Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022

22.06.2021 | Original Article

Prevalence of Adenomas on Surveillance Colonoscopies for Patients with a History of Colonic Polyps of Unknown Histology

verfasst von: John B. Doyle, Anna Krigel, Benjamin Lebwohl

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 7/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Guidelines for surveillance colonoscopy depend on polyp histology. When patients present to a new healthcare system and report a personal history of “colon polyps,” however, information on polyp histology is frequently unavailable.

Aims

To assess adenoma prevalence in patients with a history of colonic polyps of unknown histology and to compare it to patients undergoing either screening colonoscopy or surveillance colonoscopy for known adenomatous polyps.

Methods

This cohort study evaluated colonoscopies of patients ≥ 50 years of age over a 14-year period at a single institution. The exposure of interest was colonoscopy indication, categorized into three groups: screening colonoscopy, surveillance colonoscopy for history of colonic polyp(s) of unknown histology, and surveillance colonoscopy for history of adenoma(s). The primary outcome was adenoma detection rate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between colonoscopy indication and adenoma detection rate.

Results

Of 31,856 colonoscopies, the adenoma prevalence was 26.1% for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy, 32.9% for patients with a history of polyps of unknown histology, and 41.9% for patients with a history of known adenomatous polyps. Relative to screening colonoscopies, there were higher odds of adenoma detection in surveillance colonoscopies for polyps of unknown histology (aOR compared to screening 1.42, 95% CI 1.30–1.55) and even higher odds among surveillance colonoscopies for a history of adenoma (aOR compared to screening 1.89, 95% CI 1.75–2.05).

Conclusion

The adenoma prevalence on surveillance colonoscopy for patients with polyps of unknown histology was higher than that of screening colonoscopies but lower than that of surveillance colonoscopies for patients with adenomatous polyps.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2020;158:1131–1153.CrossRef Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2020;158:1131–1153.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkin W, Wooldrage K, Brenner A et al. Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:823–834.CrossRef Atkin W, Wooldrage K, Brenner A et al. Adenoma surveillance and colorectal cancer incidence: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:823–834.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cottet V, Jooste V, Fournel I et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after adenoma removal: a population-based cohort study. Gut 2012;61:1180–1186.CrossRef Cottet V, Jooste V, Fournel I et al. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after adenoma removal: a population-based cohort study. Gut 2012;61:1180–1186.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:562–567.CrossRef Laiyemo AO, Pinsky PF, Marcus PM et al. Utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy in the continued follow-up study of the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:562–567.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology 2010;138:73–81.CrossRef Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology 2010;138:73–81.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:225–232.CrossRef Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L et al. Role of colonoscopy and polyp characteristics in colorectal cancer after colonoscopic polyp detection: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:225–232.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai V, Sussman DA, Greenspan M et al. Most premature surveillance colonoscopy is not attributable to bowel preparation or new clinical indications. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61:2496–2504.CrossRef Desai V, Sussman DA, Greenspan M et al. Most premature surveillance colonoscopy is not attributable to bowel preparation or new clinical indications. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61:2496–2504.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman D, Williams J, Holub J et al. Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes 2000–2011. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:133–143.CrossRef Lieberman D, Williams J, Holub J et al. Colonoscopy utilization and outcomes 2000–2011. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80:133–143.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Suriani R, Rizzetto M, Mazzucco D et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in a digestive endoscopy unit: a prospective study using ASGE guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract 2009;15:41–45.CrossRef Suriani R, Rizzetto M, Mazzucco D et al. Appropriateness of colonoscopy in a digestive endoscopy unit: a prospective study using ASGE guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract 2009;15:41–45.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:3–16.CrossRef Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:3–16.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Quintero E. Colonoscopy appropriateness: really needed or a waste of time? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7:94–101.CrossRef Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Quintero E. Colonoscopy appropriateness: really needed or a waste of time? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7:94–101.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ladabaum U, Schoen RE. Post-polypectomy surveillance that would please goldilocks–not too much, not too little, but just right. Gastroenterology 2016;150:791–796.CrossRef Ladabaum U, Schoen RE. Post-polypectomy surveillance that would please goldilocks–not too much, not too little, but just right. Gastroenterology 2016;150:791–796.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jover R, Bretthauer M, Dekker E et al. Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials. Endoscopy 2016;48:571–578.CrossRef Jover R, Bretthauer M, Dekker E et al. Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials. Endoscopy 2016;48:571–578.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1207–1214.CrossRef Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1207–1214.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahadev S, Green PH, Lebwohl B. Rates of suboptimal preparation for colonoscopy differ markedly between providers: impact on adenoma detection rates. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015;49:746–750.CrossRef Mahadev S, Green PH, Lebwohl B. Rates of suboptimal preparation for colonoscopy differ markedly between providers: impact on adenoma detection rates. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015;49:746–750.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use–United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 2013; 62:881–888 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use–United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 2013; 62:881–888
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al. High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:364–370.CrossRef Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG et al. High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:364–370.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prevalence of Adenomas on Surveillance Colonoscopies for Patients with a History of Colonic Polyps of Unknown Histology
verfasst von
John B. Doyle
Anna Krigel
Benjamin Lebwohl
Publikationsdatum
22.06.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07108-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.