Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2021

07.09.2020 | Original Article

Patient, Physician, and Procedure Characteristics Are Independently Predictive of Polyp Detection Rates in Clinical Practice

verfasst von: Nicole G. Jawitz, Ziad F. Gellad, Li Lin, Richard K. Wood, David A. Leiman

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 8/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Variability in colon polyp detection impacts patient outcomes. However, the relative influence of physician, patient, and procedure-specific factors on polyp detection is unclear. Therefore, determining how these factors contribute to adenoma and sessile serrated polyp (SSP) detection is important to contextualize measures of colonoscopy quality such as adenoma detection rate and patient outcomes.

Aims

To determine the relative contribution of physician, patient, and procedure-specific factors in total polyp, adenoma, and SSP detection rates.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy and used a two-level generalized linear mixed regression model to identify factors associated with polyp detection.

Results

7799 average risk screening colonoscopies were performed between July 2016 and October 2017. The patient factor most strongly associated with increased risk of adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection was white race (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05–1.39 and OR 3.17, 95% CI 2.34–4.30, respectively). Adenomatous (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04–3.57) and sessile serrated polyps (OR 5.56, 95% CI 1.37–20.0) were more likely to be found during procedures performed with anesthesia care as compared to those with moderate sedation. Physician with a luminal gastrointestinal focus had increased odds of adenoma detection (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.02–2.50).

