Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2021

Open Access 05.02.2020 | Original Article

Prognostic Nutritional Index and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predict the Prognosis of Patients with HCC

verfasst von: Dong Wang, Xi Hu, Liang Xiao, Guo Long, Lei Yao, ZhiMing Wang, LeDu Zhou

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Abstract

Introduction

Systemic nutrition and inflammation are the critical factors in cancer initiation, evolution, and progression. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent liver resection.

Methods

A total of 202 HCC patients met the criteria and were included in the study. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the optimal PNI and SII cutoff values. The relationship between PNI/SII and clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed. The effect of PNI and SII on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

The areas under the ROC curve for PNI and SII were 0.64 and 0.58. The ideal preoperative PNI and SII cutoff values were 50.25 and 461.5, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified that the PNI (P = 0.001) and tumor diameter (P = 0.018) were significant prognostic markers for RFS, and that the PNI (P = 0.049), SII (P = 0.039) and tumor diameter (P = 0.001) were significant prognostic markers for OS. The median RFS in the PNI-low and PNI-high groups was 13.5 months and 23 months (P = 0.001), and that in the SII-low and SII-high groups was 18 months and 15 months (P = 0.03), respectively. The median OS in the PNI-low and PNI-high groups was 24 months and 39 months (P = 0.001), and that in the SII-low and SII-high groups was 36 months and 22 months (P = 0.002), respectively.

Conclusion

Interestingly, we found that PNI and SII could be important prognostic parameters for HCC patients who under hepatectomy.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
AFP
Alpha-fetoprotein
ALT
Alanine transaminase
AST
Aspartate transaminase
BCLC
Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer
HCC
Hepatocellular carcinoma
PLT
Platelet
PNI
Prognostic nutritional index
PT
Prothrombin time
SII
Systemic immune-inflammation index
TNM
Tumor-node-metastasis
WBC
White blood cell

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive system and has high morbidity and mortality worldwide. In China, liver cancer is the fourth highest incidence rate and the third highest mortality rate.1 In the USA, the incidence of liver cancer is rising faster than that for any other cancers, and the 5-year relative survival rate is only 18%.2 The burden of HCC is increasing and might surpass an annual incidence of 1 million cases.3 HCC most commonly occurs with hepatitis infection (including hepatitis B virus (HBV), HCV), alcohol abuse, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Cirrhosis underlines most cases of HCC and is an independent risk factor for HCC. Liver resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation are the first-line radical treatments for HCC.4, 5 For HCC patients, especially those with advanced-stage HCC, who are not candidates for radical treatments, locoregional therapies,6 targeted therapies,3 and immunotherapy7 are the most widely used treatments. Researchers reported a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 50–70% for HCC patients, but the high recurrence rate following curative surgery limits the treatment outcome.8, 9 The traditional prognostic parameters of HCC patients, including tumor size, vascular invasion, and other factors obtained after surgical resection, are considered inconveniently in daily clinical work. Accordingly, finding novel prognostic parameters to help predict the clinical outcomes of HCC patients is warranted.
Inflammation is considered one of the enabling characteristics in tumorigenesis, progression, and metastasis.10 Chronic inflammation is associated with an elevated risk of cancers;11 for example, HBV infection leads to HCC, EBV leads to nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and Helicobacter pylori leads to gastric cancer. With the increasing understanding of cancer-related inflammation, systemic inflammatory response biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein level,12 have been clearly demonstrated to predict the prognoses of cancer patients, including those with non-small cell lung cancer,13 renal cell carcinoma,14 and colorectal cancer.15 However, inflammation prognosis biomarkers only integrate two inflammatory cells. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is calculated by platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts and is a novel indicator that can predict the clinical outcomes of cancer patients.1618
The status of nutrition is also closely associated with postoperative complications and the clinical outcomes of patients with various solid tumors. Recently, many indicators containing nutritional and inflammatory variables have been found to play a role in predicting the prognoses for cancer patients, such as those with colorectal cancer,19 esophageal cancer,20 and so on. The concept of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was first proposed by Buzby et al.21 to evaluate the risk of gastrointestinal surgery. The PNI, which is calculated based on the serum albumin and circulating peripheral blood lymphocyte count, has been used to assess the immunonutritional status of cancer patients. The PNI has also been verified as a useful prognostic biomarker in various cancers, including esophageal carcinoma and osteosarcoma.22, 23 In HCC patients, the albumin is also regarded as the important factor for the liver function.
Although increasing evidence shows that the SII and PNI, which can reflect systemic inflammation and nutritional statuses, can accurately predict cancer patient prognosis, the relationship between PNI, SII, and clinical outcomes in patients with HCC remains unclear and has not been verified. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of SII and PNI in HCC patients who underwent surgical resection.

Methods and Materials

Study Population and Design

In our study, 202 HCC patients were included, and all patients underwent hepatectomy between 2012 and 2015 at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. After surgical resection, all patients were diagnosed with HCC by pathology. Patients who met any one of the following criteria were excluded from this study: (1) patients with previous splenectomy; (2) patients with tumor rupture and bleeding; (3) patients with recurrence HCC; (4) patients with infectious diseases before hepatectomy, such as lung infections and urinary tract infections; (5) patients with autoimmune diseases; (6) patients who underwent antitumor therapies; and (7) patients with missing clinical data. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, and the patients provided informed consent.

Follow-up and Definitions

All HCC patients underwent preoperative blood routine and liver function tests before surgical resection, and the PNI was calculated as albumin level (g/L) + 5× total lymphocyte count (109/L). The SII was defined as platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte counts. The clinicopathological data of the HCC patients including sex, age, HBV infection, tumor size, tumor number, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and so on.
Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), white blood cell (WBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) were tested in all patients. Abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and chest radiography were performed for all patients. The PNI and SII cutoff values were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves according to the OS of patients. In our study, tumor number within the liver was divided into two groups: the single tumor group and the multiple tumors group. The seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) scores were applied to classify the HCC stage.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism software (GraphPad Prism Software, La Jolla, CA) and SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Company, Chicago, IL) for Windows. Student’s t tests were used to analyze the quantitative data. Chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze the categorical variables. Spearman’s correlation was performed to analyze the correlations between PNI/SII and other clinicopathological parameters. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the prognostic factors associated with OS and RFS with univariate and multivariate analyses. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to describe the relative risk factors. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients and Tumor Characteristics

In this study, 202 HCC patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled.
There were 168 males and 34 females, and the average age was 50.41 ± 11.95 years. The HBV infection proportion was 83.66%, and 24.26% of the patients had multiple tumors. The median serum albumin level was 41.39 ± 3.75 g/L. The average neutrophil, lymphocyte, and plate counts were (3.46 ± 1.35)109/L, (1.49 ± 0.54)109/L, and (161.72 ± 69.06)109/L, respectively. The mean ALT and AST were 43.28 ± 34.19 U/L and 46.90 ± 32.98 U/L, respectively; the mean total bilirubin and direct bilirubin were 14.94 ± 12.0 μmol/L and 5.94 ± 6.55 μmol/L, respectively. The mean tumor diameter was 5.77 ± 3.38 cm. The mean PNI and SII were 48.83 ± 4.8 and 433.23 ± 325.61, respectively. The proportion of patients with BCLC stages of 0/A, B, and C were 69.80%, 19.80%, and 10.40%, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1
The clinicopathological variables in patients with HCC (n = 202)
Variables
Values (n = 202)
Age (years), mean (SD)
50.41 (11.95)
Albumin (g/L), mean (SD)
41.39 (3.75)
WBC (109/L), mean (SD)
5.63 (1.67)
Neutrophil (109/L), mean (SD)
3.46 (1.35)
Lymphocyte (109/L), mean (SD)
1.49 (0.54)
Monocyte (109/L), mean (SD)
0.48 (0.2)
PLT (109/L), mean (SD)
161.72 (69.06)
Total bilirubin (μmol/L), mean (SD)
14.94 (12)
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L), mean (SD)
5.94 (6.55)
ALT (U/L), mean (SD)
43.28 (34.19)
AST (U/L), mean (SD)
46.90 (32.98)
PT (s), mean (SD)
13.2 (0.98)
APTT (s), mean (SD)
33.11 (4.32)
Tumor diameter (cm), mean (SD)
5.77 (3.38)
Creatinine (μmol/L), mean (SD)
86.55 (16.5)
PNI
48.83 (4.8)
SII
433.23 (325.61)
Hospital stay (days), mean (SD)
15.43 (4.33)
Gender
  Male
168
  Female
34
HBV
  Absence
33
  Presence
169
Tumor capsular
  Absence
142
  Presence
60
AFP
  ≤ 20 ng/mL
74
  > 20 ng/mL
128
Edmondson grade
  I–II
152
  III–IV
50
Tumor number
  Single
153
  Multiple
49
Satellite nodules
  Absence
186
  Presence
16
Cirrhosis
  Absence
52
  Presence
152
BCLC stage
  0/A
141
  B
40
  C
21
TNM stage
  I/II
167
  III
35
WBC white blood cell, PLT platelet, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, PT prothrombin time, PNI prognostic nutritional index, SII systemic immune-inflammation index, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, TNM tumor-node-metastasis

