Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2018

03.04.2018 | SHORT REPORT

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX as the first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: retrospective analysis

verfasst von: Jihoon Kang, Inhwan Hwang, Changhoon Yoo, Kyu-pyo Kim, Jae Ho Jeong, Heung-Moon Chang, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Tae Jun Song, Dong Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, Myung-Hwan Kim, Seung-Mo Hong, Sang Hyun Shin, Dae Wook Hwang, Ki Byung Song, Jae Hoon Lee, Song Cheol Kim, Baek-Yeol Ryoo

Erschienen in: Investigational New Drugs | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Purpose nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) and FOLFIRINOX have been established as standard first-line treatment in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). We performed retrospective analysis comparing the efficacies of AG and FOLFIRINOX in daily practice setting. Materials and Methods We analyzed 308 patients who presented initially as mPC and received AG (n = 149) or FOLFIRINOX (n = 159) as first-line treatment between 2013 and 2016. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Result There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, except older age and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score in AG group. The response rates (34% vs 34%) and median PFS (6.8 vs 5.1 months) were comparable between two groups (p = 0.88 and p = 0.19, respectively), while median OS was significantly better with AG than FOLFIRINOX (11.4 vs 9.6 months; p = 0.002). Elevated baseline CA19–9 level and liver metastasis were independent adverse prognostic factors for PFS and OS. In subgroup analyses, PFS with AG was better in patients with age ≥ 65 years, peritoneal metastasis, and higher CCI than that with FOLFIRINOX. Conclusion Both AG and FOLFIRINOX showed comparable efficacy outcomes in daily practice setting. AG might be preferentially considered in patients with peritoneal metastasis, comorbid medical conditions or old age.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht JR, Gallinger S, Au HJ, Murawa P, Walde D, Wolff RA, Campos D, Lim R, Ding K, Clark G, Voskoglou-Nomikos T, Ptasynski M, Parulekar W, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.9525 CrossRefPubMed Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, Figer A, Hecht JR, Gallinger S, Au HJ, Murawa P, Walde D, Wolff RA, Campos D, Lim R, Ding K, Clark G, Voskoglou-Nomikos T, Ptasynski M, Parulekar W, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​07.​9525 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouché O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardière C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Péré-Vergé D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M, Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer, PRODIGE Intergroup (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouché O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardière C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Péré-Vergé D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M, Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer, PRODIGE Intergroup (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stein SM, James ES, Deng Y, Cong X, Kortmansky JS, Li J, Staugaard C, Indukala D, Boustani AM, Patel V, Cha CH, Salem RR, Chang B, Hochster HS, Lacy J (2016) Final analysis of a phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 114:737–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.45 CrossRefPubMed Stein SM, James ES, Deng Y, Cong X, Kortmansky JS, Li J, Staugaard C, Indukala D, Boustani AM, Patel V, Cha CH, Salem RR, Chang B, Hochster HS, Lacy J (2016) Final analysis of a phase II study of modified FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 114:737–743. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​bjc.​2016.​45 CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim BJ, Hyung J, Yoo C, Kim KP, Park SJ, Lee SS, Park DH, Song TJ, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Park JH, Cho H, Ryoo BY, Chang HM (2017) Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 740 patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3353-2 CrossRefPubMed Kim BJ, Hyung J, Yoo C, Kim KP, Park SJ, Lee SS, Park DH, Song TJ, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Park JH, Cho H, Ryoo BY, Chang HM (2017) Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 740 patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80:209–215. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00280-017-3353-2 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Montes A, Villarroel P, Ayerbes M, Gómez JC, Aldana GQ, Tuñas LV, Fernández MS, Fernández MJ (2017) Prognostic and predictive markers of response to treatment in patients with locally advanced unresectable and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel: results of a retrospective analysis. J Can Res Ther 13:240–246. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.181181 CrossRef Montes A, Villarroel P, Ayerbes M, Gómez JC, Aldana GQ, Tuñas LV, Fernández MS, Fernández MJ (2017) Prognostic and predictive markers of response to treatment in patients with locally advanced unresectable and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel: results of a retrospective analysis. J Can Res Ther 13:240–246. https://​doi.​org/​10.​4103/​0973-1482.​181181 CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabernero J, Chiorean EG, Infante JR, Hingorani SR, Ganju V, Weekes C, Scheithauer W, Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Penenberg DN, Romano A, Ferrara S, von Hoff DD (2015) Prognostic factors of survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic Cancer. Oncologist 20:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tabernero J, Chiorean EG, Infante JR, Hingorani SR, Ganju V, Weekes C, Scheithauer W, Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Penenberg DN, Romano A, Ferrara S, von Hoff DD (2015) Prognostic factors of survival in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic Cancer. Oncologist 20:143–150. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1634/​theoncologist.​2014-0394 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX as the first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: retrospective analysis
verfasst von
Jihoon Kang
Inhwan Hwang
Changhoon Yoo
Kyu-pyo Kim
Jae Ho Jeong
Heung-Moon Chang
Sang Soo Lee
Do Hyun Park
Tae Jun Song
Dong Wan Seo
Sung Koo Lee
Myung-Hwan Kim
Seung-Mo Hong
Sang Hyun Shin
Dae Wook Hwang
Ki Byung Song
Jae Hoon Lee
Song Cheol Kim
Baek-Yeol Ryoo
Publikationsdatum
03.04.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Investigational New Drugs / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-018-0598-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Investigational New Drugs 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.