Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control 4/2017

21.02.2017 | Original paper

Personalized medicine for prevention: can risk stratified screening decrease colorectal cancer mortality at an acceptable cost?

verfasst von: Sujha Subramanian, Georgiy Bobashev, Robert J. Morris, Sonja Hoover

Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Tailored health care interventions are expected to transform clinical practice. The objective of this study was to develop an innovative model to assess the effectiveness, cost, and harms of risk stratified colorectal cancer screening.

Methods

We updated a previously validated microsimulation model consisting of three interlinked components: risk assessment, natural history, and screening/treatment modules. We used data from representative national surveys and the literature to create a synthetic population that mimics the family history and genetic profile of the US population. We applied risk stratification based on published risk assessment tools to triage individuals into five risk categories: high, increased, medium, decreased, and low.

Results

On average, the incremental cost of risk stratified screening for colorectal cancer compared to the current approach at 60% and 80% compliance rates is $18,342 and $23,961 per life year gained. The harms in terms of false positives and perforations are consistently lower for personalized scenarios across all compliance rates. False positives are reduced by more than 47.0% and perforations by at least 9.9%. There is considerable uncertainty in the life years gained, but the reduction in harms remains stable under all scenarios.

Conclusion

A key finding is that risk stratified screening can reduce harms at all levels of compliance. Therefore, selection of screening scenarios should include comprehensive comparisons of mortality, harms from screening, and cost. This study provides guidance for evaluating risk stratified cancer screening and further research is required to identify optimal implementation approaches in the real-world setting.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabatino S, White M, Thompson T, Klabunde C (2013) Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC). Cancer screening test use—United States, 2013. MMWR 64(17):464–468 Sabatino S, White M, Thompson T, Klabunde C (2013) Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC). Cancer screening test use—United States, 2013. MMWR 64(17):464–468
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB (2006) Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines. CEBP 15(1):108–113 Fisher JA, Fikry C, Troxel AB (2006) Cutting cost and increasing access to colorectal cancer screening: another approach to following the guidelines. CEBP 15(1):108–113
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2010) When budgets are tight, there are better options than colonoscopies for colorectal cancer screening. Health Aff 29(9):1734–1740CrossRef Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2010) When budgets are tight, there are better options than colonoscopies for colorectal cancer screening. Health Aff 29(9):1734–1740CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, Anderson DS, Day L, Deshpande AR et al (2014) Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. JNCI 106(4):dju032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, Anderson DS, Day L, Deshpande AR et al (2014) Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. JNCI 106(4):dju032CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheuner MT, McNeel TS, Freedman AN (2010) Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California health interview survey. Genet Med 12(11):726–735CrossRefPubMed Scheuner MT, McNeel TS, Freedman AN (2010) Population prevalence of familial cancer and common hereditary cancer syndromes. The 2005 California health interview survey. Genet Med 12(11):726–735CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wijnen JT, Vasen HF, Khan PM, Zwinderman AH, van der Klift H, Mulder A, et al (1998) Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer. NEJM 339(8):511–518CrossRefPubMed Wijnen JT, Vasen HF, Khan PM, Zwinderman AH, van der Klift H, Mulder A, et al (1998) Clinical findings with implications for genetic testing in families with clustering of colorectal cancer. NEJM 339(8):511–518CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman AN, Slattery ML, Ballard-Barbash R, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility. JCO 27(5):686–693CrossRef Freedman AN, Slattery ML, Ballard-Barbash R, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility. JCO 27(5):686–693CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Park Y, Freedman AN, Gail MH, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Validation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction model among white patients age 50 years and older. JCO 27(5):694–698CrossRef Park Y, Freedman AN, Gail MH, Willis G, Cann BJ, Pee D et al (2009) Validation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction model among white patients age 50 years and older. JCO 27(5):694–698CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma GK, Ladabaum U (2014) Personalizing colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of models to predict risk of colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1624–1634(10):e1621 Ma GK, Ladabaum U (2014) Personalizing colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of models to predict risk of colorectal neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1624–1634(10):e1621
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells BJ, Kattan MW, Cooper GS, Jackson L, Koroukian S (2014) Colorectal cancer predicted risk online (CRC-PRO) calculator using data from the multi-ethnic cohort study. JABFM 27(1):42–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wells BJ, Kattan MW, Cooper GS, Jackson L, Koroukian S (2014) Colorectal cancer predicted risk online (CRC-PRO) calculator using data from the multi-ethnic cohort study. JABFM 27(1):42–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Levitzky BE, Brown CC, Heeren TC, Schroy PC 3rd (2011) Performance of a risk index for advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia among a racially/ethnically diverse patient population. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1099–1106CrossRefPubMed Levitzky BE, Brown CC, Heeren TC, Schroy PC 3rd (2011) Performance of a risk index for advanced proximal colorectal neoplasia among a racially/ethnically diverse patient population. Am J Gastroenterol 106(6):1099–1106CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM (2000) Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 284(15):1954–1961CrossRefPubMed Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM (2000) Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. JAMA 284(15):1954–1961CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ladabaum U, Song K (2005) Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 129(4):1151–1162CrossRefPubMed Ladabaum U, Song K (2005) Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 129(4):1151–1162CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2009) Modeling the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: policy guidance based on patient preferences and compliance. CEBP 18(7):1971–1978 Subramanian S, Bobashev G, Morris RJ (2009) Modeling the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: policy guidance based on patient preferences and compliance. CEBP 18(7):1971–1978
