Background
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is the most crucial ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family member in breast cancer with overexpression in about one fourth of patients [
1]. Since HER2 plays a key role in HER2-positive breast cancer, these patients usually have bad prognosis, and HER2-related target drugs have been the foundation of treatment. Trastuzumab, a HER2 monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of the molecule, has been a new standard in neo-adjuvant, adjuvant and palliative treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer [
1‐
3]. However, trastuzumab mono-therapy shows a response rate of no more than 30% in palliative setting [
4], and there is still a problem of primary or acquired resistance even with combination regimens. HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells are dependent on or "addictive" to the Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway [
5]. Published literatures showed that PI3K pathway activation is associated with primary resistance to trastuzumab, and trastuzumab exerts its antitumor effects only in the presence of a normal PI3K pathway [
6‐
11].
PI3K pathway is one of the most important signaling pathways in cell, which is involved in many fundamental cellular processes, including proliferation, cell survival, motility and cell growth [
12,
13]. Class IA PI3K, the most important member of the PI3K complex, is composed of a heterodimer with a p85 regulatory subunit and a p110 catalytic subunit (PIK3CA), residing downstream of multiple receptor kinase families including ErbB RTK family (EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4) and transducing signals originating from them [
12,
13]. Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) is a phosphotase that converts membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) back to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and negatively regulates signaling transduction of PI3K pathway [
14,
15]. It is well known that dysregulation of PI3K pathway plays an important role in the development of malignancy, and the most common genetic alterations in this pathway are PIK3CA mutation and PTEN loss [
16,
17], both of which can lead to constitutive activation of PI3K pathway and resistance to trastuzumab [
7]. PTEN-related resistance to trastuzumab can be reversed by combined treatment with trastuzumab and the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 [
18]. Therefore, PI3K pathway activation resulting from PIK3CA mutation and/or PTEN loss warrants further studies.
Up to now, little knowledge is available about the correlation between PI3K pathway status and efficacy and resistance of the other FDA-approved anti-HER2 agent, lapatinib. Laptinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR and HER2, binds to the intracellular kinase domain [
19]. It has no cross-resistance with trastuzumab since it is effective against breast cancer expressing p95HER2 [
20], an active truncated form of HER2 and with HER2 epitope masked by mucin 4 [
21]. Clinical data have shown the safety and efficacy of lapatinib alone and in combination with capecitabine, paclitaxel and letrozole and it is still effective in patients who have progressed on trastuzumab [
22‐
24]. Therefore, the HER2 pathway is still an "addictive" oncogenic pathway in breast cancer pretreated with trastuzumab. However, several recent papers touching on PI3K pathway activation and lapatinib resistance conflicted with each other [
18,
25‐
29], so we conducted this study to explore their correlation and the protocol was approved by the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Institutional review board on June 30, 2008.
Methods
Patient Eligibility and Study Design
A global lapatinib Expanded Access Program was started to offer preapproval drug in order to provide clinical benefit to patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had progressive diseases on treatment with regimens including anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab. Trastuzumab had to be used in metastatic setting. Tumors with either 3+ immunohistochemical staining for HER2 protein or HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization were defined as HER2 positive in our institution. Women previously treated with capecitabine were eligible. Patients were required to have evaluable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) within the institution's normal range; a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks; and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function. patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases were eligible if they were clinically stable for at least 3 months after discontinuation of radiation therapy. patients with preexisting heart disease or conditions that could affect gastrointestinal absorption were ineligible. All patients gave written informed consent on recruitment into the global lapatinib Expanded Access Program and provision of the primary tumor sample for this translational study(
http://ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00338247).
