Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 6/2021

Open Access 09.08.2020 | Original Article

New computed tomographic predictors of complicated perioperative course of 17.5F mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL)

verfasst von: Tomasz Ozimek, Jan M. Laturnus, Carolin Gohlke, Judith R. Wiessmeyer, Julian P. Struck, Marie C. Hupe, Axel S. Merseburger, Mario W. Kramer

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 6/2021

Abstract

Purpose

Radiological parameters predicting a postoperative stone-free status (SFS) or a complicated perioperative course of mini-PNL, are scarce. Our aim was to identify such factors for prone 17.5F mini-PNL.

Methods

A monocentric cohort of 103 cases was retrospectively analysed for factors predicting SFS and relevant complications, i.e. Clavien–Dindo (CD) ≥ 2. Parameters measured on preoperative supine CT included maximal stone diameter, skin-to-stone distance (SSD), ideal tract length (ITL), access angle, minimal T12—Lower Kidney Pole distance (T12LP) and minimal Iliac Crest—Lower Kidney Pole distance (ICLP). Infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) was measured on intraoperative pyelography.

Results

The median maximal stone diameter was lower in cases with postoperative SFS [16 mm (Min. 10; Max. 35) vs. 20 mm (Min. 6; Max. 85), p = 0.0052]. CD ≥ 2 was more frequent in cases with a bigger stone burden [19 mm (Min. 13; Max. 85) vs. 16 mm (Min. 6; Max. 49), p = 0.0056] and with the ribs in the access angle [7/23 (30.43%) vs. 8/76 (10.53%); p = 0.0454]. T12LP significantly differed in cases with and without CD ≥ 2 [80.48 mm (± 21.31) vs. 90.43 mm (± 19.42), p = 0.0397]; however, it had no influence on SFS (p > 0.05). SSD, ITL, IPA and ICLP were significant regarding neither SFS nor CD ≥ 2 prevalence (p > 0.05). Using multivariate logistic regression, T12LP was confirmed as an independent predictor on CD ≥ 2 prevalence.

Conclusions

Preoperative computed tomographic factors indicating elevated kidney position influence perioperative course of mini-PNL. T12LP and the presence of ribs in the access angle are, apart from stone diameter, the most useful indicators for cases at risk of CD ≥ 2.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the preferred option for the treatment of large kidney stones > 2 cm in diameter. Due to its miniaturization, it is also considered a viable approach for a smaller stone burden [1]. Despite the wide choice of devices for percutaneous stone treatment (4.8–24F), mini-PNL is preferred in most clinical settings, as a compromise between good outcomes, safety and acceptable operation times [2]. However, the procedure is associated, as every endourologic procedure is, with substantial perioperative complications [3], postoperative urinary tract infections or sepsis [4]. To identify high-risk cases and to increase patient’s safety, several risk factors, such as staghorn stones, positive preoperative urine culture, diabetes, patient’s age, prolonged operation time or upper pole access, have already been determined [46].
Apart from stone burden itself, other radiological parameters predicting a postoperative stone-free status (SFS) or complicated perioperative course of percutaneous procedures are scarce. Thus, our aim was to identify such factors, based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) in supine position, and intraoperative pyelographic imaging, for prone 17.5F mini-PNL.

