Background
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth edition or DSM-5 [
6], insomnia is a sleep disturbance marked by predominant dissatisfaction with sleep quantity or quality that is associated with substantial distress and impairments of daytime functioning. Typical symptoms of insomnia include difficulty initiating sleep, difficulty maintaining sleep (characterized by frequent waking), and early-morning waking with inability to return to sleep [
12].
Insomnia adversely affects well-being and quality of life of men and women of all ages and ethnicities [
68]. It contributes to considerable healthcare and social challenges, including accidents, impaired social, occupational, educational functioning, and decreased work productivity [
60,
68].
To date, most of the research on the epidemiology of insomnia comes from Western European and North American countries [
53]. Even so, there are substantial differences in reported findings. These differences may derive from varied sample characteristics, methodologies, cultural contexts, as well as how insomnia is defined. Therefore, it is relevant whether prevalence estimates are based on dissatisfaction with quality or quantity of sleep, symptom-level definitions or international diagnostic criteria. A review conducted by Ohayon in 2002 reported that the highest prevalence estimates (30.0–48.0%) were typical of community-based studies that used the presence of one or more of insomnia symptoms as the defining criteria, while the lowest prevalence estimates (4.4 and 6.4%) were associated with the use of the DSM fourth edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria [
53].
Additionally, findings in relation to sociodemographic correlates of insomnia such as gender, age, education, income, and marital status are not always consistent. A study in the United States (US) found that all of these variables were strongly associated with insomnia in the adult population [
26]. Similarly, in Spain, gender and age were found to be important variables affecting insomnia with significantly higher prevalence in women than in men and overall prevalence increased with age [
55].
From a public health perspective, prevalence estimates are important for service planning, policymaking, and in preventing common sleep disorders like insomnia. In addition, measures of insomnia are important indicators of poor mental health such as impaired concentration, disturbed memory, depression, and anxiety [
3,
10,
65]. In fact, insomnia has been recognized as one of the most prevalent symptoms of depression [
19,
52,
67] and anxiety disorders [
30,
50]. A cohort study conducted in Taiwan which included 19,273 subjects with insomnia and 38,546 subjects without insomnia, showed that respondents with insomnia had a higher risk of developing anxiety, depression or both [
14].
Unlike Western countries, the literature on insomnia in the Middle East and most Muslim countries remains sparse. Large-scale epidemiological studies, of prevalence of insomnia and associated clinical features, are scarce. A comprehensive literature review retrieved only one general population study in Turkey. This reported that 15.3% of adults suffer from insomnia [
18]. The study investigated the prevalence of sleep disorders in a nationwide representative sample of 5021 Turkish adults. Multiple investigation tools were used to assess the prevalence of sleep disorders. Insomnia was measured by “Yes” response to any of the following, as adapted from DSM–IV–TR: a) difficulty initiating sleep at least three times a week for a month or more; b) difficulty maintaining sleep, a fragmented sleep at least three times a week for a month or more; c) early morning awakening at least once a week in the last month. It was found that insomnia prevalence among women increased with age [
18].
Most studies conducted in countries of the Arabian Gulf focus on insomnia in specific populations, such as adolescents and students, or primary care patients. In Kuwait, the rates of insomnia varied between 6.0 to 36.0% in adolescents [
1] and between 4.0 to 32.0% in college students [
2]. A recent study conducted in primary care centers of one region in Saudi Arabia reported a 60.0% prevalence of insomnia that was significantly higher among 25–40 year-old adults (as well as in those older than 40 years of old) than those younger than 25 years of age and among those having insufficient income [
9]. In Qatar, the only study of insomnia reported prevalence as high as 27.0% in a population of soccer players [
35]. No study to date estimated the prevalence of insomnia in the general population of Qatar or any of these countries using standard international diagnostic criteria.
With an urban population that continues to grow, Qatar’s context displays a high standard of living and a well-established system of social and healthcare services [
7]. The high rate of urban growth, economic development, and a relatively young population [
37,
62] as seen in Qatar is associated with the potential risk of insomnia [
58] and mental illness [
4,
21,
31,
39,
46,
47,
57,
64]. As insomnia is an important risk factor for mental illness [
23‐
25,
44], it is important to determine its prevalence and clinical associations in order to focus effectively on mental health in the population.
Hence, to aid this effort, the present study aimed to estimate the 30-day prevalence of insomnia using DSM-5 criteria and to explore its socio-demographic correlates and associations with depression and anxiety symptoms in the general population of Qatar.
Methods
This study was part of a larger annual survey conducted in February of 2019 by the Social and Economic Survey Research Institute (SESRI) at Qatar University, which covered various topics related to social, health, economic, and political issues.