In this one-arm study, all patients receive the combination regimen consisting of lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg daily on a continuous basis and capecitabine at a dose of 2000 mg per square meter of body-surface area in two divided doses on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle. Standard recommendations for capecitabine dosage modifications were followed in the management of adverse events. Lapatinib was withheld for up to 14 days for grade 2 or more nonhematologic toxicity or any grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity. Patients were assessed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks, and then every 12 weeks while they were still receiving the study treatment. Patients who had no progressive disease but whose study treatment was withdrawn were assessed every 12 weeks until the commencement of alternative anticancer treatment, disease progression, or death. Efficacy was determined according to the RECIST criteria. Adverse events were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 3.0). The clinical benefit was defined as a complete response, partial response, or stable disease for at least 6 months. Progression-free survival was calculated as the interval between the date of signing informed consent and the date of disease progression, or death from any cause.
PCR Sequencing and PIK3CA Mutation
DNA was extracted from formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. PCR were performed with 10 to 100 ng of genomic DNA as template following a standard protocol. PIK3CA gene PCR primers were E9F CAAAGCAATTTCTACACGAGATCC; E9R GTAAAAACATGCTGAGATCAGCCACAT; E20F TGGAATGCCAGAACTACAATCTTT; E20R GGTCTTTGCCTGCTGAGAGTT. The PCR products were sequenced using the ABI3130XL automated capillary sequencer by Shanghai Tianhao Biotechnology Company.
Immunohistochemistry and PTEN Scoring
The antibody for PTEN IHC staining was a rabbit monoclonal anti-PTEN (D4.3) XPTM (Cell Signaling Beverly, MA, USA) diluted 1:200. The antibody was applied overnight at 4ºC. Then the tissues were incubated with the second antibody (1:500, Jackson lab) for 30 min. The color was developed with DAB solution about 1 min at room temperature and then stained in Harris hematoxylin solution for 3 min. Each set of slides included positive and negative control slides and normal cells in a tumor were used as an internal control.
PTEN immunoreactivity was examined by two independent observers who were blinded to the clinical data. A third pathologist was invited when the discordance was present between them. The staining was mainly visible in the cytoplasm of tumor cells. PTEN expression levels were semiquantified using immunoreactive scores (IRS) calculated by multiplying the percentage of PTEN-positive tumor cells (scored 0 to 4) with the PTEN staining intensity [
1‐
3]. The tumor was graded as PTEN-negative (IRS 0-3), weak positive (IRS 4-6), positive (IRS 7-9), and strong positive (IRS 10-12)[
6].
Statistical Analysis
The relationships between different variables were assessed by Chi-square tests and the trends were also examined by Chi-square tests when required. Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups were determined using the log-rank test. After a univariate analysis, the variables with significant correlation with PFS and OS, continuous variables and PI3K pathway status were put in a Cox proportional hazard regression model to determine which was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS, respectively. The statistical difference was considered significant if the P value was less than 0.05.
Discussion
PI3K pathway activation is the most common signal transduction pathway alteration in malignancies, including breast cancer [
30]. It mostly results from PIK3CA mutation or amplification, PTEN loss [
16]. Since the patients enrolled in this study were HER2-positive and high-level PIK3CA amplification without mutation is rare in this subpopulation [
31,
32], so only PIK3CA mutation and PTEN loss were determined for the samples in our study.
Our data showed that PIK3CA mutation occurred in 12.3% of the patients, lower than 8-40% reported in other studies [
33‐
38]. There are several reasons. First, only two exons accounting for approximately 85% of all mutations were determined in our study [
33]. Second, mutation correlates with an old age and this phenomenon was confirmed by our study [
39]. However, the median age of our patients was 49.0 years, about 10 years younger than Caucasian counterparts [
39]. Third, the mutation was reported to occur more frequently in HER2-negative patients [
39,
40], however, all patients in our study were HER2-positive.
Regarding mutations in hot spots, two common mutation points, H1047R and E542K were also present in our patients with no mutation of E545K observed [
37,
39]. As to mutations in non-hot spots, two new points, L540F and T1052A mutations were first reported based on our knowledge. An analysis of our data showed that the ratio of hot spots to non-hot spots was 2.5 to 1, which is consistent with other reports [
39]. Since there were only a few patients with the new mutation, our result needed further confirmation by other studies. Therefore, it remains a question whether the new mutation in non-hot spots results in an activation of PI3K pathway. As in other studies, these patients were considered to have a mutated gene in the analysis [
39].