Conclusions

In a multi-level model accounting for clustering effects, we identified patient, provider and procedural factors independently influence adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection. Our findings suggest that to compare polyp detection rates between endoscopists, even at the same institution, risk adjustment by characteristics of the patient population and practice is necessary.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803 (Epub 05/14/2010). Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803 (Epub 05/14/2010).
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:739–750 (Epub 02/26/2009). Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:739–750 (Epub 02/26/2009).
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306 (Epub 04/04/2014). Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1298–1306 (Epub 04/04/2014).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Groff RJ, Nash R, Ahnen DJ. Significance of serrated polyps of the colon. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008;10:490–498 (Epub 09/19/2008). Groff RJ, Nash R, Ahnen DJ. Significance of serrated polyps of the colon. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008;10:490–498 (Epub 09/19/2008).
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai JH, Liau JY, Lin YL, et al. Traditional serrated adenoma has two pathways of neoplastic progression that are distinct from the sessile serrated pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:1375–1385 (Epub 03/08/2014). Tsai JH, Liau JY, Lin YL, et al. Traditional serrated adenoma has two pathways of neoplastic progression that are distinct from the sessile serrated pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:1375–1385 (Epub 03/08/2014).
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada A, Notohara K, Aoyama I, et al. Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenoma and other serrated colorectal polyps. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:45–51 (Epub 04/23/2011) Yamada A, Notohara K, Aoyama I, et al. Endoscopic features of sessile serrated adenoma and other serrated colorectal polyps. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:45–51 (Epub 04/23/2011)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, et al. Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1661–1674 (Epub 02/10/2019). Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, et al. Magnitude, risk factors, and factors associated with adenoma miss rate of tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1661–1674 (Epub 02/10/2019).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross WA, Thirumurthi S, Lynch PM, et al. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards? Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:567–574 (Epub 01/15/2015). Ross WA, Thirumurthi S, Lynch PM, et al. Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards? Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:567–574 (Epub 01/15/2015).
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehrotra A, Morris M, Gourevitch RA, et al. Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:778–786.CrossRef Mehrotra A, Morris M, Gourevitch RA, et al. Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:778–786.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaminski MF, Anderson J, Valori R, et al. Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut. 2016;65:616–624.CrossRef Kaminski MF, Anderson J, Valori R, et al. Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut. 2016;65:616–624.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541 (Epub 12/15/2006). Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541 (Epub 12/15/2006).
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kushnir VM, Oh YS, Hollander T, et al. Impact of retroflexion vs second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:415–422.CrossRef Kushnir VM, Oh YS, Hollander T, et al. Impact of retroflexion vs second forward view examination of the right colon on adenoma detection: a comparison study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:415–422.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1528–1545 (Epub 09/17/2014). Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1528–1545 (Epub 09/17/2014).
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Leiman DA, Jawitz NG, Lin L, et al. Terminal ileum intubation is not associated with colonoscopy quality measures. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 (Epub 02/01/2020). Leiman DA, Jawitz NG, Lin L, et al. Terminal ileum intubation is not associated with colonoscopy quality measures. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 (Epub 02/01/2020).
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1714–1723. (quiz 24).CrossRef Clark BT, Rustagi T, Laine L. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1714–1723. (quiz 24).CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Almadi MA, Alharbi O, Azzam N, et al. Bowel preparation quality between hospitalized patients and outpatient colonoscopies. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:93–99.CrossRef Almadi MA, Alharbi O, Azzam N, et al. Bowel preparation quality between hospitalized patients and outpatient colonoscopies. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:93–99.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC, et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:463–485.CrossRef Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC, et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:463–485.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy. 2014;46:203–211.CrossRef Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy. 2014;46:203–211.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Horvath MM, Winfield S, Evans S, et al. The DEDUCE guided query tool: providing simplified access to clinical data for research and quality improvement. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44:266–276.CrossRef Horvath MM, Winfield S, Evans S, et al. The DEDUCE guided query tool: providing simplified access to clinical data for research and quality improvement. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44:266–276.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu Y, Chen K, Xu L, et al. Diagnostic yield is not influenced by the timing of screening endoscopy: morning versus afternoon. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:365–369.CrossRef Xu Y, Chen K, Xu L, et al. Diagnostic yield is not influenced by the timing of screening endoscopy: morning versus afternoon. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:365–369.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfinger R, O’Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul. 1993;48:233–243.CrossRef Wolfinger R, O’Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simul. 1993;48:233–243.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A, et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:376–380 (Epub 12/06/2012). Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A, et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:376–380 (Epub 12/06/2012).
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:3–16 (Epub 12/07/2014). Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:3–16 (Epub 12/07/2014).
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta N. How to improve your adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:1054–1057.CrossRef Gupta N. How to improve your adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:1054–1057.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Botteri E, Iodice S, Bagnardi V, et al. Smoking and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:2765–2778.CrossRef Botteri E, Iodice S, Bagnardi V, et al. Smoking and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:2765–2778.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh MP, Muthukuru S, Jobanputra Y, et al. Proximal sessile serrated adenomas are more prevalent in caucasians, and gastroenterologists are better than nongastroenterologists at their detection. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:6710931 (Epub 02/07/2018). Parikh MP, Muthukuru S, Jobanputra Y, et al. Proximal sessile serrated adenomas are more prevalent in caucasians, and gastroenterologists are better than nongastroenterologists at their detection. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:6710931 (Epub 02/07/2018).
