Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2007

Open Access 01.09.2007

Pain after Open Preperitoneal Repair versus Lichtenstein Repair: A Randomized Trial

verfasst von: Simon Nienhuijs, Erik Staal, Mariël Keemers-Gels, Camiel Rosman, Luc Strobbe

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2007

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Background

The open preperitoneal approach in inguinal hernia repair might have the benefit of a mesh in the preferred space without the disadvantages of an endoscopic procedure.

Methods

A total of 172 patients with primary inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo the open preperitoneal Kugel or the standard open anterior Lichtenstein procedure in a teaching hospital. The main outcome measures were operating variables, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and consumed analgesics during the first 2 weeks postoperatively and at 3 months, neurological examination, and complications.

Results

In the Lichtenstein group the operation took longer (54 min versus 41 min; p < .001). There were no clinically important differences in VAS pain score or number of analgesics during the first 2 weeks postoperatively. In the Kugel group the mean VAS pain score at 3 months was less (0.3 versus 0.9; p = .002), as was the proportion of patients reporting pain (21 versus 40%; p = .007). Pain was merely described as neuropathic, especially in the Lichtenstein group. With the anterior repair significantly more nerves were encountered, numbness reported, and cutaneous sensory changes found with neurological examination (all p < .001).

Conclusions

For those surgeons preferring an open approach, the Kugel procedure is a feasible alternative for the standard Lichtenstein procedure and is associated with less chronic pain at three months. Most likely the neuropathic pain and numbness with the Lichtenstein technique are results of more nerves at risk with the anterior approach.
In inguinal hernia repair the endoscopic approach is associated with less postoperative pain. In two trials with 5 years of follow-up this repair was also superior in terms of chronic pain compared to open techniques [1, 2]. Nevertheless, the open approaches are used more frequently. Reported reasons are the demands of the endoscopic technique for anesthesia, experience level, and costs. Most surgeons reserve this approach for specific indications and in dedicated centers.
There remains a need to diminish the main complication of inguinal hernia repair as chronic pain is reported in 28%–37% of the patients [3]. Due to the complexity of chronic pain, the true mechanism still is unclear. However, the position of a mesh is probably one factor. In some anterior techniques a (part of a) mesh is placed under the fascia transversalis, a route that passes through the inguinal canal. Furthermore, all anterior approaches require to some extent dissection of the inguinal canal, and this involves manipulation of at least one or two inguinal nerves. An open preperitoneal approach might have the benefit of a mesh in the preferred preperitoneal space without the disadvantages of an endoscopic procedure. The purpose of this trial was to compare an open preperitoneal to an open anterior approach in terms of chronic pain, as such a study has not been reported before. Therefore the technique described by Kugel [4] and the present standard technique of Lichtenstein were used.

Materials and methods

Randomization

The study was conducted between December 2004 and September 2005 in a regional teaching hospital. The eligibility criteria were fulfilled if adult patients who had been referred for elective primary, unilateral inguinal hernia repair and did not have an irreducible inguinoscrotal hernia or previous hernia repair via the preperitoneal approach, gave informed consent. For that purpose these patients received a diary including written information about the aims and contents of the study. The regional ethics committee approved the study protocol.
A total of 172 consecutive patients were included in the study. Randomization was done using a computer generated list. In consecutive order the patients were allocated to receive one of the two repairs. The patients themselves were blinded to the method used. Patients characteristics recorded were age, sex, body mass index, ASA, and employment status (Table 1).
Table 1
Patient characteristics
 
Lichtenstein
Kugel
p Value
No. of patients
 
86
86
 
Mean (SD) age (years)
54.4 (13.6)
55.6 (15.8)
.384
Sex ratio (M:F)
85:1
85:1
1.00
Mean (SD) BMI (kg/m2)
25.4 (2.7)
25.1 (2.9)
.447
ASA group
I
59
54
.657
II
26
30
 
III
1
2
 
Employment
Light
37
27
.315
Heavy
24
25
 
None or retired
20
26
 
Missing
5
8
 
Presence of hernia
Weeks
23
20
.843
Months
43
45
 
Years
15
13
 
Missing
5
8
 
BMI body mass index; ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists; SD standard deviation

