Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2020

17.11.2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Payment to gamete donors: equality, gender equity, or solidarity?

verfasst von: C. Samorinha, C. De Freitas, I. Baía, H. Machado, E. Vale-Fernandes, S. Silva

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Regulation of payment to gamete donors varies substantially across countries. The development of an ethically sustainable governance system of payments in gamete donation demands that the preferences of different stakeholders be heard. This study intends to contribute to improving the understanding of payment to gamete donors by analysing the views of donors and recipients about the preferred form of payment and its associations with their sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 70 donors and 172 recipients recruited at the Portuguese Public Bank of Gametes (July 2017–June 2018). Participants completed a self-reported questionnaire. Views about the preferred form of payment were collected through a multiple-choice question and an open-ended item. Associations were quantified through χ2 tests; content analysis was conducted with the open-ended answers.

Results

Both donors (48.6%) and recipients (40.7%) considered that reimbursement is the preferred form of payment to ensure solidarity-based motivations to donate. This option was followed by compensation for non-financial losses (41.4% of donors; 33.7% of recipients) based on gender equity. Preference for a fixed reward (22.7% of recipients; 8.6% of donors) was less frequent among younger donors and married/living with a partner or employed recipients, being based on the promotion of equality.

Conclusion

In the context of the search for cross-border reproductive care and gamete circulation across countries, the findings from this study claim for the need to create solutions for payment to gamete donors that take into account gender equity and are simultaneously sensitive to donor’s actual expenses and further health complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human bodies: donation for medicine and research. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2011. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human bodies: donation for medicine and research. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2011.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Blyth E, Yee S. Ka tat Tsang a. perspectives of Canadian oocyte donors and recipients on donor compensation and the establishment of a personal health information registry. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:72–9.CrossRef Blyth E, Yee S. Ka tat Tsang a. perspectives of Canadian oocyte donors and recipients on donor compensation and the establishment of a personal health information registry. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:72–9.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:e15–9. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:e15–9.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings G. Central role of altruism in the recruitment of gamete donors. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015;33:78–88.CrossRef Pennings G. Central role of altruism in the recruitment of gamete donors. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2015;33:78–88.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, III. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;17:1407–8.CrossRef ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law, III. Gamete and embryo donation. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;17:1407–8.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Waldby C, Kerridge I, Boulos M, Carroll K. From altruism to monetisation: Australian women’s ideas about money, ethics and research eggs. Soc Sci Med. 2013;94:34–42.CrossRef Waldby C, Kerridge I, Boulos M, Carroll K. From altruism to monetisation: Australian women’s ideas about money, ethics and research eggs. Soc Sci Med. 2013;94:34–42.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MS, Farland L, Missmer S, Ginsburg ES. Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey. Fertil Steril. 2016;107:1355–63.CrossRef Lee MS, Farland L, Missmer S, Ginsburg ES. Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey. Fertil Steril. 2016;107:1355–63.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalampalikis N, Haas V, Fieulaine N, Doumergue M, Deschamps G. Giving or giving back: new psychosocial insights from sperm donors in France. Psychol Health Med. 2013;18:1–9.CrossRef Kalampalikis N, Haas V, Fieulaine N, Doumergue M, Deschamps G. Giving or giving back: new psychosocial insights from sperm donors in France. Psychol Health Med. 2013;18:1–9.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Prainsack B. The “we” in the “me”: solidarity and health care in the era of personalized medicine. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2018;43:21–44.CrossRef Prainsack B. The “we” in the “me”: solidarity and health care in the era of personalized medicine. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2018;43:21–44.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Purewal S, van den Akker OBA. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:499–515.CrossRef Purewal S, van den Akker OBA. Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:499–515.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings G, Vayena E, Ahuja K. Balancing ethical criteria for the recruitment of gamete donors. In: Richards M, Pennings G, Appleby J, editors. Reproductive donation: policy, practice, and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 150–67.CrossRef Pennings G, Vayena E, Ahuja K. Balancing ethical criteria for the recruitment of gamete donors. In: Richards M, Pennings G, Appleby J, editors. Reproductive donation: policy, practice, and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 150–67.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva SP, De Freitas C, Baía I, Samorinha C, Machado H, Silva S. Doação de gâmetas: questões sociais e éticas (não) respondidas em Portugal. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35:e00122918.CrossRef Silva SP, De Freitas C, Baía I, Samorinha C, Machado H, Silva S. Doação de gâmetas: questões sociais e éticas (não) respondidas em Portugal. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35:e00122918.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Cross-border reproductive care: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1627–33.CrossRef Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Cross-border reproductive care: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1627–33.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ministério da Saúde. Despacho n.° 3192/2017. Diário da República, 2.ª Série - N.°75; 2017; 7192–7193. Ministério da Saúde. Despacho n.° 3192/2017. Diário da República, 2.ª Série - N.°75; 2017; 7192–7193.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Assembleia da República. Artigo 205.°, Alteração ao Decreto-Lei n.° 113/2011, de 29 de novembro. Diário da República, 1.ª série - N.° 62; 2016; 1096-(70). Assembleia da República. Artigo 205.°, Alteração ao Decreto-Lei n.° 113/2011, de 29 de novembro. Diário da República, 1.ª série - N.° 62; 2016; 1096-(70).
