Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2018

28.03.2017 | Original Paper

New Price, New Hope? An Examination of the Effects of Doubling the Ticket Price in UK Lotto

verfasst von: David Forrest, O. David Gulley

Erschienen in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The UK Lotto game was introduced in November 1994 with a standard 6/49 format and an entry fee of £1 per ticket. After several years, revenue began to fall despite extensive publicity and a variety of inducements. By 2013, nominal weekly revenue was less than half the 1995 level. In October 2013, the operator doubled the price of a ticket to £2 and made a number of changes to the pay-out structure of smaller prizes. The intent of the changes was to reverse the long downward trend in game revenue by encouraging higher jackpots and offering more pay-out opportunities for each ticket. We use draw by draw revenue and other data to evaluate how players responded to these changes and find that, while ticket sales fell dramatically, total revenue rose following the changes. Primarily this appears to have been the consequence of increased frequency of rollovers (and therefore of more frequent high jackpot draws) rather than ticket price inelasticity. However, although there was a short-term gain in revenue, the changes did not arrest, and indeed seem to have accentuated, the long-run trend decrease in the revenue generated by the game.
Fußnoten
1
In the case of UK Lotto, there is also a bonus number drawn from a separate pool of numbers. Matching this number and five of the six regular numbers also wins a prize.
 
2
Proceeds from the each Lotto draw are now employed as follows: 45% paid out in prizes, 28% paid to the Good Causes, 12% to the Government, 5% in retailer commission, 5% for operating costs and profit to the operator; the remaining 5% is reserved for use to fund extra or enhanced prizes in future special promotional draws or scratchcards (http://​lottery.​merseyworld.​com/​Sales_​index.​html). The Good Causes: arts, charities, heritage, sports, health, education, and environment. Lottery revenues also partially funded the 2012 London Olympics. (http://​www.​lotterygoodcause​s.​org.​uk/​sites/​default/​files/​Fact%20​Sheet%20​Oct%20​2014.​pdf).
 
3
See http://​www.​marketingweek.​co.​uk/​news/​camelot-prepares-biggest-ever-marketing-campaign/​4008018.​article for a discussion of the marketing campaign associated with the lottery changes.
 
4
Camelot would presumably have felt safe in promising higher jackpots. So long as players still purchased more than half the number of tickets as before, revenue and therefore the amount allocated to the jackpot would increase. Further, the price increase would reduce the absolute number of entries to some extent and so players collectively would cover fewer number combinations in each draw. Consequently, with the jackpot won less often, there would be expected to be longer sequences of draws where the jackpot prize was successively carried over (‘rolled over’ in lottery parlance), allowing large prize pots to build up.
 
6
Jackpots are often above £50 m and occasionally above £100 m. The odds are much longer than the UK game, though, at 1:116,531,800 for winning the main prize.
 
8
Subsequently we checked whether this made a material difference to our results. In fact, findings would have been broadly similar had we analysed data on all draws since 1997.
 
9
The specification of stage 1 is therefore: JACKPOT = f(TREND, OCT2013 VARIABLES, ROLLOVER, ROLLOVERSQ).
 
10
We also experimented with variables representing jackpot size in adjacent Euromillions draws but these were not significant and so are not included in our final specification. We also included a number of dummy variables to account for a number of one-off events that may impact lotto sales, including England’s participation in soccer World Cups, the 2012 Olympics, among others. Inclusion of these variables had no effect on our results.
 
11
And indeed gain from greater revenue at an initial non-rollover draw delivering a higher jackpot for the draw: the observed point on the new demand curve will lie upwards and to the right compared with that at the same jackpot size.
 
12
As reported in Table 2, we found evidence of higher-order serial correlation in the Saturday regression results. Reported t-statistics have been corrected using the Newey–West method.
 
13
It is possible only to speculate about the reason. Any effect of Wednesday sales on sales of the draw three days later may be a habit effect but it may also reflect reinvestment of bottom-tier prizes won on Wednesday. After the product changes, the bottom prize, for matching three numbers, was £25 instead of £10. Individuals may be inclined to treat £10 as ‘house money’ to be thrown back into the game but view £25 as substantial enough to be worth cashing in, i.e. keeping for themselves.
 
14
This finding is reinforced by the significant negative sign on the interaction term with jackpot size in Saturday results. The corresponding Wednesday value is also negative, but not quite significant.
 
15
In addition to the attractiveness of larger jackpots, sales may also be boosted due to the fact that, post-price change, there are now fewer winners to share a jackpot. In the 210 drawing prior to the October 2013 price change, there were an average of 2.16 winners when the jackpot was won by at least one ticket. The figure for the 210 drawings after the price change is 1.78. This difference is significant at the 5% level.
 
