Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 1/2000

01.12.2000 | Original Research Article

Payment Systems and Considerations of Case Mix — Are Diagnosis-Related Groups Applicable in Japan?

verfasst von: Koichi Kawabuchi

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Sonderheft 1/2000

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective: Cost containment is a large concern. Japanese medical institutions operate on a fee-for-service basis, giving few incentives for healthcare providers to control the number of procedures performed or to save the healthcare costs. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) in Japan, since systems that employ DRGs provide these incentives.
Design and setting: Three types of data (patient discharge, hospital cost and hospital characteristics data) were collected from 17 acute general hospitals in Japan.
These data were used to calculate variance (R2) for length of stay for each of 3 US-based DRG systems [health care financing administration (HCFA)-DRG, all patient (AP)-DRG, all-patient refined (APR)-DRG] in order to determine which of the systems is most appropriate for use in Japan to classify patients. We also examined the financial impact for hospitals through budget simulations when DRG is used as a payment tool.
Main outcome measures and results: Of the DRG alternatives examined, we have found that the AP-DRGs are the preferred alternative. The data in Japan are not sufficiently complete to support the APR-DRGs, and we believe that the HCFA-DRGs are not as clinically sophisticated as the AP-DRGs and may not be as well accepted by the medical community. As there is a clear intention in Japan of developing Japanese-specific DRGs, the AP-DRGs represent a sound starting point for this effort.
Our work demonstrates that basing payments on DRGs is partially feasible for Japan. This means that the treated case was found to be feasible as the unit of payment.
Conclusion: Changing to a prospective payment system in Japan will give hospitals powerful incentives to become more efficient. This, in turn, will open hospital capacity, which should assist Japan in providing the care needed by an aging population in a cost-effective way.
Fußnoten
1
‘Severity of illness’ refers to the relative levels of loss of function and mortality that may be experienced by patients with a particular disease. ‘Prognosis’ refers to the probable outcome of an illness, including the likelihood of improvement or deterioration in the severity of the illness, the likelihood for recurrence and the probable life span. ‘Treatment difficulty’ refers to the patient management problems which a particular illness presents to the healthcare provider. Such management problems are associated with illnesses without a clear pattern of symptoms, illnesses requiring sophisticated and technically difficult procedures, and illnesses requiring close monitoring and supervision. ‘Need for intervention’ refers to the consequences in terms of severity of illness that lack of immediate or continuing care would produce. ‘Resource intensity’ refers to the relative volume and types of diagnostic, therapeutic and bed services used in the man-agement of a particular illness.
 
2
The data grouping results were reviewed by 3M HIS’s coding and grouping expert Dr Robert Mullin.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Management and Coordination Agency, 1995 Census Bulletin. Institute of Population Problems, Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW). Projected future population in Japan. Tokyo: MHW, 1995 Management and Coordination Agency, 1995 Census Bulletin. Institute of Population Problems, Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW). Projected future population in Japan. Tokyo: MHW, 1995
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Statistics and Information Department. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW). National health care expenditure, 1997. Tokyo: MHW, 1997 Statistics and Information Department. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW). National health care expenditure, 1997. Tokyo: MHW, 1997
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Statistics and Information Department. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW). Patient survey, 1996. Tokyo: MHW,1996 Statistics and Information Department. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW). Patient survey, 1996. Tokyo: MHW,1996
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Physician Payment Review Commission (PPRC). Annual report to Congress, 1997. Washington: PPRC, 1997 Physician Payment Review Commission (PPRC). Annual report to Congress, 1997. Washington: PPRC, 1997
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Newhouse JP, Manning WG, Keeler EB, et al. Adjusting capitation rates using objective health measures and prior utilisation. Health Care Financ Rev 1989: 10 (3): 41-54PubMed Newhouse JP, Manning WG, Keeler EB, et al. Adjusting capitation rates using objective health measures and prior utilisation. Health Care Financ Rev 1989: 10 (3): 41-54PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Averill R, Muldoon JM, Vertrees JC, et al. The evolution of case mix measurement using diagnosis related groups. Internal Working Paper. 3MHealth Information Systems, 1998:Working Paper 10-97 Averill R, Muldoon JM, Vertrees JC, et al. The evolution of case mix measurement using diagnosis related groups. Internal Working Paper. 3MHealth Information Systems, 1998:Working Paper 10-97
Metadaten
Titel
Payment Systems and Considerations of Case Mix — Are Diagnosis-Related Groups Applicable in Japan?
verfasst von
Koichi Kawabuchi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2000
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2000
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200018001-00012

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2000

PharmacoEconomics 1/2000 Zur Ausgabe

Concluding Remarks

Concluding Remarks