Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Virology Journal 1/2012

Open Access 01.12.2012 | Research

Microsatellite instability in Marek’s Disease Virus infected primary chicken embryo fibroblasts

verfasst von: Zhenlei Zhou, Dawei Yao, Yan Qiu, Deji Yang

Erschienen in: Virology Journal | Ausgabe 1/2012

Abstract

Background

Marek’s disease virus (MDV), an oncogenic α-herpes virus, causes a devastating disease in chickens characterized by development of lymphoblastoid tumors in multiple organs. Microsatellite instability (MSI), a symptom of defect in DNA mismatch repair function, is a form of genomic instability frequently detected in many types of tumors. However, the involvement of MSI in MDV-infected cells has not been investigated. In this study, we determined the presence and frequency of MSI in primary chicken embryo fibroblasts infected with or without MDV strain in vitro.

Results

118 distinct microsatellite markers were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 21 samples. MSI was found in 91 of 118 markers, and 12 out of 118 demonstrated frequency of MSI at ≥ 40%. 27 of 118 microsatellite loci did not show microsatellite instability.

Conclusions

These findings showed that MSI was a real event occurring in primary chicken embryo fibroblasts infected with MDV in vitro as evidenced by the high frequency of MSI, and may be specifically associated with genome alteration of host cells during MDV infected.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1743-422X-9-193) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

DJY designed research. ZLZ carried out most of the studies, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. DWY and QY participated in parts of the studies and writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Background

Marek’s disease (MD), caused by the highly oncogenic lymphotropic Marek’s disease virus (MDV), is a highly contagious neoplastic disease of poultry. MD is characterized by lymphomas and lymphoproliferative infiltration of their visceral organs, peripheral nerves, muscles and skin[1]. Although many different kinds of control measures have been implemented against the disease since 1907, MD remains a severe threat to poultry industry in many countries because of its high occurrence. Economically losses from MD is estimated at least US $1 billion annually[2].
The pathogenesis of MD is complex and is not fully understood. Susceptible genotypes of birds are infected by the infectious virus which replicates in the host lymphoid organs. B-cells and macrophages undergo a lytic infection, resulting in the activation of T-cells. The latent T-cells become targets for neoplastic transformation leading to the development of lymphomatous tumors in various visceral organs[3, 4]. Some of the factors that lead to MD lymphomas have been investigated. A study demonstrated that MDV might induce host cell DNA strand breaks. Accumulation of genomic alteration over time can lead to gene modifications in cells that might turn to be mutagenic or carcinogenic[5].
Genetic mutations may occur throughout the genome, involving gross chromosomal aberrations or only variations in the length of genomic DNA fragments carrying microsatellite sequences. Microsatellites are repetitive DNA sequences comprised of short reiterative motifs, which locates within the heterochromatin near chromosomal centromeres and telomeres[6]. Microsatellite sequences are stably inherited with high accuracy making them excellent genetic markers. The length of microsatellite sequences is unique to each individual and distinct among individuals. In addition, individual has identical microsatellite in different kinds of cells. Microsatellite mutations or microsatellite instability (MSI) leads to DNA replication error (RER) phenotype. If uncorrected, these errors are fixed after a next round of replication as addition or deletion of one or more microsatellite sequences. This mutated phenotype manifests as MSI, and appears to play an important role in tumorigenesis and/or tumor progression[79].
Marek’s disease provides excellent model for the study of herpes virus-induced tumors both in experimental and natural conditions. Therefore the main objective of the present study was to determine the presence and frequency of MSI in chicken fibroblasts infected with the Marek’s disease virus, and to determine microsatellites markers with high frequency of MSI for prediction of host cells gene alteration by virus in vitro.

