Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2014

01.08.2014 | Original Research Article

Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Duloxetine in Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder

verfasst von: Evelyn D. Lobo, Tonya Quinlan, Apurva Prakash

Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Duloxetine, a selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been approved since 2004 for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). It is currently not approved for use in pediatric patients (aged <18 years) with MDD. The clinical development program for duloxetine in the pediatric MDD population, which consisted of three clinical studies, provided extensive data on the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of duloxetine across a wide dose range in pediatric patients of differing ages, sex, body weights, and sexual maturation.

Objectives

The objectives were to characterize the pharmacokinetics of duloxetine based on population modeling following daily oral administration in children and adolescents aged 7–17 years diagnosed with MDD; to estimate the magnitude of between- and within-patient variability; to identify potential patient factors affecting duloxetine pharmacokinetics, and to compare duloxetine pharmacokinetics in the pediatric population with those characterized in adults.

Methods

The analyses meta-dataset was created from pharmacokinetic and demographic data available from one phase II (open-label) and two phase III (randomized, double-blind) clinical trials of duloxetine in children and adolescents. Patients received 20–120 mg of oral duloxetine once daily. Duloxetine concentrations (a total of 1,581 concentrations) were obtained from 428 patients: 34 % were children (aged 7–11 years) and 66 % were adolescents (aged 12–18 years). Population modeling analyses were performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling and the first-order conditional estimation method with interaction. Patient factors were assessed for their potential influence on duloxetine apparent clearance (CL/F) and apparent volume of distribution (V d/F). Duloxetine pharmacokinetic parameters and model-predicted duloxetine concentrations at steady state in the pediatric population were compared with those in adults.

Results

Duloxetine pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients was described by a one-compartmental model. Typical values of CL/F, V d/F, and half-life (t 1/2) at 60 mg/day of duloxetine were 79.7 L/h, 1,200 L, and 10.4 h, respectively. The between-patient variability in CL/F and V d/F was 68 and 87 %, respectively, while within-patient variability was 57 % (proportional error) and 2.04 ng/mL (additive error). Body surface area (BSA), dose, and race had a statistically significant effect on duloxetine pharmacokinetics. With a 2.2-fold increase in BSA, the CL/F increased about twofold. A sixfold increase in dose (20 to 120 mg) decreased CL/F by 32 %. In American Indian patients, V d/F was 131 % higher than the other races combined. Age, sex, body mass index, serum creatinine, cytochrome P450 2D6 predicted phenotype, and menarche status did not have a statistically significant effect. Estimates of CL/F and V d/F were higher in the pediatric population than in adults; subsequently, the average steady-state duloxetine concentration was approximately 30 % lower in the pediatric population than in adults.