Assessment of the PNI and SII Cutoff Values

The optimal PNI and SII cutoff values were analyzed by ROC curves according to the OS of patients with HCC. According to the ROC curve and the Youden index, the ideal preoperative PNI and SII cutoff values were 50.25 and 461.5, respectively. The areas under the ROC curve for PNI and SII were 0.64 (95% CI for the area between 0.56 and 0.72, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1a) and 0.58 (95% CI for the area between 0.50 and 0.66, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1b), respectively. The PNI and SII cutoff values correspond to sensitivity values of 73.64% and 42.73% and specificity values of 53.26% and 73.91%, respectively. For subsequent data analysis, the patients were divided into two groups for further analysis based on the ideal cutoff values: the PNI-low group (PNI ≤ 50.25) and PNI-high group (PNI > 50.25), and the SII-low group (SII ≤ 461.5) and SII-high group (SII > 461.5).

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses for the HCC Patients

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for age, serum albumin, ALT, AST, tumor diameter, and other clinicopathologic variables. The univariate Cox regression analysis identified that serum albumin (HR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.78–0.97; P = 0.013), tumor diameter (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.09–1.53; P = 0.004), and PNI (HR = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.07–0.39; P = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors associated with RFS. Serum albumin (HR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.81–0.95; P = 0.001), tumor diameter (HR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.08–1.32; P = 0.001), PNI (HR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.17–0.57; P = 0.02), and SII (HR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.15–3.76; P = 0.016) were significant prognostic factors associated with OS (Table 2).
Table 2
Univariate and multivariate analyses for RFS and OS in patients with HCC
Variables
RFS
OS
HR (95% CI)
P value
HR (95% CI)
P value
Univariate analysis
  Age (years)
1.01 (0.98–1.04)
0.516
0.99 (0.97–1.02)
0.537
  Albumin (g/L)
0.87 (0.78–0.97)
0.013
0.88 (0.81–0.95)
0.001
  WBC (109/L), mean (SD)
0.84 (0.68–1.04)
0.115
1.09 (0.93–1.30)
0.295
  Neutrophil (109/L), mean (SD)
0.82 (0.63–1.07)
0.138
1.14 (0.92–1.40)
0.23
  Lymphocyte (109/L), mean (SD)
0.63 (0.32–1.22)
0.168
0.75 (0.44–1.26)
0.274
  Monocyte (109/L), mean (SD)
0.59 (0.10–3.45)
0.559
3.91 (0.90–17.08)
0.069
  PLT (109/L)
1.00 (1.00–1.01)
0.54
1.00 (1.00–1.01)
0.189
  Total bilirubin (μmol/L)
0.99 (0.97–1.01)
0.394
1.00 (0.97–1.02)
0.734
  Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)
0.98 (0.94–1.03)
0.411
0.99 (0.95–1.04)
0.672
  ALT (U/L)
1.01 (0.99–1.03)
0.24
1.00 (0.99–1.01)
0.923
  AST (U/L)