Results

A total of 21 samples were determined for the presence of MIS. All samples were tested at 118 microsatellite loci. Alternations in the size of microsatellites in the MDV-infected samples were revealed as differences in the electrophoretic migration of MDV-infected DNA as compared with control DNA. The MSI frequencies of MDV-infected chicken embryo fibroblasts are summarized in Table 1 and representative samples are illustrated in Figure 1. Twelve markers showed high frequency of MSI (>40%). These markers were ABR0052, ABR0392, LEI0099, ABR0123, ADL0199, ABR0007, ABR204, ABR0086, ABR0059, ABR0634, ABR0133 and ABR0026. 27 microsatellite markers showed no change in length of fragments and 79 microsatellite markers had the lower occurrence of MSI (<40%). Over all, the incidence of MSI in CEF samples of 21 chicken embryos induced by the virus was 100%, at least one microsatellite marker was demonstrated MSI (data not showed).
Table 1
MSI frequencies of samples from chicken embryo fibroblasts infected by Marek’s disease virus
Markers
NO. of samples
Frequency
Markers
NO. of samples
Frequency
MCW0248
2,6,11,13,15,17,18,21
8/21(38.01%)
MCW0134
3,4,6,7,9,10,20,21
8/21(38.10%)
ABR0352
1,3,6,8,12,19,20
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0325
4,10,11,14,17,19,20
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0329
5,10,11,12,14,17,18
7/21(33.33%)
MCW0067
2,3,4,8,10,12,14,15
8/21(38.10%)
LEI0209
None
0
ABR0495
3,10,15,17,18,19,20
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0528
3,7,14,16,18
5/21(23.81%)
ADL0038
10,12,13,16,18,20
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0139
3,7,17
3/21(14.29%)
ADL0106
2,9,10,16,18,21,
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0007
2,5,6,7,8,9,10,17,18
9/21(42.86%)
ADL0112
None
0
ABR0379
6,9,11,14,15
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0478
None
0
ABR0518
1,2,6
3/21(14.29%)
ADL0123
None
0
LEI0146
5,6,7,11,16,18,20
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0052
2,4,6,7,9,10,11,14,16,17,19,20
12/21(57.14%)
ABR0525
9,11,12
3/21(14.29%)
ABR0389
6,8,11,12,14,17,21
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0594
4,9,15,21
4/21(19.05%)
ADL0308
1,4,7,10,12,13,14
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0280
None
0
ABR0037
6,11,15,18,19
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0542
4,5,6,7,15
4/21(19.05%)
ABR0059
1,4,7,10,11,12,14,16,21
9/21(42.83%)
ABR0117
1,3,4,9,12,21
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0033
2,3,7,9,11,14,16,18
8/21(38.10%)
ADL0150
None
0
ABR0634
1,2,3,6,9,10,11,14,19
9/21(42.83%)
ABR0368
None
0
ABR0086
1,3,4,6,12,13,14,18,21
9/21(42.83%)
ABR0521
4,9,11,14,17,19
6/21(28.57%)
LEI0099
2,3,4,7,8,9,11,13,14,16,18,21
12/21(57.14%)
MCW0058
4,5,6,8,9,10,
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0271
1,2,6,16,20
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0522
1,6,9,13,19,20,21,
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0506
None
0
ABR0373
None
0
ADL0147
1,2,3,6,9,10,14,21,
8/21(38.10%)
ABR0172
None
0
MCW0322
None
0
ABR0504
None
0
ADL0225
6,11,14,15
4/21(19.05%)
ADL0268
8
1/21(4.76%)
ABR0365
1,6,9,11,14,19,20
7/21(33.33%)
MCW0327
None
0
ABR0517
3,4,5,9,10,12,21
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0247
3,4,10,14
4/21(19.05%)
ABR0530
1,2,6,13,18
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0185
1,3,10,
3/21(14.29%)
ABR0257
None
0
ABR0609
None
0
ADL0293
2,7,9,12,19
5/21(23.81%)
MCW0200
None
0
MCW0330
1,3,4,8,14
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0204
2,6,7,10,13,14,15,18,21
9/21(42.86%)
ABR0387
1,6,8,10,15,17,19
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0649
1,3,10,15
4/21(19.05%)
ADL0199
1,2,3,8,9,13,14,17,18,21
10/21(47.62%)
MCW0036
2,6,10,19,
4/21(19.05%)
ABR0374
3,9,11,14
4/21(19.05%)
ABR0169
None
0
MCW0217
7,8,11,15,16,17
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0284
4,8,12,13,17,19,20
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0650
2,6,7,11,14,16,19
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0113
1,2,6,10,12,16
6/21(28.57%)
MCW0094
None
0
MCW0167
None
0
ABR0133
1,3,5,6,8,13,18,19,20
9/21(42.86%)
LEI0106
4,7,12,17,21
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0180
6,7,9,12,13,16,19
7/21(33.33%)
LEI0168
None
0
MCW0304
8,10,15,19
4/21(19.05%)
MCW0145
3,5,8,9,10,13,15,17
8/21(38.10%)
ABR0364
None
0
ABR0549
4,5,7,8,14,16
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0223
3,18,19,20
4/21(19.05%)
ABR0424
2,6,13,18,21
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0001
7,8,10,11,14,21
6/21(28.57%)
LEI0162
16
1/21(4.76%)
ABR0123
2,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,14,18
10/21(47.62%)
ADL0198
None
0
ABR0026
1,5,6,9,13,14,15,18,21
9/21(42.85%)
ABR0287
4,5,7,8,14,18,19
7/21(33.33%)
ABR0405
2,4,5,6,7,19
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0641
None
0
ABR0624
5,7,15,20
4/21(19.05%)
ABR0631
5,6,10,12,18
5/21(23.81%)
LEI0102
9
1/21(4.76%)
MCW0115
4,7,9,10,11,13,14,20
8/21(38.10%)
ADL0262
17
1/21(4.76%)
ABR0609
None
0
MCW0301
6,15,19,21
4/21(19.05%)
ABR0140
7,8,11,18,20
5/21(23.81%)
ROS0302
3,10,13,15,20
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0392
2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,15,16,20
12/21(57.14%)
MCW0262
1,5,6,11,17
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0046
6
1/21(4.76%)
ABR0109
9,11,18
3/21(14.29%)
ABR0391
1,3,9,10,17,21
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0617
1,6,7,8,9,15,16
7/21(33.33%)
ADL0253
8,11,18,
3/21(14.29%)
MCW0069
8,9,20
3/21(14.29%)
ADL0292
10,19,20
3/21(14.29%)
ABR0006
1,2,3,9,10,18
6/21(28.57%)
MCW0214
4,21
2/21(9.52%)
ABR0015
None
0
ABR0299
11,4,5,6,16
5/21(23.81%)
ABR0076
4,9,13,16
4/21(19.05)
LEI0130
None
0
LEI0135
5,19,20
3/21(14.29%)
ABR0526
4,7,8,10,16,18,20
7/21(33.33%)
ADL0254
None
0
ABR0362
1,4,7,8,14,18
6/21(28.57%)
ABR0066
12,20
2/21(9.52%)