Treatment

Inguinal hernia repairs were performed by staff surgeons as well as surgeons in training. According to our protocol, all patients received 7.5 mg midazolam and pre-emptive analgesics: 1,000 mg paracetamol and 15 mg meloxicam, approximately 1 h before surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics were not used. The Lichtenstein operation was performed as described elsewhere [5]. Briefly, a 6 × 11-cm polypropylene mesh (Prolene; Ethicon) was trimmed to fit the inguinal floor, as necessary. The mesh was sutured to the ligament of Poupart with a non-absorbable suture and secured cranially using an absorbable suture. For the Kugel repair the open, preperitoneal approach was used as described by Kugel [4]. KugelMesh (Bard, Inc), medium oval size (11 × 14 cm), was used in each case. This patch is constructed of a double layer of monofilament polypropylene with a transverse opening in the anterior layer. Hereby a pocket is created to facilitate positioning. A memory recoil ring allows the patch to maintain its shape during placement in the preperitoneal space. Further specifications and illustrations have been reported previously [4]. Nerves and vessels were spared whenever possible. In both techniques, the skin was closed with a subcuticular absorbable suture.
In the Lichtenstein group 61 patients received spinal anesthesia using 15–22.5 mg plain bupivacaine; in 4 patients complementary general anesthesia was needed due to incomplete block. The remaining 25 patients in this group preferred general anesthesia: volatile anesthetics with additional opiates (fentanyl and morphine). In the Kugel group the number of patients was 63 for spinal anesthesia with 8 complementary general anesthesia’s and 23 for general anesthesia from the start. Local anesthetic (10 ml bupivacaine 0.75%) was administered into the wounds of all patients. Paracetamol up to 4 g and meloxicam up to 15 mg were recommended as a supplementary analgesic. Patients were encouraged to resume normal activities and/or work as soon as possible.

Assessment

The duration of surgery, level of experience attained by the surgeon, and the identification and possible dissection of nerves and vessels in the operative field were recorded. In the diary the patients received, three sections were completed: the first section consisted of the study information and informed consent; the second section was devoted to recording height, weight, employment, and the duration of the hernia. The third part included were a preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and a questionnaire about the use of analgesics and the reasons for their consumption (pain due to the hernia, back pain, arthritis, headache, or other). The VAS pain score is a scale indicating a range of pain from zero, indicating no pain, to 100, the least bearable pain, on a 100-mm line. For calculation, the scores were rounded to the closest centimeter. Patients were asked to complete the second part preoperatively. At discharge patients took the diary home to complete the third section during the first 2 postoperative weeks. They recorded daily VAS pain scores as well as entries concerning the number and kind of analgesics taken. At 3 months after the operation all patients visited a surgeon for a physical and neurological exam. This evaluator was not the surgeon who had performed the operation. Any complications were recorded. Furthermore the patients completed a pain questionnaire. This included a VAS pain score and questions on the number and kind of analgesics used. Other questions were about numbness, bulging, and cutaneous sensory changes at the operative site. Bulging was defined as a bulge in the groin and demanded a physical examination (positive Valsalva test) or an ultrasound test to confirm any recurrence. For the sensory changes, a patient could choose from several sensory (neuropathic and nociceptive) and affective descriptors.

Objectives

The aim of the present study was to test the hypotheses that Kugel hernioplasty has less postoperative pain than the standard Lichtenstein repair, and that its feasibility is comparable. For the first hypothesis, the primary endpoint was the VAS pain score at 3 months. A score above zero at this time point is regarded as chronic pain as defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain [6]. Secondary outcome measures were pain scores and number of analgesics consumed during the first 2 weeks, as well as chronic pain descriptions. The duration of the procedure as well as number of complications were used for evaluating the second hypothesis.

Statistical analysis

According to the power calculations, 77 subjects per treatment group were needed for the study to achieve a statistical power of 90% with an alpha of 5%. The calculations were made with a two-sided test for the VAS pain score at 3 months, considering a difference in VAS score of 1.0 as clinically significant. Based on a previous study, the standard deviation was set at 1.9 [7].
Statistical comparison was made with the Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. For ordinal data, the Pearson χ2 test was used; p < .05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed on the basis of intention to treat.