Material and methods

A monocentric cohort of patients scheduled for prone 17.5F mini-PNL (103 cases) in our department between 2014 and 2019 was retrospectively analysed for factors predicting postoperative SFS and relevant perioperative complications Clavien–Dindo (CD) ≥ 2.
Written patient consent was obtained at least 24 h preoperatively. Microbiological testing was performed less than 2 weeks preoperatively. No routine preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was applied. In patients with positive preoperative urine culture, a preoperative antibiotics course was administered and continued postoperatively. For patients with negative urine cultures, antibiotic prophylaxis, usually fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin), was administered intraoperatively, and continued orally during the postoperative hospital stay. All patients were operated under general anaesthesia in a classic prone position. Mini-PNL tract was dilated for the 17.5F working channel and surgery was performed with a 12F MIP M nephroscope (Karl Storz, Germany). The hospital stay for an uncomplicated postoperative course was limited to 72 h.
Stone-free status was, in the majority of the cases, determined intraoperatively by an endourologist. A radiological postoperative re-evaluation with a non-contrast CT was not a standard and was indicated only in case of uncertainty regarding postoperative stone-free status or prior to second-look procedure. A recurrent stone former was defined as a patient with at least one stone episode in the past.
Parameters were measured using Agfa HealthCare IMPAX Software and were based on preoperative CT in the supine position. These parameters included maximal stone diameter, skin-to-stone distance (SSD), ideal tract length (ITL), access angle, minimal T12—Lower Kidney Pole distance (T12LP) and minimal Iliac Crest—Lower Kidney Pole distance (ICLP). Measurements were taken on native CT scans; however, a urographic phase was additionally taken into consideration for better identification of calyceal anatomy, whenever available (7/103 cases). SSD was calculated as the arithmetic mean of three distances from the middle of the dominant stone to the skin, at 0º, 45º and 90º on axial CT images [7]. According to Marchini et al. [8] ITL was determined as the distance between the bottom of the lower calyx and the skin, on an imaginary line from the antero-lateral edge of the vertebra, through the bottom of the posterior calyx to the skin (Fig. 1). An access angle was drawn on axial CT images, with the vertex in the bottom of the punctured calyx, one leg adjacent to the lateral circumference of the paraspinous muscles and the other at the first adjacent organ [8] (Fig. 1). We also used coronal CT images to determine the minimal vertical distance between the bottom of the lower calyx and bone structures as the lowest point of T12 vertebra (T12LP), and the most cranial aspect of the iliac crest (ICLP) (Fig. 2). The infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) was retrospectively measured in accordance with the El-Bahnasy [9], and based on recorded intraoperative retrograde pyelography (RPG) images. The angle was determined between the ureteropelvic axis and the central axis of the lower pole infundibulum. The Clavien–Dindo scale was applied to classify the intra- and post-operative complications [10].
Uni- and multi-variate statistical analyses were performed in RStudio (version 1.0.136). Mean values with standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed variables, median values with minimum and maximum values for variables without normal distribution and percent values for categorical variables were used for descriptive statistics. The Chi-square test was applied for qualitative data whenever applicable. Normal distribution of quantitative data was proven with the Shapiro–Wilk test. The Mann–Whitney U (MWU) test or unpaired t test was conducted for univariate analysis. The level of statistical significance was p < 0.05.

Results

We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 103 patients scheduled for 17.5F mini-PNL in our department, between 2014 and 2019. Working channel was successfully established in 92.23% (95/103) of cases. The access was placed supracostal in one case. The general cohort and stone characteristics are presented in Table 1. Overall ipsilateral stone-free rate was 73.79% (76/103) for median maximal stone diameter of 17.0 mm (Min 6.0; Max. 85.0 mm). The CD ≥ 2 complication rate was 22.33% (23/103), and constituted mostly of postoperative febrile infections (18/23; 78.26%), that were defined as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), requiring additional postoperative intravenous antibiotic therapy. In 66.67% (12/18) of cases, this prolonged the hospital stay over the standard 72 h. Non-infectious complications were associated with postoperative macrohaematuria (2 patients), neurological complications (transient ischemic attack––1 patient; postoperative syncope––1 patient) and pneumonia (1 patient). In five cases (5/23; 21.74%) with CD ≥ 3A, severe complications, either ureteral catheter placement or intensive care, were postoperatively required. No complications leading to death were recorded.
Table 1
Univariate analysis of general and stone characteristics regarding stone-free status and complications
 
