nach oben

Obesity Surgery

Erschienen in:

07.08.2021 | Original Contributions

Network Meta-Analysis of Metabolic Surgery Procedures for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes

verfasst von: Andrew C. Currie, Alan Askari, Ana Fangueiro, Kamal Mahawar

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Metabolic surgery is part of a well-established treatment intensification strategy for obesity and its related comorbidities including type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are the most commonly performed metabolic surgeries worldwide, but comparative efficacy is uncertain. This study employed network meta-analysis to compare weight loss, T2DM remission and perioperative complications in adults between RYGB, SG and OAGB.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, trial registries were searched for randomised trials comparing RYGB, SG and OAGB. Study outcomes were excess weight loss (at 1, 2 and 3–5 years), trial-defined T2DM remission at any time point and perioperative complications.

Results

Twenty randomised controlled trials were included involving 1803 patients investigating the three metabolic surgical interventions. RYGB was the index for comparison. The excess weight loss (EWL) demonstrated minor differences at 1 and 2 years, but no differences between interventions at 3–5 years. T2DM remission was more likely to occur with either RYGB or OAGB when compared to SG. Perioperative complications were higher with RYGB when compared to either SG or OAGB. Two-way analysis of EWL and T2DM remission against the risk of perioperative complications demonstrated OAGB was the most positive on this assessment at all time points.

Conclusion

OAGB offers comparable metabolic control through weight loss and T2DM remission to RYGB and SG whilst minimising perioperative complications.

Registration number: CRD42020199779 (https:// www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO)

Graphical abstract

Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.PubMedCrossRef

Gulliford MC, Charlton J, Prevost T, et al. Costs and outcomes of increasing access to bariatric surgery: cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis using electronic health records. Value Health. 2017;20(1):85–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(41):1–190. 215-357PubMedCrossRef

Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8(8):CD003641.

Dixon JB, le Roux CW, Rubino F, et al. Bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2012;379(9833):2300–11.PubMedCrossRef

Pareek M, Schauer PR, Kaplan LM, et al. Metabolic surgery: weight loss, diabetes, and beyond. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(6):670–87.PubMedCrossRef

Mackenzie H, Markar SR, Askari A, et al. Obesity surgery and risk of cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105(12):1650–7.PubMedCrossRef

Stefanova I, Currie AC, Newton RC, et al. A meta-analysis of the impact of bariatric surgery on back pain. Obes Surg. 2020;30(8):3201–7.PubMedCrossRef

Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by International Diabetes Organizations. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):861–77.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Green CA, et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1985.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

11.

Cariou B, Hadjadj S, Wargny M, et al. Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study. Diabetologia. 2020;29

12.

Rubino F, Cohen RV, Mingrone G, et al. Bariatric and metabolic surgery during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: DSS recommendations for management of surgical candidates and postoperative patients and prioritisation of access to surgery. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(7):640–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

13.

Hussain A, Mahawar K, El-Hasani S. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on obesity and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020;30(8):3222–3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral

14.

Currie AC, Askari A, Newton RC, et al. Regional variation in unmet need for metabolic surgery in England: a retrospective, multicohort analysis. Obes Surg. 2021;31(1):439–44.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Dixon JB. Regional differences in the coverage and uptake of bariatric-metabolic surgery: a focus on type 2 diabetes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(6):1171–7.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Welbourn R, Dixon J, Barth JH, et al. NICE-accredited commissioning guidance for weight assessment and management clinics: a model for a specialist multidisciplinary team approach for people with severe obesity. Obes Surg. 2016;26(3):649–59.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Welbourn R, Hopkins J, Dixon JB, et al. Commissioning guidance for weight assessment and management in adults and children with severe complex obesity. Obes Rev. 2018;19(1):14–27.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):782–95.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Borgeraas H, Hofso D, Hertel JK, et al. Comparison of the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on remission of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2020;21(6):e13011.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

20.

Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: an updated meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(9):2721–30.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Jia D, Tan H, Faramand A, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1211–8.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Madadi F, Jawad R, Mousati I, et al. Remission of type 2 diabetes and sleeve gastrectomy in morbid obesity: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(12):4066–76.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94. Epub 2018/08/20PubMedCrossRef

24.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9. W64CrossRefPubMed

25.

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. 2011 2011-10-18 10:55:48.

27.

Sidik K, Jonkman JN. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies. Stat Med. 2007;26(9):1964–81.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Raudenbush SW. Analyzing effect sizes: random effects models. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC, editors. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 295–315.

29.

Jackson D, Barrett JK, Rice S, et al. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects. Stat Med. 2014;33(21):3639–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Higgins JPT, Jackson D, Barrett JK, et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

White IR, Barrett JK, Jackson D, et al. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):111–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

32.

Chaimani A, Higgins JPT, Mavridis D, et al. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76654.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

White IR. Multivariate random-effects meta-regression: updates to mvmeta. Stata J. 2011;11(2):255–70.CrossRef

34.

White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stata J. 2015;15(4):951–85.CrossRef

35.

Biter LU, Buuren MMA, Mannaerts GHH, et al. Quality of life 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial focusing on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Obes Surg. 2017;27

36.

Casajoana A, Pujol J, Garcia A, et al. Predictive value of gut peptides in T2D remission: randomized controlled trial comparing metabolic gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and greater curvature plication. Obes Surg. 2017;27

37.

Gras-Miralles B, Haya JR, Moros JM, et al. Caloric intake capacity as measured by a standard nutrient drink test helps to predict weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24

38.

Hofso D, Fatima F, Borgeraas H, et al. Gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes (Oseberg): a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(12):912–24.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Ignat M, Vix M, Imad I, et al. Randomized trial of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in achieving excess weight loss. Br J Surg. 2017;104

40.

Karamanakos SN, Vagenas K, Kalfarentzos F, et al. Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-YY levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study. Ann Surg. 2008;247

41.

Kehagias I, Karamanakos SN, Argentou M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the management of patients with BMI < 50 kg/m2. Obes Surg. 2011;21

42.

Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH, et al. Gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2011;146

43.

Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242

44.

Paluszkiewicz R, Kalinowski P, Wroblewski T, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the management of patients with morbid obesity. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2012;7

45.

Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319

46.

Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Vetter D, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-Y-gastric bypass for morbid obesity-3-year outcomes of the prospective randomized Swiss multicenter bypass or sleeve study (SM-BOSS). Ann Surg. 2017;265

47.

Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Salminen P, Helmio M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319

49.

Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2002–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

51.

Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

52.

Seetharamaiah S, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. LSG vs OAGB-1 year follow-up data-a randomized control trial. Obes Surg. 2017;27

53.

Tang Q, Sun Z, Zhang N, et al. Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(20):e3522.CrossRef

54.

Vix M, Diana M, Liu KH, et al. Evolution of glycolipid profile after sleeve gastrectomy vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Obes Surg. 2013;23(5):613–21.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Yang J, Wang C, Cao G, et al. Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with body mass index 28-35 kg/m(2). BMC Surg. 2015;15

56.

Zhang Y, Zhao H, Cao Z, et al. A randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of morbid obesity in China: a 5-year outcome. Obes Surg. 2014;24

57.

Jain M, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. LSG vs MGB-OAGB: 5-year follow-up data and comparative outcome of the two procedures over long term-results of a randomised control trial. Obes Surg. 2020;

58.

Level L, Rojas A, Pinango S, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized trial. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2020;

59.

Shivakumar S, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 year follow-up data: a randomised control trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(9):2820–8.PubMedCrossRef

60.

De Luca M, Angrisani L, Himpens J, et al. Indications for surgery for obesity and weight-related diseases: position statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1659–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

61.

