Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 3/2021

18.05.2021 | Surgical Techniques

Primary endoprosthetic replacement of the arthritic CMC-1 joint

verfasst von: Anton Borgers, MD, Andreas Verstreken, Matthias Vanhees, MD, PhD, Frederik Verstreken, MD

Erschienen in: Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal (CMC)-1 joint is a common condition that can cause significant pain and functional problems. When nonoperative management fails, surgery may be indicated. Resection of the trapezium, often combined with soft tissue stabilization, is still considered the gold standard. But recovery time is often prolonged and a significant number of patients remain unsatisfied in the long term. Knowing that total endoprosthetic joint replacement is one of the most successful achievements of orthopedic surgery, many attempts have been made to produce a replacement for the CMC‑1 joint that provides a better outcome than trapeziectomy.

Indications

Eaton–Glickel stage 2–3 CMC‑1 osteoarthritis.

Contraindications

Symptomatic pan-trapezial osteoarthritis (Eaton–Glickel stage 4), infection, young manual worker, poor bone quality or insufficient trapezium size.

Surgical technique

A dorsoradial approach to the CMC‑1 joint is used. Minimal resection of the trapezial and metacarpal articular surfaces, including osteophytes and loose bodies. Reaming of the trapezium and broaching of the metacarpal stem with dedicated instruments. Implantation of the endoprosthetic components. Selection of the correct neck length to ensure a stable joint. Closure of the capsule and skin.

Postoperative management

Immobilization of thumb for 2 weeks in a splint. Followed by a removable thumb CMC brace for 4 weeks, starting with gentle mobilization exercises. No forceful gripping or pinching the first 6 weeks.

Results

A specific design—the uncemented, ball in socket, metal on polyethylene total joint replacement—has stood the test of time and successful long-term clinical and radiographic outcome results have been published. Recent comparative trials have shown better pinch strength, better pain relief and faster functional recovery, when compared to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition. The incidence of complications such as dislocation, polyethylene wear and cup loosening is acceptable.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
5.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eaton R, Glickel S (1987) Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Staging as a rationale for treatment. Hand Clin 3:455–471CrossRef Eaton R, Glickel S (1987) Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Staging as a rationale for treatment. Hand Clin 3:455–471CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB (2005) Prevalence of osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg 87:12CrossRef Sodha S, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Jupiter JB (2005) Prevalence of osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Bone Joint Surg 87:12CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Primary endoprosthetic replacement of the arthritic CMC-1 joint
verfasst von
Anton Borgers, MD
Andreas Verstreken
Matthias Vanhees, MD, PhD
Frederik Verstreken, MD
Publikationsdatum
18.05.2021
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0934-6694
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-0981
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-021-00713-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Einführung zum Thema

Rhizarthrose

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.