Overall
Stone-free status
Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2
Yes
No
p value
Test
Yes
No
p value
Test
Length of stay (days)
3 (1; 15)
3 (2; 9)
3 (1; 15)
0.2184
MWU
5 (2; 15)
3 (1; 10)
0.0001
MWU
Gender (male/female)
60/43
41/35
19/8
0.2079
Chi2
9/14
51/29
0.0615
Chi2
Age (years)
56.68 (SD 15.14)
59 (23; 84)
54.59 (SD 14.25)
0.2953
MWU
56.78 (SD 16.35)
56.65 (SD 14.88)
0.9707
t test
Side (right/left)
43/60
32/44
11/16
1
Chi2
13/10
30/50
0.1644
Chi2
BMI (kg/m2)
28 (14; 51)
28.71 (SD 6.53)
28.63 (SD 7.66)
0.958
t test
38.26 (SD 6.81)
27 (14; 51)
0.1411
MWU
ASA > 2 (yes/no)a
35/65
29/45
6/20
0.214
Chi2
8/15
27/50
1
Chi2
Previous PNL (yes/no)
4/99
1/75
3/24
0.0924
Chi2
0/23
4/76
0.6301
Chi2
Previous SWL (yes/no)
7/96
7/69
0/27
0.2347
Chi2
2/21
5/75
1
Chi2
Previous URS (yes/no)
5/98
4/72
1/26
1
Chi2
1/22
4/76
1
Chi2
Recurrent stone former (yes/no)
42/61
31/45
11/16
1
Chi2
10/13
32/48
0.9534
Chi2
Positive urine culture (yes/no)
43/60
31/45
12/15
0.9174
Chi2
15/8
28/52
0.0188
Chi2
Prestenting (yes/no)
77/26
56/20
21/6
0.8707
Chi2
19/4
58/22
0.477
Chi2
Nephrostomy Preoperatively (yes/no)
4/99
3/73
1/26
1
Chi2
1/22
3/77
1
Chi2
Guy’s stone score (1/2/3/4)b
40/30/17/11
36/22/9/5
4/8/8/6
0.0024
Fisher exact
7/6/3/7
33/24/14/4
0.01991
Fisher exact
Hounsfield units
906 (SD 336)
895 (SD 333)
943 (SD 354)
0.6418
t test
917 (SD 281)
902 (SD 358)
0.882
t test
Radiopacity (yes/no)3
89/12
66/9
23/3
1
Chi2
22/1
67/11
0.366
Chi2
Concomitant ureterolithiasis (yes/no)
15/88
11/65
4/23
1
Chi2
5/18
10/70
0.4403
Chi2
Lower pole stone (yes/no)
72/31
50/26
22/5
0.1996
Chi2
15/8
57/23
0.7657
Chi2
Lower pole stone—maximal diameter (mm)
13.05 (SD 4.77)
13.11 (SD 4.78)
12.86 (SD 4.90)
0.8645
t test
15 (6; 19)
12.83 (SD 4.97)
0.3494
MWU
Dominant stone position (lower/middle/upper pole/pelvis)
34/4/3/62
29/2/2/43
5/2/1/19
0.1537
Fisher exact
5/2/1/15
29/2/2/47
0.2357
Fisher exact
Dominant stone—maximal diameter (mm)
17 (6; 85)
16 (10; 35)
20 (6; 85)
0.0052
MWU
19 (13; 85)
16 (6; 49)
0.0056
MWU
Number of affected calyceal groups
1 (0; 3)
1 (0; 3)
2 (0; 3)
0.0054
MWU
1 (0; 3)
1 (0; 3)
0.9626
MWU
Number of relevant kidney stones (1/2/3/ > 3)
58/19/6/20
48/13/4/11
10/6/2/9
0.0711
Fisher exact
11/4/2/6
47/15/4/14
0.6211
Fisher exact
Predominantly calcium oxalate stone composition (yes/no)
51/37
38/32
13/5
0.2682
Chi2
9/10
42/27
0.4276
Chi2
Standard deviation for mean values and minimum/maximum for median values in brackets
aNo data in 3 cases, bno data in 5 cases, cno data in 2 cases
As expected, the median values of maximal stone diameter were significantly lower in cases with postoperative SFS [16 mm (Min. 10; Max. 35) vs. 20 mm (Min. 6; Max. 85), p = 0.0052]. The incidence of relevant complications, CD ≥ 2, was more frequent in cases with a bigger stone burden [19 mm (Min. 13; Max. 85) vs. 16 mm (Min. 6; Max. 49), p = 0.0056] and with the ribs in the access angle [7/23 (30.43%) vs. 8/76 (10.53%); p = 0.0454]. T12LP significantly differed in cases with and without CD ≥ 2 complications [80.48 mm (SD 21.31) vs. 90.43 mm (SD 19.42), p = 0.0397]; however, it had no influence on SFS (p > 0.05). SSD, ITL, IPA and ICLP parameters were not predictors for postoperative SFS or CD ≥ 2 prevalence (p > 0.05). Guy’s Stone Score was confirmed as relevant for SFS (p = 0.002) and CD ≥ 2 (p = 0.0199) prediction.
Radiologic measurements and perioperative characteristics are presented in Table 2. Using multivariate logistic regression for continuous radiological data, T12LP was confirmed as an independent predictor for CD ≥ 2 complications, with a moderate power of discrimination––area under the curve = 0.65. Short T12LP, defined as < 90 mm, was measured in 18 out of 23 cases (78.26%), with CD ≥ 2 complications. The specificity for the prediction of CD ≥ 2 complications, for cases with ribs in the access angle on preoperative CT, was 89.47% (sensitivity 30.43%, positive predictive value 46.67% and negative predictive value 80.95%).
Table 2
Univariate analysis of radiological and perioperative characteristics regarding stone-free status and complications
 
