nach oben

Erschienen in:

20.04.2020 | SSAT Poster Presentation

Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of C-Reactive Protein for Infectious Complications in Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery

verfasst von: Tiffany Paradis, Anudari Zorigtbaatar, Maude Trepanier, Julio F. Fiore Jr, Gerald M. Fried, Liane S. Feldman, Lawrence Lee

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

C-reactive protein may predict anastomotic complications after colorectal surgery, but its predictive ability may differ between laparoscopic and open resection due to differences in stress response. Therefore, the objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic characteristics of C-reactive protein to detect anastomotic leaks and infectious complications after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA. Studies were included if they reported on the diagnostic characteristics of postoperative day 3–5 values of serum C-reactive protein to diagnose anastomotic leak or infectious complications specifically in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. The main outcome was a composite of anastomotic leak and infectious complications. A random-effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.

Results

A total of 13 studies were included (9 for laparoscopic surgery, 8 for open surgery). The pooled incidence of the composite outcome was 14.8% (95% CI 10.2–19.3) in laparoscopic studies and 21.0% (95% CI 11.9–30.0) for open. The pooled diagnostic accuracy characteristics were similar for open and laparoscopic studies. However, the C-reactive protein threshold cutoffs were lower in laparoscopic studies for postoperative days 3 and 4, but similar on day 5.

Conclusions

The diagnostic characteristics of C-reactive protein in the early postoperative period to detect infectious complications and leaks are similar after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. However, thresholds are lower for laparoscopic surgery, suggesting that the interpretation of serum CRP values needs to be tailored based on operative approach.

Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR, Atkinson SJ, Abbott DE, Shah SA et al. Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(3):333-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000249.CrossRefPubMed

Tevis SE, Carchman EH, Foley EF, Heise CP, Harms BA, Kennedy GD. Does Anastomotic Leak Contribute to High Failure-to-rescue Rates? Ann Surg. 2016;263(6):1148-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001409.CrossRefPubMed

Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253(5):890-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182128929.CrossRefPubMed

Artinyan A, Orcutt ST, Anaya DA, Richardson P, Chen GJ, Berger DH. Infectious postoperative complications decrease long-term survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer: a study of 12,075 patients. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):497-505. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000854.CrossRefPubMed

Tan WJ, Ng WQ, Sultana R, de Souza NN, Chew MH, Foo FJ et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of serum procalcitonin levels to predict intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(2):171-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2956-8.CrossRefPubMed

Singh PP, Zeng IS, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Connolly AB, Hill AG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(4):339-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9354.CrossRefPubMed

Gans SL, Atema JJ, van Dieren S, Groot Koerkamp B, Boermeester MA. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein to rule out infectious complications after major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30(7):861-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2205-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Madbouly KM, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Endogenous morphine levels after laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97(5):759-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6987.CrossRefPubMed

Kuntz C, Wunsch A, Bay F, Windeler J, Glaser F, Herfarth C. Prospective randomized study of stress and immune response after laparoscopic vs conventional colonic resection. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(7):963-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900757.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):216-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tsimogiannis KE, Tellis CC, Tselepis AD, Pappas-Gogos GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Basdanis G. Toll-like receptors in the inflammatory response during open and laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):330-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1871-2.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097.CrossRef

13.

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ journal of surgery. 2003;73(9):712-6.CrossRef

14.

Cole DS, Watts A, Scott-Coombes D, Avades T. Clinical utility of peri-operative C-reactive protein testing in general surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(4):317-21. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588408X285865.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d549.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Simundic AM. Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. EJIFCC. 2009;19(4):203-11.PubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Linn S, Grunau PD. New patient-oriented summary measure of net total gain in certainty for dichotomous diagnostic tests. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2006;3:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-3-11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Adamina M, Warschkow R, Naf F, Hummel B, Rduch T, Lange J et al. Monitoring c-reactive protein after laparoscopic colorectal surgery excludes infectious complications and allows for safe and early discharge. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2939-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3556-0.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Facy O, Paquette B, Orry D, Santucci N, Rat P, Rat P et al. Inflammatory markers as early predictors of infection after colorectal surgery: the same cut-off values in laparoscopy and laparotomy? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32(6):857-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2805-9.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mik M, Dziki L, Berut M, Trzcinski R, Dziki A. Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and C-Reactive Protein as Two Predictive Tools of Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer Open Surgery. Dig Surg. 2018;35(1):77-84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000456081.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Munoz JL, Alvarez MO, Cuquerella V, Miranda E, Pico C, Flores R et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(9):4003-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6144-x.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Nason GJ, Barry BD, Obinwa O, McMacken E, Rajaretnam NS, Neary PC. Early rise in C-reactive protein is a marker for infective complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24(1):57-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828fa03e.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Pedersen T, Roikjaer O, Jess P. Increased levels of C-reactive protein and leukocyte count are poor predictors of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic colorectal resection. Dan Med J. 2012;59(12):A4552.PubMed

24.