Sample design
As Qatar is divided into eight administrative municipalities, the households in each municipality were stratified according to geographic location and the type of household residents (non-migrants or Qataris, and migrants or resident expatriates hereafter referred to as non-Qataris). The target population included residents of Qatar aged 18 and above who were living in residential units during the survey reference period. For this study, the non-residential units such as army barracks, hospitals, dormitories, camps of blue-collar workers and prisons were excluded. A probability-based sample was then drawn from these strata. As Qataris represented the minority group in the population, they were oversampled. A validated adaptation of the Kish method [
38] was utilized to randomly select one eligible adult inside each household in Qatar [
43]. Constructed weights accounted for sampling disproportionality and nonresponse.
Sample size determination
For our survey design, the following formula:
n = z2(p (1 − p)/e2) deff [
16,
38] was used to calculate the required sample size, which was estimated at 1160. The estimate was based on α value of 0.05 or z = 1.96; p or estimate of the proportion set at 50.0% to identify the largest sample size requirement; desired sampling error e = ±3.5%; deff or design effect = 1.48; and a survey response rate = 48.0%. Prior face-to-face surveys conducted by SESRI in the same population have determined the estimates of design effect and survey response rate.
Language and translation procedures
For the interviews, the measures were available in both English and Arabic, enabling participants to select their preferred language. A team formed of four bilingual research members translated and adapted the measures in the following steps: 1) Each measure was independently translated from English to Arabic by the first author and a researcher; 2) Another two researchers who had not seen the original English version of these measures were assigned to back-translate the two Arabic versions to English; 3) Finally, all team members met and reviewed the two Arabic versions of the questionnaire and compared the original and back-translated English versions. Upon their reviews and comparisons, minor discrepancies in translation arose. These were solved by consensus among team members. Please see
“Additional file
1” for details of survey questions asked in both languages.
Data collection
Qatar University’s Institutional Review Board approved the study (QU-IRB 339-E/14). The survey questionnaire was programmed in BLAISE and administered using CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) during face-to-face interviews conducted by trained interviewers in the households of consenting participants who were 18 years old and above. A total of 50 interviewers visited the sampled households and introduced the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after explaining that study participation is voluntary and anonymous. Out of the total sampled households, approximately 4.8% refused to participate. Other reasons for non-participation included language barrier, illness/disability, and vacant housing units. A total of 1611 completed interviews were recorded and the survey response rate was 52.1%. As per household type, the completed interviews included 803 Qataris and 808 non-Qataris. The corresponding maximum sampling error percentage was +/− 3.9 and 3.8 percentage points for Qataris and non-Qataris, respectively.
Data management
After data collection, all individual interviews were merged and saved in a single BLAISE data file. This dataset was then cleaned, coded, weighted to adjust for probability of selection and non-response, and saved in STATA version 16 for analysis.
Insomnia
The eight-item Sleep Condition Indicator (SCI) was used to screen for insomnia disorder in the past month based on the DSM-5 criteria [
20]. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale (0–4). The scale captured sleep continuity, quality, satisfaction with sleep in addition to symptoms severity, consequences on mood, cognition and day performance and duration of sleep problems. A composite score of all items was computed ranging from 0 to 32 with higher scores indicating better sleep.
As operationalized by the SCI, we measured four main criteria for insomnia disorder as per DSM-5 criteria. The first criterion was difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep. This was based on reports of taking more than 30 min to fall asleep or if waking up during the night, staying awake for greater than 30 min in total; and a rating of sleep quality as average, poor, or very poor. The second criterion was significant distress, which was based on endorsing “somewhat”, “much” or “very much” for the extent that poor sleep in the past month has troubled the respondent in general and endorsing “somewhat”, “much” or “very much” to one of two questions about the extent has poor sleep in the past month affected respondents’ mood, energy, or relationships or affected concentration, productivity, or ability to stay awake. The third criterion was in relation to the frequency of sleep disturbances, which was based on endorsing a minimum of 3 nights per week for the frequency of encountering sleep problems. The fourth criterion was related to the duration of sleep disturbances, based on endorsing a minimum duration of 3 months for having sleep problems.
We estimated 30-day prevalence of insomnia disorder using two methods in relation to the SCI data. First, we used a previously validated cut-off score of 16 or less to denote the proportion of our sample that met minimum criteria for putative insomnia disorder [
20]. Second, we used the inherent operationalization of main clinical criteria in the SCI to identify proportion of the sample that met all four main criteria for insomnia disorder.