PTEN is a tumor suppressor gene, and can be down-regulated or lost of expression via deletion (common in breast cancer), mutation (rare in breast cancer), or promoter DNA methylation [
14,
41,
42]. Loss of PTEN expression results in activation of PI3K pathway leading to development of cancer [
15,
41]. PTEN loss is present in about one third of breast cancer patients, ranging from 15% to 48% [
43‐
46]. Our study showed that the incidence of PTEN loss was 31.6%, which is consistent with other reported results.
Previous reports suggested that PIK3CA mutation and PTEN loss were mutually exclusive [
37]. However, in 4 patients with H1047R mutations in our study, 3 patients were also found to have no PTEN expression. This fact was previously reported by Perez-Tenorio et al in 2009 [
40]. PI3K mutation was indicated to be associated with ER positivity, HER2 negativity and primary tumor size, which were not observed in our study [
37,
39,
40].
An analysis of our data showed that patients with PI3K pathway activation had a statistically significant shorter median PFS than those with no PI3K pathway activation (4.5 versus 9.0 months, P = 0.013), confirming the reported conclusion that PI3K pathway activation can result in resistance to trastuzumab [
6‐
10]. Based on the published preclinical studies, these patients should be sensitive to lapatinib, a drug with a different mechanism of action [
47]. There were some clinical data demonstrating that lapatinib induced objective responses in patients who had failed trastuzumab [
22]. However, all patients were treated with lapatinib and capecitabine in our study, and PI3K pathway activation was still correlated with a lower clinical benefit rate (36.4% versus 68.6%, P = 0.017) and a lower overall response rate (9.1% versus 31.4%, P = 0.05), which is consistent with results of a smaller study reported by Cizkova et al [
48]. Campone [
49] et al pointed out that acquisition of resistance is frequently linked to an uncoupling between upstream signals emanating from HER2 itself and downstream signals related to PI3K, AKT and/or MAPK. Two studies showed that both knockdown of PTEN and transfection of mutant PIK3CA can result in lapatinib resistance and the mTOR/PI3K inhibitor, NVP-BEZ235 can reverse the resistance [
26,
50].
However, there are also a few converse opinions. Based on the experimental results, O'Brien et al showed that lapatinib could overcome trastuzumab resistance via continued deactivation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling [
51]. A Japanese clinical study recruiting 122 patients attempted to illustrate the relationship between PI3K pathway activation and efficacy of lapatinib, but PIK3CA mutation was only found in 3 tissue samples among all 29 analyzed samples [
52]. Recently, Toi et al indicated that low PTEN could predict response to lapatinib in a small phase 2 neoadjuvant trial [
53]. Therefore, a definite conclusion regarding the PI3K pathway status and anti-HER2 therapy cannot be drawn up to now, and our study justifies further research.
It remains controversial whether the two gene alterations have any prognostic value. Li et al suggested that PIK3CA mutation was a negative prognostic factor [
35]. On the contrary, a larger sample size study and a Japanese study indicated that it was a positive prognostic factor [
36,
39]. Barbareschi [
54] et al reported that mutation in exon 20 usually indicated good prognosis, while the mutation in exon 9 often meant bad prognosis. Perez-Tenorio [
40] et al suggested that the two gene alterations should be combined with S phase fraction to give an accurate prediction of prognosis. Recently, Dupont Jensen [
55] et al showed that there is a discrepancy of PIK3CA mutation between primary and metastatic tumors, urging on a simultaneous detection of the two matched samples. For the prognostic value of PTEN, it is relatively uniform and most investigators thought that PTEN loss is a negative prognostic factor [
56,
57]. Our data showed that it was statistically associated with clinical benefit rate (P = 0.021). Due to a relatively smaller sample size of our study, no significant correlations between PI3K pathway status and clinicopathological parameters were found.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
LW designed the study, carried out the experiments, statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. QZ contributed equally. JZ, SS, HG, ZJ, BW, ZS and ZW participated in the clinical work. XH proposed this study, organized the research team, interpreted all the data, and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.