nach oben

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

Erschienen in:

07.06.2023 | Original Article

Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach

verfasst von: D. Regis, G. Lugani, A. Valentini, A. Sandri, C. Ambrosini, F. Bagnis, A. Dorigotti, S. Negri, B. Magnan

Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the medium-term clinical and radiographic results of current generation metal-on-metal resurfacing prostheses performed through anterolateral approach.

Materials and methods

Fifty-seven hips in 52 patients underwent resurfacing arthroplasty. Two patients died from unrelated causes, leaving 55 hips in 35 males (3 bilateral) and 15 females (2 bilateral), with a mean age at surgery of 56.2 years (range, 27–70 years). Clinical and radiographic assessment was carried out preoperatively and at follow-up in all the survived cases. The cumulative survival rate was determined according to the method of Kaplan–Meier.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (range, 1.8–9.1 years), 2 HRs of the same female patient were revised because of early loosening of the acetabular component. Deep venous thrombosis and transient femoral nerve palsy occurred both in 1 case. No specific complications of HR were observed. Average Harris hip score improved significantly from 59.8 points (range, 30.4–90.6) preoperatively to 93.7 points (range, 53–100) at the latest examination. Neck narrowing showed an average of 3.27%, but it never exceeded 10%. Nonprogressive acetabular radiolucencies and osteolysis were detected both in 2 hips. A high rate of patients (32, 60.4%) developed heterotopic ossifications, although low-grade in most cases (27, 84.4%). The cumulative survival rate at 9.1 years with revision for any reason as the end point was 93.0%.

Conclusions

The early clinical and radiographic results of modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing performed through an anterolateral approach are promising, but longer-term follow-up studies are necessary.

McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P (1996) Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:S89–S98. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608001-00009CrossRef

Wagner M, Wagner H (2000) Medium-term results of a modern metal-on-metal system in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200010000-00015CrossRef

Mont MA, Schmalzried TP (2008) Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 3):3–11. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00750CrossRefPubMed

Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86(1):28–39. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200401000-00006CrossRef

Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AVF (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22770CrossRefPubMed

Clough EJ, Clough TM (2021) Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Where are we now? J Orthop 23:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.12.036CrossRefPubMed

de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, Graves SE, Davidson DC (2011) Five-year results of the ASR XL acetabular system and the ASR hip resurfacing system: an analysis from the Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(24):2287–2293. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01727CrossRefPubMed

Naal FD, Pilz R, Munzinger U, Hersche O, Leunig M (2011) High revision rate at 5 years after hip resurfacing with the durom implant. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2598–2604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1792-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Daniel J, Pradhan C, Ziaee H, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2014) Results of birmingham hip resurfacing at 12–15 years: a single-surgeon series. Bone Joint J 96-B(10):1298–1306. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.33695CrossRefPubMed

10.

Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ (2020) Long-term results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients 65 years of age or older. HIP Int 32(1):113–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700020924642CrossRefPubMed

11.

Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2004) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(2):177–184. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b2.14600CrossRefPubMed

12.

Giannini S, Cadossi M, Chiarello E, Faldini C, Moroni A, Romagnoli M (2011) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 140 consecutive hips with a minimum five year follow-up. a clinical, radiological and histological analysis. Hip Int 21(1):052–058. https://doi.org/10.5301/hip.2011.6281CrossRef

13.

Matharu GS, McBryde CW, Pynsent WB, Pynsent PB, Treacy RBC (2013) The outcome of the birmingham hip resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Bone Joint J 95-B(9):1172–1177. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B9.31711CrossRefPubMed

14.

Woon RP, Johnson AJ, Amstutz HC (2013) The results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients under 30 years of age. J Arthroplasty 28(6):1010–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.043CrossRefPubMed

15.

Steffen RT, Smith SR, Urban JPG et al (2005) The effect of hip resurfacing on oxygen concentration in the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(11):1468–1474. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16780CrossRefPubMed

16.

Beaulé PE, Campbell P, Shim P (2007) Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 456:148–152. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000238865.77109.afCrossRefPubMed

17.

Khan A, Yates P, Lovering A, Bannister GC, Spencer RF (2007) The effect of surgical approach on blood flow to the femoral head during resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(1):21–25. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B1.18330CrossRefPubMed

18.

Steffen R, O’Rourke K, Gill HS, Murray DW (2007) The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(10):1293–1298. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B10.18974CrossRefPubMed

19.

Amarasekera HW, Costa ML, Foguet P, Krikler SJ, Prakash U, Griffin DR (2008) The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparison of two approaches using laser doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(4):442–445. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20050CrossRefPubMed

20.

Jacobs MA, Goytia RN, Bhargava T (2008) Hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach: surgical description and early review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Supplement_3):38–44. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00684CrossRefPubMed

21.

Benoit B, Gofton W, Beaulé PE (2009) Hueter anterior approach for hip resurfacing: assessment of the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am 40(3):357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2009.02.002CrossRefPubMed

22.

Steffen R-T, De Smet KA, Murray DW, Gill HS (2011) A modified posterior approach preserves femoral head oxgenation during hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 26(3):404–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.12.018CrossRefPubMed

23.