Discussion

Marek’s disease is a very common disease and provides excellent model for the study of herpes virus-induced tumors in both experimental and natural conditions. In this study, chicken embryo fibroblasts were used to evaluate the effects of MDV on host cells genome in vitro. It was reported that not only lymphocytes but also primary chicken embryo fibroblasts could be targets for neoplastic transformation by the MDV[10]. Microsatellite instability (MSI), reflecting a cellular deficiency in DNA mismatch repair (MMR), is now regarded as an important biomarker to predict the cellular genome mutation.
Microsatellites are located in both non-coding and coding portions of the genome, and are thought to play a functional role in gene regulation or indirectly as hot spots for recombination. MSI phenotype mainly caused by mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. This defect may alter gene expression and contribute to cancer development and progression by accelerating the accumulation of mutations in tumor-related genes[11]. MSI in human tumors development and progression has been extensively investigated, which was regarded to have a closed relationship with malignancies, such as endometrial, renal, colorectal, and gastric cancer[1215]. The present study indicates for the first time an association between MSI and MDV infection. It was showed that the high frequency of MSI in MDV-infected CEF specimens could be regarded as one of the fundamental feature of CEF transformation. Regulation from oncogenic genes derived from MDV could be a major driving force of the transformation[10]. It is envisaged MDV might lead to defect of MMR system during replication in host cells, which may result in dysregulation of cell division, imbalance between cell growth and death, and act as a trigger for the initiation of cell transformation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that MSI is presented and its frequency is high in MDV infection in vitro, and MSI may be related to pathogenesis of MDV disease. In order to identify whether the hypothesis is true, we are investigating and comparing MSI frequency of microsatellites markers in chickens infected with pathogenic strain or the non-pathogenic strains (e.g. CVI988). More studies were still needed to further to determine predictive microsatellite markers and evaluate whether MSI is a useful independent prognosticator.

Methods

Chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEF) and Marek’s disease virus infection

Twenty-one chicken embryos (9-days old) from SPF eggs for preparation of chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) were from SPAFAS Co. (Jinan, China; a joint venture with Charles River Laboratory, Wilmington, MA, USA). Each embryos was trypsinized according to conventional procedures, and the cells were suspended in Medium 199 supplemented with 5% calf serum, glutamine (2 mM), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), Penicillin (1000 u/mL) and Streptomycin (1000 μg/ml) in a 75 cm2 flask (Corning Glass Works, Coming, NY). The fibroblasts from each chicken embryo were divided into two for in vitro culture. One is assigned for control and another for infection with the virulent RB-1B strain of MDV. The RB-1B strain of MDV was provided by Dr. Aijian Qin (College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, China).