Overall
Stone-free status
Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2
Yes
No
p value
Test
Yes
No
p value
Test
Stone to skin distance (mm)a
101.7 (SD 28.72)
103.0 (SD 27.15)
97.72 (SD 33.07)
0.4284
t test
102.9 (SD 29.51)
101.3 (SD 28.66)
0.8177
t test
Ideal tract length (mm)a
100.1 (SD 28.26)
101.5 (SD 28.37)
96.37 (SD 30.34)
0.4349
t test
105.8 (SD 29.35)
98.37 (SD 28.68)
0.2826
t test
T12-lower pole distance (mm)a
88.07 (SD 20.29)
89.51 (SD 20.04)
84.15 (SD 20.85)
0.2519
t test
80.48 (SD 21.31)
90.43 (SD 19.42)
0.0397
t test
Iliac crest-lower pole distance (mm)a
44.04 (SD 20.06)
41.62 (SD 19.41)
50.41 (SD 20.71)
0.0522
t test
51.04 (SD 22.20)
41.89 (SD 19.00)
0.0552
t test
Access angle—window of puncture (°)a
87.42 (SD 24.35)
88.82 (SD 25.10)
83.7 (SD 22.24)
0.3544
t test
81.83 (SD 21.58)
89.12 (SD 25.01)
0.2098
t test
Ribs in the access angle (yes/no)a
15/84
8/64
7/20
0.1295
Chi2
7/16
8/68
0.0454
Chi2
Infundibulopelvic angle (°)
55.29 (SD 16.74)
55.67 (SD 16.45)
54.05 (SD 18.01)
0.6919
t test
51.3 (SD 19.80)
56.57 (SD 15.58)
0.1906
t test
DJ postoperatively (yes/no)
101/2
74/2
27/0
0.9686
Chi2
22/1
79/1
0.927
Chi2
Nephrostomy postoperatively (yes/no)
18/85
8/68
10/17
0.0048
Chi2
6/17
12/68
0.3563
Chi2
Lower pole puncture successful (yes/no)
91/3
70/1
21/2
0.2958
Chi2
20/0
71/3
0.8428
Chi2
At least one unsuccessful puncture (yes/no)**
25/76
17/58
8/18
0.5746
Chi2
6/17
19/59
1
Chi2
Any puncture successful (yes/no)b
99/2
75/0
24/2
0.1076
Chi2
23/0
76/2
1
Chi2
Real supracostal puncture (yes/no)
1/102
1/75
0/27
1
Chi2
0/23
1/79
1
Chi2
Lower pole access successful (yes/no)c
85/10
69/1
16/9
0.0001
Chi2
18/3
67/7
0.8156
Chi2
Any access successful (yes/no)b
93/8
75/0
18/8
0.0001
Chi2
21/2
72/6
1
Chi2
Number of accesses
1(0; 2)
1(1; 1)
1 (0; 2)
0.0001
MWU
1(0; 1)
1(0; 2)
0.734
MWU
combined with URS (yes/no)
26/77
19/57
7/20
1
Chi2
8/15
18/62
0.3561
Chi2
Laser energy (kJ)
3.96 (0.11; 408.2)
3.46 (0.11; 408.2)
20.19 (SD 5.85
0.0053
MWU
6.55 (0.26; 408.2)
3.64 (0.11; 34.07)
0.1405
MWU
Fluoroscopy time (s)
242 (24; 758)
241 (24; 651)
246 (34; 758)
0.3522
MWU
225 (131; 584)
259.5 (24; 758)
0.8424
MWU
Operation time (min)
103.5 (35; 242)
98 (51; 199)
138.8 (SD 48.94)
0.0001
MWU
127.7 (SD 40.59)
99 (35; 242)
0.01338
MWU
Clavien–Dindo ≥ 2 (yes/no)
23/80
13/64
10/16
0.0413
Chi2
    
