Over the years, cancer continues to impose a heavy burden on public health and presents a challenge to science. Globally, cancer is a leading cause of death; it is believed that the growth and aging of the population will increase cancer burden, especially in Africa, Asia, Central and South American, where approximately 70% of the world’s population resides [
24,
25]. This disease has been labelled as a global menace and kills more people than AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria combined [
26,
27]. As documented by Ferlay et al., [
25], head and neck cancer accounts for over 600,000 cases yearly, with 40%–50% mortality. In fact, over half of all sufferers will eventually die of the disease [
28]. The tumours arise in the epithelial cells of the mucosal linings of the oral cavity, nasal cavity, oropharynx, pharynx and larynx, most of which are squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) [
29]. In addition to the synergistic effect of tobacco and alcohol, which is the most important risk factors for SCCHN, infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of SCCHN [
30]. Besides these exogenous risk factors, Fanconi anaemia and a more general genetic susceptibility may cause SCCHN [
30,
31]. The choice of treatment of SCCHN is largely dependent on the stage and location of tumour. The stage of the tumour is determined by the extent of the tumour, presence of lymph node metastases and distant metastases. More so, correct staging with the aid of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by a head and neck surgeon is of paramount importance in therapeutic decision making [
29]. Current treatment options include surgery and radiotherapy. However, recurrent and metastatic cancer is generally untreatable. As reviewed by Forastiere et al [
32], great strides have been made in the treatment of head and neck cancer, but existing treatment options are still faced with one or more challenges. Noteworthy is the invasiveness of surgical methods and chemotherapeutic agents toxicity; both usually accompanied with severe side effect on non-target cells. Certainly, there is an unmet need for development or exploration of alternative and complementary treatment options. Based on extensive literature search, it could be opined that the use of monotherapy and surgery, as often the case, might not be exhaustive and efficacious treatment for cancer. Consequently, an important area researchers and clinicians should focus SCCHN investigations into is the application of phytopharmacology in managing, curing or ameliorating treatment-induced toxic effects.
Medicinal plants are made up of various chemical constitutes that works independently, supplement or in synergy to improve health [
3]. These natural plant-derived medicines that have been used in the remedy of various health problems, have a safe profile, they are gentle, cost-effective and easily accessible; and this has encouraged self-medication without consulting a medical practitioner [
33‐
36].
While the exact molecular mechanisms by which medicinal plants mediate their chemo-preventive (cancer preventive) properties are still unclear, it has been suggested that the mechanism of medicinal plant-derived chemo-prevention may be due to the presence of phytocompounds (which may work in a synergistic/combinatorial manner) with strong antioxidant and antiproliferative properties [
37]. Similarly, it has been reported that the chemical constituents of medicinal plants can induce apoptosis, possess anti-inflammatory, anti-hormonal and immune-enhancing effect. They can also induce cell cycle arrest, cell differentiation, suppression of cellular proliferation and angiogenesis; as well as inhibiting secondary modification and development of the neoplastic cells [
38].
It has been suggested that phytocompounds can carry out their antioxidant activities by lowering free radical production through metal chelation and free radical scavenging [
22,
39]. In addition, phytocompounds can reduce mitochondrial damage and fission, thereby enhancing the electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation [
39]. The transcription factor nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) can be activated and translocated to the nucleus, by polyphenols (e.g., hydroxytyrosol), where it can transactivate antioxidant enzymes and phase II genes, by binding antioxidant response elements promoters [
38,
39]. Anti-inflammatory effect of phytocompounds have been linked to downmodulation of proinflammatory cytokines, prostaglandins, NF-κB, nitric oxides, as well as inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and other pro-inflammatory genes [
39]. Furthermore, hydroxytyrosol has been found to influence cellular energetics by increasing the expression of respiratory chain mitochondrial complexes (I-V) and overall mitochondrial function [
39].