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal S, Bhupinderjit A, Bhutani MS, Boardman L, Nguyen C, Romero Y et al (2005) Colorectal cancer in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol 100(3):515–523. (discussion 514)CrossRefPubMed Agrawal S, Bhupinderjit A, Bhutani MS, Boardman L, Nguyen C, Romero Y et al (2005) Colorectal cancer in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol 100(3):515–523. (discussion 514)CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Winawer SJ et al (2009) Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race. Gastrointest Endosc 96–108(108):e101–e124 Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Boer R, Wilschut J, Winawer SJ et al (2009) Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race. Gastrointest Endosc 96–108(108):e101–e124
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Muc-Wierzgon M, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Dziegielewska-Gesiak S, Kokot T, Klakla K, Fatyga E et al (2014) Specific metabolic biomarkers as risk and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(29):9759–9774CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Muc-Wierzgon M, Nowakowska-Zajdel E, Dziegielewska-Gesiak S, Kokot T, Klakla K, Fatyga E et al (2014) Specific metabolic biomarkers as risk and prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(29):9759–9774CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramsey SD, Burke W, Pinsky L, Clarke L, Newcomb P, Khoury MJ (2005) Family history assessment to detect increased risk for colorectal cancer: conceptual considerations and a preliminary economic analysis. CEBP 14(11 Pt 1):2494–2500 Ramsey SD, Burke W, Pinsky L, Clarke L, Newcomb P, Khoury MJ (2005) Family history assessment to detect increased risk for colorectal cancer: conceptual considerations and a preliminary economic analysis. CEBP 14(11 Pt 1):2494–2500
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubbard RA, Johnson E, Hsia R, Rutter CM (2013) The cumulative risk of false-positive fecal occult blood test after 10 years of colorectal cancer screening. CEBP 22(9):1612–1619 Hubbard RA, Johnson E, Hsia R, Rutter CM (2013) The cumulative risk of false-positive fecal occult blood test after 10 years of colorectal cancer screening. CEBP 22(9):1612–1619
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pignone M, Russell L, Wagner J (eds) (2005) Economic models of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults: workshop summary. Institute of medicine and national research council, Washington DC, USA Pignone M, Russell L, Wagner J (eds) (2005) Economic models of colorectal cancer screening in average-risk adults: workshop summary. Institute of medicine and national research council, Washington DC, USA
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM (2007) Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for Colorectal cancer. AHRQ Technology Assessment, Rockville, Maryland, USA Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM (2007) Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for Colorectal cancer. AHRQ Technology Assessment, Rockville, Maryland, USA
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ness RM, Holmes AM, Klein R, Dittus R (2000) Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages. AJG 95(7):1800–1811CrossRefPubMed Ness RM, Holmes AM, Klein R, Dittus R (2000) Cost-utility of one-time colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer at various ages. AJG 95(7):1800–1811CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu KH, Wood ME, Daniels M, Burke C, Ford J, Kauff ND et al (2014) American society of clinical oncology expert statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers. JCO 32(8):833–840CrossRef Lu KH, Wood ME, Daniels M, Burke C, Ford J, Kauff ND et al (2014) American society of clinical oncology expert statement: collection and use of a cancer family history for oncology providers. JCO 32(8):833–840CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Riley BD, Culver JO, Skrzynia C, Senter LA, Peters JA, Costalas JW et al (2012) Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 21(2):151–161CrossRefPubMed Riley BD, Culver JO, Skrzynia C, Senter LA, Peters JA, Costalas JW et al (2012) Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 21(2):151–161CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Doerr M, Teng K (2012) Family history: still relevant in the genomics era. Cleve Clin J Med 79(5):331–336CrossRefPubMed Doerr M, Teng K (2012) Family history: still relevant in the genomics era. Cleve Clin J Med 79(5):331–336CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ, Krabbe PF (2007) On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care 45(9):835–841CrossRefPubMed Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ, Krabbe PF (2007) On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care 45(9):835–841CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreira L, Balaguer F, Lindor N, de la Chapelle A, Hampel H, Aaltonen LA et al (2012) Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 308(15):1555–1565CrossRefPubMed Moreira L, Balaguer F, Lindor N, de la Chapelle A, Hampel H, Aaltonen LA et al (2012) Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 308(15):1555–1565CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Mvundura M, Grosse SD, Hampel H, Palomaki GE (2010) The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 12(2):93–104CrossRefPubMed Mvundura M, Grosse SD, Hampel H, Palomaki GE (2010) The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer. Genet Med 12(2):93–104CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Personalized medicine for prevention: can risk stratified screening decrease colorectal cancer mortality at an acceptable cost?
verfasst von
Sujha Subramanian
Georgiy Bobashev
Robert J. Morris
Sonja Hoover
Publikationsdatum
21.02.2017
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Cancer Causes & Control / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0864-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Cancer Causes & Control 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

13.05.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.

Viel pflanzliche Nahrung, seltener Prostata-Ca.-Progression

12.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Ein hoher Anteil pflanzlicher Nahrung trägt möglicherweise dazu bei, das Progressionsrisiko von Männern mit Prostatakarzinomen zu senken. In einer US-Studie war das Risiko bei ausgeprägter pflanzlicher Ernährung in etwa halbiert.

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.