Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 9/2018

16.06.2018 | Original Article – Clinical Oncology

Organized screening detects breast cancer at earlier stage regardless of molecular phenotype

verfasst von: Claire M. B. Holloway, Li Jiang, Marlo Whitehead, Jennifer M. Racz, Patti A. Groome

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 9/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Mortality reduction attributable to organized breast screening is modest. Screening may be less effective at detecting more aggressive cancers at an earlier stage. This study was conducted to determine the relative efficacy of screening mammography to detect cancers at an earlier stage by molecular phenotype.

Methods

We identified 2882 women with primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2012 and who had a mammogram through the Ontario Breast Screening Program in the 28 months before diagnosis. Five tumor phenotypes were defined by expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors and HER2/neu oncogene. We conducted univariable and multivariable analyses to describe the predictors of detection as an interval cancer. Additional analyses identified predictors of detection at stages II, III, or IV compared with stage I, by phenotype. Analyses were adjusted for the effects of age, grade, and breast density.

Results

ER negative and HER2 positive tumors were over-represented among interval cancers, and triple negative cancers were more likely than ER +/HER2 − cancers to be detected as interval cancers OR 2.5 (95% CI 2.0–3.2, p < 0.0001). Method of detection (interval vs. screen) and molecular phenotype were independently associated with stage at diagnosis (p < 0.0001), but there was no interaction between method of detection and phenotype (p = 0.44).