DNA extraction

At day 5 post infection of MDV, 95% of CEF showed cytopathic effect (CPE). The control fibroblasts and MDV-infected CEFs were used for DNA exraction. The cells were scraped from the flasks and pelleted by centrifugation. The pellet was washed once with 0.2 mol/L pH 7.2 phosphate buffered saline and pelleted again. The pellet was lysed in digestion buffer (10 mM Tris–Cl pH 8.0, 0.1 M EDTA pH 8.0, 0.5% SDS, 20 μg/mL pancreatic RNase) and treated with proteinase K. After extraction with phenol, DNA was precipitated with ethanol, dissolved in 1X TE (10 mM Tris–Cl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA). The concentration of DNA was determined by OD260 using the BioPhotometer plus (Eppendorf, Germany). The quality of DNA was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Primers, PCR and gel electrophoresis

One-hundred-eighteen microsatellite markers in chicken linkage map[16] were chosen to determine MSI in present study (Table 1). Each microsatellite repeat was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and subjected to gel electrophoresis aimed at comparing the pattern of MDV-infected DNA and control DNA from the same chicken embryo fibroblasts. All primers were provided by Dr. Takahashi, National Institute of Agro biological Sciences (NIAS), Tsukuba, Japan.
PCR was performed in a 12.5μL reaction mixture containing 0.5 μl template DNA (100 ng), 0.5 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U/μl), 1.25 μl of 10 × PCR buffer, 0.5 μl of each primer (5 μmol/L), 1 μl of dNTPs (2.5 mmol/L), 8.25 μl distilled H2O. PCR was performed as following steps: a hot start, 94°C for 15 s, then 94°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 60 s, all repeated for 10 cycles, followed by 10 under the same condition except for the annealing temperature that was changed to 50°C and 45°C, finally an elongation time of 9 min at 68°C. PCR amplification was performed using the PTC-200 (Bio-Rad, USA). PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 12% polyacrylamide gel containing 6 M urea for 2.5 h at 70 W. Gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid, and stained with AgNO3[17].

Microsatellite analysis

Each gel was compared with matched normal and MDV-infected CEF specimens. To accurately size the PCR products, a DNA ladder was used on both sides of the gel. Comparisons were made between the number of bands present in both MDV-infected and normal CEF samples. Band intensity was noted but was not categorized for differences between the normal and abnormal DNA. To quantify the presence or absence of MSI, each primer was analyzed for differences in the number of alleles present, be it through insertions or deletions (Figure 1). All microsatellite markers were analyzed for each MDV-infected CEF sample. If the number of allelic bands were not equal in number, band intensity had a significant difference, they were graded as MSI.

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (NO.30871847) and A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

DJY designed research. ZLZ carried out most of the studies, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. DWY and QY participated in parts of the studies and writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Anhänge

