nach oben

Erschienen in:

07.06.2017 | Review

Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs

verfasst von: Suoshi Jing, Qiongyan Gai, Xin Zhao, Juan Wang, Yuwen Gong, Yangyang Pang, Chen Peng, Yuejun Tian, Yuhan Wang, Zhiping Wang

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

With an increased risk of symptomatic events, the complications related to residual fragments are complex and intractable. The management of stone fragments is a challenge to urologists. This review focused on the progress, status, and needs of the newly developed physical therapies to remove fragments and improve the stone-free rate. Physical therapies, including mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy, ultrasonic propulsion technology, glue–clot technology, and magnetization technology, will facilitate progress in endoscopic stone fragment retrieval.

Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2015) EAU guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:468–474CrossRefPubMed

Heers H, Turney BW (2016) Trends in urological stone disease: a 5-year update of hospital episode statistics. BJU Int 118:785–789CrossRefPubMed

Osman MM, Alfano Y, Kamp S et al (2005) 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 47:860–864CrossRefPubMed

Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, de la Rosette J (2006) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy 25 years later: complications and their prevention. Eur Urol 50:981–990 (discussion 990) CrossRefPubMed

Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E et al (2002) Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model. J Urol 167:1239–1242CrossRefPubMed

Sayed MA, el-Taher AM, Aboul-Ella HA et al (2001) Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management. BJU Int 88:675–678CrossRefPubMed

Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E (1996) Clinical implications of clinically insignificant store fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 155:1186–1190CrossRefPubMed

Chew BH, Brotherhood HL, Sur RL et al (2016) Natural history, complications and re-intervention rates of asymptomatic residual stone fragments after ureteroscopy: a report from the EDGE research consortium. J Urol 195:982–986CrossRefPubMed

Ganpule A, Desai M (2009) Fate of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a critical analysis. J Endourol 23:399–403CrossRefPubMed

10.

Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482CrossRefPubMed

11.

Olvera-Posada D, Ali SN, Dion M et al (2016) Natural history of residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of factors related to clinical events and intervention. Urology 97:46–50CrossRefPubMed

12.

Muller-Mattheis VG, Schmale D, Seewald M et al (1991) Bacteremia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi. J Urol 146:733–736CrossRefPubMed

13.

Tan YM, Yip SK, Chong TW et al (2002) Clinical experience and results of ESWL treatment for 3,093 urinary calculi with the Storz Modulith SL 20 lithotripter at the Singapore general hospital. Scand J Urol Nephrol 36:363–367CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ather MH, Shrestha B, Mehmood A (2009) Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications? Urol Int 83:222–225CrossRefPubMed

15.

Altunrende F, Tefekli A, Stein RJ et al (2011) Clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: medium-term follow-up. J Endourol 25:941–945CrossRefPubMed

16.

Buchholz NP, Meier-Padel S, Rutishauser G (1997) Minor residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: spontaneous clearance or risk factor for recurrent stone formation? J Endourol 11:227–232CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ozgor F, Simsek A, Binbay M et al (2014) Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results. Urolithiasis 42:533–538CrossRefPubMed

18.

Khaitan A, Gupta NP, Hemal AK et al (2002) Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth? Urology 59:20–24CrossRefPubMed

19.

Saglam R, Muslumanoglu AY, Tokatli Z et al (2014) A new robot for flexible ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2b). Eur Urol 66:1092–1100CrossRefPubMed

20.

Desai MM, Grover R, Aron M et al (2011) Robotic flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi: initial clinical experience. J Urol 186:563–568CrossRefPubMed

21.

Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS et al (2008) Flexible robotic retrograde renoscopy: description of novel robotic device and preliminary laboratory experience. Urology 72:42–46CrossRefPubMed

22.

Hein S, Miernik A, Wilhelm K et al (2016) Clinical significance of residual fragments in 2015: impact, detection, and how to avoid them. World J Urol 34:771–778CrossRefPubMed

23.

Schmidt S, Wilhelm K (2015) Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy. Urol A 54:1609–1612CrossRef

24.

Long Q, Zhang J, Xu Z et al (2015) A prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of external physical vibration lithecbole after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a lower pole renal stone <2 cm in a single center. J Urol 195:965–970CrossRefPubMed

25.

May PC, Bailey MR, Harper JD (2016) Ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones. Curr Opin Urol 26:264–270CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Harper JD, Cunitz BW, Dunmire B et al (2016) First in human clinical trial of ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones. J Urol 195:956–964CrossRefPubMed

27.

Hein S, Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K et al (2016) Novel biocompatible adhesive for intrarenal embedding and endoscopic removal of small residual fragments after minimally invasive stone treatment in an ex vivo porcine kidney model: initial evaluation of a prototype. J Urol 196:1772–1777CrossRefPubMed

28.

Cloutier J, Cordeiro ER, Kamphuis GM et al (2014) The glue–clot technique: a new technique description for small calyceal stone fragments removal. Urolithiasis 42:441–444CrossRefPubMed

29.

Tracy CR, McLeroy SL, Best SL et al (2010) Rendering stone fragments paramagnetic with iron-oxide microparticles improves the efficiency and effectiveness of endoscopic stone fragment retrieval. Urology 76(1266):e1210–e1264

30.

