Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2020

13.06.2019 | Original Article

Omentoplasty Decreases Leak Rate After Esophagectomy: a Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Guangxin Tuo, Gang Jin, Yao Pang, Wenhao Wang, Xiaolei Zhu, Hongyi Zhang, Yi Yang, Peng Wu, Zijiang Zhu

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of omentoplasty with non-omentoplasty in the prevention of postoperative anastomotic leakage, and to investigate the safety of omentoplasty.

Methods

Literature searches were performed of the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that compared the efficacy of omentoplasty and non-omentoplasty after esophagectomy were selected. A meta-analysis was performed on anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay. Results were reported as odds ratio (OR), weighted mean difference (WMD), or relative risk (RR), with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Six studies involving a total of 1608 patients met inclusion criteria. Compared with the non-omentoplasty group, the incidence of anastomotic leakage in the omentoplasty group (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23–0.60; P < 0.0001) was significantly reduced and the length of hospital stay (WMD, 2.13; 95% CI, 3.57–0.69; P = 0.004) was significantly shortened. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic strictures (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.37–1.80; P = 0.61) or in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.25–1.51; P = 0.29).

Conclusions

Omentoplasty after esophagectomy is a safe and effective method to prevent anastomotic leakage.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, Lagergren J. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012. 19(1): 99–103.CrossRef Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, Lagergren J. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012. 19(1): 99–103.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, van Raemdonck D. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2002. 19(2): 92–8.CrossRef Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Nafteux P, van Raemdonck D. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2002. 19(2): 92–8.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. 27(1): 3–7.CrossRef Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS. Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on longterm survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. 27(1): 3–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992. 49(3): 163–7.CrossRef Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol. 1992. 49(3): 163–7.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Alanezi K, Urschel JD. Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. 10(2): 71–5.PubMed Alanezi K, Urschel JD. Mortality secondary to esophageal anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004. 10(2): 71–5.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Peracchia A, Bardini R, Ruol A, Asolati M, Scibetta D. Esophagovisceral anastomotic leak. A prospective statistical study of predisposing factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988. 95(4): 685–91.CrossRef Peracchia A, Bardini R, Ruol A, Asolati M, Scibetta D. Esophagovisceral anastomotic leak. A prospective statistical study of predisposing factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988. 95(4): 685–91.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chalmers PJ, Newing RK. Influence of omentum transposition on experimental tumors. J Surg Oncol. 1986. 32(3): 135–7.CrossRef Chalmers PJ, Newing RK. Influence of omentum transposition on experimental tumors. J Surg Oncol. 1986. 32(3): 135–7.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat John H, Buchmann P. Improved perineal wound healing with the omental pedicle graft after rectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991. 6(4): 193–6.CrossRef John H, Buchmann P. Improved perineal wound healing with the omental pedicle graft after rectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991. 6(4): 193–6.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jesus EC, Karliczek A, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN. Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. (4): CD002100. Jesus EC, Karliczek A, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN. Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. (4): CD002100.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002. 21(11): 1539–58.CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002. 21(11): 1539–58.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986. 7(3): 177–88.CrossRef DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986. 7(3): 177–88.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepesi B, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, et al. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012. 144(5): 1146–50.CrossRef Sepesi B, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, et al. Omental reinforcement of the thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: an analysis of leak and reintervention rates in patients undergoing planned and salvage esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012. 144(5): 1146–50.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ye P, Cao JL, Li QY, et al. Mediastinal transposition of the omentum reduces infection severity and pharmacy cost for patients undergoing esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2016. 8(7): 1653–60.CrossRef Ye P, Cao JL, Li QY, et al. Mediastinal transposition of the omentum reduces infection severity and pharmacy cost for patients undergoing esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2016. 