Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2018

02.04.2018 | Original Scientific Report

Optimal Surgery for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer: Laparoscopic Extended Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy

verfasst von: Takeru Matsuda, Yasuo Sumi, Kimihiro Yamashita, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Masashi Yamamoto, Yoshiko Matsuda, Shingo Kanaji, Taro Oshikiri, Tetsu Nakamura, Satoshi Suzuki, Yoshihiro Kakeji

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer have been shown by the recent studies, the optimal laparoscopic approach for mid-transverse colon cancer is controversial.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with the mid-transverse colon cancer at our institutions between January 2007 and April 2017. Thirty-eight and 34 patients who received extended right hemicolectomy and transverse colectomy, respectively, were enrolled.

Results

There were no significant differences in operating time, blood loss, and hospital stay between the two groups. Postoperative complications developed in 10 of 34 patients (29.4%; wound infection: 2 cases, anastomotic leakage: 2 cases, bowel obstruction: 1 case, incisional hernia: 2 cases, others: 3 cases) for the transverse colectomy group and in 4 of 38 patients (10.5%; wound infection: 1 case, anastomotic leakage: 0 case, bowel obstruction: 2 cases, incisional hernia: 0 case, others: 1 case) for the extended right hemicolectomy group (P = 0.014). Although the median number of harvested #221 and #222 LNs was similar between the two groups (6 vs. 8, P = 0.710, and 3 vs. 2, P = 0.256, respectively), that of #223 was significantly larger in extended right hemicolectomy than in transverse colectomy (3 vs. 1, P = 0.038). The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 92.4 and 90.3% for the extended right hemicolectomy group, and 95.7 and 79.6% for the transverse colectomy group (P = 0.593 and P = 0.638, respectively).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic transverse colectomy offer similar oncological outcomes for mid-transverse colon cancer. Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy might be associated with fewer postoperative complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (Lond Engl) 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet (Lond Engl) 365:1718–1726CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefPubMed Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K et al (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 10:33–40PubMed Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K et al (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 10:33–40PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Cebrian JM, Gil Yonte P, Jimenez-Toscano M et al (2013) Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma: a surgical challenge but oncologically feasible. Colorectal Dis 15:e79–e83CrossRefPubMed Fernandez-Cebrian JM, Gil Yonte P, Jimenez-Toscano M et al (2013) Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon carcinoma: a surgical challenge but oncologically feasible. Colorectal Dis 15:e79–e83CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda T, Fujita H, Kunimoto Y et al (2013) Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancers in a community setting. Asian J Endosc Surg 6:186–191CrossRefPubMed Matsuda T, Fujita H, Kunimoto Y et al (2013) Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for transverse and descending colon cancers in a community setting. Asian J Endosc Surg 6:186–191CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto M, Okuda J, Tanaka K et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse and descending colon cancer: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 26:1566–1572CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto M, Okuda J, Tanaka K et al (2012) Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for advanced transverse and descending colon cancer: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 26:1566–1572CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong CS, Huh JW, Oh BY et al (2016) Operative method for transverse colon carcinoma: transverse colectomy versus extended colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 59:630–639CrossRefPubMed Chong CS, Huh JW, Oh BY et al (2016) Operative method for transverse colon carcinoma: transverse colectomy versus extended colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 59:630–639CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Mitsutsuji M et al (2015) Cranial-to-caudal approach for radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 29:1001CrossRefPubMed Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Mitsutsuji M et al (2015) Cranial-to-caudal approach for radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 29:1001CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Mitsutsuji M et al (2015) Cranially approached radical lymph node dissection around the middle colic vessels in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 400:113–117CrossRef Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Mitsutsuji M et al (2015) Cranially approached radical lymph node dissection around the middle colic vessels in laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 400:113–117CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Sumi Y et al (2017) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer using a cranial approach: anatomical and embryological consideration. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:139–141CrossRefPubMed Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Sumi Y et al (2017) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer using a cranial approach: anatomical and embryological consideration. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:139–141CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat De’Angelis N, Hain E, Disabato M et al (2016) Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:623–630CrossRefPubMed De’Angelis N, Hain E, Disabato M et al (2016) Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:623–630CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gravante G, Elshaer M, Parker R et al (2016) Extended right hemicolectomy and left hemicolectomy for colorectal cancers between the distal transverse and proximal descending colon. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:303–307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gravante G, Elshaer M, Parker R et al (2016) Extended right hemicolectomy and left hemicolectomy for colorectal cancers between the distal transverse and proximal descending colon. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:303–307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Perez A, Brunetti F, Vitali GC et al (2017) Surgical treatment of colon cancer of the splenic flexure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27:318–327CrossRefPubMed Martinez-Perez A, Brunetti F, Vitali GC et al (2017) Surgical treatment of colon cancer of the splenic flexure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 27:318–327CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Park IJ, Choi GS, Kang BM et al (2009) Lymph node metastasis patterns in right-sided colon cancers: is segmental resection of these tumors oncologically safe? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1501–1506CrossRefPubMed Park IJ, Choi GS, Kang BM et al (2009) Lymph node metastasis patterns in right-sided colon cancers: is segmental resection of these tumors oncologically safe? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1501–1506CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Athanasiou CD, Robinson J, Yiasemidou M et al (2017) Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes. Int J Surg (Lond Engl) 41:78–85CrossRef Athanasiou CD, Robinson J, Yiasemidou M et al (2017) Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes. Int J Surg (Lond Engl) 41:78–85CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MK, Lee IK, Kang WK et al (2017) Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer are comparable to conventional open surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res 93:35–42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim MK, Lee IK, Kang WK et al (2017) Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer are comparable to conventional open surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res 93:35–42CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Cassoni P et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29:2196–2202CrossRefPubMed Mistrangelo M, Allaix ME, Cassoni P et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29:2196–2202CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi S, Tashiro J, Araki R et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse and descending colon cancer: short-term and long-term outcomes of a multicenter retrospective study of 1830 patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 10:268–275CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi S, Tashiro J, Araki R et al (2017) Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse and descending colon cancer: short-term and long-term outcomes of a multicenter retrospective study of 1830 patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 10:268–275CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng WG, Liu MJ, Zhou ZX et al (2015) Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1869–1874CrossRefPubMed Zeng WG, Liu MJ, Zhou ZX et al (2015) Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19:1869–1874CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Hirata K et al (2015) A three-step method for laparoscopic mobilization of the splenic flexure. Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S335CrossRefPubMed Matsuda T, Iwasaki T, Hirata K et al (2015) A three-step method for laparoscopic mobilization of the splenic flexure. Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S335CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Optimal Surgery for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer: Laparoscopic Extended Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy
verfasst von
Takeru Matsuda
Yasuo Sumi
Kimihiro Yamashita
Hiroshi Hasegawa
Masashi Yamamoto
Yoshiko Matsuda
Shingo Kanaji
Taro Oshikiri
Tetsu Nakamura
Satoshi Suzuki
Yoshihiro Kakeji
Publikationsdatum
02.04.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4612-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

World Journal of Surgery 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.