Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2011

01.12.2011 | Original Article

Misoprostol Vs Mifepristone and Misoprostol in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy

verfasst von: Tripti Nagaria, Namrata Sirmor

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The present study was conducted with the aim to assess and comparatively evaluate the safety and efficacy of misoprostol alone and mifepristone with misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy.

Methods and Materials

The study was conducted on 200 selected cases, divided in two groups of 100 cases each. In the study group mifepristone was given 200 mg 12 h before intravaginal insertion of 600 μg of misoprostol followed by 400 μg every 3 h up to a maximum of 5 doses or until the abortion occurs, whichever occurs early. In the control group only misoprostol was inserted in the same dose regime. The results were analyzed.

Results

The success rate in both regimens was 100%. Mean induction abortion interval from the insertion of the first misoprostol tablet was significantly shorter in the mifepristone pretreated group 6.72 ± 2.26 h as compared to 12.93 ± 3.4 h in the misoprostol alone group (P < 0.001). The mean blood loss was slightly higher in the control group. The mean dose of the misoprostol required was significantly less in the study group 1,186 ± 291.64 μg as against 1,736 ± 320.20 μg (P < 0.001). The side effects observed in both the groups were similar mainly nausea vomiting, fever, abdominal cramps.

Conclusion

Pretreatment with mifepristone 12 h before intravaginal misoprostol significantly improves the induction abortion interval.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong KS, Ngai CS, Yeo EL, et al. A comparison of two regimen of intravaginal misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:709–12.PubMedCrossRef Wong KS, Ngai CS, Yeo EL, et al. A comparison of two regimen of intravaginal misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:709–12.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbutya Y, Chanarchakul B, Punyavachira P. Vaginal misoprostol in the termination of second trimester pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2000;26:121–5.CrossRef Herbutya Y, Chanarchakul B, Punyavachira P. Vaginal misoprostol in the termination of second trimester pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2000;26:121–5.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Pongsatha S, Tongsong T. Second trimester pregnancy termination with 800 mcg vaginal misoprostol. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001;84:859–63.PubMed Pongsatha S, Tongsong T. Second trimester pregnancy termination with 800 mcg vaginal misoprostol. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001;84:859–63.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbutya Y, Chanarchakul B, Punyavachira P. Second trimester pregnancy termination: a comparison of 600 and 800 μg of intravaginal misoprostol. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2001;27:125–8.CrossRef Herbutya Y, Chanarchakul B, Punyavachira P. Second trimester pregnancy termination: a comparison of 600 and 800 μg of intravaginal misoprostol. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2001;27:125–8.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbert A, Reid R. A randomized trial of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for the purpose of mid trimester termination of pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;41:407–10.PubMedCrossRef Gilbert A, Reid R. A randomized trial of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol for the purpose of mid trimester termination of pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;41:407–10.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramin KD, Ogburn PL, Danilenko DR, et al. High dose oral misoprostol for mid trimester pregnancy interruption. J Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54:176–9.CrossRef Ramin KD, Ogburn PL, Danilenko DR, et al. High dose oral misoprostol for mid trimester pregnancy interruption. J Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54:176–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickinson JE, Evans SF. A comparison of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol administration in second-trimester pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1294–9.CrossRef Dickinson JE, Evans SF. A comparison of oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol administration in second-trimester pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1294–9.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang OS, Lau WNT, Chan CCW, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 2004;11:1001–5.CrossRef Tang OS, Lau WNT, Chan CCW, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 2004;11:1001–5.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pongastha S, Tong song T. Therapeutic termination of second trimester pregnancies with intrauterine fetal death with 400 μg of oral misoprostol. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30:217–20.CrossRef Pongastha S, Tong song T. Therapeutic termination of second trimester pregnancies with intrauterine fetal death with 400 μg of oral misoprostol. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30:217–20.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Baird DT, Rodger MW. Pretreatment with mifepristone (R U 486) reduces interval between prostaglandin administration and expulsion in second trimester abortion. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1990;97:41–5.CrossRef Baird DT, Rodger MW. Pretreatment with mifepristone (R U 486) reduces interval between prostaglandin administration and expulsion in second trimester abortion. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1990;97:41–5.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinshaw K, Refaey HE. Mid trimester termination for fetal abnormality: advantages of a new regimen using mifepristone and misoprostol. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1995;102:559–60.CrossRef Hinshaw K, Refaey HE. Mid trimester termination for fetal abnormality: advantages of a new regimen using mifepristone and misoprostol. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1995;102:559–60.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Refaey HE, Templeton A. Induction of abortion in the second trimester by a combination of misoprostol and mifepristone: a randomized comparison between two misoprostol regimens. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:475–8.PubMed Refaey HE, Templeton A. Induction of abortion in the second trimester by a combination of misoprostol and mifepristone: a randomized comparison between two misoprostol regimens. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:475–8.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat HO PC, Tsang SSK, Ma HK. Reducing the induction to abortion interval in termination of second trimester pregnancies: a comparison of mifepristone with laminaria tent. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1995;102:648–51.CrossRef HO PC, Tsang SSK, Ma HK. Reducing the induction to abortion interval in termination of second trimester pregnancies: a comparison of mifepristone with laminaria tent. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1995;102:648–51.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Premila WA, Templeton A. Nonsurgical mid trimester termination of pregnancy; a review of 500 consecutive cases. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1999;106:706–10.CrossRef Premila WA, Templeton A. Nonsurgical mid trimester termination of pregnancy; a review of 500 consecutive cases. Br J Obstet Gyneacol. 1999;106:706–10.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngai SW, Tang OS, Pak Chiung HO. Randomized comparison of vaginal (200 μg every 3 h) and oral (400 μg every 3 h) misoprostol when combined with mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2001;15:2205–8.CrossRef Ngai SW, Tang OS, Pak Chiung HO. Randomized comparison of vaginal (200 μg every 3 h) and oral (400 μg every 3 h) misoprostol when combined with mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2001;15:2205–8.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Misoprostol Vs Mifepristone and Misoprostol in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy
verfasst von
Tripti Nagaria
Namrata Sirmor
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-011-0118-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 6/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Gestationsdiabetes: In der zweiten Schwangerschaft folgenreicher als in der ersten

13.05.2024 Gestationsdiabetes Nachrichten

Das Risiko, nach einem Gestationsdiabetes einen Typ-2-Diabetes zu entwickeln, hängt nicht nur von der Zahl, sondern auch von der Reihenfolge der betroffenen Schwangerschaften ab.

Embryotransfer erhöht womöglich Leukämierisiko der Kinder

13.05.2024 Assistierte Reproduktion Nachrichten

Reproduktionsmedizinische Techniken haben theoretisch das Potenzial, den epigenetischen Code zu verändern und somit das Krebsrisiko der Kinder zu erhöhen. Zwischen Embryotransfer und Leukämie scheint sich ein solcher Zusammenhang bestätigt zu haben.

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.