nach oben

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Erschienen in:

01.04.2018 | Original Research Article

Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization

verfasst von: Danielle L. Mosby, Matthew J. Manierre, Steve S. Martin, Paul Kolm, A. Sami Abuzaid, Claudine T. Jurkovitz, Daniel J. Elliott, William S. Weintraub

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Bridging the Divides (Bridges), a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-funded program, developed a post-hospitalization care management infrastructure integrating information technology-enabled informatics with patient care for ischemic heart disease patients. The objective of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the Bridges program and determine the patient characteristics associated with higher satisfaction.

Methods

All adult English-speaking patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction and agreed to participate in the Bridges program were eligible. A survey instrument was administered to address patient satisfaction of care received, aspects of care that patients appreciated, and challenges faced. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and primary analyses included comparisons of overall patient satisfaction after discharge between procedure type, and according to age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidity count, and length of stay.

Results

Four hundred and sixty-seven (46%) had complete or partial response rates. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall satisfaction among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.023). There were significant procedure by sex (p = 0.052) and procedure by age (p = 0.039) interactions. There were no statistically significant differences in overall satisfaction according to age, sex, race, comorbidity count, or length of stay.

Conclusions

This study identified several important components related to patient satisfaction for patients with ischemic heart disease. Results found that patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were reportedly “very satisfied” when compared with patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction, as well as significant age and sex interactions between procedures.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1921–31.CrossRefPubMed

Mann RK, Siddigui Z, Kurbanova N, Qayyum R. Effect of HCAHPS reporting on patient satisfaction with physician communication. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(2):105–10.CrossRefPubMed

HCAHPS hospital survey (n.d). Available from: http://www.hcahpsonline.org/home.aspx. Accessed 26 Jul 2016.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. HCAHPS: patients’ perspectives of care survey (2014). Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS.html. Accessed 28 Jul 2016.

Langdorf MI, Kazzi AA, Marwah RS, Bauche J. Monetary resident incentives: effect on patient satisfaction in an academic emergency department. Cal J Emerg Med. 2005;1:8–13.

Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Jaffe D, Bindman AB. Primary care physicians’ experience of financial incentives in managed-care systems. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1516–21.CrossRefPubMed

Boulding W, Glickman SW, Manary MP, Schulman KA, Staelin R. Relationships between patient satisfaction with inpatient care and hospital readmission within 30 days. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(1):41–8.PubMed

Glickman SW, Boulding W, Manary M, Staelin R, Roe MT, Wolosin RJ, Ohman M, Peterson ED, Schulman KA. Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:188–95.CrossRefPubMed

Goldstein JN, Hicks L, Kolm P, Weintraub WS, Elliott DJ. Is the care transitions measure associated with readmission risk? Analysis from a single academic center. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(7):732–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130–9.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tijssen JGP, Kolm P. Demystifying the new statistical recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(2):231–3.CrossRefPubMed

12.

StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station (TX): StataCorp LP;2015.

13.

Lindguist R, Dupuis G, Terrin ML, Hoogwerf B, Czajkowski S, Herd JA, Barton FB, Tracy MF, Hunninghake DB, Treat-Jacobson D, Shumaker S, Zyzanski S, Goldenberg I, Knatterud GL, POST CABG Biobehavioral Study Investigators. Comparison of health-related quality of life outcomes of men and women after coronary artery bypass surgery through 1 year: findings from the Post CABG Biobehavioral Study. Am Heart J. 2003;146(6):1038–44.CrossRef

14.

Vaccarino V, Lin ZQ, Kasl SV, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Abramson JL, Krumholz HM. Sex differences in health status after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation. 2003;108(21):2642–7.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Seto TB, Taira DA, Berezin R, Chauhan MS, Cutlip DE, Ho KK, Kuntz RE, Cohen DJ. Percutaneous coronary revascularization in elderly patients: impact on functional status and quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:955–8.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Graham MM, Norris CM, Galbraith PD, Knudtson ML, Ghali WA, APPROACH Investigators. Quality of life after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Eur Heart J. 2006;14:1690–8.CrossRef

17.

Taherzadeh G, Filippo DE, Kelly S, van Engen-Verheul M, Peek N, Oh P, Grace SL. Patient reported outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation: what do we know about program satisfaction? A review. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2015;35:1–10.CrossRef

18.

Wurgler MW, Sonne LT, Kilsmark J, Voss H, Sogaard J. Danish heart patients’ participation in and experience with rehabilitation. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(2):126–32.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Soja AMB, Zwisler AD, Nissen NK, Rasmussen S, Melchor T, Hommel E. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improves self-estimated health and patient satisfaction: important factors in future risk factor and lifestyle management. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(1):523.

20.

Fatima K, Yousuf-ul-Islam M, Ansari M, Bawany FI, Khan MS, Khetpal A, Khetpal N, Lashari MN, Arshad MH, Amir RB, Kakalia HR, Zaidi QH, Mian SK, Kazani B. Comparison of postprocedural quality of life between coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:7842514.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Fan VS, Reiber GE, Diehr P, Burman M, McDonell MB, Fihn SD. Functional status and patient satisfaction: a comparison of ischemic heart disease, obstructive lung disease, and diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(5):452–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):2–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Groves RM. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q. 2006;70:646–75.CrossRef

24.

Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(9):1351–9.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization
verfasst von: Danielle L. Mosby
Matthew J. Manierre
Steve S. Martin
Paul Kolm
A. Sami Abuzaid
Claudine T. Jurkovitz
Daniel J. Elliott
William S. Weintraub
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2018
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0274-4

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

The Primacy of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Tracheostomy Care

Evaluation of Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Medication Safety

Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Ventral Hernia Repair: Designing a Qualitative Assessment Tool

A Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Experiences with a Tracheostomy

Symptom Monitoring in Pediatric Oncology Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: Why, How, and Where Next