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva S, Barros H. Perspectives on access to in vitro fertilization in Portugal. Rev Saúde Públ. 2012;46:344–50.CrossRef Silva S, Barros H. Perspectives on access to in vitro fertilization in Portugal. Rev Saúde Públ. 2012;46:344–50.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrd LM, Sidebotham M, Lieberman B. Egg donation - the donor’s view: an aid to future recruitment. Hum Fertil. 2002;5:175–82.CrossRef Byrd LM, Sidebotham M, Lieberman B. Egg donation - the donor’s view: an aid to future recruitment. Hum Fertil. 2002;5:175–82.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ravelingien A, Provoost V, Wyverkens E, Buysse A, De Sutter P, Pennings G. Recipients’ views on payment of sperm donors. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:225–31.CrossRef Ravelingien A, Provoost V, Wyverkens E, Buysse A, De Sutter P, Pennings G. Recipients’ views on payment of sperm donors. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:225–31.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Espirito Santo E, Oliveira JBA, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RLR, Franco JG Jr. A survey on public opinion regarding financial incentives for oocyte donation in Brazil. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2013;17:173–9. Espirito Santo E, Oliveira JBA, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Baruffi RLR, Franco JG Jr. A survey on public opinion regarding financial incentives for oocyte donation in Brazil. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2013;17:173–9.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kool EM, Bos AME, Van Der Graaf R, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL. Ethics of oocyte banking for third- party assisted reproduction: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:615–35.CrossRef Kool EM, Bos AME, Van Der Graaf R, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL. Ethics of oocyte banking for third- party assisted reproduction: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:615–35.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sills ES, Collins GS, Walsh DJ, Omar AB, Salma U, Walsh APH. A descriptive study of selected oocyte, blood and organ/tissue donation features among fertility patients in Ireland. Hum Fertil. 2010;13:98–104.CrossRef Sills ES, Collins GS, Walsh DJ, Omar AB, Salma U, Walsh APH. A descriptive study of selected oocyte, blood and organ/tissue donation features among fertility patients in Ireland. Hum Fertil. 2010;13:98–104.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyall H, Gould GW, Cameron IT. Should sperm donors be paid? A survey of the attitudes of the general public. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(3):771–5.CrossRef Lyall H, Gould GW, Cameron IT. Should sperm donors be paid? A survey of the attitudes of the general public. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(3):771–5.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2001;7:1–9. Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2001;7:1–9.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Isasi RM, Knoppers BM. Monetary payments for the procurement of oocytes for stem cell research: in search of ethical and political consistency. Stem Cell Res. 2007;1:37–44.CrossRef Isasi RM, Knoppers BM. Monetary payments for the procurement of oocytes for stem cell research: in search of ethical and political consistency. Stem Cell Res. 2007;1:37–44.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimet GD. Behavioral research on biomedical sexual health technologies: opportunities and directions. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;42:12–3.CrossRef Zimet GD. Behavioral research on biomedical sexual health technologies: opportunities and directions. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;42:12–3.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ives J, Dunn M, Molewijk B, Schildmann J, Bærøe K, Frith L, et al. Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):68.CrossRef Ives J, Dunn M, Molewijk B, Schildmann J, Bærøe K, Frith L, et al. Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus. BMC Med Ethics. 2018;19(1):68.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Prainsack B, Buyx A. Ethics of healthcare policy and the concept of solidarity. In: Kuhlmann E, Blank RH, Bourgeault IL, Wendt C, editors. The Palgrave international handbook of healthcare policy and governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 649–64.CrossRef Prainsack B, Buyx A. Ethics of healthcare policy and the concept of solidarity. In: Kuhlmann E, Blank RH, Bourgeault IL, Wendt C, editors. The Palgrave international handbook of healthcare policy and governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 649–64.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Polo A, Trullenque M, Esteve C, Coll O. Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;17:237–43.CrossRef Bodri D, Guillen JJ, Polo A, Trullenque M, Esteve C, Coll O. Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;17:237–43.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer W, Schneider J, Schultz N. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychologic issues. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3144–9.CrossRef Kramer W, Schneider J, Schultz N. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychologic issues. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:3144–9.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, et al. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:450–65.CrossRef Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, et al. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:450–65.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tourangeau R. Defining hard-to-survey populations. In: Tourangeau R, Edwards B, Johnson TP, Wolter KMand Bates N, editors. Hard-to-survey populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 3–20.CrossRef Tourangeau R. Defining hard-to-survey populations. In: Tourangeau R, Edwards B, Johnson TP, Wolter KMand Bates N, editors. Hard-to-survey populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 3–20.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Salama M, Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Westphal LM, et al. Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1277–88.CrossRef Salama M, Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Westphal LM, et al. Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1277–88.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Payment to gamete donors: equality, gender equity, or solidarity?
verfasst von
C. Samorinha
C. De Freitas
I. Baía
H. Machado
E. Vale-Fernandes
S. Silva
Publikationsdatum
17.11.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01625-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Hirsutismus bei PCOS: Laser- und Lichttherapien helfen

26.04.2024 Hirsutismus Nachrichten

Laser- und Lichtbehandlungen können bei Frauen mit polyzystischem Ovarialsyndrom (PCOS) den übermäßigen Haarwuchs verringern und das Wohlbefinden verbessern – bei alleiniger Anwendung oder in Kombination mit Medikamenten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Durch die Häufung nach der COVID-19-Pandemie sind Infektionen mit dem Respiratorischen Synzytial-Virus (RSV) in den Fokus gerückt. Fachgesellschaften empfehlen eine Impfung inzwischen nicht nur für Säuglinge und Kleinkinder.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.