Results

A total of 172 patients were randomly allocated to receive one of the two repairs. Two patients died during the study for reasons not related to the operation. Ultimately, 166 of 170 patients (97.6%) were analyzed for the primary endpoint (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics and pre-existent pain complaints were comparable between the groups (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 2).
Table 2
Pre-existing pain complaints
Mean VAS pain score (SD)
 
Lichtenstein (n = 81)
Kugel (n = 78)
p Value
  
2.8 (2.3)
2.8 (2.3)
.926
Use analgesics (n)
Sometimes
6
10
.952
Regular
4
7
 
Reasons (n)
Back pain
2
5
.505
Arthritis
0
1
 
Headache
3
7
 
Hernia
5
4
 
VAS visual analog scale
The mean VAS pain score was lower in the Kugel group than in the Lichtenstein group for every day of the first 2 postoperative weeks (Fig. 3). During the same period there were no significant differences in the total number of consumed paracetamol tablets (19.9 versus 18.5; p = .400) or in the number of consumed meloxicam tablets (8.6 versus 7.0; p = .295). On the days that the patients did not consume any analgesics (1,176 days), the mean VAS pain score was 1.4.
At 3 months, patients who underwent the open preperitoneal mesh repair reported significantly less pain (mean VAS score 0.3 versus 0.9, p = .002). The number of patients reporting chronic pain was 17 of 82 (20.7%) in the Kugel group and 34 of 84 (40.5%) in the Lichtenstein group (p = .007). In the 131 procedures performed by a first surgeon with a history of more than 5 procedures, 44 cases of chronic pain were recorded, an incidence not a significantly higher than that recorded with less experienced first surgeons (7 of 35, p = .122). The pain intensity distribution is detailed in Figure 4. Eight patients who reported pain at 3 months used analgesics; paracetamol (n = 2), meloxicam or ibuprofen (n = 3), and combinations (n = 3). Forty-one patients used nine different descriptors to describe their pain, mostly neuropathic (Table 3).
Table 3
Pain descriptors
 
Lichtenstein (n = 28)
Kugel (n = 13)
Neuropathic
  Aching
1
1
  Burning
10
2
  Pricking
17
5
  Shooting
2
5
Nociceptive
  Gnawing
0
1
  Pulling
1
1
  Tender
7
2
Affective
  Tiring
2
0
  Irritating
2
2
In the Lichtenstein group the operation took significantly longer (54 min versus 41 min; p < .001). The nerves were encountered significantly more frequently when the anterior approach was employed, and the inferior epigastric vessels were encountered more frequently with the preperitoneal approach (Table 4). Complications included hematoma, which was treated conservatively (n = 14); infection (n = 5); dysejaculation (n = 1) and urination problems resulting from pressure of the mesh against the bladder, as seen on a CT scan. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to recurrence. Diagnosed by either physical examination (n = 3) or ultrasound (n = 1), each group had two recurrences. Three patients with recurrences underwent reoperation within 3 months. Another 12 Lichtenstein and 5 Kugel patients had a swelling/bulging recorded by physical examination or in the patient questionnaire. In no case was the bulging indicative of recurrence, as stated by the consulting physician or a confirming ultrasound test.
Table 4
Procedure encounters
 
Lichtenstein (n = 86)
Kugel (n = 84)
p Value
Ilioinguinal nerve
67
9
.000
Damaged
5
0
.025
Iliohypogastric nerve
23
4
.000
Damaged
3
1
.325
Genitofemoral nerve
21
6
.002
Damaged
1
0
.323
Inferior epigastric vessels
42
73
.000
Vas deferens
78
79
.413
Numbness was reported significantly more in the Lichtenstein group (22 versus 3, p < .001). For patients with reported numbness, nerve damage was reported by the surgeon as the cause in 3 cases, and hypoesthesia was found on neurological examination in 15 cases. Cutaneous sensory changes were found in 6 Kugel patients and 24 Lichtenstein patients. The corresponding nerves were the iliohypogastric (n = 17), genitofemoral (femoral branch n = 6 and genital branch n = 3), and ilioinguinal (n = 4). The sensory changes were related to the number of nerves encountered (R = .152, p = .050). The Pearson χ2 test for patients with a cutaneous sensory change of reported numbness was 37.4 (p < .001); that of reported chronic pain, 18.3 (p < .001). Patients without any sensory changes scored their pain as significantly less (.41 versus 1.53, p < .001) at 3 months.
For the entire group, the preoperative VAS pain score correlated with the scores in the first 2 weeks after the repair (R = .445, p < .001), the number of paracetamol taken (R = .260, p = .001), and the number of meloxicam taken (R = .205, p = .010). No significant correlation with the pain score was found at 3 months. The preoperative consumption of analgesics had no influence.

