Pre-transplant FLT3/ITD status predicts outcome in FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) is expressed by myeloid and lymphoid progenitors, and it is responsible for differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis of the cells. Internal tandem duplication in the juxtamembrane domain of FLT3 (FLT3/ITD) is frequent molecular aberration which is detected in approximately 30% of the patients with acute myeloid leukemia and normal diploid karyotype (AML-CN). This mutation leads to ligand-independent activation of the receptor and its signaling pathways [1]. Many studies have demonstrated that the occurrence of FLT3/ITD mutation in AML remains a poor prognostic factor owing for high relapse rate and shortened survival [2, 3]. However, it was recently shown that this aberration produces a negative effect only if the ratio of mutated to normal alleles is > 0.5 [4].

The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) in FLT3-mutated patients in the first complete remission (CR1) seems to be controversial, especially in the view of the newest findings in the molecular signature of AML. The assessment of FLT3/ITD allelic ratio and co-occurrence of NPM1 mutation have a confirmed impact on risk stratification and therapeutic approaches [4‐6]. The results from the donor versus no donor study of adult patients with FLT3/ITD mutation treated according to the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (UK MRC) AML protocol have demonstrated lower relapse rate for patients with donor, but no difference in overall survivals (OS) between compared groups [7]. It was also found that FLT3-mutated patients when compared with FLT3-unmutated had higher relapse incidence (RI) and lower leukemia-free survival (LFS) even after Allo-SCT. Nevertheless, more than 50% of the transplanted patients carrying this mutation were leukemia free at 2 years. Of note is that other predictors than FLT3/ITD mutation may play a role in leukemia relapse after transplantation [8]. The FLT3/ITD mutation may serve as a marker of minimal residual disease (MRD), and its utility has been evaluated in a single study so far [9].

The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential factors which may have an impact on a post-transplant outcome in FLT3-mutated patients with AML following Allo-SCT.

The study patients were retrospectively identified through the use of our institutional database of medical records. The diagnosis of AML and response criteria to therapy were based on European Leukemia Net Recommendations [4]. Marrow aplasia (MA) was defined as pancytopenia with bone marrow aplasia after salvage chemotherapy. Patients were treated according to Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG) protocol [www.​palg.​witaj.​pl] and induction chemotherapy included DA+/− C regimen (daunorubicin, cytarabine, cladribine). For those who achieved complete remission, 2 cycles of consolidative chemotherapy consisting of mitoxantrone with cytarabine (HAM) or cytarabine alone (ARA-C) were administered. For patients with resistant disease (RD) after 2 inductions, 3 different salvage regimens were given according to the treating physician: CLAM (cladribine, cytarabine, mitoxantrone), MEC (mitoxantrone, etoposide, cytarabine), and FLAG-IDA (fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, G-CSF). All patients who were FLT3-mutated at diagnosis were proceeded to Allo-SCT according to the center policy.

The FLT3/ITD and nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutation analysis were performed at diagnosis, and FLT3/ITD was then performed before conditioning commencement and at day + 30 after procedure. Multiplex fluorescence-based PCR method was performed on DNA isolated from bone marrow aspirate sample as described elsewhere. The sensitivity of this assay is approximately 5% [10]. All patients were grouped according to the molecular and cytogenetic genetic stratification of the European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2010 [11] as most AML patients (38/43) were diagnosed < 2017. Data on FLT3/ITD allelic ratio was available only for 4 patients, and therefore this parameter was not analyzed. Chimerism of unseparated blood leukocytes was assessed by a short tandem repeat polymerase chain reaction.

Beneficial role of Allo-SCT in FLT3-mutated AML patients in CR1 remains unclear as these patients had poor prognosis even after procedure. Of note is that the presented data are limited by selection bias and the small number of included patients [7, 8]. To light up this controversy, a systemic review of 9 studies with 772 FLT3-mutated AML patients has been performed. This meta-analysis has demonstrated that SCT (autologous and allogeneic were lumped together) when compared with chemotherapy alone reduced the relapse rate and prolonged OS and LFS. Unexpectedly, there was no advantage of Allo-SCT over Auto-SCT in terms of OS and LFS, and this probably resulted from the higher transplant-related mortality and lower relapse rate (RR) for patients who received allograft. Higher RR for auto-transplanted patients should be explained by no “graft versus leukemia” effect. An interesting observation is that some FLT3-mutated AML patients with no suitable donor may benefit from the Auto-SCT. Of note is that these conclusions were based on 3 studies only, and the results were limited by selection bias, the number of included patients, and inclusion of retrospective and non-randomized studies [12] (Figs. 3 and 4).