1.00 (0.99–1.01)
0.794
1.00 (0.99–1.00)
0.291
  APTT (s)
1.01 (0.92–1.11)
0.796
0.97 (0.91–1.03)
0.313
  PT (s)
1.02 (0.69–1.51)
0.925
0.97 (0.73–1.29)
0.843
  Tumor diameter (cm)
1.29 (1.09–1.53)
0.004
1.19 (1.08–1.32)
0.001
  Creatinine (μmol/L)
0.99 (0.97–1.01)
0.352
1.00 (0.98–1.01)
0.534
  HBV (presence vs. absence)
1.99 (0.57–6.96)
0.284
1.00 (0.48–2.12)
0.991
  Tumor capsular (absence vs. presence)
1.04 (0.45–2.41)
0.929
1.07 (0.58–1.95)
0.835
  AFP (ng/mL) (> 20 vs. ≤ )
1.06 (0.48–2.36)
0.885
1.50 (0.84–2.69)
0.169
  Edmondson grade (III–IV vs. I–II)
1.86 (0.67–5.13)
0.232
1.51 (0.78–2.90)
0.218
  Tumor number (multiple vs. single)
3.44 (1.00–11.84)
0.051
1.61 (0.83–3.13)
0.157
  PNI (high group vs. low group)
0.17 (0.07–0.39)
0.01
0.31 (0.17–0.57)
0.02
  SII (high group vs. low group)
1.23 (0.54–2.77)
0.625
2.08 (1.15–3.76)
0.016
  Sex (male vs. female)
3.34 (0.76–14.72)
0.111
1.95 (0.89–4.25)
0.094
  Cirrhosis (presence vs. absence)
1.46 (0.64–3.35)
0.369
1.19 (0.63–2.26)
0.587
  TNM stage (III vs. I/II)
2.40 (0.69–8.36)
0.169
1.79 (0.86–3.73)
0.122
Multivariate analysis
  Albumin (g/L)
1.07 (0.92–1.25)
0.377
0.98 (0.88–1.09)
0.705
  PNI (high group vs. low group)
0.11 (0.03–0.39)
0.001
0.43 (0.19–1.00)
0.049
  SII (high group vs. low group)
1.14 (0.46–2.87)
0.776
1.98 (1.04–3.77)
0.039
  Tumor number (multiple vs. single)
2.41 (0.64–9.20)
0.194
  
  Tumor diameter (cm)
1.27 (1.04–1.54)
0.018
1.20 (1.08–1.33)
0.001
WBC white blood cell, PLT platelet, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, PT prothrombin time, PNI prognostic nutritional index, SII systemic immune-inflammation index, AFP alpha-fetoprotein, TNM tumor-node-metastasis
From the multivariate analyses, we found that PNI (HR = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.03–0.39; P = 0.001) and tumor diameter (HR = 1.27; 95% CI = 1.04–1.54; P = 0.018) were significant prognostic markers for RFS, and that PNI (HR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.19–1.00; P = 0.049), SII (HR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.04–3.77; P = 0.039), and tumor diameter (HR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.08–1.33; P = 0.001) were significant prognostic markers for OS (Table 2).

The Prognostic Value of PNI and SII in HCC Patients

Finally, we evaluated the prognostic value of PNI and SII in HCC patients who underwent liver resection. The median RFS times in the PNI-low and PNI-high groups were 13.5 months and 23 months (P = 0.001, Fig. 2a), respectively, and the median RFS times in the SII-low and SII-high groups were 18 months and 15 months (P = 0.03, Fig. 2b), respectively. The median OS times in the PNI-low and PNI-high groups were 24 months and 39 months (P = 0.001, Fig. 2c), respectively, and the median OS in the SII-low and SII-high groups was 36 months and 22 months (P = 0.002, Fig. 2d), respectively.

Discussion

A lot of research studies have found that the PNI and SII play an important role in the cancer development and prognosis. In our study, we divided the patients into two group: PNI(SII) high group and PNI(SII) low group. And, we interestingly found that PNI and SII can predict the HCC prognosis in patients who had underwent liver resection, and PNI and SII were independent risk factors for the OS of HCC patients.
Inflammation is closely related to the occurrence and metastasis of tumors, and the immune and nutritional status of the system is an important part of the inflammatory response. Therefore, an increasing number of studies have focused on the role of inflammation and nutrition in cancer patients, including those with pancreatic cancer24 and osteosarcoma.23 Many studies have reported that PNI and SII have great clinical significance in evaluating the prognosis in many solid cancers.
The PNI is calculated based on lymphocyte count and serum albumin levels. By releasing TNF, interferon-γ, and other cytokines, lymphocytes can restrain cancer cell growth and metastasis. The reduction in lymphocyte count can weaken bodily immune functions, and cancer cells are more prone to immune escape and lead to poor prognosis in cancer patients. Ostroumov et al.25 reported that CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes can mediate the growth of cancer cells. Serum albumin is produced by the liver and is an important nutritional index of the body. And in the HCC patients who underwent liver resection, the lower albumin level means the HCCs may have had liver dysfunction even liver failure which had high mortality rate and worse clinical outcomes.
The reasons why PNI can predict the prognosis of cancer patients are as follows: (1) lymphocytes mainly participate in the immune response and inhibit tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. A lower lymphocyte count can weaken the systemic immune system, and the cancer cells easily escape from immune surveillance and ultimately enhance the malignant biological behavior of cancer cells. (2) Serum albumin is the most simple and effective parameter for reflecting the body’s nutritional status, which is a decisive factor in cancer cell immune reactions. Moreover, serum albumin can be used to evaluate liver function in HCC patients. Hypoalbuminemia downregulates the systemic immune system and leads to tumor cell proliferation. Therefore, lymphocytes combined with serum albumin can predict the prognosis of cancer patients.
SII is an accurate systemic inflammatory index based on neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts. SII can accurately reflect the degree of systemic inflammation. Moreover, inflammation plays an important role in the tumor microenvironment. Many inflammatory cells and cytokines in the tumor microenvironment can affect cancer occurrence, development, and metastasis. A growing number of studies have demonstrated that platelets, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, can influence the biological behavior of cancer cells,2629 including aggregate in vessels and release of vascular endothelial growth factor, TGF-beta, platelet-derived growth factor, etc., which can promote the differentiation of tumor cells and tumor proliferation. In addition, cancer cells can release thrombopoietin and inflammatory mediators, which can promote platelet growth, in turn promoting tumor growth. Neutrophils can promote angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis by releasing VEGF and matrix metalloproteinase. Many studies have shown that extensive neutrophil infiltration in tumor tissues is associated with cancer recurrence and is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in cancer patients. In this study, we found that SII was negatively correlated with albumin and AST, indicating that SII can also damage the liver function in HCC patients. A higher SII score in HCC patients usually indicated poorly liver function, which is a negative risk factor for the clinical outcomes of these patients.
In addition, PNI and SII are simple, practical, and effective biomarkers for the routine examination of patients with tumors because these indices can be evaluated by routine blood and liver function tests. There were also limitations in our study: firstly, our research was a retrospective study, and the sample size was not large. Therefore, multicenter, large-sample clinical studies are needed to obtain more accurate PNI and SII value and to accurately predict the prognosis of cancer patients. Secondly, the optimal PNI and SII values vary in different studies because of diverse sample sizes and patient selection criteria, resulting in bias in the values. Thirdly, there were many HBV-related HCC patients in our study, but we can analyze the viral load which may alter the PNI/SII. For patients who had poor prognosis by the PNI and SII, early treatment such as TACE and targeted therapy may improve the prognosis and prolong the survival time in HCC patients.

