Minor impact of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer on long-term male urinary and sexual function

For mid and high rectal cancers, a sphincter-saving anterior resection is often feasible, aimed at preserving bowel continuity [1]. A colorectal anastomosis has a 4–16% risk of anastomotic leakage (AL), with a subsequent high risk of failure to maintain bowel continuity [2]. Additionally, AL may have a negative impact on oncological outcomes, with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence [3‐5]. The functional outcome after anterior resection (AR) can be poor with persistent urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction, along with a corresponding impact on quality of life [6‐10]. A negative effect of AL on bowel function has been reported [11‐15] but few studies have focused on long-term urinary and sexual function after AL, with conflicting results [13, 15‐17]. Hypothetically, AL might cause neural and/or organ damage leading to dysfunction, either through chronic inflammation or treatment-related injury incurred by drains or reoperations.

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effect on urinary function of AL after AR for rectal cancer. A secondary aim was to explore the effect of AL on the risk of urinary catheter permanence and sexual function, including sexual inactivity. Our hypothesis was that AL results in urinary and sexual dysfunction in the long-term perspective.

From 864 male rectal cancer patients operated with AR 2007–2013 in the original cohort, 598 patients were alive at the time of questionnaire dispatch. Of these, 379 (63.4%) patients responded with a median follow-up of 84 months (IQR 67–110) (Fig. 2). Clinical characteristics in responders stratified by AL are presented in Table 1. In total, 59 (15.6%) had AL. Of these leaks, one was grade A, 42 were grade B, and 16 were grade C. In the whole cohort, 318 (83.9%) patients reported bowel continuity compared to 29 (49.1%) in the AL group.

Functional and quality of life outcomes measured by IPSS score, IPSS quality of life, IIEF score, and EORTC QLQ-CR29 urinary symptoms (frequency, incontinence, and dysuria) are shown in Table 2. Unadjusted mean scores for urinary incontinence measured by CR29 were higher in the AL group: 18.7 compared to 13.2 in those without AL. Permanent urinary catheter prevalence (6.8 vs 3.1%) and sexual inactivity (59.3% vs 48.1%) was higher in the AL group compared to the group without AL.

The adjusted analyses are demonstrated in Table 3. A statistically significantly increased urinary incontinence was detected in patients with AL, with a mean score difference of 8.69 (95% CI 0.72–16.67). An increased urinary frequency and a higher rate of permanent urinary catheter in AL patients almost reached statistical significance. The IPSS and IIEF scores were not affected, and no discernible effect of AL on sexual inactivity could be demonstrated in the adjusted analyses.

Sexual activity in relation to median age, AL, and stoma status is shown in Supplementary Table 2. In the whole group, 44.3% were sexually active. AL was numerically more common in the sexually inactive group (18.5 vs 13.7%), and a residual stoma was also more prevalent (19.9 vs 9.0%).

In this study, a significantly higher risk of urinary incontinence after a median follow-up of 7 years was observed in the leakage group, while IPSS and IIEF scores were not affected. This finding adds further functional morbidity to patients already suffering from other consequences of the leakage. The clinical relevance of urinary incontinence is highlighted in recent publications suggesting an association between urinary incontinence and poor quality of life, especially in men [22] and also an increased risk of death with worsening degrees of incontinence [23, 24].

The relationship of AL after AR and various aspects of functional results have previously been explored with different outcomes, with sparse reporting regarding urogenital dysfunction. The finding of no substantial detrimental effect of AL on long-term urinary function measured by EORTC QLQ-CR29 and IPSS is in line with others. The mean score differences in urinary function between groups, though statistically significant, could be considered only small in nature, as they ranged between 6 and 9 [25]. Mongin et al. reported no difference concerning urinary frequency, incontinence, or dysuria in 21 patients suffering AL compared to a group without AL using CR-29 scores [17]. Similarly, Riss et al. reported no difference in urinary function measured with IPSS in 16 patients with and without AL, while using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF), patients with AL scored significantly higher than the control group [16]. This discrepancy could be explained by the IPSS being a more composite questionnaire on overall urinary function, while ICIQ-SF includes specific questions regarding urinary incontinence. Hain et al. reported urogenital outcome among 23 patients with AL and found significantly increased risk of frequent urination as measured by EORTC-CR29 [13]. These studies corroborate the results in the present study to some degree. In contradiction to our findings, Torrijo et al. [22], with shorter follow-up time than ours (12 months), reported AL as a risk factor for urinary dysfunction measured by IPSS [26]. Our results are also in contrast with Kverneng et al. reporting that AL was associated with a decreased risk for urinary incontinence [15]. However, in that study, urinary function in the AL group at baseline was superior to the group without AL and a non-validated questionnaire was employed. Patients with AL tended to be less sexually active, although not to a statistically significant degree; this is in line with previous findings including no influence on sexual function characterized by IIEF [15, 16].