Kirsch E, von Ardenne M, Reitnauer PG (1965) A recently developed vibrating chair and its significance in the conservative treatment of urolithiasis. Concluding remarks. Z Urol Nephrol 58:225–236PubMed

31.

Cottet J, Wisner A (1967) Expulsive treatment of urinary calculi by externally controlled mechanical vibrations. Bull Mem Soc Med Hop Paris 119:383–388PubMed

32.

Cottet J, Wisner A, Berthoz A (1968) Application of mechanical vibrations to expulsive treatment of urinary calculi. Bull Acad Natl Med 152:111–119PubMed

33.

Golubchikov VA (1969) Method of general vibration in the therapy of ureteral calculi. Urol Nefrol (Mosk) 34:19–23

34.

Cottet J, Auvert J (1969) Expulsion treatment of urinary calculi by the association of diuresis and mechanical actions. J Urol Nephrol (Paris) 75:672–677

35.

Zomorrodi A, Golivandan J, Samady J (2008) Effect of diuretics on ureteral stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 19:397–400PubMed

36.

Chaussy C, Schuller J, Schmiedt E et al (1984) Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of urolithiasis. Urology 23:59–66CrossRefPubMed

37.

Brownlee N, Foster M, Griffith DP et al (1990) Controlled inversion therapy: an adjunct to the elimination of gravity-dependent fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 143:1096–1098CrossRefPubMed

38.

Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ et al (2001) Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 166:2065–2071CrossRefPubMed

39.

Liu LR, Li QJ, Wei Q et al (2013) Percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy for the passage of lower pole kidney stones following shock wave lithotripsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008569.pub2

40.

Lee SW, Chaiyakunapruk N, Chong HY et al (2015) Comparative effectiveness and safety of various treatment procedures for lower pole renal calculi: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJU Int 116:252–264CrossRefPubMed

41.

Kosar A, Ozturk A, Serel TA et al (1999) Effect of vibration massage therapy after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with lower caliceal stones. J Endourol 13:705–707CrossRefPubMed

42.

D’A Honey RJ, Luymes J, Weir MJ et al (2000) Mechanical percussion inversion can result in relocation of lower pole stone fragments after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 55:204–206CrossRefPubMed

43.

Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM et al (2005) Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 65:1070–1074CrossRefPubMed

44.

Albanis S, Ather HM, Papatsoris AG et al (2009) Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance? Urol Int 83:211–216CrossRefPubMed

45.

Leong WS, Liong ML, Liong YV et al (2014) Does simultaneous inversion during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy improve stone clearance: a long-term, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study. Urology 83:40–44CrossRefPubMed

46.

Shah A, Owen NR, Lu W et al (2010) Novel ultrasound method to reposition kidney stones. Urol Res 38:491–495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Shah A, Harper JD, Cunitz BW et al (2012) Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney. J Urol 187:739–743CrossRefPubMed

48.

Harper JD, Sorensen MD, Cunitz BW et al (2013) Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney: safety and efficacy of a clinical prototype device. J Urol 190:1090–1095CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM et al (2014) Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 191:235–241CrossRefPubMed

50.

Wang YN, Simon JC, Cunitz BW et al (2014) Focused ultrasound to displace renal calculi: threshold for tissue injury. J Ther Ultrasound 2:5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Maxwell AD, Cunitz BW, Kreider W et al (2015) Fragmentation of urinary calculi in vitro by burst wave lithotripsy. J Urol 193:338–344CrossRefPubMed

52.

Patel A (2008) Lower calyceal occlusion by autologous blood clot to prevent stone fragment reaccumulation after retrograde intra-renal surgery for lower calyceal stones: first experience of a new technique. J Endourol 22:2501–2506CrossRefPubMed

53.

Mir SA, Best SL, McLeroy S et al (2011) Novel stone-magnetizing microparticles: in vitro toxicity and biologic functionality analysis. J Endourol 25:1203–1207CrossRefPubMed

54.

Tan YK, Best SL, Donnelly C et al (2012) Novel iron oxide microparticles used to render stone fragments paramagnetic: assessment of toxicity in a murine model. J Urol 188:1972–1977CrossRefPubMed

55.

Tan YK, McLeroy SL, Faddegon S et al (2012) In vitro comparison of prototype magnetic tool with conventional nitinol basket for ureteroscopic retrieval of stone fragments rendered paramagnetic with iron oxide microparticles. J Urol 188:648–652CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs
verfasst von: Suoshi Jing
Qiongyan Gai
Xin Zhao
Juan Wang
Yuwen Gong
Yangyang Pang
Chen Peng
Yuejun Tian
Yuhan Wang
Zhiping Wang
Publikationsdatum: 07.06.2017
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0988-8

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Physical therapy in the management of stone fragments: progress, status, and needs

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Urologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

SaRNA-mediated activation of TRPV5 reduces renal calcium oxalate deposition in rat via decreasing urinary calcium excretion

Vitamin B6 intake and the risk of incident kidney stones

What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney

The effect of hydrodynamic and thermodynamic factors and the addition of citric acid on the precipitation of calcium oxalate dihydrate

Evaluation of stone volume distribution in renal collecting system as a predictor of stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective single-center study

Lime powder treatment reduces urinary excretion of total protein and transferrin but increases uromodulin excretion in patients with urolithiasis

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Urologie