Pedrazzani C, Moro M, Mantovani G, Lazzarini E, Conci S, Ruzzenente A et al. C-reactive protein as early predictor of complications after minimally invasive colorectal resection. J Surg Res. 2017;210:261-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.047.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Platt JJ, Ramanathan ML, Crosbie RA, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Horgan PG et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infective complications after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(13):4168-77. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2498-9.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Ramanathan ML, MacKay G, Platt J, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The impact of open versus laparoscopic resection for colon cancer on C-reactive protein concentrations as a predictor of postoperative infective complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(3):938-43. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4065-z.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Ramos Fernandez M, Rivas Ruiz F, Fernandez Lopez A, Loinaz Segurola C, Fernandez Cabrian JM, de la Portilla de Juan F. C Reactive Protein as a Predictor of Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Surgery. Comparison Between Open and Laparoscopic Surgery. Cir Esp. 2017;95:529-35.CrossRef

28.

Welsch T, Muller SA, Ulrich A, Kischlat A, Hinz U, Kienle P et al. C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious postoperative complications in rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(12):1499-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0354-3.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Waterland P, Ng J, Jones A, Broadley G, Nicol D, Patel H et al. Using CRP to predict anastomotic leakage after open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is there a difference? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(4):861-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2547-0.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Torzewski M, Naf F, Lange J, Steffen T. Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein and white blood cell counts in the early detection of inflammatory complications after open resection of colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 1,187 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(11):1405-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1262-0.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Watt DG, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Routine clinical markers of the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response after elective operation: a systematic review. Surgery. 2015;157(2):362-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.009.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Fink-Neuboeck N, Lindenmann J, Bajric S, Maier A, Riedl R, Weinberg AM et al. Clinical impact of interleukin 6 as a predictive biomarker in the early diagnosis of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome after major thoracic surgery: A prospective clinical trial. Surgery. 2016;160(2):443-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.004.CrossRefPubMed

33.

McSorley ST, Khor BY, MacKay GJ, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Examination of a CRP first approach for the detection of postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: A pragmatic study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(7):e6133. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Holl S, Fournel I, Orry D, Facy O, Cheynel N, Rat P et al. Should CT scan be performed when CRP is elevated after colorectal surgery? Results from the inflammatory markers after colorectal surgery study. Journal of visceral surgery. 2017;154(1):5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.07.003.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Benedetti M, Ciano P, Pergolini I, Ciotti S, Guercioni G, Ruffo G et al. Early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by the Dutch leakage score, serum procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein: study protocol of a prospective multicentre observational study by the Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iC). G Chir. 2019;40(1):20-5.PubMed

36.

Kornmann V, van Ramshorst B, van Dieren S, van Geloven N, Boermeester M, Boerma D. Early complication detection after colorectal surgery (CONDOR): study protocol for a prospective clinical diagnostic study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(2):459-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2468-3.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Barbic J, Ivic D, Alkhamis T, Drenjancevic D, Ivic J, Harsanji-Drenjancevic I et al. Kinetics of changes in serum concentrations of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and C- reactive protein after elective abdominal surgery. Can it be used to detect postoperative complications? Coll Antropol. 2013;37(1):195-201.PubMed

38.

Persec J, Persec Z, Husedzinovic I. Postoperative pain and systemic inflammatory stress response after preoperative analgesia with clonidine or levobupivacaine: a randomized controlled trial. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(17-18):558-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-009-1221-8.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Cabellos Olivares M, Labalde Martinez M, Torralba M, Rodriguez Fraile JR, Atance Martinez JC. C-reactive protein as a marker of the surgical stress reduction within an ERAS protocol (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) in colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(4):717-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24909.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of C-Reactive Protein for Infectious Complications in Laparoscopic Versus Open Colorectal Surgery
verfasst von: Tiffany Paradis
Anudari Zorigtbaatar
Maude Trepanier
Julio F. Fiore Jr
Gerald M. Fried
Liane S. Feldman
Lawrence Lee
Publikationsdatum: 20.04.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04599-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Toxicity and Postoperative Complications on Short-term and Long-term Outcomes After Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: 22-Year Experience

Is There Still a Role for Surgical Shunts in the Treatment of Budd-Chiari Syndrome? A 25-Year Experience

Inferior Right Hepatic Vein-Preserving Hepatectomy for Large Liver Tumors: Anterior Approach Using the Two-Stage Modified Hanging Maneuver (with Video)

An Incidentally Discovered Hepatic Mass with Rim Calcification

The “Tenting Sign of the Hepatic Vein” Is Important for Laparoscopic Anatomical Hepatectomy Along the Major Hepatic Vein

Update Chirurgie