In this study, 51% of patients experiencing AL still had a stoma, while the corresponding number for patients without AL was 7%. The effect of a permanent stoma on sexual function is difficult to distinguish from the effect of AL. In two recent meta-analyses on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery, worse sexual function was associated with abdominoperineal resection compared to sphincter-saving surgery in men [27, 28]. In abdominoperineal excision of the rectum, more neural damage might occur; thus, the stoma per se might not be the ultimate reason for sexual dysfunction.

The negative impact of AL on urinary and sexual function is minor compared to the substantial impact on bowel function previously reported for this cohort [14]. It is possible that inflammation and fibrosis in the rectal wall influence bowel function more directly compared to a more indirect effect via neural damage on urinary and sexual function. The fact that bowel function was evaluated in patients with bowel continuity, while urinary and sexual function was analyzed in the entire AL group, could also have had an impact on this discrepancy. This study has a long follow-up and several aspects of quality of life have been reported to improve with extended follow-up [29]. This might be explained by symptoms improving but also with a change of expectations, sometimes referred to as response shift [30].

This is one of few studies, with a relatively large AL group, investigating AL effect on male urogenital dysfunction with long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, the still low AL number prohibited subgroup analyses of different leak severity; more importantly, such considerations made it difficult to evaluate female patients as well, as the sample size turned out to be too small for meaningful analysis, despite our initial aim of including both sexes. Moreover, this is a multicenter study, and decreasing selection bias and the use of validated questionnaires make the results comparable to previous research. Furthermore, the medical records of all patients have been reviewed to identify all cases of AL, according to the protocol definition.

A limitation is the response rate of 63.4%, making sampling bias a concern, and there were some differences in the responding compared to the non-responding group, mostly suggesting that the non-responders were frailer with more advanced tumors; this could introduce loss of external validity. The retrospective nature of the study is also a limitation, perhaps contributing to the low response rate. The low number of patients excluded due to cancer recurrence could be explained by misclassifications in SCRCR, though the variables in this registry are reported to be accurate on average in 90% [31]. However, the at most 10% missing data in covariates were regarded as acceptable. Heterogeneity in follow-up time is also a limitation less problematic, as the minimum follow-up time (4 years) probably is beyond the time when further improvement could be expected. A more substantial concern is the lack of knowledge as to what extent urinary and sexual dysfunction were treated. At the time of the study, no structural follow-up programs were in place in Sweden. Treatment of urinary dysfunction was probably limited, while treatment of sexual dysfunction among men after rectal cancer surgery has been more common. There is also a risk of type II error using a relatively small sample of 59 AL patients, limiting the possibility of detecting anything but a large difference in functional outcome. This limitation is further accentuated by the high prevalence of sexual dysfunction also in the non-leakage group. A larger study size might have detected more impact on urinary and sexual dysfunction. In addition, no analysis of the influence of operative treatment of the AL, i.e., further pelvic surgery, has been possible. Speculatively, such procedures could have a further detrimental influence on urinary and sexual function. Future research in this area should be with a prospective design with adequate sample size, a uniform short- and long-term follow-up both using clinical data and patient-reported outcomes.

This study suggests that AL after AR leads to an increased incidence of urinary incontinence and possibly an increased urinary frequency and permanent catheter use among men 4–11 years after surgery, while no major effect on overall urinary and sexual function was found. This is important information when counselling rectal cancer survivors, enabling awareness of long-term function, especially as urinary incontinence in particular might constitute a major problem for men, as even mortality increases with the degree of incontinence [23, 24].