Park CH, Nam SJ, Choi HS, et al. Comparative efficacy of bariatric surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(7):2180–90.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Riley RD, Jackson D, Salanti G, et al. Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples. BMJ. 2017;358:j3932.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

63.

Ramos AC, Chevallier JM, Mahawar K, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) consensus conference statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625–34.PubMedCrossRef

64.

De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28(5):1188–206.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery utilisation in patients with and without diabetes: data from the IFSO Global Registry 2015–2018. Obes Surg. 2021;

66.

Parikh M, Eisenberg D, Johnson J, et al. American Society for M, Bariatric surgery clinical issues C. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery review of the literature on one-anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(8):1088–92.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Hussain A, Van den Bossche M, Kerrigan DD, et al. Retrospective cohort study of 925 OAGB procedures. The UK MGB/OAGB collaborative group. Int J Surg. 2019;69:13–8.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Haddad A, Bashir A, Fobi M, et al. The IFSO worldwide one anastomosis gastric bypass survey: techniques and outcomes? Obes Surg. 2021;

69.

Rutledge R, Deitel M, Carbajo MA, et al. Commentary: cancer after the OAGB-MGB. Obes Surg. 2020;30(2):755–8.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Mahawar KK, Parmar C, Carr WRJ, et al. Impact of biliopancreatic limb length on severe protein-calorie malnutrition requiring revisional surgery after one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass. J Minimal Access Surg. 2018;14(1):37–43.CrossRef

71.

Boyle M, Mahawar K. One anastomosis gastric bypass performed with a 150-cm biliopancreatic limb delivers weight loss outcomes similar to those with a 200-cm biliopancreatic limb at 18–24 months. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1258–64.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Abdallah E, Emile SH, Zakaria M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with fixed bypass of the proximal two meters versus tailored bypass of the proximal one-third of small bowel: short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2021;

73.

Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Andalib A, et al. Individualized metabolic surgery score: procedure selection based on diabetes severity. Ann Surg. 2017;266(4):650–7.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Chiappetta S, Stier C, Weiner RA. members of StuDo Q, Viszeralchirurgie/StuDoQ MBEoDGfA-u. The Edmonton Obesity Staging System predicts perioperative complications and procedure choice in obesity and metabolic surgery—a German nationwide register-based cohort study (StuDoQ|MBE). Obes Surg. 2019;29(12):3791–9.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Russel SM, Valle V, Spagni G, et al. Physiologic mechanisms of Type II diabetes mellitus remission following bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis and clinical implications. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(3):728–41.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Dardzinska JA, Kaska L, Wisniewski P, et al. Fasting and post-prandial peptide YY levels in obese patients before and after mini versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Minerva Chir. 2017;72(1):24–30.PubMed

77.

Marciniak C, Chavez-Talavera O, Caiazzo R, et al. Characterization of one anastomosis gastric bypass and impact of biliary and common limbs on bile acid and postprandial glucose metabolism in a minipig model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021;25

78.

Yeung KTD, Penney N, Ashrafian L, et al. Does sleeve gastrectomy expose the distal esophagus to severe reflux?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2020;271(2):257–65.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Network Meta-Analysis of Metabolic Surgery Procedures for the Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes
verfasst von: Andrew C. Currie
Alan Askari
Ana Fangueiro
Kamal Mahawar
Publikationsdatum: 07.08.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05643-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2021

A Systematic Review of Genetic Correlates of Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery

Lisdexamfetamine Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between Patients Who Underwent Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Nonsurgical Controls

Incidence of Colorectal Adenomas After Bariatric Surgery: Pre-operative Super Morbid Obesity Is Independently Associated with Increased Risk

Screening and treatment of thiamine deficiency in a sample of multidisciplinary bariatric surgery clinical teams

Prophylactic Administration of Diphenhydramine/Acetaminophen and Ondansetron Reduced Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Pain Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Are the Changes in Gastrointestinal Hormone Secretion Necessary for the Success of Bariatric Surgery? A Critical Review of the Literature

Update Chirurgie