Conclusion

In a screened population, triple negative and HER2 + breast cancers are diagnosed at a higher stage but this appears to be due to higher growth rates of these tumors rather than a relative inability of screening to detect them.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Baum M (2004) Breast cancer screening comes full circle. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96(20):1490–1491CrossRefPubMed Baum M (2004) Breast cancer screening comes full circle. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 96(20):1490–1491CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(17):1784–1792CrossRefPubMed Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(17):1784–1792CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bleyer A, Welch HG (2012) Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 367(21):1998–2005CrossRefPubMed Bleyer A, Welch HG (2012) Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 367(21):1998–2005CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bleyer A, Baines C, Miller AB (2016) Impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 138(8):2003–2012CrossRefPubMed Bleyer A, Baines C, Miller AB (2016) Impact of screening mammography on breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 138(8):2003–2012CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C et al (2004) Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 years. 96(19):1432–1440 Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C et al (2004) Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 years. 96(19):1432–1440
Zurück zum Zitat Coburn NG, Cady B, Fulton JP et al (2012) Improving size, lymph node metastatic rate, breast conservation, and mortality of invasive breast cancer in Rhode Island women, a well-screened population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135(3):831–837CrossRefPubMed Coburn NG, Cady B, Fulton JP et al (2012) Improving size, lymph node metastatic rate, breast conservation, and mortality of invasive breast cancer in Rhode Island women, a well-screened population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135(3):831–837CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Collett K, Stefansson IM, Eide J et al (2005) A basal epithelial phenotype is more frequent in interval breast cancers compared with screen detected tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14(5):1108–1112CrossRef Collett K, Stefansson IM, Eide J et al (2005) A basal epithelial phenotype is more frequent in interval breast cancers compared with screen detected tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 14(5):1108–1112CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dawood S, Hu R, Homes MD et al (2011) Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(1):185–192CrossRefPubMed Dawood S, Hu R, Homes MD et al (2011) Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(1):185–192CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat de Roos M, van der Vegt B, de Vries J et al (2007) Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 14(7):2097–2104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Roos M, van der Vegt B, de Vries J et al (2007) Pathological and biological differences between screen-detected and interval ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 14(7):2097–2104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Goding Sauer A et al (2016) Breast cancer statistics, 2015: convergence of incidence rates between black and white women. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1):31–42CrossRefPubMed DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Goding Sauer A et al (2016) Breast cancer statistics, 2015: convergence of incidence rates between black and white women. CA Cancer J Clin 66(1):31–42CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Dogan BE, Turnbull LW (2012) Imaging of triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 6):23–29CrossRef Dogan BE, Turnbull LW (2012) Imaging of triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 6):23–29CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dogan BE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Gilcrease M et al (2010) Multimodality imaging of triple receptor-negative tumors with mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(4):1160–1166CrossRefPubMed Dogan BE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Gilcrease M et al (2010) Multimodality imaging of triple receptor-negative tumors with mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(4):1160–1166CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Domingo L, Blanch J, Servitja S et al (2013) Aggressiveness features and outcomes of true interval cancers: comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cancers. Eur J Cancer Prev 22(1):21–28CrossRefPubMed Domingo L, Blanch J, Servitja S et al (2013) Aggressiveness features and outcomes of true interval cancers: comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cancers. Eur J Cancer Prev 22(1):21–28CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ernst MF, Roukema JA, Coebergh JW et al (2002) Breast cancers found by screening: earlier detection, lower malignant potential or both? Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(1):19–25CrossRefPubMed Ernst MF, Roukema JA, Coebergh JW et al (2002) Breast cancers found by screening: earlier detection, lower malignant potential or both? Breast Cancer Res Treat 76(1):19–25CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Huynh PT, Jarolimek AM, Daye S (1998) The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics 18(5):1137–1154CrossRefPubMed Huynh PT, Jarolimek AM, Daye S (1998) The false-negative mammogram. Radiographics 18(5):1137–1154CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Jatoi I, Anderson WF (2017) Breast-cancer tumor size and screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 376(1):93CrossRefPubMed Jatoi I, Anderson WF (2017) Breast-cancer tumor size and screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 376(1):93CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Jose Bento M, Goncalves G, Aguiar A et al (2014) Clinicopathological differences between interval and screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed within a screening programme in northern Portugal. J Med Screen 21(2):104–109CrossRefPubMed Jose Bento M, Goncalves G, Aguiar A et al (2014) Clinicopathological differences between interval and screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed within a screening programme in northern Portugal. J Med Screen 21(2):104–109CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Lee S, Bae S et al (2012) Comparison between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers according to molecular subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(2):527–540CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Lee S, Bae S et al (2012) Comparison between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers according to molecular subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131(2):527–540CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kirsh VA, Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA et al (2011) Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the ontario breast screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(12):942–950CrossRefPubMed Kirsh VA, Chiarelli AM, Edwards SA et al (2011) Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the ontario breast screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(12):942–950CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lehtimaki T, Lundin M, Linder N et al (2011) Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. Breast Cancer Res 13(6):R134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lehtimaki T, Lundin M, Linder N et al (2011) Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. Breast Cancer Res 13(6):R134CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(13):1081–1087CrossRefPubMed Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL et al (2000) Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(13):1081–1087CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Palka I, Kelemen G, Ormandi K et al (2008) Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers. Pathol Oncol Res 14(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed Palka I, Kelemen G, Ormandi K et al (2008) Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers. Pathol Oncol Res 14(2):161–167CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Patani N, Martin L, Dowsett M (2013) Biomarkers for the clinical management of breast cancer: International perspective. Int J Cancer 133(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed Patani N, Martin L, Dowsett M (2013) Biomarkers for the clinical management of breast cancer: International perspective. Int J Cancer 133(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Porter PL, ElBastawissi AY, Mandelson MT et al (1999) Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 91(23):2020–2028CrossRefPubMed Porter PL, ElBastawissi AY, Mandelson MT et al (1999) Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 91(23):2020–2028CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Burrell HC et al (2007) NHSBSP type 1 interval cancers: a scientifically valid grouping? Clin Radiol 62(3):262–267CrossRefPubMed Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Burrell HC et al (2007) NHSBSP type 1 interval cancers: a scientifically valid grouping? Clin Radiol 62(3):262–267CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Sihto H, Lundin J, Lehtimaki T et al (2008) Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening. Clin Cancer Res 14(13):4103–4110CrossRefPubMed Sihto H, Lundin J, Lehtimaki T et al (2008) Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening. Clin Cancer Res 14(13):4103–4110CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2011) Recommendations on screening for average risk women age 40–74. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 183(17):1991–2000CrossRef The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (2011) Recommendations on screening for average risk women age 40–74. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 183(17):1991–2000CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Ikeda DM, Narasimhan B et al (2008) Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology 246(2):367–375CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Ikeda DM, Narasimhan B et al (2008) Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression. Radiology 246(2):367–375CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Weber RJP, van Bommel RMG, Louwman MW et al (2016) Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158(3):471–483CrossRefPubMed Weber RJP, van Bommel RMG, Louwman MW et al (2016) Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158(3):471–483CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Welch HG, Prorok PC, O’Malley AJ et al (2016) Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 375(15):1438–1447CrossRefPubMed Welch HG, Prorok PC, O’Malley AJ et al (2016) Breast-cancer tumor size, overdiagnosis, and mammography screening effectiveness. N Engl J Med 375(15):1438–1447CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Weller DP, Patnick J, McIntosh HM et al (2009) Uptake in cancer screening programmes. Lancet Oncol 10(7):693–699CrossRefPubMed Weller DP, Patnick J, McIntosh HM et al (2009) Uptake in cancer screening programmes. Lancet Oncol 10(7):693–699CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Organized screening detects breast cancer at earlier stage regardless of molecular phenotype
verfasst von
Claire M. B. Holloway
Li Jiang
Marlo Whitehead
Jennifer M. Racz
Patti A. Groome
Publikationsdatum
16.06.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2687-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2018

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 9/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.