Introduction
Thromboembolic complications are frequently observed during induction therapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) [
1]. They can significantly increase morbidity of this malignant disease and often lead to long-term consequences. Potential reasons for this increased tendency to thrombosis could, on the one hand, be the disease itself, on the other hand treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, in particular L-asparaginase (ASP) and glucocorticoids [
2]. L-asparaginase is widely used in the treatment of pediatric ALL. Besides allergic reactions, therapy with ASP is associated with coagulopathy due to a decrease in almost all proteins responsible for coagulation and anticoagulation, but antithrombin III (AT III) is affected to the greatest extent [
3]. Early detection and prevention of thromboembolic complications during ALL induction is important to reduce potentially life-threatening events and ensure timely continuation of therapy. Thus, several authors agree that prophylaxis with anticoagulants should be considered in this sensitive phase of therapy [
4]. However, to date there is no generally valid consensus on the effectiveness of thromboembolic prophylaxis in children with cancer and different centers take different approaches [
5]. As early as 2008, we were able to show that the use of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in combination with AT III substitution led to a significant reduction in severe thrombosis without increasing the risk of major bleeding [
6]. More recent recommendations in the literature support the claim that LMWH can effectively and safely reduce thromboembolic complications in childhood ALL [
7]. There is a need for large, prospective studies that compare different approaches with each other so that a statement can also be made about other strategies such as use of vitamin K antagonists, AT III replacement or other options. In a prospective study, Greiner et al. recommended thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin (one of the most common LMWH) in children and adolescents with ALL [
8]. Another randomized controlled trial is currently underway on thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in childhood leukemia [
9]. Newer anticoagulants such as apixaban are also currently being tested in randomized studies for their effectiveness in reducing thrombosis in children with ALL [
10].
However, in addition to these certainly very important prospective studies, many years of clinical experience with successful management of thrombosis prophylaxis in childhood ALL can produce an important statement regarding the effectiveness and safety of these procedures. In the following retrospective analysis, we describe 20 years of experience with strikingly successful thromboembolic prophylaxis with enoxaparin plus AT III substitution during ALL induction therapy.
Discussion
Thromboembolic complications are well-known events in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and can lead to mortality and excess morbidity. They are strongly associated with administration of ASP and also glucocorticoids [
11,
12]. The state of hypercoagulability may be attributed to hemostatic derangement with marked hypofibrinolysis [
13] and decreased natural anticoagulants (AT III, protein C, protein S) [
3,
14] associated with increased thrombin generation indicated by elevated D-dimer levels [
4], whereby the drop in AT III is most strongly described in the literature [
3]. In line with the literature, we were also able to show a marked decline in AT III (Fig.
1A) and fibrinogen (Fig.
1B) during the first 40 days of treatment, whereby the drop in AT III is not as evident as described in the literature since it was regularly substituted in patients with AT III levels below 50%. As stated above, it has been reported that thrombosis is more likely to occur during ASP therapeutic phase due to the relative procoagulant state caused by marked fibrinolysis inhibition. However, the present retrospective study cannot show clear data to suggest this point. If these points can be evaluated, the duration of anticoagulation therapy may change.
The incidence of thromboembolic complications under ALL therapy is reported differently in the literature: Nowak-Göttl et al. in 2009 described a symptomatic thrombosis prevalence of up to 36% in children with ALL during therapy with ASP and glucocorticoids [
1]. Similar figures were published by Mitchell et al., who reported a prevalence of deep vein thrombosis of 36.7% in pediatric ALL patients [
15]. Other authors reported an incidence of thromboembolic complications as 16.7% [
4] or 6.2% [
16] in pediatric ALL cohorts. As early as 2008, our department was able to demonstrate a 12.7% frequency of deep vein thrombosis in a historical cohort of 71 pediatric ALL patients, who were treated according to the AIEOP-BFM 95/2000 protocols [
6]. A newer study from Austria [
17] finally showed an incidence of thromboembolic events (≥ grade 2) of < 5%.