Postoperative UTI (yes/no)
18/85
10/66
8/19
0.1008
Chi2
    
Standard deviation for mean values and minimum/maximum for median values in brackets
aNo data in 4 cases, bnephrostomy used for a tract dilation in 2 cases, cnephrostomy used for a tract dilation in 1 case

Discussion

According to data from the CROES study group, the prone position is being preferred in approximately 80% of cases for percutaneous stone surgery [11]. Preoperative radiological diagnostics is an important tool for the planning percutaneous access, and identifying eventual conflicts of the possible tract with adjacent organs (e.g. spleen, liver and colon) as a cause of major complications [8, 12].
Our study presents two new radiological CT-based predictive factors for a complicated perioperative course that can be measured on every CT, but do not depend on a possible conflict of the puncture tract with adjacent internal organs. Neither T12LP nor the presence of ribs in the access angle has been studied so far. Our results support the hypothesis that the elevated retroperitoneal position of the kidney, indicated by a reduced T12LP, and the position of the lower pole behind the costal margin with the ribs in the access angle may complicate the perioperative course due to a more challenging access for the mini-PNL.
It is unclear whether computed tomographic preoperative imaging in the spinal position is suitable enough for mini-PNL in the prone position. Marchini et al. [8] suggested that due to an elevated risk of organ injury while aiming at the upper pole in the prone position, exact ITL should be preoperatively planned, based on CT images in the prone position. In our opinion, supine CT is also sufficient for preparation before prone surgery, on the condition that intraoperative ultrasound is applied for improved recognition of potential conflicts with adjacent structures, while establishing the working channel. In our department, combined sonography and fluoroscopy is an intraoperative standard. Kidney puncture is sonographic-guided and is followed by fluoroscopic-guided tract dilatation. Using this technique, no organ injuries were recorded in the analysed cohort.
Further studies would be helpful to prove, if CT in the prone position could possibly provide more reliable information regarding presented parameters, and by this mean facilitate prone percutaneous surgery. In our opinion, CT in the prone position, instead of the standard spinal position, should be discussed with the radiologist, as a diagnostic tool for an acute flank pain, especially with sonographic stone signal.
Our study did not entirely cover factors influencing SFS and associated complications, however, indicates possible directions for future research.
The anatomically elevated position of the kidney, expressed in reduced T12LP or the presence of ribs in the access angle, is according to our results associated with a complicated perioperative course of mini-PNL. Thus, we advise a special attention to the preoperative body positioning. An additional tilting of the head and legs away from the operated side could increase the T12LP and facilitate the percutaneous access. The effects of such modification and the role of parameters as T12LP in other body positions for mini-PNL should, however, be confirmed in further studies.
The literature on radiological factors predicting outcomes of mini-PNL is limited. To increase the accuracy of SFS prediction in the preoperative setting, numerous tools, such as Guy’s Stone Score, S.T.O.N.E. Score or CROES Score, have been developed [13, 14]. For SFS prediction, we confirmed the role of stone size and numbers of affected calyceal groups as crucial parameters, already included in aforementioned scores. Other parameters in the S.T.O.N.E score including ITL, stone density and preoperative hydronephrosis, had in our study no influence on SFS prediction. In our opinion, further research to establish scores or nomograms for the prediction not only of SFS but also of complication risks are warranted.
The retrospective character is the main drawback to our study. Intraoperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was always administered, as recommended by EAU and AUA guidelines [1, 15]. However, no standard policy for patients with negative urine cultures was applied. The choice of antibiotic type and dose in this subgroup was made intraoperatively by the operating surgeon. To exclude any potential influences of bias regarding the prevalence of infectious complications, we suggest a detailed antibiotic algorithm for future prospective studies, validating our results.
Increased postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) rates are known problems in patients with positive preoperative urine cultures [16]. Despite preoperative microbiological testing and targeted treatment at least 48 h prior to surgery, the complications rate was still significantly elevated among the analysed patients with positive urine cultures. Due to the retrospective nature of our study, we were unable to define whether a prolonged preoperative antibiotic administration would decrease postoperative UTI rates. In our opinion, further studies on this topic are required to determine optimal antibiotic regimens for the preoperative preparation of patients at risk from positive preoperative urine cultures.
In eight cases, a working channel could not be established, mostly due to an unsuccessful dilatation caused by hypermobile kidney (six of eight cases). This well-known phenomenon is associated with factors, including gender (female), lowered BMI and previous open stone surgery [17]. No radiological predictors of renal displacement have yet been determined and would be an interesting topic for the future research.
IPA is a parameter of special interest due to its ability to predict complications, as well as a flexible ureteroscope damage risk during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) [18]. During mini-PNL, the ureter plays anatomically a less important role when compared to a fURS procedure. We showed that contrary to fURS, IPA had no influence on the outcomes and complications of mini-PNL. Thus, a percutaneous approach could surely be considered as an option, especially for cases with steep IPA.
Our data on the gender-associated prevalence of UTIs are consistent with the literature and indicate a higher trend rate for infectious complications after percutaneous surgery in females [19]. This observation supports the notion that special attention to antibiotic prophylaxis and sufficient perioperative antibiotic therapy should focus especially on this group.