16
Citing a lack of viewers, the BBC in January 2017 ended the live broadcast of the Saturday evening Lotto drawing. Instead, the drawing is now live-streamed on its website. Televised Wednesday drawings ended in 2012. At its peak in the mid-1990 s, the televised drawings drew millions of viewers and often featured celebrities pushing the button to begin the number drawing process.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Beenstock, M., & Haitovsky, Y. (2001). Lottomania and other anomalies in the market for lotto. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(6), 721–744.CrossRef Beenstock, M., & Haitovsky, Y. (2001). Lottomania and other anomalies in the market for lotto. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(6), 721–744.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1989). Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1989). Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Conlisk, J. (1993). The utility of gambling. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6(3), 255–275.CrossRef Conlisk, J. (1993). The utility of gambling. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6(3), 255–275.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell, L., Hartley, R., Lanot, G., & Walker, I. (2000). The demand for lotto: The role of conscious selection. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18(2), 228–241. Farrell, L., Hartley, R., Lanot, G., & Walker, I. (2000). The demand for lotto: The role of conscious selection. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18(2), 228–241.
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest, D., Gulley, O. D., & Simmons, R. (2000). Elasticity of demand for U.K. National Lottery tickets. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 853–863. (Part 1).CrossRef Forrest, D., Gulley, O. D., & Simmons, R. (2000). Elasticity of demand for U.K. National Lottery tickets. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 853–863. (Part 1).CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest, D., Perez, L., & Baker, R. D. (2010). Evaluating the effects of game design on lotto sales: A case study from Spain. Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 4(2), 1–20. Forrest, D., Perez, L., & Baker, R. D. (2010). Evaluating the effects of game design on lotto sales: A case study from Spain. Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 4(2), 1–20.
Zurück zum Zitat Forrest, D., Simmons, R., & Chesters, N. (2002). Buying a dream: Alternative models of demand for lotto. Economic Inquiry, 40(3), 485–496.CrossRef Forrest, D., Simmons, R., & Chesters, N. (2002). Buying a dream: Alternative models of demand for lotto. Economic Inquiry, 40(3), 485–496.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), 279–304.CrossRef Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), 279–304.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia, J., & Rodriguez, P. (2007). The demand for football pools in Spain: The role of price, prizes, and the composition of the coupon. Journal of Sports Economics, 8, 335–354.CrossRef Garcia, J., & Rodriguez, P. (2007). The demand for football pools in Spain: The role of price, prizes, and the composition of the coupon. Journal of Sports Economics, 8, 335–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garrett, T. A., & Sobel, R. S. (2004). State lottery revenue: The importance of game characteristics. Public Finance Review, 32(3), 313–340.CrossRef Garrett, T. A., & Sobel, R. S. (2004). State lottery revenue: The importance of game characteristics. Public Finance Review, 32(3), 313–340.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gulley, O. D., & Scott, F. A. (1993). The demand for wagering on state-operated lotto games. National Tax Journal, 46(1), 13–22. Gulley, O. D., & Scott, F. A. (1993). The demand for wagering on state-operated lotto games. National Tax Journal, 46(1), 13–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason, P. M., Steagall, J. W., & Fabilus, M. M. (1997). The elasticity of demand for lotto tickets and the corresponding welfare effects. Public Finance Review, 25(5), 474–490.CrossRef Mason, P. M., Steagall, J. W., & Fabilus, M. M. (1997). The elasticity of demand for lotto tickets and the corresponding welfare effects. Public Finance Review, 25(5), 474–490.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson, V., & Grote, K. (2004). Lotto fever: Do lottery players act rationally around large jackpots? Economics Letters, 83, 233–237.CrossRef Matheson, V., & Grote, K. (2004). Lotto fever: Do lottery players act rationally around large jackpots? Economics Letters, 83, 233–237.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papachristou, G. A. (2006). Is lottery demand elasticity a reliable marketing tool? Evidence from a game innovation in Greece. International Review of Economics, 53, 627–640.CrossRef Papachristou, G. A. (2006). Is lottery demand elasticity a reliable marketing tool? Evidence from a game innovation in Greece. International Review of Economics, 53, 627–640.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Perez, L., & Forrest, D. (2011). Own- and cross-price elasticities for games within a state lottery portfolio. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(4), 536–549.CrossRef Perez, L., & Forrest, D. (2011). Own- and cross-price elasticities for games within a state lottery portfolio. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(4), 536–549.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roger, P. (2011). “La demande de grilles d’Euromillions: une comparison internationale” (The demand of Euromillions lottery tickets: An international comparison with english summary). Revue Économique, 62, 29–55.CrossRef Roger, P. (2011). “La demande de grilles d’Euromillions: une comparison internationale” (The demand of Euromillions lottery tickets: An international comparison with english summary). Revue Économique, 62, 29–55.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, I. (1998). The economic analysis of lotteries. Economic Policy, 13(27), 359–392.CrossRef Walker, I. (1998). The economic analysis of lotteries. Economic Policy, 13(27), 359–392.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, I., & Young, J. (2001). An economist’s guide to lottery design. Economic Journal, 111(475), F700–F722.CrossRef Walker, I., & Young, J. (2001). An economist’s guide to lottery design. Economic Journal, 111(475), F700–F722.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
New Price, New Hope? An Examination of the Effects of Doubling the Ticket Price in UK Lotto
verfasst von
David Forrest
O. David Gulley
Publikationsdatum
28.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-017-9689-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

Psychotherapie Medizin aktuell

Fünf Jahren nach der Neugestaltung der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie wurden jetzt die Effekte der vorgenommenen Änderungen ausgewertet. Das Hauptziel der Novellierung war eine kürzere Wartezeit auf Therapieplätze. Dieses Ziel wurde nicht erreicht, es gab jedoch positive Auswirkungen auf andere Bereiche.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.