Conclusion

PNI and SII can predict the prognosis of HCC patients who underwent hepatectomy.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, W., et al., Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016. 66(2): p. 115–32.CrossRef Chen, W., et al., Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016. 66(2): p. 115–32.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel, R.L., K.D. Miller, and A. Jemal, Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019. 69(1): p. 7–34.CrossRef Siegel, R.L., K.D. Miller, and A. Jemal, Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin, 2019. 69(1): p. 7–34.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Llovet, J.M., et al., Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2018. 15(10): p. 599–616.CrossRef Llovet, J.M., et al., Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2018. 15(10): p. 599–616.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadier, B., et al., Early detection and curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in France and in the United States. Hepatology, 2017. 65(4): p. 1237–1248.CrossRef Cadier, B., et al., Early detection and curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in France and in the United States. Hepatology, 2017. 65(4): p. 1237–1248.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bai, N., et al., circFBLIM1 act as a ceRNA to promote hepatocellular cancer progression by sponging miR-346. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2018. 37(1): p. 172.CrossRef Bai, N., et al., circFBLIM1 act as a ceRNA to promote hepatocellular cancer progression by sponging miR-346. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2018. 37(1): p. 172.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Memon, K., et al., Radiographic response to locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma predicts patient survival times. Gastroenterology, 2011. 141(2): p. 526–35, 535 e1–2.CrossRef Memon, K., et al., Radiographic response to locoregional therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma predicts patient survival times. Gastroenterology, 2011. 141(2): p. 526–35, 535 e1–2.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Khoueiry, A.B., et al., Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet, 2017. 389(10088): p. 2492–2502.CrossRef El-Khoueiry, A.B., et al., Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet, 2017. 389(10088): p. 2492–2502.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Villanueva, A., et al., Combining clinical, pathology, and gene expression data to predict recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology, 2011. 140(5): p. 1501–12 e2.CrossRef Villanueva, A., et al., Combining clinical, pathology, and gene expression data to predict recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology, 2011. 140(5): p. 1501–12 e2.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tao, Y.M., et al., BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 7: epithelial-mesenchymal transition promoter and prognostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 2013. 57(6): p. 2326–37.CrossRef Tao, Y.M., et al., BTB/POZ domain-containing protein 7: epithelial-mesenchymal transition promoter and prognostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology, 2013. 57(6): p. 2326–37.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Crusz, S.M. and F.R. Balkwill, Inflammation and cancer: advances and new agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2015. 12(10): p. 584–96.CrossRef Crusz, S.M. and F.R. Balkwill, Inflammation and cancer: advances and new agents. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2015. 12(10): p. 584–96.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zitvogel, L., F. Pietrocola, and G. Kroemer, Nutrition, inflammation and cancer. Nat Immunol, 2017. 18(8): p. 843–850.CrossRef Zitvogel, L., F. Pietrocola, and G. Kroemer, Nutrition, inflammation and cancer. Nat Immunol, 2017. 18(8): p. 843–850.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris-Stiff, G., D. Gomez, and K.R. Prasad, C-reactive protein in liver cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2008. 34(7): p. 727–9.CrossRef Morris-Stiff, G., D. Gomez, and K.R. Prasad, C-reactive protein in liver cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2008. 34(7): p. 727–9.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Diem, S., et al., Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab. Lung Cancer, 2017. 111: p. 176–181.CrossRef Diem, S., et al., Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with nivolumab. Lung Cancer, 2017. 111: p. 176–181.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu, H., et al., Prognostic value of preoperative NLR, dNLR, PLR and CRP in surgical renal cell carcinoma patients. World J Urol, 2017. 35(2): p. 261–270.CrossRef Hu, H., et al., Prognostic value of preoperative NLR, dNLR, PLR and CRP in surgical renal cell carcinoma patients. World J Urol, 2017. 35(2): p. 261–270.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ying, H.Q., et al., The prognostic value of preoperative NLR, d-NLR, PLR and LMR for predicting clinical outcome in surgical colorectal cancer patients. Med Oncol, 2014. 31(12): p. 305.CrossRef Ying, H.Q., et al., The prognostic value of preoperative NLR, d-NLR, PLR and LMR for predicting clinical outcome in surgical colorectal cancer patients. Med Oncol, 2014. 31(12): p. 305.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, J.H., et al., Systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol, 2017. 