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Saif YM, Barnes HJ: Diseases of poultry. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Pub. Professional; 2008:452-514. 12 Saif YM, Barnes HJ: Diseases of poultry. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Pub. Professional; 2008:452-514. 12
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nair V: Evolution of Marek’s disease – A paradigm for incessant race between the pathogen and the host. Vet J 2005, 170: 175-183.PubMedCrossRef Nair V: Evolution of Marek’s disease – A paradigm for incessant race between the pathogen and the host. Vet J 2005, 170: 175-183.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakenell PS, O'Connell P, Blackmore C, Mondal SP, Schat KA: Role of Marek's disease herpes virus in the induction of tumours in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) by methylcholanthrene. Avian Pathol 2010, 39: 183-188.PubMedCrossRef Wakenell PS, O'Connell P, Blackmore C, Mondal SP, Schat KA: Role of Marek's disease herpes virus in the induction of tumours in Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) by methylcholanthrene. Avian Pathol 2010, 39: 183-188.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schat KA, Markowski-Grimsrud CJ: Immune responses to Marek's disease virus infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2001, 255: 91-120.PubMed Schat KA, Markowski-Grimsrud CJ: Immune responses to Marek's disease virus infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2001, 255: 91-120.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Keles H, Fidan AF, Cigerci IH, Kucukkurt I, Karadas E, Dundar Y: Increased DNA damage and oxidative stress in chickens with natural Marek's disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2010, 133: 51-58.PubMedCrossRef Keles H, Fidan AF, Cigerci IH, Kucukkurt I, Karadas E, Dundar Y: Increased DNA damage and oxidative stress in chickens with natural Marek's disease. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2010, 133: 51-58.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Woerner SM, Kloor M, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Gebert JF: Microsatellite instability in the development of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors. Cancer Biomark 2006, 2: 69-86.PubMed Woerner SM, Kloor M, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Gebert JF: Microsatellite instability in the development of DNA mismatch repair deficient tumors. Cancer Biomark 2006, 2: 69-86.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaish M, Mittal B: DNA mismatch repair, microsatellite instability and cancer. Indian J Exp Biol 2002, 40: 989-994.PubMed Vaish M, Mittal B: DNA mismatch repair, microsatellite instability and cancer. Indian J Exp Biol 2002, 40: 989-994.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasavi M, Kiran V, Ravishankar B, Prabhakar B, Ahuja YR, Hasan Q: Microsatellite instability analysis and its correlation with hMLH1 repair gene hypermethylation status in esophageal pathologies including cancers. Cancer Biomark 2010, 7: 1-10.PubMed Vasavi M, Kiran V, Ravishankar B, Prabhakar B, Ahuja YR, Hasan Q: Microsatellite instability analysis and its correlation with hMLH1 repair gene hypermethylation status in esophageal pathologies including cancers. Cancer Biomark 2010, 7: 1-10.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Buranathai C, Rodriguez J, Grose C: Transformation of primary chick embryo fibroblasts by Marek's disease virus. Virology 1997, 239: 20-35.PubMedCrossRef Buranathai C, Rodriguez J, Grose C: Transformation of primary chick embryo fibroblasts by Marek's disease virus. Virology 1997, 239: 20-35.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah SN, Hile SE, Eckert KA: Defective mismatch repair, microsatellite mutation bias, and variability in clinical cancer phenotypes. Cancer Res 2010, 70: 431-435.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shah SN, Hile SE, Eckert KA: Defective mismatch repair, microsatellite mutation bias, and variability in clinical cancer phenotypes. Cancer Res 2010, 70: 431-435.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Corso G, Velho S, Paredes J, Pedrazzani C, Martins D, Milanezi F, Pascale V, Vindigni C, Pinheiro H, Leite M, Marrelli D, Sousa S, Carneiro F, Oliveira C, Roviello F, Seruca R: Oncogenic mutations in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability. Eur J Cancer 2011, 47: 443-451.PubMedCrossRef Corso G, Velho S, Paredes J, Pedrazzani C, Martins D, Milanezi F, Pascale V, Vindigni C, Pinheiro H, Leite M, Marrelli D, Sousa S, Carneiro F, Oliveira C, Roviello F, Seruca R: Oncogenic mutations in gastric cancer with microsatellite instability. Eur J Cancer 2011, 47: 443-451.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tinelli A, Mezzolla V, Leo G, Pisanò M, Storelli F, Alemanno G, Malvasi A, Tommasi S, Ronzino G, Lorusso V: Microsatellite instability (MSI) as genomic markers in endometrial cancer: toward scientific evidences. Mini Rev Med Chem 2010, 10: 1356-1365.PubMedCrossRef Tinelli A, Mezzolla V, Leo G, Pisanò M, Storelli F, Alemanno G, Malvasi A, Tommasi S, Ronzino G, Lorusso V: Microsatellite instability (MSI) as genomic markers in endometrial cancer: toward scientific evidences. Mini Rev Med Chem 2010, 10: 1356-1365.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Altavilla G, Fassan M, Busatto G, Orsolan M, Giacomelli L: Microsatellite instability and hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression in renal tumors. Oncol Rep 2010, 24: 927-932.PubMedCrossRef Altavilla G, Fassan M, Busatto G, Orsolan M, Giacomelli L: Microsatellite instability and hMLH1 and hMSH2 expression in renal tumors. Oncol Rep 2010, 24: 927-932.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi H, Tsudzuki M, Sasaki O, Niikura J, Inoue-Murayama M, Minezawa M: A chicken linkage map based on microsatellite markers genotyped on a Japanese Large Game and White Leghorn cross. Anim Genet 2005, 36: 463-467.PubMedCrossRef Takahashi H, Tsudzuki M, Sasaki O, Niikura J, Inoue-Murayama M, Minezawa M: A chicken linkage map based on microsatellite markers genotyped on a Japanese Large Game and White Leghorn cross. Anim Genet 2005, 36: 463-467.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassam BJ, Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff PM: Fast taxand sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1991, 196: 80-83.PubMedCrossRef Bassam BJ, Caetano-Anolles G, Gresshoff PM: Fast taxand sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1991, 196: 80-83.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Microsatellite instability in Marek’s Disease Virus infected primary chicken embryo fibroblasts
verfasst von
Zhenlei Zhou
Dawei Yao
Yan Qiu
Deji Yang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Virology Journal / Ausgabe 1/2012
Elektronische ISSN: 1743-422X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-9-193

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Virology Journal 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.