nach oben

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery

Erschienen in:

25.07.2023 | Original Article

Nasalance, Nasal Airflow and Perceived Nasality in Carnatic Singers and Non-singers

verfasst von: Thirunavukkarasu Jayakumar, Vijaitha V. Soonan, Vijitha Raj Thankamany, Jesnu Jose Benoy

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study aims to compare the nasalance and nasal airflow between professional singers trained in Carnatic classical singing and non-singers. We also aimed to correlate perceived nasality with objective measurements of nasalance and nasal airflow. A total of 40 female participants (20 to 50 years) were involved in this study. The first group comprised 15 female professional Carnatic singers with a minimum of 10 years of classical training. The second group consisted of 25 non-singer females. These participants were compared on nasalance, nasal airflow and perceived nasality across three sets of stimuli (vowels, oral non-words, and nasal non-words) and three pitch-conditions (low, mid, and high). Correlations were also made between objective measures of nasalance and nasal airflow and perceived nasality. Mixed ANOVA showed a significant (P < 0.05) interaction in nasalance between pitch conditions and groups. Group differences were also observed in the nasalance scores of vowels, oral non-words, nasal non-words. There was a significant difference (P < 0.05) in nasalance with ascending pitch in singers and non-singers. A comparison of aerodynamic analysis of vowels, oral non-words, and nasal non-words between singers and non-singers suggested that nasal airflow was higher in singers. Perceptual nasality was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in Carnatic singers than non-singers. Correlations between objective measures of nasalance and nasal airflow and perceived nasality were not observed. Despite an increased airflow, nasality was lower in trained Carnatic singers than non-singers. Current findings suggest that vocal training impacts nasalance, nasal airflow and perceived nasality.

McKinney JC (1994) The diagnosis and correction of vocal faults: a manual for teachers of singing & for choir directors. Waveland Press, Long Grove

Sundberg J, Birch P, Gümoes B et al (2007) Experimental findings on the nasal tract resonator in singing. J Voice 21:127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOICE.2005.11.005CrossRefPubMed

Sundberg J (2001) Level and center frequency of the singer’s formant. J Voice 15:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00019-4CrossRefPubMed

Raveendran R, Yeshoda K (2022) Effects of resonant voice therapy on perceptual and acoustic source and tract parameters—a preliminary study on Indian Carnatic classical singers. J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOICE.2022.09.023CrossRefPubMed

Gramming P, Nord L, Sundberg, Elliot J (1993) Dept. for Speech, Music and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report Does the nose resonate during singing? STL-QPSR 34:35–42

Birch P, Gümoes B, Stavad H et al (2002) Velum Behavior in professional classic operatic singing. J Voice 16:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00073-5CrossRefPubMed

Tanner K, Roy N, Merrill RM, Power D (2005) Velopharyngeal port status during classical singing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/091)CrossRefPubMed

Jennings JJ, Kuehn DP (2008) The effects of frequency range, vowel, dynamic loudness level, and gender on Nasalance in amateur and classically trained singers. J Voice 22:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOICE.2006.08.017CrossRefPubMed

Perna N (2020) Nasality deconstructed. J Sing 76:429–432

10.

Austin SF (1997) Movement of the velum during speech and singing in classically trained singers. J Voice 11:212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80080-XCrossRefPubMed

11.

Brown WS, Hunt E, Williams WN (1988) Physiological differences between the trained and untrained speaking and singing voice. J Voice 2:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(88)80065-1CrossRef

12.

Sundberg J (1979) Maximum speed of pitch changes in singers and untrained subjects. J Phon 7:71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31040-XCrossRef

13.

Carlo DS, Autesserre D (1987) Movement of velum in singing. J Res Sing 10:3–13

14.

Fowler LP, Morris RJ (2007) Comparison of fundamental frequency Nasalance between trained singers and nonsingers for sung vowels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116:739–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940711601005CrossRefPubMed

15.

Arunachalam R, Boominathan P, Mahalingam S (2014) Clinical voice analysis of Carnatic singers. J Voice 28:128.e1-128.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.003CrossRefPubMed

16.

Venkataraman M, Boominathan P, Nallamuthu A (2022) Frequency range measures in Carnatic singers. J Voice 36:732.e1-732.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.022CrossRefPubMed

17.

Balasubramanium RK, Shastry A, Singh M, Bhat JS (2015) Cepstral characteristics of voice in Indian female classical Carnatic singers. J Voice 29:693–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.01.002CrossRefPubMed

18.

Maruthy S, Ravibabu P (2015) Comparison of dysphonia severity index between younger and older Carnatic classical singers and nonsingers. J Voice 29:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.05.001CrossRefPubMed

19.

Nair RM, Joshi A, Gunjawate DR (2021) Knowledge, attitude and practices towards vocal health care amongst Indian Carnatic singers. J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.07.004CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rao RM, Banga S, Devadas U, Maruthy S (2023) Carnatic classical singers’ interest and knowledge levels of vocal function and dysfunction: a cross-sectional survey. J Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.002CrossRefPubMed

21.

Devadas U, Kumar PC, Maruthy S (2020) Prevalence of and risk factors for self-reported voice problems among Carnatic singers. J Voice 34:303.e1-303.e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.013CrossRefPubMed

22.