Regarding risk factors for developing thromboembolic complications during therapy, patients with ALL and ≥ 10.0 years of age who are treated according to the BFM regimen are particularly affected (compared to JACLS – Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia Study ALL-02 protocol) [
13]. Adolescent age (10–16 or 10–18 years, retrospectively) was also reported by other authors to be a main risk factor for the development of thromboembolic events [
17], as this patient cohort shows a more severe decline in anticoagulant and fibrinolytic parameters [
18]. Furthermore, obese pediatric ALL patients showed a three-fold increased risk of developing a thromboembolic complication (symptomatic or asymptomatic) [
19]. Parallel thereto, in this study, thrombelastography did not predict the development of thromboembolic events [
19], which is in line with our observations (data not shown).
There is still conflicting evidence regarding thromboprophylaxis in children undergoing ALL treatment – comparable to the data available for adult ALL patients [
20]. However, there is unanimous agreement that prophylactic use of anticoagulants should be considered in at least some patients during induction/consolidation. It has repeatedly been shown in the literature that the administration of fresh frozen plasma has no effect on the frequency of thrombosis under asparaginase therapy [
21,
22]. Elhasid et al. showed 2001 in a pilot study that enoxaparin is a safe and possibly effective means of preventing thromboembolism in ALL patients during L-asparaginase therapy [
23]. As early as 2008, we were able to show that a combination of enoxaparin and AT III is a safe and efficient option for thrombosis prophylaxis during ALL induction therapy [
6]. In addition, Nowak-Göttl et al. mentioned a possible positive effect of AT III substitution even earlier [
24]. A meta-analysis of six studies on the subject of thromboprophylaxis in children with cancer (especially ALL) showed that only the use of LMWH is safe and effective. A statement on AT III or vitamin K antagonists could not be made here [
7]. A prospective study that examined the antithrombotic measures in the ALL-BFM 2000 and AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 studies was able to show that the use of enoxaparin can be preferred to therapy with unfractionated heparin (thrombosis frequency 3.5% vs 8.0%). This study shows that the use of enoxaparin in children and adolescents with ALL in induction therapy can be recommended; the role of AT III remains to be determined [
8]. Another prospective study has set itself the task of measuring the use of LMWH in comparison to no prophylaxis in children and adolescents with ALL in the Netherlands [
9]. In addition, according to Pelland-Marcotte et al. [
25], there is no evidence for a recommendation for antithrombotic prophylaxis solely because children have central catheters.
After 20 years of experience with consistently performed anti-thrombotic prophylaxis with LMWH and AT III substitution in all pediatric ALL patients in induction therapy, our patient population shows a very low incidence of deep venous thrombotic events (2.9%, Table
2). However, it should be mentioned here that in this study only symptomatic patients were examined for thrombosis using imaging. The fact that four of the five patients with deep vein thrombosis were male is interesting and could possibly be explained by the fact that male gender is also approximately 1.3 times overrepresented in the diagnosis of childhood leukemia. The need for a particular number and duration of AT III substitutions at serum values below 50% was independent of gender, but significantly dependent on age. We observed that adolescent patients had a greater decrease in AT III than did younger patients and therefore needed more AT III administration (total population
p < 0.0001; female
p < 0.0001; male
p = 0.003; see also Table
2: need for AT III substitution: > 10 years of age 91.4% versus 65.2% in patients < 10 years of age). In addition, especially female adolescents showed these low AT III values for a longer time, which meant a longer period of AT III substitution (total population
p = 0.064; female
p = 0.022; male
p = 0.567). This means that in the group of adolescents, prophylaxis with enoxaparin would be particularly important. Whether an additional substitution with AT III makes sense must be shown by large prospective studies. However, we have had good experience with a combination prophylaxis (enoxaparin and AT III) over the last 20 years, although it should always be kept in mind that increased AT III activity may decrease asparaginase activity [
26].
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.