Promoting awareness of rights is a value-based process that entails a different way of thinking and acting, which is at times misunderstood or deemed as aspirational.
Guided by the SURE framework, we undertook a secondary analysis of 26 documents identified by an earlier systematic review on promoting awareness of rights to increase use of maternity care services. We thematically analysed stakeholder experiences and implementation factors across the diverse initiatives to derive common elements to guide future efforts.
Interventions that promote awareness of rights for maternal health varied in nature, methodological orientation, depth and quality. Materials included booklets, posters, pamphlets/ briefs and service standards/charters. Target populations included women, family members, communities, community structures, community-based and non governmental organizations, health providers and administrators, as well as elected representatives. While one initiative only focused on raising awareness, most were embedded within larger efforts to improve the accountability and responsiveness of service delivery through community monitoring and advocacy, with a few aiming to change policies and contest elections. Underlying these action oriented forms of promoting awareness of rights, was a critical consciousness and attitudinal change gained through iterative capacity-building for all stakeholders; materials and processes that supported group discussion and interaction; the formation or strengthening of community groups; situational analysis to ensure adaptation to local context; facilitation to ensure common ground and language across stakeholders; and strategic networking and alliance building across health system levels. While many positive experiences are discussed, few challenges or barriers to implementation are documented. The limited documentation and poor quality of information found indicate that while various examples of promoting awareness of rights for maternal health exists, research partnerships to systematically evaluate their processes, learning and effects are lacking.
Rather than being aspirational, several examples of promoting awareness of women’s rights for quality maternity care services exist. More than mainly disseminate information, they aim to change stakeholder mindsets and relationships across health system levels. Due to their transformatory intent they require sustained investment, with strategic planning, concrete operationalization and political adeptness to manage dynamic stakeholder expectations and reactions overtime. More investment is also required in research partnerships that support such initiatives and better elucidate their context specific variations.
United Nations. International conference on population and development program of action. New York: United Nations Population Fund; 1994. p. 296
United Nations Secretary General. Global strategy for Women's and Children's health. New York: Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health; 2010. p. 20.
DFID. How to reduce maternal deaths: rights and responsibilities. London: UK Department for International Development (DFID); 2005.
World Health Organization. Working with individuals, families and communities to improve maternal and newborn health. Geneva: WHO; 2003. WHO/MPS/09.04
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on health promotion interventions for maternal and newborn health. Geneva: WHO; 2015. p. 94.
United Nations Human Rights Council. Resolution of the United Nations human rights council on preventable maternal mortality and morbidity and human rights. New York: United Nations; 2012. p. 3.
World Health Organization. State of inequality: reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health. Geneva: WHO; 2015. p. 124.
World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: WHO; 2014. WHO/RHR/14.23
Pandey P, Sehgal AR, Riboud M, Levine D, Goyal M. Informing resource-poor populations and the delivery of entitled health and social services in rural India: a cluster randomized controlled trial. JAMA : J Am Med Associat. 2007;298(16):1867–75. CrossRef
Ganju S, Khanna R, Taparia M, Hardikar N. Promoting accountability for maternal health through report card. COPASAH Communique. 2014;8:3–5,33.
Sinha D. Empowering communities to make pregnancy safer an intervention in rural Andhra Pradesh. Population Council: New Delhi; 2008.
Björkman M, Svensson J. Power to the people: evidence from a randomized field experiment of a community-based monitoring project in Uganda. Quarterly J Econ. 2009;124(2):735–69. CrossRef
Shakespeare W. The tragedy of hamlet prince of Denmark. Vol. XLVI, part 2. The Harvard classics. New York: P.F. Collier & Son. p. 1909–14.
Molina H, Michelini M, Escobar R, Robinson G. Evaluation report for Argentinian child rights education for professionals (CRED PRO). Buenos Aires: Iniciative del Cono Sur (FLACSO-CRED PRO); 2010.
Strecker M, Stuttaford M, London L. Health rights pamphlets: critical literacy and inclusive citizenship, South Africa. Health Promot Int. 2012;29(2) doi: 10.1093/heapro/das067.
Burket M, Hainsworth G, Boyce C. Saving young lives: pathfinder internationals youth-friendly postabortion care project. Pathfinder International: Watertown; 2008.
EPHPP. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. EPHP: Hamilton, Canada; 1988.
SURE Collaboration. Identifying and addressing barriers to implementing policy options. Version 2.1 ed. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
Shepard B. Lets be citizens, not patients!: Womens groups in Peru assert their right to high-quality reproductive health care. Responding to Cairo: case studies of changing practice in reproductive health and family planning. New York: Population Council; 2002. p. 339–54.
Kayongo M, Esquiche E, Luna MR, Frias G, Vega-Centeno L, Bailey P. Strengthening emergency obstetric care in Ayacucho. Peru International Journal of Gynaecology &Obstetrics. 2006;92(3):299–307. CrossRef
Davis-Floyd R, Pascal-Bonaro, D., Davies, R. and, Ponce de Leon, RG. The international motherbaby childbirth initiative: a human rights approach to optimal maternity care. Midwifery Today. 2010;(94):1–14.
Reis V, Deller B, Catherine Carr C, Smith J. Respectful maternity care. Washington DC: USAID; 2012.
Das A, Dasgupta J. Claiming entitlements: the story of women leaders’ struggle for the right to health in Uttar Pradesh. India: The Center for Health and Social Justice and COPASAH; 2013.
Stoffregen M, Andion X, Dasgupta J, Frisanch A, Matunga A. Human rights-based approaches to maternal mortality reduction efforts. India: International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights; 2010.
Danish Family Planning Association. Promoting women's sexual and reproductive health and rights in South Asia: project document 2011–2014. Denmark: DFPA; 2010.
CARE International. Learning, sharing, adapting innovations in maternal health programming. Atlanta: CARE International; 2012. p. 91
CARE International, ICW. Inner spaces outer faces initiative (ISOFI) toolkit: tools for learning and action on gender and sexuality. Washington, DC: CARE International, ICRW; 2007.
London L, Schneider H. Globalisation and health inequalities: can a human rights paradigm create space for civil society action? Social Science & Medicine(1982). 2012;74(1):6–13. CrossRef
Bajpai S. Enhancing community awareness on maternal health entitlements - a report. Ahmedabad: CHETNA; 2009. p. 21.
George AS, Scott K, Mehra V, Sriram V. Synergies, strengths and challenges: findings on community capability from a systematic health systems research literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(Suppl 7):623. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1860-1.
- Principles and processes behind promoting awareness of rights for quality maternal care services: a synthesis of stakeholder experiences and implementation factors
Asha S. George
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet
Mail Icon II