Depression
The nine-item Physician Health Questionnaire or PHQ-9 was used to measure the frequency of nine symptoms of depression in the past 2 weeks with a 4-point response including: 0 = “not at all,” 1 = “several days,” 2 = “more than half the days,” and 3 = “nearly every day.” A composite score was calculated based on all nine items and a cut-off score of 10 or higher was used to denote moderate to severe depressive symptoms [
41,
59].
Anxiety
The two-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) scale was used to measure severity of anxiety symptoms. Although not a diagnostic instrument, the GAD-2 captures the frequency of two symptom criteria for GAD in the DSM-5 including feeling anxious, nervous or on edge and not being able to control or stop worrying over the past 2 weeks. The frequency of these symptoms was captured using the same 4-point response options as describe above for the PHQ-9 [
40]. The GAD-2 was scored and a cut-off of 3 or higher was used to denote potentially clinically significant anxiety symptoms [
45,
61].
Covariates
A health-based rating question was used to measure self-reported health status with categories including poor, fair, good, and excellent. Respondents were classified into Qataris or non-Qataris based on self-reported nationality. Ethnicity was determined according to respondent’s country of origin and the language selected to complete the interview. We first coded ethnicity into the following main categories: Arab, South Asian, South East Asian, and other (East Asian, Asian other, African, Latin American, European, from the UK, Russia, US, Canada or Australia). To increase statistical power, we collapsed non-Arab ethnicities into one category to compare with Arab ethnicity. We collected standard socio-demographic information including age, gender, marital status, education level, and employment status.
Statistical analysis
Weighted proportions, corresponding percentages, and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) along with raw (unweighted) frequencies (N) were generated to describe the distribution of most of the variables in our sample. Mean and standard deviation (SD) was used to describe age of respondents in years.
Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate associations between main independent variables (including depression and anxiety) and insomnia, our main dependent variable. For each bivariate model, we adjusted for the association between one independent variable and insomnia. In the adjusted model, we simultaneously controlled for the associations between all variables and insomnia. Unadjusted (bivariate) and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% CI and p-values were generated from these models.
Results
Sample characteristics are shown in Table
1. The sample comprised more females than males and more Arabs than non-Arabs. The respondents were mainly young, non-Qatari adults with post-secondary education. Over half of the sample reported being employed. Less than a tenth rated their current health status as fair or poor. However, only 2.0% of the sample screened positive for depression and 3.4% for anxiety in the past 2 weeks, and 5.5% for insomnia in the past month. The prevalence of those who met all the DSM-5 clinical criteria for insomnia in the past month was 3.0% (Table
1).
Table 1
Sample descriptives
Gender |
Female | 53.2 | 50.1–56.3 |
Marital status |
Never married | 17.5 | 15.2–20.1 |
Currently married | 79.3 | 76.6–81.7 |
Separated/divorced | 3.2 | 2.4–4.3 |
Education level |
Less than high school | 10.5 | 8.9–12.3 |
High school | 21.4 | 18.9–24.0 |
Post-secondary | 68.1 | 65.3–70.9 |
Arab ethnicity |
Yes | 57.3 | 54.4–60.1 |
Respondent group |
Qatari household | 24.5 | 23.5–25.6 |
Non-Qatari household | 75.5 | 74.4–76.5 |
Employment status |
Employed | 55.0 | 51.9–58.1 |
Unemployed | 45.0 | 41.9–48.1 |
Health rating |
Excellent | 45.5 | 42.4–48.6 |
Good | 46.3 | 43.2–49.4 |
Fair | 7.4 | 6.0–9.2 |
Poor | 0.7 | 0.4–1.6 |
General anxiety |
Yes | 3.4 | 2.5–4.7 |
Depression |
Depressed | 2.0 | 1.4–3.0 |
Insomnia |
Yes | 5.5 | 4.3–7.0 |
Insomnia Diagnostic Criteria |
Yes | 3.0 | 2.1–4.3 |
Table
2 shows that a cut-off score of
< 16 (as opposed to
> 16 on the SCI) was significantly associated with endorsement on all DSM-5 criteria for insomnia including difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, significant distress, a minimum of 3 nights per week for frequency of sleep-related disturbances, and a minimum duration of 3 to 6 months for having sleep problem. Also shown in Table
2, the prevalence of meeting any one of the four criteria was higher than meeting all criteria at 10.1% (95% CI: 7.2–13.5), 13.5% (95% CI: 11.5–15.6), 10.3% (95% CI: 8.5–12.1), and 12.2% (95% CI: 10.2–14.2), respectively.