Discussion

In this randomized trial comparing the standard open anterior approach to hernia repair with an open preperitoneal approach, some significant advantages were found for the open preperitoneal repair technique. The procedure was performed in less time; at a 3 months follow-up, a lower mean VAS pain score and a smaller proportion of patients with chronic pain were reported than in the Lichtenstein group. The chronic pain was mostly described as neuropathic, because nerves were encountered more frequently with the anterior approach. In the open preperitoneal repair group less numbness was reported and fewer cutaneous sensory changes were found at neurological examination.
The authors regard chronic pain as a more severe complication than recurrence, because of its incapacitating character. Therefore the primary endpoint of this study was the mean VAS pain scores at 3 months. The VAS has it limitations, as it measures pain only one-dimensionally without regard to frequency. Nevertheless, this instrument is by far the most used measurement tool, and it is useful for comparisons like those made in the present study. The VAS pain score differed significantly between the groups, although the absolute difference was only 0.6. As stated in the Methods section, this might not be regarded as clinically relevant. Only four patients in each group used analgesics at this point. Thirty-four Lichtenstein patients (40%), however, reported a VAS pain score higher than zero. This figure is relatively high compared to some other published data [810], although similar results have been reported from studies with comparable designs [7, 11, 12]. In the present study, the chronic pain of 40% in the Lichtenstein group is almost twice the rate found in the Kugel group (17 of 82, or 21%). The pain was merely described as “neuropathic,” and it is assumed that this pain arises from nerve damage, which is more likely to occur with the Lichtenstein procedure because the ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerves are encountered significantly more frequently with this approach. The higher proportion of numbness and cutaneous changes underline this assumption.
Where some parameters are concerned, the procedures had similar outcomes. In the first 2 weeks postoperatively there were no clinically important differences in pain VAS score or in number of analgesics taken; nor were significant differences seen in the incidence or types of complications. One complication specific to the preperitoneal approach was seen in this study: higher urinary frequency (1 patient). A CT scan revealed impression of the mesh on the bladder, and removal of the preperitoneal mesh resolved the problem, and a definitive hernia repair is planned. In both groups two recurrences were found, and all four were regarded as technical failures. For some investigators, recurrence is of great concern. Schroder et al. reported a recurrence rate of 7.7% with the Kugel technique [13]. Because most failures occurred in their first 36 cases, they attribute this to the learning curve. They summarize other studies wherein preperitoneal repairs are noted for steep learning curves. In contrast, acceptable recurrence rates have been reported in numerous studies with long-term follow-up, with the recurrence rate varying from 0% to 0.8% [4, 1417]. Nevertheless, we have the impression that the preperitoneal approach is more technically demanding, probably because the preperitoneal space is more unknown. We therefore established learning workshops before this study was begun. In addition, patients with recurrent hernias and large direct hernias were excluded. The experience of the operating surgeon was dichotomized into five or fewer procedures and more than five procedures, similar to the design of a previous study from the same institution to collect comparable data [18]. In practice, the experience of the supervisor exceeded 20 procedures. The level of experience of the supervising surgeon was not specified, and it is therefore possible that a procedure carried out under less experienced supervision might have failed, thereby contributing to the recurrence rate of 2.3% (4 of 172).
The Kugel patch is heavier than a monofilament Prolene mesh. It is double layered with a memory coil [4]. Thus it might be assumed that this patch is stiffer, resulting in more pain [11]. At the 3-month follow-up, however, significantly less pain and less swelling/bulging was found in the Kugel group than in the Lichtenstein group.
Only one previous study known to the authors has compared the two hernia repair techniques, that by Dofru et al. [16], who found similar results with regard to operating time and complications. However, no pain-related outcomes were included. The present study has its own limitations: (1) The Kugel procedure requires a more cranial incision, and knowledge of this feature impairs the blindness of the patient and the evaluator. However, none of our patients realized this when they were seen at follow-up. (2) Fifteen of our patients did not have a physical or neurological follow-up examination, because they had passed the clinical visit and thereafter would only be contacted by telephone. These 15 patients were more or less equally divided between the two groups, and none of them reported any pain at the follow-up interview. The pain-related outcomes are therefore at least not overestimated. (3) The use of a VAS pain score as the primary endpoint has limitations, because pain is far more than a one-dimensional score. Additional pain parameters had to be employed to compensate for this. Nevertheless, it is difficult to express the significance of every VAS pain score higher than zero. In half of the immediate postoperative period (1,176 of 2,406 days) patients reported a pain score without taking any pain medication, as did 43 of 51 patients reporting pain at 3 months. This occurred even though the surgeons had advised patients concerning the standard pain protocol and explained the use of analgesics to the patients.