Conclusions

Duloxetine pharmacokinetics was similar in children and adolescents with MDD. The statistically significant effects of dose, BSA, and race on duloxetine pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients did not appear to be clinically meaningful. At a given dose, the typical steady-state duloxetine concentrations in the pediatric population were lower than in adults, and the distribution of steady-state duloxetine concentrations in pediatric patients were typically in the lower range of concentrations in adults.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer D, Fisher P, Dulcan MK, et al. The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA Study. Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35(7):865–77.PubMedCrossRef Shaffer D, Fisher P, Dulcan MK, et al. The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA Study. Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996;35(7):865–77.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammerness PG, Vivas FM, Gellar DA. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pediatric psychopharmacology: a review of the evidence. J Pediatr. 2006;148(2):158–65.PubMedCrossRef Hammerness PG, Vivas FM, Gellar DA. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pediatric psychopharmacology: a review of the evidence. J Pediatr. 2006;148(2):158–65.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Atuah KN, Hughes D, Pirmohamed M. Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2004;27(8):535–54.PubMedCrossRef Atuah KN, Hughes D, Pirmohamed M. Clinical pharmacology: special safety considerations in drug development and pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 2004;27(8):535–54.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Findling RL, McNamara NK, Stansbrey RJ, et al. The relevance of pharmacokinetic studies in designing efficacy trials in juvenile major depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2006;16(1–2):131–45.PubMedCrossRef Findling RL, McNamara NK, Stansbrey RJ, et al. The relevance of pharmacokinetic studies in designing efficacy trials in juvenile major depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2006;16(1–2):131–45.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Prakash A, Lobo E, Kratochvil CJ, et al. An open-label safety and pharmacokinetics study of duloxetine in pediatric patients with major depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012;22(1):48–55.PubMedCrossRef Prakash A, Lobo E, Kratochvil CJ, et al. An open-label safety and pharmacokinetics study of duloxetine in pediatric patients with major depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2012;22(1):48–55.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Emslie G, Prakash A, Zhang Q, et al. A double-blind, efficacy and safety study of duloxetine fixed doses in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014;24(4):170–9. Emslie G, Prakash A, Zhang Q, et al. A double-blind, efficacy and safety study of duloxetine fixed doses in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014;24(4):170–9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson SD, Prakash A, Zhang Q, et al. A double-blind, efficacy and safety study of duloxetine flexible dosing in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014;24(4):180–9. Atkinson SD, Prakash A, Zhang Q, et al. A double-blind, efficacy and safety study of duloxetine flexible dosing in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014;24(4):180–9.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Beal S, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, et al. NONMEM user’s guide. (1989–2011). Ellicott City (MD): Icon Development Solutions; 2011. Beal S, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann A, et al. NONMEM user’s guide. (1989–2011). Ellicott City (MD): Icon Development Solutions; 2011.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lobo ED, Quinlan T, O’Brien L, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of orally administered duloxetine in patients: implications for dosing recommendation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(3):189–97.PubMedCrossRef Lobo ED, Quinlan T, O’Brien L, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of orally administered duloxetine in patients: implications for dosing recommendation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(3):189–97.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien L, Hewitt R, Heathman M, et al. Challenging the robustness of a population pharmacokinetic model obtained from a phase III raloxifene study [abstract no. 3548.] American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences Annual Meeting; 1998 Nov 15–19; San Francisco (CA). O’Brien L, Hewitt R, Heathman M, et al. Challenging the robustness of a population pharmacokinetic model obtained from a phase III raloxifene study [abstract no. 3548.] American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences Annual Meeting; 1998 Nov 15–19; San Francisco (CA).
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Alderman J, Wolkow R, Chung M, et al. Sertraline treatment of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder or depression: pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and efficacy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37(4):386–94.PubMedCrossRef Alderman J, Wolkow R, Chung M, et al. Sertraline treatment of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder or depression: pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and efficacy. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37(4):386–94.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Findling RL, Reed MD, Myers C, et al. Paroxetine pharmacokinetics in depressed children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38(8):952–9.PubMedCrossRef Findling RL, Reed MD, Myers C, et al. Paroxetine pharmacokinetics in depressed children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999;38(8):952–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilens TE, Cohen L, Biederman J, et al. Fluoxetine pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;22(6):568–75.PubMedCrossRef Wilens TE, Cohen L, Biederman J, et al. Fluoxetine pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;22(6):568–75.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lobo ED, Bergstrom RF, Reddy S, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of cytochrome P450 1A2 interactions with duloxetine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(3):191–202.PubMedCrossRef Lobo ED, Bergstrom RF, Reddy S, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of cytochrome P450 1A2 interactions with duloxetine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(3):191–202.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Skinner MH, Kuan HY, Pan A, et al. Duloxetine is both an inhibitor and a substrate of cytochrome P4502D6 in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73(3):170–7.PubMedCrossRef Skinner MH, Kuan HY, Pan A, et al. Duloxetine is both an inhibitor and a substrate of cytochrome P4502D6 in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003;73(3):170–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Strolin Benedetti M, Baltes EL. Drug metabolism and disposition in children. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2003;17(3):281–99.PubMedCrossRef Strolin Benedetti M, Baltes EL. Drug metabolism and disposition in children. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2003;17(3):281–99.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zoloft® (sertraline hydrochloride tablets and oral concentrate) full prescribing information. Zoloft website [online]. Available at http://www.zoloft.com/. Updated 2012. Accessed May 2012. Zoloft® (sertraline hydrochloride tablets and oral concentrate) full prescribing information. Zoloft website [online]. Available at http://​www.​zoloft.​com/​. Updated 2012. Accessed May 2012.
Metadaten
Titel
Pharmacokinetics of Orally Administered Duloxetine in Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
verfasst von
Evelyn D. Lobo
Tonya Quinlan
Apurva Prakash
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-014-0149-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe