Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 3/2015

01.06.2015 | Research Article

Potential drug–drug interactions in hospitalized patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study

verfasst von: Paula Stoll, Luciane Kopittke

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background Adverse drug–drug interactions (DDI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in susceptible populations. Cancer patients are a population at high risk for DDI especially because they commonly receive several drugs concomitantly. The knowledge about the most common interactions between drugs used in oncology inpatients is essential to reduce drug-related problems and increase the safety and efficacy of the therapy. Objective To assess the frequency of potential DDI throughout the hospital stay of cancer patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy, describe their epidemiology, and identify risk factors for major DDI. Setting An oncology–hematology inpatient unit of a public hospital in southern Brazil. Method Drug prescriptions were prospectively reviewed throughout the hospital stay of patients admitted for systemic chemotherapy. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression were used for data analysis. Main outcome measure Potential DDI and their characteristics. Results The cohort consisted of 113 patients, who used a mean of 8.9 ± 2.7 drugs/day. All patients had at least one potential DDI (median, 7.0/patient; 25th–75th percentile, 3.5–12.0), and 46 % of the patients had at least one DDI classified as major, i.e. that it may result in death, hospitalization, permanent injury, or therapeutic failure. Only 13.7 % of all interactions involved antineoplastic agents, identified in 62.8 % of patients. Most interactions were of moderate severity, 6.4 % were major, and 8.5 % had a recommendation for therapy modification. Multivariate analysis revealed mean number of drugs prescribed [relative risk (RR) for each additional drug: 1.12; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.17; P < 0.01] and age ≥60 years (RR 1.48; 95 % CI 1.03–2.14; P < 0.01) as independent risk factors for major DDI. Conclusion Potential DDI were highly frequent in this cohort. Older age and number of drugs prescribed were more likely to lead to major interactions. Prospective surveillance is required to detect adverse DDI, aiming primarily at reducing the risk of toxicity or treatment failure.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartshorn EA. Drug interaction: 1. General considerations. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:116–8.CrossRefPubMed Hartshorn EA. Drug interaction: 1. General considerations. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:116–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Blower P, de Wit R, Goodin S, Aapro M. Drug–drug interactions in oncology: why are they important and can they be minimized? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;55:117–42.CrossRefPubMed Blower P, de Wit R, Goodin S, Aapro M. Drug–drug interactions in oncology: why are they important and can they be minimized? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;55:117–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Riechelmann RP, Moreira F, Smaletz O, Saad ED. Potential for drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005;56:286–90.CrossRefPubMed Riechelmann RP, Moreira F, Smaletz O, Saad ED. Potential for drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005;56:286–90.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Haddad A, Davis M, Lagman R. The pharmacological importance of cytochrome CYP3A4 in the palliation of symptoms: review and recommendations for avoiding adverse drug interactions. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:251–7.CrossRefPubMed Haddad A, Davis M, Lagman R. The pharmacological importance of cytochrome CYP3A4 in the palliation of symptoms: review and recommendations for avoiding adverse drug interactions. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:251–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Riechelmann RP, Saad ED. A systematic review on drug interactions in oncology. Cancer Invest. 2006;24:704–12.CrossRefPubMed Riechelmann RP, Saad ED. A systematic review on drug interactions in oncology. Cancer Invest. 2006;24:704–12.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Riechelmann RP, Zimmermann C, Chin SN, et al. Potential drug interactions in cancer patients receiving supportive care exclusively. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2008;35:535–43.CrossRef Riechelmann RP, Zimmermann C, Chin SN, et al. Potential drug interactions in cancer patients receiving supportive care exclusively. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2008;35:535–43.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Riechelmann RP, Tannock IF, Wang L, Saad ED, Taback NA, Krzyzanowska MK. Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:592–600.CrossRefPubMed Riechelmann RP, Tannock IF, Wang L, Saad ED, Taback NA, Krzyzanowska MK. Potential drug interactions and duplicate prescriptions among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:592–600.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansman FG, Reyners AK, van Roon EN, et al. Consensus-based evaluation of clinical significance and management of anticancer drug interactions. Clin Ther. 2011;33:305–14.CrossRefPubMed Jansman FG, Reyners AK, van Roon EN, et al. Consensus-based evaluation of clinical significance and management of anticancer drug interactions. Clin Ther. 2011;33:305–14.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Riechelmann RP, Del Giglio A. Drug interactions in oncology: how common are they? Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1907–12.CrossRefPubMed Riechelmann RP, Del Giglio A. Drug interactions in oncology: how common are they? Ann Oncol. 2009;20:1907–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Voll ML, Yap KD, Terpstra WE, Crul M. Potential drug–drug interactions between anti-cancer agents and community pharmacy dispensed drugs. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:575–80.CrossRefPubMed Voll ML, Yap KD, Terpstra WE, Crul M. Potential drug–drug interactions between anti-cancer agents and community pharmacy dispensed drugs. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:575–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Leeuwen RW, Swart EL, Boven E, Boom FA, Schuitenmaker MG, Hugtenburg JG. Potential drug interactions in cancer therapy: a prevalence study using an advanced screening method. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2334–41.CrossRefPubMed van Leeuwen RW, Swart EL, Boven E, Boom FA, Schuitenmaker MG, Hugtenburg JG. Potential drug interactions in cancer therapy: a prevalence study using an advanced screening method. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2334–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hadjibabaie M, Badri S, Ataei S, Moslehi AM, Karimzadeh I, Ghavamzadeh A. Potential drug–drug interactions at a referral hematology–oncology ward in Iran: a cross-sectional study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:1619–27.CrossRefPubMed Hadjibabaie M, Badri S, Ataei S, Moslehi AM, Karimzadeh I, Ghavamzadeh A. Potential drug–drug interactions at a referral hematology–oncology ward in Iran: a cross-sectional study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71:1619–27.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrons R. Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61:380–5.PubMed Barrons R. Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61:380–5.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Reis AM, Cassiani SH. Evaluation of three brands of drug interaction software for use in intensive care units. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:822–8.CrossRefPubMed Reis AM, Cassiani SH. Evaluation of three brands of drug interaction software for use in intensive care units. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:822–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krähenbuhl S, Beer JH. Evaluation of frequently used drug interaction screening programs. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:367–74.CrossRefPubMed Vonbach P, Dubied A, Krähenbuhl S, Beer JH. Evaluation of frequently used drug interaction screening programs. Pharm World Sci. 2008;30:367–74.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V, et al. Potential medication problems in older newly diagnosed cancer patients in Canada during cancer treatment: a prospective pilot cohort study. Drugs Aging. 2010;27:559–72.CrossRefPubMed Puts MT, Monette J, Girre V, et al. Potential medication problems in older newly diagnosed cancer patients in Canada during cancer treatment: a prospective pilot cohort study. Drugs Aging. 2010;27:559–72.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Egger SS, Drewe J, Schlienger RG. Potential drug–drug interactions in the medication of medical patients at hospital discharge. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;58:773–8.PubMed Egger SS, Drewe J, Schlienger RG. Potential drug–drug interactions in the medication of medical patients at hospital discharge. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;58:773–8.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sokol KC, Knudsen JF, Li MM. Polypharmacy in older oncology patients and the need for an interdisciplinary approach to side-effect management. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:169–75.CrossRefPubMed Sokol KC, Knudsen JF, Li MM. Polypharmacy in older oncology patients and the need for an interdisciplinary approach to side-effect management. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2007;32:169–75.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Miranda V, Fede A, Nobuo M, et al. Adverse drug reactions and drug interactions as causes of hospital admission in oncology. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;42:342–53.CrossRef Miranda V, Fede A, Nobuo M, et al. Adverse drug reactions and drug interactions as causes of hospital admission in oncology. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;42:342–53.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Riechelmann RP. Drug combinations with the potential to interact among cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:1113–4.CrossRefPubMed Riechelmann RP. Drug combinations with the potential to interact among cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:1113–4.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Peral Aguirregoitia J, Lertxundi Etxebarria U, Martínez Bengoechea MJ, Mora Atorrasagasti O, Franco Lamela E, Gabilondo Zelaia I. Prospective assessment of drug interactions in hospitalized patients using a computer programme. Farm Hosp. 2007;31:93–100.CrossRefPubMed Peral Aguirregoitia J, Lertxundi Etxebarria U, Martínez Bengoechea MJ, Mora Atorrasagasti O, Franco Lamela E, Gabilondo Zelaia I. Prospective assessment of drug interactions in hospitalized patients using a computer programme. Farm Hosp. 2007;31:93–100.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Norton PG, Baker GR. Patient safety in cancer care: a time for action. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:579–80.CrossRefPubMed Norton PG, Baker GR. Patient safety in cancer care: a time for action. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:579–80.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaboli PJ, Hoth AB, McClimon BJ, Schnipper JL. Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:955–64.CrossRefPubMed Kaboli PJ, Hoth AB, McClimon BJ, Schnipper JL. Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:955–64.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bremberg ER, Hising C, Nylén U, Ehrsson H, Eksborg S. An evaluation of pharmacist contribution to an oncology ward in a Swedish hospital. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2006;12:75–81.CrossRefPubMed Bremberg ER, Hising C, Nylén U, Ehrsson H, Eksborg S. An evaluation of pharmacist contribution to an oncology ward in a Swedish hospital. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2006;12:75–81.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavero Rodrigo E, Climente Martí M, Navarro Fontestad MC, Jiménez Torres NV. Quality assessment of two pharmaceutical care models for oncohaematological patients. Farm Hosp. 2007;31:231–7.CrossRefPubMed Cavero Rodrigo E, Climente Martí M, Navarro Fontestad MC, Jiménez Torres NV. Quality assessment of two pharmaceutical care models for oncohaematological patients. Farm Hosp. 2007;31:231–7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Potential drug–drug interactions in hospitalized patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy: a prospective cohort study
verfasst von
Paula Stoll
Luciane Kopittke
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Elektronische ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0083-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.