Within the limitations of this study, an open preperitoneal repair like the Kugel repair has shown some clinically relevant advantages. As the learning curve flattens, this repair may also be suitable in the treatment of large direct and recurrent hernias. For surgeons who prefer an open approach, the Kugel procedure is a feasible alternative for the standard Lichtenstein procedure and is associated with less chronic pain at 3 months, most likely because fewer nerves are at risk than with the anterior approach. The superiority of the approach will demonstrated if education of surgeons focuses on the preperitoneal space as it has emphasized the inguinal canal.
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​2.​0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, et al. (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up. BMJ 326:1012–1013PubMedCrossRef Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, et al. (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up. BMJ 326:1012–1013PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574PubMedCrossRef Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354:185–190CrossRef MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354:185–190CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kugel RD (1999) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178:298–302PubMedCrossRef Kugel RD (1999) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178:298–302PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Amid PK (2004) Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia 8:1–7PubMedCrossRef Amid PK (2004) Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty: its inception, evolution, and principles. Hernia 8:1–7PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes, definitions of pain terms (1994) In Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors, Task Force on Taxonomy of the IASP, 2nd Edition, Seattle, WA, IASP Press 209–214 Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes, definitions of pain terms (1994) In Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors, Task Force on Taxonomy of the IASP, 2nd Edition, Seattle, WA, IASP Press 209–214
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, et al. (2005) Randomized trial comparing the Prolene hernia system, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38PubMedCrossRef Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, et al. (2005) Randomized trial comparing the Prolene hernia system, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147PubMedCrossRef Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237:142–147PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno-Egea A, Martinez JAT, Cuenca GM, et al. (2004) Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Arch Surg 139:1376–1379PubMedCrossRef Moreno-Egea A, Martinez JAT, Cuenca GM, et al. (2004) Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty. Arch Surg 139:1376–1379PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravichandran D, Kalambe BG, Pain JA (2000) Pilot randomized controlled study of preservation or division of ilioinguinal nerve in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 87:1166–1167PubMedCrossRef Ravichandran D, Kalambe BG, Pain JA (2000) Pilot randomized controlled study of preservation or division of ilioinguinal nerve in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 87:1166–1167PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, et al. (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170PubMedCrossRef O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, et al. (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nienhuijs SW, Remijn EE, Rosman C (2005) Hernia repair in elderly patients under unmonitored local anaesthesia is feasible. Hernia 9:218–222PubMedCrossRef Nienhuijs SW, Remijn EE, Rosman C (2005) Hernia repair in elderly patients under unmonitored local anaesthesia is feasible. Hernia 9:218–222PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroder DM, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, et al. (2004) Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surg 70:132–136PubMed Schroder DM, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, et al. (2004) Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surg 70:132–136PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ceriani V, Faleschini E, Bignami P, et al. (2005) Kugel hernia repair: open “mini-invasive” technique. Personal experience on 620 patients. Hernia 9:344–347PubMedCrossRef Ceriani V, Faleschini E, Bignami P, et al. (2005) Kugel hernia repair: open “mini-invasive” technique. Personal experience on 620 patients. Hernia 9:344–347PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenoglio ME, Bermas HR, Haun WE, et al. (2005) Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach. Hernia 9:160–161PubMedCrossRef Fenoglio ME, Bermas HR, Haun WE, et al. (2005) Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach. Hernia 9:160–161PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dogru O, Girgin M, Bulbuller N, et al. (2006) Comparison of Kugel and Lichtenstein operations for inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 30:346–350PubMedCrossRef Dogru O, Girgin M, Bulbuller N, et al. (2006) Comparison of Kugel and Lichtenstein operations for inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized study. World J Surg 30:346–350PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Misawa T, Sakurai M, Kanai H, et al. (2005) Kugel herniorrhaphy: clinical results of 124 consecutive operations. Surg Today 35:639–644PubMedCrossRef Misawa T, Sakurai M, Kanai H, et al. (2005) Kugel herniorrhaphy: clinical results of 124 consecutive operations. Surg Today 35:639–644PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nienhuijs S, Kortmann B, Boerma M, et al. (2004) Preferred mesh-based inguinal hernia repair in a teaching setting. Results of a randomized study. Arch Surg 139:1097–1100PubMedCrossRef Nienhuijs S, Kortmann B, Boerma M, et al. (2004) Preferred mesh-based inguinal hernia repair in a teaching setting. Results of a randomized study. Arch Surg 139:1097–1100PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pain after Open Preperitoneal Repair versus Lichtenstein Repair: A Randomized Trial
verfasst von
Simon Nienhuijs
Erik Staal
Mariël Keemers-Gels
Camiel Rosman
Luc Strobbe
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9090-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2007

World Journal of Surgery 9/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.