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Figueiredo JC, Crockett SD, Snover DC, et al. Smoking-associated risks of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps in the colorectum. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26:377–386.CrossRef Figueiredo JC, Crockett SD, Snover DC, et al. Smoking-associated risks of conventional adenomas and serrated polyps in the colorectum. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26:377–386.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Fedewa SA, Anderson JC, Robinson CM, et al. Prevalence of ‘one and done’ in adenoma detection rates: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Endosc Int Open. 2019;7:E1344–E1354 (Epub 11/02/2019). Fedewa SA, Anderson JC, Robinson CM, et al. Prevalence of ‘one and done’ in adenoma detection rates: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Endosc Int Open. 2019;7:E1344–E1354 (Epub 11/02/2019).
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Crockett SD, Gourevitch RA, Morris M, et al. Endoscopist factors that influence serrated polyp detection: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2018;50:984–992.CrossRef Crockett SD, Gourevitch RA, Morris M, et al. Endoscopist factors that influence serrated polyp detection: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2018;50:984–992.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarvepalli S, Garber A, Rothberg MB, et al. Association of adenoma and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rates with endoscopist characteristics. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:627–635 (Epub 04/18/2019). Sarvepalli S, Garber A, Rothberg MB, et al. Association of adenoma and proximal sessile serrated polyp detection rates with endoscopist characteristics. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:627–635 (Epub 04/18/2019).
35.
Zurück zum Zitat East JE, Bassett P, Arebi N, et al. Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:456–463.CrossRef East JE, Bassett P, Arebi N, et al. Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:456–463.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gralnek IM, Carr-Locke DL, Segol O, et al. Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:472–479.CrossRef Gralnek IM, Carr-Locke DL, Segol O, et al. Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:472–479.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Fu L, Dai M, Liu J, et al. Study on the influence of assistant experience on the quality of colonoscopy: a pilot single-center study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e17747.CrossRef Fu L, Dai M, Liu J, et al. Study on the influence of assistant experience on the quality of colonoscopy: a pilot single-center study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e17747.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Azer SA. Challenges facing the detection of colonic polyps: What can deep learning do? Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55:473.CrossRef Azer SA. Challenges facing the detection of colonic polyps: What can deep learning do? Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55:473.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, et al. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1466–1471 (Epub 04/20/2011). Gurudu SR, Ratuapli SK, Leighton JA, et al. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1466–1471 (Epub 04/20/2011).
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wernli KJ, Brenner AT, Rutter CM, et al. Risks associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:888–894. (quiz e18. Epub 12/29/2015). Wernli KJ, Brenner AT, Rutter CM, et al. Risks associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:888–894. (quiz e18. Epub 12/29/2015).
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Bielawska B, Hookey LC, Sutradhar R, et al. Anesthesia assistance in outpatient colonoscopy and risk of aspiration pneumonia, bowel perforation, and splenic injury. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:77–85 (Epub 09/04/2017). Bielawska B, Hookey LC, Sutradhar R, et al. Anesthesia assistance in outpatient colonoscopy and risk of aspiration pneumonia, bowel perforation, and splenic injury. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:77–85 (Epub 09/04/2017).
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Turse EP, Dailey FE, Bechtold ML. Impact of moderate versus deep sedation on adenoma detection rate in index average-risk screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:502–505 (Epub 05/19/2019). Turse EP, Dailey FE, Bechtold ML. Impact of moderate versus deep sedation on adenoma detection rate in index average-risk screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;90:502–505 (Epub 05/19/2019).
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Bannert C, Reinhart K, Dunkler D, et al. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1837–1848 (Epub 11/14/2012). Bannert C, Reinhart K, Dunkler D, et al. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1837–1848 (Epub 11/14/2012).
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Thirumurthi S, Raju GS, Pande M, et al. Does deep sedation with propofol affect adenoma detection rates in average risk screening colonoscopy exams? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:177–182 (Epub 05/04/2017). Thirumurthi S, Raju GS, Pande M, et al. Does deep sedation with propofol affect adenoma detection rates in average risk screening colonoscopy exams? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;9:177–182 (Epub 05/04/2017).
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Weiss JE, et al. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1188–1194 (Epub 02/06/2017). Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Weiss JE, et al. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1188–1194 (Epub 02/06/2017).
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Janne PA, Mayer RJ. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1960–1968 (Epub 06/30/2000). Janne PA, Mayer RJ. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1960–1968 (Epub 06/30/2000).
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Davenport JR, Su T, Zhao Z, et al. Modifiable lifestyle factors associated with risk of sessile serrated polyps, conventional adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Gut. 2018;67:456–465 (Epub 11/18/2016). Davenport JR, Su T, Zhao Z, et al. Modifiable lifestyle factors associated with risk of sessile serrated polyps, conventional adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Gut. 2018;67:456–465 (Epub 11/18/2016).
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JY, Chang HS, Kim TH, et al. Association between cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption and sessile serrated polyps in subjects 30 to 49 years old. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:1551–1560 (Epub 11/27/2018). Lee JY, Chang HS, Kim TH, et al. Association between cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption and sessile serrated polyps in subjects 30 to 49 years old. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:1551–1560 (Epub 11/27/2018).
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Lee JY, Hwang SW, et al. Risk factors of traditional serrated adenoma and clinicopathologic characteristics of synchronous conventional adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 (Epub 05/08/2019). Kim J, Lee JY, Hwang SW, et al. Risk factors of traditional serrated adenoma and clinicopathologic characteristics of synchronous conventional adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 (Epub 05/08/2019).
Metadaten
Titel
Patient, Physician, and Procedure Characteristics Are Independently Predictive of Polyp Detection Rates in Clinical Practice
verfasst von
Nicole G. Jawitz
Ziad F. Gellad
Li Lin
Richard K. Wood
David A. Leiman
Publikationsdatum
07.09.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06592-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2021

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

ADT zur Radiatio nach Prostatektomie: Wenn, dann wohl länger

24.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Welchen Nutzen es trägt, wenn die Strahlentherapie nach radikaler Prostatektomie um eine Androgendeprivation ergänzt wird, hat die RADICALS-HD-Studie untersucht. Nun liegen die Ergebnisse vor. Sie sprechen für länger dauernden Hormonentzug.

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

So sicher sind Tattoos: Neue Daten zur Risikobewertung

22.05.2024 Melanom Nachrichten

Das größte medizinische Problem bei Tattoos bleiben allergische Reaktionen. Melanome werden dadurch offensichtlich nicht gefördert, die Farbpigmente könnten aber andere Tumoren begünstigen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.