Amarasekera HW, Campbell PC, Parsons N et al (2013) The effect of surgical approach on the histologyof the femoral head following resurfacing of the hip: analysis of retrieval specimens. Bone Joint Res 2(9):200–205. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.29.2000179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Sandri A, Regis D, Magnan B, Luminari E, Bartolozzi P (2009) Hip resurfacing using the anterolateral Watson-Jones approach in the supine position. Orthopedics 32(6):406. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090511-09CrossRefPubMed

25.

Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755CrossRefPubMed

26.

Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A (2005) Early results of primary birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(3):324–329. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15556CrossRefPubMed

27.

Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(8):1629–1632CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Bailey M, Back DL, Shimmin AJ (2007) Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.18830CrossRefPubMed

29.

Cadossi M, Moroni A, Romagnoli M, Chiarello E, Faldini C, Giannini S (2010) Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 7(2):135–139PubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Ramakrishnan R, Jaffe WL, Kennedy WR (2008) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing radiographic evaluation techniques. J Arthroplasty 23(8):1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.021CrossRefPubMed

31.

DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32

32.

Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452CrossRef

33.

Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P (2006) Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 77(1):57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610045704CrossRefPubMed

34.

Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Gundle R, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P (2012) The ten-year survival of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(9):1180–1186. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.29462CrossRefPubMed

35.

Gaillard-Campbell MD, Fowble C, Webb L, Gross TP (2021) Hip resurfacing as an outpatient procedure: a comparison of overall cost and review of safety. Musculoskelet Surg 105(1):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00637-zCrossRefPubMed

36.

Willert H-G, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints a clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.A.02039ppCrossRefPubMed

37.

Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CLM, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill HS, Murray DW (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B(7):847–851. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20213CrossRef

38.

Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS et al (2011) Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):164–171. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25099CrossRefPubMed

39.

Cadossi M, Terrando S, Sambri A et al (2017) What should I expect from my recalled adept hip resurfacing? Musculoskelet Surg 101(3):249–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0476-xCrossRefPubMed

40.

Langton DJ, Sprowson AP, Joyce TJ et al (2009) Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(10):1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22308CrossRefPubMed

41.

Parry MC, Eastaugh-Waring S, Bannister GC, Learmonth ID, Case CP, Blom AW (2013) Blood levels of cobalt and chromium are inversely correlated to head size after metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty. Hip Int 23(6):529–534. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000057CrossRefPubMed

42.

De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, Murray DW, Campbell PA, De Smet K (2008) Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(10):1291–1297. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.20533CrossRefPubMed

43.

Liu F, Gross TP (2013) A safe zone for acetabular component position in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: winner of the 2012 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty 28(7):1224–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.033CrossRefPubMed

44.

Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ et al (2011) Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(5):572–579. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26429CrossRefPubMed

45.

Hartmann A, Hannemann F, Lützner J et al (2013) Metal ion concentrations in body fluids after implantation of hip replacements with metal-on-metal bearing–systematic review of clinical and epidemiological studies. PLoS One 8(8):e70359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070359CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Sabah SA, Moon JC, Jenkins-Jones S et al (2018) The risk of cardiac failure following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 100-B(1):20–27. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-1065.R1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Morse KW, Premkumar A, Zhu A, Morgenstern R, Su EP (2021) Return to sport after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop J Sport Med 9(5):23259671211003520. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211003521CrossRef

48.

Nunley RM, Della Valle CJ, Barrack RL (2009) Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):56–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0558-zCrossRefPubMed

49.

Dewar DC, Lazaro LE, Klinger CE et al (2016) The relative contribution of the medial and lateral femoral circumflex arteries to the vascularity of the head and neck of the femur: a quantitative MRI-based assessment. Bone Joint J 98-B(12):1582–1588. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.BJJ-2016-0251.R1CrossRefPubMed

50.

Spencer S, Carter R, Murray H, Meek RMD (2008) Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 23(8):1105–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.014CrossRefPubMed

51.

Suraci AB, Bhullar RS, Dobransky JS, Beaulé PE (2021) Hueter anterior approach for metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: 555 cases at a minimum five-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 36(9):3200–3208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.023CrossRefPubMed

52.

Nunley RM, Zhu J, Brooks PJ et al (2010) The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(2):382–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1106-1CrossRefPubMed

53.

Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD et al (2007) Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e318159dd60CrossRefPubMed

54.

Geller JA, Wang W, Goyal A, Liabaud B, Brown M (2014) Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing. Hip Int 24(2):129–135. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000103CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcome of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing through an anterolateral approach
verfasst von: D. Regis
G. Lugani
A. Valentini
A. Sandri
C. Ambrosini
F. Bagnis
A. Dorigotti
S. Negri
B. Magnan
Publikationsdatum: 07.06.2023
Verlag: Springer Milan
Erschienen in: MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 2035-5106
Elektronische ISSN: 2035-5114
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-023-00789-8

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Isolated radial tears of the lateral meniscus midbody: a case series of professional athletes treated with outside-in repair

Closed reduction and cast immobilization of overriding distal forearm fractures under nitrous oxide as conscious sedation without the use of imaging control

Influence of posterior tibial slope on postoperative outcomes after postero-stabilized and condylar-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Influence of subscapularis tendon reattachment after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical findings and ultrasonographic evaluation of the subscapularis at 89 months mean follow-up

Osteoarthritis after an ankle fracture: we can't really avoid it