Background
Posterior choroidal leiomyoma (CL) is a rare tumor, to our knowledge, less than 10 cases reported in the literature [
1‐
7]. Clinically, the diagnosis of CL is challenging and the differential diagnosis includes amelanotic choroidal melanoma, atypical hemangioma, schwannoma, neurilemmoma, and other neuroderived neoplasms in several clinicopathologic aspects. A rare variant of intraocular leiomyoma has been described with both myogenic and neurogenic histologic features [
8], referred as mesectodermal leiomyoma because of its presumed origin from the neural crest. As for its rarity and ability to camouflage as melanoma, enucleation was common management for intraocular leiomyoma in most of the previous reports. Herein we report 2 cases of CL in young woman and the results of local excision treatment.
Discussion and conclusions
Posterior choroidal leiomyoma is extremely rare and is very difficult to be differentiated clinically, especially the amelanotic melanoma. Even with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), A- and B-scan ultrasonography [
9] and fluorescein angiogram, CL still difficult to distinguish from amelanotic choroidal melanoma, RPE adenoma or metastasis. Thus far, there are less than 10 cases reported the neoplasm was located exclusively in the posterior choroid [
1‐
7].
Of these cases of CL described above, 6 underwent enucleation due to the malignant tumors were considered to be diagnosed clinically [
2,
3,
6,
7]. In another case, because a single case report without considering the malignant tumor occurred in a young patient, the biopsy specimens was performed using pars plana vitrectomy, thereby providing the correct diagnosis [
5]. Shields et al. described the main clinical and pathological features of leiomyoma of the ciliary body and the choroid, based on 7 cases and 17 literature reviews [
4]. In our two cases, compared with the previous personal observation results, some unique features to our case are described.
Microscopically, the intraocular tumor is composed of interlacing bundles of spindle cells and blunt-ended oval nuclei, with moderate amount of fibrous cytoplasm. On trichrome staining, there was no significant difference between intercellular myoglial fibrils and neurofibrils of Schwann cell tumor. Mitosis is rarely present. Many CL lesions showed a muscular appearance under light microscopy.
In addition, immunohistochemistry showed that the expression of smooth muscle actin and muscle specific actin were consistent in the two tumors mentioned in this report. The immunohistochemical results of our cases are consistent with those of smooth muscle tumors.
Local excision was performed in two patients by the 23 to 25-gauge mircoinvasive vitrectomy and reconstruction of the eyeball. No serious complications such as hemorrhage occurred during the operation. The retinas were well attached with silicone oil 3 months after operation. Follow-up for 2 years, there was no sign of tumor recurrences or retinal detachment. The best corrected visual acuity of the two patients were 20/66 and 20/100 respectively.
Neither of our patients developed metastasis.
In summary, we described 2 cases of CL, a rare, benign neoplasm which arises exclusively in the posterior choroid. Clinically, CL mimics malignant (metastasis and choroidal melanoma) and benign lesions. Under light microscopy, it is similar to the neural tumors, so muscular immunohistochemical markers and morphology should be carefully evaluated before the confirmed diagnosis.
And, if a tumor is suspected benign or malignant is uncertain, especially if the tumor is mainly located in the choroid, local resection is a reasonable treatment to its management, in that it preserves eye structure and remains visual function. However, optimal treatment methods of choroidal leiomyoma remain to be determined. More cases are needed to analyze the characteristics for more precise differentiation from other tumors, prognosis and appropriate therapeutic options.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.