To date,
neogenin expression has been shown to be downregulated in a variety of human cancers such as glioblastoma [
26], colon cancer [
27], prostate cancer [
28], and breast cancer [
24]. In the original
neogenin cloning and screening study, Meyerhardt and colleagues [
13] reported no alteration in
neogenin expression in more than 50 different human cancer cell lines, including breast cancer cell lines. Later, Lee and colleagues [
23] measured expression of
neogenin in breast cancer cell lines and in eight matched breast cancer and adjacent non-cancerous tissues using Western blot, and in only breast cancer tissues by using tissue array. They found that
neogenin expression was downregulated in both breast cancer cell lines as well as cancerous tissues and concluded that
neogenin expression was inversely correlated with mammary carcinogenicity. Our current data support this and other previously published data [
24] in that we have found an association between
neogenin expression and breast cancer grade. We observed no
neogenin expression in higher histological grade breast cancer compared to lower grade tumors, which is consistent with a study of glioma [
22] where
neogenin expression was inversely associated with histological grade of that cancer.
Neogenin expression has been reported to be even lower in recurrent glioma cases compared to that of their primary tumors [
22]. The histological grading system in breast cancer is based on differentiation of tumor cells, which is an important factor in predicting prognosis of breast cancer patients and tumor aggressiveness. Thus, we speculate that breast cancer with lower
neogenin expression in the high histological grade might be more likely to recur and/or have a worse prognosis. However, the majority of our patients had grade II and III breast cancers which precluded precise evaluation of
neogenin expression in grade I breast cancer. Future studies should recruit patients with this breast cancer grade to further confirm that
neogenin expression is associated with breast cancer grade.
In the current study, we observed that level of
neogenin expression was particularly low in the four patients who were 65 years or older. In parallel with our findings, Bondy and colleagues [
29] also showed that minimum levels of
neogenin appeared in older glioma patients with poor prognosis. As older patients frequently have systemic diseases after being diagnosed with breast cancer, treatment of older patients is conservative compared to younger ones [
30]. Thus,
neogenin should be further evaluated as a potential biomarker for older breast cancer. Based on our clinical experiences, malignancy of breast cancer is closely associated with tumor size, subtype, TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, vascular invasion, and expression of other biomarkers (such as ER, PR HER-2, and Ki67); however, we failed to find any statistical significance between
neogenin expression and these prognostic factors. This indicates that
neogenin expression and its functions warrant further investigation in breast cancer. A previous study showed that the function of
neogenin in normal breast development is to guide cap cells and luminal cells into juxtaposition during the adolescent development period [
22]. Although the combination of netrin-1 and
neogenin plays a significant role during this process, the role of
neogenin in breast cancer remains to be determined. It has previously been shown that
neogenin might function as an independent receptor in breast cancer to suppress tumor development [
24]. When
neogenin levels are downregulated,
neogenin-induced apoptosis could be interrupted which could, in turn, lead to cancer development [
20,
31]. Similarly, other studies suggest that
neogenin could induce chemoattraction or chemorepulsion after binding to ligands such as netrin-1 and RGM to influence tumor cell migration and invasion [
21,
32]. In addition, we have shown in the current study that
neogenin expression is only marginally associated with lymph node metastasis of breast cancer.