8(7): 1653–60.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou D, Liu QX, Deng XF, et al. Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty reduces anastomotic leakage for minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018. 10: 257–263.CrossRef Zhou D, Liu QX, Deng XF, et al. Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty reduces anastomotic leakage for minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018. 10: 257–263.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng QF, Wang JJ, Ying MG, Liu SY. Omentoplasty in preventing anastomotic leakage of oesophagogastrostomy following radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. 43(2): 274–8.CrossRef Zheng QF, Wang JJ, Ying MG, Liu SY. Omentoplasty in preventing anastomotic leakage of oesophagogastrostomy following radical oesophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. 43(2): 274–8.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM. Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006. 82(5): 1857–62.CrossRef Bhat MA, Dar MA, Lone GN, Dar AM. Use of pedicled omentum in esophagogastric anastomosis for prevention of anastomotic leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006. 82(5): 1857–62.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX, Huang XB, Wang JS. Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2011. 149(3): 404–10.CrossRef Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX, Huang XB, Wang JS. Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2011. 149(3): 404–10.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Thakur B, Zhang CS, Tan ZB. Omentoplasty versus no omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after surgery for cancer of cardia and esophagus. Indian J Cancer. 2004. 41(4): 167–9.PubMed Thakur B, Zhang CS, Tan ZB. Omentoplasty versus no omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after surgery for cancer of cardia and esophagus. Indian J Cancer. 2004. 41(4): 167–9.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang QX, Magovern CJ, Mack CA, Budenbender KT, Ko W, Rosengart TK. Vascular endothelial growth factor is the major angiogenic factor in omentum: mechanism of the omentum-mediated angiogenesis. J Surg Res. 1997. 67(2): 147–54.CrossRef Zhang QX, Magovern CJ, Mack CA, Budenbender KT, Ko W, Rosengart TK. Vascular endothelial growth factor is the major angiogenic factor in omentum: mechanism of the omentum-mediated angiogenesis. J Surg Res. 1997. 67(2): 147–54.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams W, Ctercteko G, Bilous M. Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992. 35(8): 731–8.CrossRef Adams W, Ctercteko G, Bilous M. Effect of an omental wrap on the healing and vascularity of compromised intestinal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992. 35(8): 731–8.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jurkiewicz MJ, Arnold PG. The omentum: an account of its use in the reconstruction of the chest wall. Ann Surg. 1977. 185(5): 548–54.CrossRef Jurkiewicz MJ, Arnold PG. The omentum: an account of its use in the reconstruction of the chest wall. Ann Surg. 1977. 185(5): 548–54.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen L, Liu F, Wang K, Zou W. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014. 40(12): 1635–40.CrossRef Chen L, Liu F, Wang K, Zou W. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014. 40(12): 1635–40.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Horstmann O, Verreet PR, Becker H, Ohmann C, Roher HD. Transhiatal oesophagectomy compared with transthoracic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg. 1995. 161(8): 557–67.PubMed Horstmann O, Verreet PR, Becker H, Ohmann C, Roher HD. Transhiatal oesophagectomy compared with transthoracic resection and systematic lymphadenectomy for the treatment of oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg. 1995. 161(8): 557–67.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011. 254(6): 894–906.CrossRef Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011. 254(6): 894–906.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiggins T, Markar SR, Arya S, Hanna GB. Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty following gastrointestinal anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 2015. 24(3): 181–6.CrossRef Wiggins T, Markar SR, Arya S, Hanna GB. Anastomotic reinforcement with omentoplasty following gastrointestinal anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 2015. 24(3): 181–6.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Z, Xu X, Ni H. Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study. Crit Care. 2013. 17(1): R2.CrossRef Zhang Z, Xu X, Ni H. Small studies may overestimate the effect sizes in critical care meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study. Crit Care. 2013. 17(1): R2.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nuesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, et al. Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2010. 341: c3515.CrossRef Nuesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, et al. Small study effects in meta-analyses of osteoarthritis trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2010. 341: c3515.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Omentoplasty Decreases Leak Rate After Esophagectomy: a Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Guangxin Tuo
Gang Jin
Yao Pang
Wenhao Wang
Xiaolei Zhu
Hongyi Zhang
Yi Yang
Peng Wu
Zijiang Zhu
Publikationsdatum
13.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04284-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Introduction

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.