23(34): p. 6261–6272.CrossRef Chen, J.H., et al., Systemic immune-inflammation index for predicting prognosis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol, 2017. 23(34): p. 6261–6272.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Diao, P., et al., Preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma after curative resection. J Transl Med, 2018. 16(1): p. 365.CrossRef Diao, P., et al., Preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma after curative resection. J Transl Med, 2018. 16(1): p. 365.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jomrich, G., et al., Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) Predicts Poor Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Resection. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019. Jomrich, G., et al., Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) Predicts Poor Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Resection. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokunaga, R., et al., Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Severe Complications, Recurrence, and Poor Prognosis in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Primary Tumor Resection. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015. 58(11): p. 1048–57.CrossRef Tokunaga, R., et al., Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Severe Complications, Recurrence, and Poor Prognosis in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Primary Tumor Resection. Dis Colon Rectum, 2015. 58(11): p. 1048–57.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Okadome, K., et al., Prognostic Nutritional Index, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg, 2018. Okadome, K., et al., Prognostic Nutritional Index, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg, 2018.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Buzby, G.P., et al., Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Surg, 1980. 139(1): p. 160–7.CrossRef Buzby, G.P., et al., Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Surg, 1980. 139(1): p. 160–7.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, H., et al., The predictive value of a preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cell Physiol, 2019. 234(2): p. 1794–1802.CrossRef Zhang, H., et al., The predictive value of a preoperative systemic immune-inflammation index and prognostic nutritional index in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cell Physiol, 2019. 234(2): p. 1794–1802.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang, X., et al., Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with osteosarcoma. J Cell Physiol, 2019. 234(10): p. 18408–18414.CrossRef Huang, X., et al., Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index and systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with osteosarcoma. J Cell Physiol, 2019. 234(10): p. 18408–18414.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Geng, Y., et al., Prognostic nutritional index predicts survival and correlates with systemic inflammatory response in advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015. 41(11): p. 1508–14.CrossRef Geng, Y., et al., Prognostic nutritional index predicts survival and correlates with systemic inflammatory response in advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015. 41(11): p. 1508–14.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostroumov, D., et al., CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay in controlling tumor growth. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2018. 75(4): p. 689–713.CrossRef Ostroumov, D., et al., CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte interplay in controlling tumor growth. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2018. 75(4): p. 689–713.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Menter, D.G., et al., Platelets and cancer: a casual or causal relationship: revisited. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2014. 33(1): p. 231–69.CrossRef Menter, D.G., et al., Platelets and cancer: a casual or causal relationship: revisited. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2014. 33(1): p. 231–69.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wojtukiewicz, M.Z., et al., Platelets and cancer angiogenesis nexus. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2017. 36(2): p. 249–262.CrossRef Wojtukiewicz, M.Z., et al., Platelets and cancer angiogenesis nexus. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 2017. 36(2): p. 249–262.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ocana, A., et al., Neutrophils in cancer: prognostic role and therapeutic strategies. Mol Cancer, 2017. 16(1): p. 137.CrossRef Ocana, A., et al., Neutrophils in cancer: prognostic role and therapeutic strategies. Mol Cancer, 2017. 16(1): p. 137.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, D., et al., Preoperative inflammatory markers of NLR and PLR as indicators of poor prognosis in resectable HCC. PeerJ, 2019. 7: p. e7132.CrossRef Wang, D., et al., Preoperative inflammatory markers of NLR and PLR as indicators of poor prognosis in resectable HCC. PeerJ, 2019. 7: p. e7132.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prognostic Nutritional Index and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predict the Prognosis of Patients with HCC
verfasst von
Dong Wang
Xi Hu
Liang Xiao
Guo Long
Lei Yao
ZhiMing Wang
LeDu Zhou
Publikationsdatum
05.02.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04492-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.