Conclusions

Not only stone characteristics but also preoperative radiologic factors indicating anatomically elevated position of the kidney influence the perioperative course of mini-PNL. Apart from stone diameter, T12LP and the presence of ribs in the access angle appear to be the most useful regarding computed tomographic preoperative indications of cases at risk of CD ≥ 2. SSD and ITL predict neither SFS nor the occurrence of CD ≥ 2 complications.

Acknowledgements

Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical committee approval was obtained for this retrospective study (No. 18-097; Universität zu Lübeck).

Research involving human participants and/or animals

No.
Not obtained, due to retrospective character of the study.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Gynäkologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Gynäkologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der beiden Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten gynäkologischen oder urologischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

e.Med Urologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Urologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu den urologischen CME-Fortbildungen und Premium-Inhalten der urologischen Fachzeitschriften.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482CrossRef Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanetti SP, Talso M, Palmisano F et al (2018) Comparison among the available stone treatment techniques from the first European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) Survey: Do we have a queen? PLoS ONE 13(11):e0205159CrossRef Zanetti SP, Talso M, Palmisano F et al (2018) Comparison among the available stone treatment techniques from the first European Association of Urology Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS) Survey: Do we have a queen? PLoS ONE 13(11):e0205159CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rossette JJ, Opondo J, Daels FP et al (2012) Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255CrossRef de la Rossette JJ, Opondo J, Daels FP et al (2012) Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez J, Smith A, Gleavlete P et al (2013) Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 31(5):1135–1140CrossRef Gutierrez J, Smith A, Gleavlete P et al (2013) Urinary tract infections and post-operative fever in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 31(5):1135–1140CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh P, Yadav S, Singh A et al (2016) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of risk factors and their impact on patient outcomes. Urol Int 96(2):207–211CrossRef Singh P, Yadav S, Singh A et al (2016) Systemic inflammatory response syndrome following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of risk factors and their impact on patient outcomes. Urol Int 96(2):207–211CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Olvera-Posada D, Tailly T, Alenezi H et al (2015) Risk factors for postoperative complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a Tertiary Referral Center. J Urol 194(6):1646–1651CrossRef Olvera-Posada D, Tailly T, Alenezi H et al (2015) Risk factors for postoperative complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a Tertiary Referral Center. J Urol 194(6):1646–1651CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammad FT, Balakrishnan A (2010) The effect of fat and nonfat components of the skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy outcome. J Endourol 24(11):1825–1829CrossRef Hammad FT, Balakrishnan A (2010) The effect of fat and nonfat components of the skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy outcome. J Endourol 24(11):1825–1829CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchini GS, Berto FC, Vincentini FC et al (2015) Preoperative planning with noncontrast computed tomography in the prone and supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a practical overview. J Endourol 29(1):6–12CrossRef Marchini GS, Berto FC, Vincentini FC et al (2015) Preoperative planning with noncontrast computed tomography in the prone and supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a practical overview. J Endourol 29(1):6–12CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM et al (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682CrossRef Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM et al (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M et al (2011) Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol 25(10):1619–1625CrossRef Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M et al (2011) Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. J Endourol 25(10):1619–1625CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuttle DN, Yeh BM, Meng MV et al (2005) Risk of injury to adjacent organs with lower-pole fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrostomy: evaluation with prone, supine, and multiplanar reformatted CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(11):1489–1492CrossRef Tuttle DN, Yeh BM, Meng MV et al (2005) Risk of injury to adjacent organs with lower-pole fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrostomy: evaluation with prone, supine, and multiplanar reformatted CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(11):1489–1492CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S et al (2015) Which is better? Guy's vs. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 33(11):1821–1825CrossRef Noureldin YA, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S et al (2015) Which is better? Guy's vs. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scoring systems in predicting stone-free status post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 33(11):1821–1825CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincentini FC, Serzedello FR, Thomas K et al (2017) What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, Guy's Stone Score and CROES nomogram. Int Braz J Urol 43(6):1102–1109CrossRef Vincentini FC, Serzedello FR, Thomas K et al (2017) What is the quickest scoring system to predict percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes? A comparative study among S.T.O.N.E score, Guy's Stone Score and CROES nomogram. Int Braz J Urol 43(6):1102–1109CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lightner DJ, Wymer K, Sanchez J et al (2020) Best practice statement on urologic procedures and antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 203(2):351–356CrossRef Lightner DJ, Wymer K, Sanchez J et al (2020) Best practice statement on urologic procedures and antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 203(2):351–356CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu J, Zhou C, Gao W et al (2020) Does preoperative urine culture still play a role in predicting post-PCNL SIRS? A retrospective cohort study. Urolithiasis 48(3):251–256CrossRef Liu J, Zhou C, Gao W et al (2020) Does preoperative urine culture still play a role in predicting post-PCNL SIRS? A retrospective cohort study. Urolithiasis 48(3):251–256CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Aminsharifi A, Haghpanah R, Haghpanah S (2014) Predictors of excessive renal displacement during access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective trial. Urolithiasis 42(1):61–65CrossRef Aminsharifi A, Haghpanah R, Haghpanah S (2014) Predictors of excessive renal displacement during access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized prospective trial. Urolithiasis 42(1):61–65CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozimek T, Cordes J, Wiessmeyer JR et al (2018) Steep infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) as a new risk factor for flexible ureteroscope damage and complicated postoperative course. J Endourol 32(7):597–602CrossRef Ozimek T, Cordes J, Wiessmeyer JR et al (2018) Steep infundibulopelvic angle (IPA) as a new risk factor for flexible ureteroscope damage and complicated postoperative course. J Endourol 32(7):597–602CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Oezsoy M, Acar O, Sarica K et al (2014) Impact of gender on success and complication rates after ureteroscopy. World J Urol 33:1297–1302CrossRef Oezsoy M, Acar O, Sarica K et al (2014) Impact of gender on success and complication rates after ureteroscopy. World J Urol 33:1297–1302CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
New computed tomographic predictors of complicated perioperative course of 17.5F mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PNL)
verfasst von
Tomasz Ozimek
Jan M. Laturnus
Carolin Gohlke
Judith R. Wiessmeyer
Julian P. Struck
Marie C. Hupe
Axel S. Merseburger
Mario W. Kramer
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03388-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

World Journal of Urology 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Alphablocker schützt vor Miktionsproblemen nach der Biopsie

16.05.2024 alpha-1-Rezeptorantagonisten Nachrichten

Nach einer Prostatabiopsie treten häufig Probleme beim Wasserlassen auf. Ob sich das durch den periinterventionellen Einsatz von Alphablockern verhindern lässt, haben australische Mediziner im Zuge einer Metaanalyse untersucht.

Neue S3-Leitlinie zur unkomplizierten Zystitis: Auf Antibiotika verzichten?

15.05.2024 Harnwegsinfektionen Nachrichten

Welche Antibiotika darf man bei unkomplizierter Zystitis verwenden und wovon sollte man die Finger lassen? Welche pflanzlichen Präparate können helfen? Was taugt der zugelassene Impfstoff? Antworten vom Koordinator der frisch überarbeiteten S3-Leitlinie, Prof. Florian Wagenlehner.

Viel pflanzliche Nahrung, seltener Prostata-Ca.-Progression

12.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Ein hoher Anteil pflanzlicher Nahrung trägt möglicherweise dazu bei, das Progressionsrisiko von Männern mit Prostatakarzinomen zu senken. In einer US-Studie war das Risiko bei ausgeprägter pflanzlicher Ernährung in etwa halbiert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.