Table 2
Pralence of DSM-5 Criteria for those who screen positive for insomnia versus those who do not
Difficulty initiating or maintaining sleepa |
Yes | 80.5 | 71.1–89.8 | 5.2 | 3.7–6.7 | < 0.001 | 9.4 | 7.6–11.2 |
Significant distressb |
Yes | 71.6 | 59.7–83.4 | 10.1 | 8.2–12.0 | < 0.001 | 13.5 | 11.5–15.6 |
Frequency of sleep disturbancesc |
Yes | 86.2 | 77.9–94.6 | 5.7 | 4.2–7.2 | < 0.001 | 10.3 | 8.5–12.1 |
Duration of sleep disturbancesd |
Yes | 86.8 | 77.8–95.8 | 7.7 | 6.0–9.4 | < 0.001 | 12.2 | 10.2–14.2 |
Table
3 shows age was significantly associated with insomnia in the multivariable model (OR = 0.96,
p = 0.010); for every unit increase in age, the odds of insomnia decreased by roughly 4.0%. For marital status, the association between never married relative to current married respondents and insomnia became more statistically significant in the multivariable model (Table
3); the odds of insomnia decreased by 62.0% for those who were never married compared to those who were married at the time of the survey.
Table 3
Bivariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Models for Insomnia
Gender (Male refa) |
Female | 1.4 | 0.8–2.4 | 0.218 | 0.6 | 0.3–1.2 | 0.168 |
Age |
In years | 1.0 | 1.0–1.1 | 0.198 | 1.0 | 0.9–1.0 | 0.010 |
Marital status (Married ref) |
Never married | 0.9 | 0.5–1.9 | 0.827 | 0.4 | 0.2–0.9 | 0.027 |
Separated/divorced | 1.7 | 0.8–3.6 | 0.193 | 1.0 | 0.4–2.5 | 0.970 |
Education level (Post-secondary ref) |
Less than high school | 4.1 | 2.2–7.8 | < 0.001 | 2.9 | 1.1–7.6 | 0.025 |
High school | 1.5 | 0.8–2.9 | 0.191 | 1.2 | 0.6–2.4 | 0.518 |
Arab ethnicity (Non-Arab ref) |
Arab | 4.8 | 2.2–10.6 | < 0.001 | 4.5 | 1.7–11.8 | 0.002 |
Respondent group (Qataris ref) |
Non-Qataris | 0.6 | 0.4–1.0 | 0.041 | 1.3 | 0.7–2.5 | 0.461 |
Employment status (Employed ref) |
Unemployed | 2.7 | 1.6–4.5 | < 0.001 | 2.6 | 1.3–5.1 | 0.008 |
Health rating (Excellent/good ref) |
Fair/poor | 3.2 | 1.7–6.3 | 0.001 | 3.4 | 1.5–7.9 | 0.004 |
General anxiety (Non-anxious ref) |
Anxious | 7.2 | 3.5–14.9 | < 0.001 | 3.8 | 1.7–8.5 | 0.001 |
Depression (Non-depressed ref) |
Depressed | 14.3 | 6.2–32.6 | < 0.001 | 8.8 | 3.6–21.4 | < 0.001 |
In the multivariable analysis, less than high school education, Arab ethnicity, unemployment, fair or poor health rating, anxiety, and depression were independently and significantly associated with insomnia (Table
3). Arab ethnicity increased the odds of reporting insomnia by 350% (OR = 4.50,
p = 0.002). Having less than excellent or good health rating increased the odds of reporting insomnia by 242% (OR = 3.24,
p = 0.004). Furthermore, being unemployed increased the odds of reporting insomnia symptoms by 156% (OR = 2.56,
p = 0.008). The adjusted odds ratio for depression and anxiety symptoms was increased by 777% (OR = 8.77,
p < 0.001) and 277% (OR = 3.77,
p = 0.001), respectively, in those with insomnia relative to those without insomnia.
Conclusions
This is the first large epidemiological study conducted in the general population in Qatar about the prevalence of insomnia and associated factors. The study suggests that there is an association between mental illness (particularly depression and anxiety) and insomnia, that needs to be taken into account particularly when screening individuals for mental illness and in the provision of mental health services. We also report important findings with regard to at-risk age groups and ethnicity that highlight the need for raising awareness of sleep hygiene in these groups.
This study suggests the need for further research into the socio-cultural and political factors affecting insomnia prevalence in Arab populations. Given the time of this publication, we also suggest conducting a similar study during COVID-19 era, in order to measure its impact on insomnia prevalence. Our study can provide a baseline prevalence of insomnia in the Arabian Gulf Region against which other studies can be compared, and to aid assessment of the impact of natural, political and social crises on insomnia and mental health.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.