In contrast, there are several studies showing that Allo-SCT improves outcome in FLT3-mutated AML when performed in CR1. The median LFS in FLT3/ITD-transplanted AML population was 54.1 month when compared with 8.6 months for FLT3/ITD-non-transplanted group (p = 0.03) [13]. The comparable parameters for our cohort were 27 and 3 months, respectively [data not published].The FLT3-mutated patients who received Allo-SCT as consolidation at CR1 had longer OS and relapse-free survival (RFS) than patients left on chemotherapy alone. OS at 3 year were 54% and 24%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed the advantage of Allo-SCT over chemotherapy irrespective of FLT3/ITD allelic ratio [14]. The results of transplantation for FLT3-mutated AML beyond CR1 are less encouraging. The post-transplant outcome of 200 FLT3-mutated AML patients was presented by MD Anderson Group. The patients were transplanted both in CR1 and beyond, including those with active disease. Median follow-up was 27 months, and OS and LFS for the entire study cohort at 2 years were 43% and 41%, respectively. RR was the lowest for those who were transplanted in CR1/CR2 and with FLT3 MRD negativity. The worst outcome was demonstrated for patients transplanted in active disease; 85% of them had relapse. In multivariate analysis, hematological/morphological remission and undetectable FLT3 MRD at transplant were found to improve outcome [9].

Median follow-up for our cohort was 15 months, and OS and LFS at 2 years were found to be slightly better than those reported in Gaballa study [9]—54% and 53%, respectively. Of note is that disease status had no impact on the post-transplant outcome. OS at 2 years did not differ between patients transplanted in CR1/2 or MA: 59% and 33%, respectively. Patients who had pre-transplant CR1/2 and FLT3 MRD negativity had the excellent 2-year OS (80%). We have also demonstrated that FLT3 MRD negativity is a strong predictor of OS and LFS in multivariate analysis. The 2-year OS for FLT3 MRD negative and FLT3 MRD positive groups at transplant was 74% and 21%, respectively. Our results strongly suggest that pre-transplant detection of FLT3/ITD mutation by PCR may serve as a reliable MRD marker which predicts post-transplant outcome better than the hematological disease status. Data on the influence of pre-transplant FLT3/ITD status on outcome after allogeneic transplantation are scarce and actually limited to Gaballa study [9]. Our results are in line with this report, despite lower number of recruited patients. Nevertheless, further studies with larger number of patients are needed to draw final conclusions.

In contrary to previously mentioned report [9], it was demonstrated that FLT3/ITD mutation may occur at any time during leukemia course, and this mutation should not be used as MRD marker in AML [15]. The introduction of more advanced PCR techniques may increase the sensitivity of PCR method and therefore early therapeutic intervention [16]. Moreover, it would be valuable to correlate different MRD methods which are the following: PCR assay for FLT3/ITD and multi-parameter flow cytometry (FC).The results of MRD by flow cytometry (MRD-FC) at transplant were available in 28 patients from our cohort, and MRD-FC was positive in 21. There was a strong positive correlation between pre-transplant FLT3 MRD(+) and MRD-FC(+). Data on the role of pre-transplant MRD measured by FC in FLT3-mutated patients have been published recently. Only MRD-FC-positive patients transplanted from HLA-matched sibling donor were found to have poor outcome when compared with MRD-FC-negative transplants from both sibling and haploidentical donors. Interestingly, the outcome of haplo-SCT for MRD-FC-positive patients was comparable with that demonstrated for subjects with pre-transplant MRD-FC-negativity [17]. In the light of the recent findings and when confirmed in prospective studies, it seems reasonable to consider FLT3 inhibitor as a part of induction therapy and post-transplant maintenance [18, 19]. A double-blind randomized study showed that the addition of midostaurin to standard chemotherapy significantly improved overall and event-free survival in FLT3-positive AML patients; however, midostaurin was not beneficial as maintenance treatment after transplantation [18]. In the phase II RADIUS study, FLT3-positive AML patients who underwent Allo-SCT in CR1 were randomized to receive standard of care (SOC) with or without midostaurin. No differences in relapse-free survivals (RFS) between arms at 18 months and 24 months post-transplantation were demonstrated [20]. In contrast, post-transplant sorafenib improved RFS and OS when compared with placebo in the SORMAIN trial [21].

Returning to our cohort, patients who received a graft from unrelated donor fared much better than those transplanted from sibling. The latter stands in contrast with Gaballa study [9], in which unrelated donor was a predictor of worse outcome (LFS/NRM). Our findings are difficult to explain, especially in the context of recent studies which showed the comparable results of Allo-SCT irrespective of donor source [22]. There was no impact of pre-transplant conditioning on the results of transplantation for FLT3-mutated AML, both in MD Anderson [9] and in our study; however, other groups found MAC to be more effective than RIC in terms of LFS [23]. It was also demonstrated that older age (> 60 years) was not associated with the worse outcome in FLT3-mutated AML patients undergoing Allo-SCT. This procedure was found to be feasible with RIC, and CR1 at transplant was a predictor of favorable outcome [24]. There were only 4 elderly patients in our cohort and 3 of them are alive; however, the follow-up is relatively short (11 months).

In conclusion, patients with FLT3-mutated AML should proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplantation as soon as possible in the disease course. Most promising results are associated with the FLT3 MRD eradication before transplantation. Post-transplant maintenance with FLT3 inhibitors may increase survival.