz P, Flor B, García JC, García-Granero E, Die J, Frasson M (2020) Biological mesh reconstruction versus primary closure for preventing perineal morbidity after extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a multicentre retrospective study. Color Dis 22:1714–1723CrossRef

31.

West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJE, Holm T, Quirke P (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:588–599PubMedCrossRef

32.

Negoi I, Hostiuc S, Paun S, Negoi RI, Beuran M (2016) Extralevator vs conventional abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 212:511–526PubMedCrossRef

33.

Tao Y, Han JG, Wang ZJ (2020) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for advanced low rectal cancer: where to go. World J Gastroenterol 26:3012–3023PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

34.

Prytz M, Angenete E, Ekelund J, Haglind E (2014) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted. Int J Color Dis 29:981–987CrossRef

35.

Wiatrek RL, Thomas JS, Papaconstantinou HT (2008) Perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21:76–85PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

36.

El-Gazzaz G, Kiran RP, Lavery I (2009) Wound complications in rectal cancer patients undergoing primary closure of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1962–1966PubMedCrossRef

37.

So JB, Palmer MT, Shellito PC (1997) Postoperative perineal hernia. Dis Colon Rectum 40:954–957PubMedCrossRef

38.

Stelzner S, Koehler C, Stelzer J, Sims A, Witzigmann H (2011) Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer--a systematic overview. Int J Color Dis 26:1227–1240CrossRef

39.

Black AJ, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang T, Brown CJ (2020) The impact of laparoscopic technique on the rate of perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07746-7

40.

Peacock O, Pandya H, Sharp T, Hurst NG, Speake WJ, Tierney GM, Lund JN (2012) Biological mesh reconstruction of perineal wounds following enhanced abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). Int J Color Dis 27:475–482CrossRef

41.

Thomas PW, Blackwell JEM, Herrod PJJ, Peacock O, Singh R, Williams JP, Hurst NG, Speake WJ, Bhalla A, Lund JN (2019) Long-term outcomes of biological mesh repair following extra levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: an observational study of 100 patients. Tech Coloproctol 23:761–767PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Dijkstra EA, Kahmann NLE, Hemmer PHJ, Havenga K, van Etten B (2020) A low incidence of perineal hernia when using a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision with or without pelvic exenteration or distal sacral resection in locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Tech Coloproctol 24:855–861PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

43.

Ge W, Jiang SS, Qi W, Chen H, Zheng LM, Chen G (2017) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer with biological mesh for pelvic floor reconstruction. Oncotarget 8:8818–8824PubMedCrossRef

44.

Burns NK, Jaffari MV, Rios CN, Mathur AB, Butler CE (2010) Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:167–176PubMedCrossRef

45.

Musters GD, Lapid O, Stoker J, Musters BF, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2016) Is there a place for a biological mesh in perineal hernia repair? Hernia 20:747–754PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

46.

Musters GD, Buskens CJ, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ (2014) Perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1129–1139PubMedCrossRef

47.

Artioukh DY, Smith RA, Gokul K (2007) Risk factors for impaired healing of the perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection of rectum for carcinoma. Color Dis 9:362–367CrossRef

48.

Farid H, O'Connell TX (1995) Methods to decrease the morbidity of abdominoperineal resection. Am Surg 61:1061–1064PubMed

49.

Althumairi AA, Canner JK, Gearhart SL, Safar B, Fang SH, Wick EC, Efron JE (2016) Risk factors for wound complications after abdominoperineal excision: analysis of the ACS NSQIP database. Color Dis 18:O260–O266CrossRef

50.

Fujino S, Miyoshi N, Ohue M, Noura S, Fujiwara Y, Yano M, Higashiyama M, Sakon M (2015) Vacuum-assisted closure for open perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection. Int J Surg Case Rep 11:87–90PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

51.

van der Valk MJM, de Graaf EJR, Doornebosch PG, Vermaas M (2017) incisional negative-pressure wound therapy for perineal wounds after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer, a pilot study. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 6:425–429CrossRef

52.

Chan S, Miller M, Ng R, Ross D, Roblin P, Carapeti E, Williams AB, George ML (2010) Use of myocutaneous flaps for perineal closure following abdominoperineal excision of the rectum for adenocarcinoma. Color Dis 12:555–560CrossRef

53.

Shibata D, Hyland W, Busse P, Kim HK, Sentovich SM, Steele G Jr, Bleday R (1999) Immediate reconstruction of the perineal wound with gracilis muscle flaps following abdominoperineal resection and intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 6:33–37PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Meta-analysis of biological mesh reconstruction versus primary perineal closure after abdominoperineal excision of rectal cancer
verfasst von: Nasir Zaheer Ahmad
Muhammad Hasan Abbas
Noof Mohammed A. B. Al-Naimi
Amjad Parvaiz
Publikationsdatum: 03.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03827-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

A meta-analysis of marsupialisation versus none in the treatment of simple fistula-in-ano

Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for low rectal cancer: a META-analysis of recurrence rates

Are colorectal cancer patients at risk for COVID-19 infection during the postoperative period? The Covid-GRECCAR study

Appendectomy versus conservative treatment with antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a propensity score–matched analysis of patient-centered outcomes (the ACTUAA prospective multicenter trial)

Real-world patterns of chemotherapy administration and attrition among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Low psoas muscle area is associated with postoperative complications in Crohn’s disease

Update Chirurgie