Devadas U, Vinod D, Maruthy S (2023) Immediate effects of straw phonation in water exercises on parameters of vocal loading in Carnatic classical singers. J Voice 37:142.e13-142.e22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.11.007CrossRefPubMed

23.

Posit Team (2023) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R

24.

Van Lierde KM, Van Borsel J, Cardinael A et al (2011) The impact of vocal intensity and pitch modulation on Nasalance scores: a pilot study. Folia Phoniatr Logop 63:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1159/000319733CrossRefPubMed

25.

Pruthi T, Espy-Wilson CY (2007) Acoustic parameters for the automatic detection of vowel nasalization. In: Interspeech 2007. ISCA, ISCA, pp 1925–1928

26.

DeLeo LW, Lee L, Stemple JC, Bush H (2010) Perceptual findings on the Broadway belt voice. J Voice 24:678–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.02.004CrossRef

27.

Hirano M, Takeuchi Y, Hiroto I (1966) Intranasal sound pressure during utterance of speech sounds. Folia Phoniatr Logop 18:369–381. https://doi.org/10.1159/000263113CrossRef

28.

Yanagisawa E, Mambrino L, Estill J, Talkin D (1991) Supraglottic contributions to pitch raising. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949110000104CrossRefPubMed

29.

Sadjadi V, Ghorbani A, Torabinezhad F et al (2010) The effect of vocal loudness on Nasalance of vowels in Persian adults. Iran Rehabil J 8:31–35

30.

Perna NK (2008) Effects of Nasalance on the acoustics of the tenor Passaggio and head voice. University of Miami

31.

Lewis KE, Watterson T, Quint T (2000) The effect of vowels on Nasalance scores. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 37:584–589. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0584_teovon_2.0.co_2CrossRefPubMed

32.

Gopishankar R, Pushpavathi M (2008) Effect of vowels on consonants in Nasalence. J All India Inst Speech Hear 27:3–7

33.

Gill BP, Lee J, Lã FMB, Sundberg J (2020) Spectrum effects of a velopharyngeal opening in singing. J Voice 34:346–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOICE.2018.11.014CrossRefPubMed

34.

Echternach M, Högerle C, Köberlein M et al (2021) The effect of Nasalance on vocal fold oscillation patterns during the male Passaggio. J Voice 35:500.e9-500.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVOICE.2019.09.013CrossRefPubMed

35.

Lubker JF, Fritzell J, Lindqvist J (1972) Velopharyngeal function: an electromyographic study. In: Proceedings of the 7th international congress of phonetic Sciences/Actes du Septième Congrès international des sciences phonétiques. De Gruyter, pp 371–374

36.

Stemple JC, Glaze L, Klaben B (2018) Clinical voice pathology: theory and management, 6th edn. Plural Publishing, San Diego

37.

Verdolini-Marston K, Katherine Burke M, Lessac A et al (1995) Preliminary study of two methods of treatment for laryngeal nodules. J Voice 9:74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80225-5CrossRefPubMed

38.

Verdolini K, Druker DG, Palmer PM, Samawi H (1998) Laryngeal adduction in resonant voice. J Voice 12:315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80021-0CrossRefPubMed

39.

Pahn JPE (1998) Education and treatment of the speaking and singing voice according to the Nasality Method. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 23:30–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/140154398434013CrossRef

40.

Santoni C, de Boer G, Thaut M, Bressmann T (2020) Influence of voice focus adjustments on oral-nasal balance in speech and song. Folia Phoniatr Logop 72:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501908CrossRefPubMed

41.

Vampola T, Horáček J, Laukkanen A-M (2021) Finite element modeling of the effects of velopharyngeal opening on vocal tract reactance in female voice. J Acoust Soc Am 150:2154–2162. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0006370CrossRefPubMedADS

42.

Köberlein M, Birkholz P, Burdumy M et al (2021) Investigation of resonance strategies of high pitch singing sopranos using dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Acoust Soc Am 150:4191–4202. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0008903CrossRefPubMedADS

43.

McIver W, Miller R (1996) A brief study of nasality in singing. J Sing 52:21–26

44.

Sinko K, Gruber M, Jagsch R et al (2017) Assessment of nasalance and nasality in patients with a repaired cleft palate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:2845–2854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4506-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Nasalance, Nasal Airflow and Perceived Nasality in Carnatic Singers and Non-singers
verfasst von: Thirunavukkarasu Jayakumar
Vijaitha V. Soonan
Vijitha Raj Thankamany
Jesnu Jose Benoy
Publikationsdatum: 25.07.2023
Verlag: Springer India
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03994-w

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Nasalance, Nasal Airflow and Perceived Nasality in Carnatic Singers and Non-singers

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

Rezidivierender Peritonsillarabszess nach Oralsex

Update HNO

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Subtotal Petrosectomy: Pictorial Review of Clinical Indications and Surgical Approach

Morphometric Analysis of Temporal Bone Radiology for Cochlear Implant Candidacy

Digital Health Literacy: Evaluating the Readability and Reliability of Cochlear Implant Patient Information on the Web

Epidermoid Cyst of the Brainstem in 3-Year-Old Child: A Rare Case Report

Outcomes of Palisade Cartilage Tympanoplasty in Chronic Otitis Media: Our Experience at a Tertiary Care Centre

ChatGPT in Head and Neck Oncology-Opportunities and Challenges

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

Rezidivierender Peritonsillarabszess nach Oralsex

Update HNO