Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2019

11.07.2019 | Original Article

Prospective multi-center study of surgeon’s assessment of the gallbladder compared to histopathological examination to detect incidental malignancy

verfasst von: Yurdakul Deniz Firat, Ufuk Oguz Idiz, Coskun Cakir, Erkan Yardimci, Pinar Yazici, Huseyin Bektasoglu, Emre Bozkurt, Ramazan Ucak, Zuhal Gucin, Taskin Uresin, Mustafa Hasbahceci

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Routine histopathological examination after cholecystectomy for gallstones is performed despite the low rates of incidental findings of malignancy. The aim of this study was to assess predictive values of macroscopic examination of cholecystectomy specimens by surgeons in gallstone disease.

Methods

A prospective multi-center diagnostic study was carried out between December 2015 and March 2017 at four different centers. All patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstone disease were consecutively screened for eligibility. Patients whose ages are 18 to 80 years, and preoperative imaging findings without any pathology except cholelithiasis were included. The gallbladder was first evaluated macroscopically ex situ by two operating surgeons and rated as macroscopically benign (group S1), suspicious for a benign diagnosis (group S2), and suspicious for malignancy (group S3). Thereafter, a pathologist made a final histopathological examination whose results are grouped as chronic cholecystitis (group P1), benign or precancerous lesions in which only cholecystectomy is the adequate treatment modality (group P2), and carcinoma (group P3). Diagnostic accuracy of the surgeon’s assessment to the histopathological examination was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy, and correlated by a kappa agreement coefficient.

Results

A total of 1112 patients were included in this trial. The specificity rates were 96.5%, 100%, and 98.7% for group S1-group S2, group S1-group S3, and group S2-group S3, respectively. Accuracy rates to detect malignancy were 100% and 95. 2% for group S1 and group S2, respectively. Kappa coefficient values were 1.0 and 0.64 for group S1-group S3 and group S2-group S3, respectively (p < 0.001 for both).

Conclusion

Assessment of the gallbladder specimen and selective histopathological examination may be adequate after cholecystectomy for gallstone diseases. Such a procedure would have the potential to reduce costs and prevent unnecessary loss of labor productivity without affecting patients’ safety. However, higher number of patients in more centers is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Koppatz H, Nordin A, Scheinin T, Sallinen V (2018) The risk of incidental gallbladder cancer is negligible in macroscopically normal cholecystectomy specimens. HPB (Oxford) 20:456–461CrossRef Koppatz H, Nordin A, Scheinin T, Sallinen V (2018) The risk of incidental gallbladder cancer is negligible in macroscopically normal cholecystectomy specimens. HPB (Oxford) 20:456–461CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Basak F, Hasbahceci M, Canbak T et al (2016) Incidental findings during routine pathological evaluation of gallbladder specimens: review of 1,747 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:280–283CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Basak F, Hasbahceci M, Canbak T et al (2016) Incidental findings during routine pathological evaluation of gallbladder specimens: review of 1,747 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:280–283CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalita D, Pant L, Singh S et al (2013) Impact of routine histopathological examination of gall bladder specimens on early detection of malignancy – a study of 4,115 cholecystectomy specimens. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14:3315–3318CrossRefPubMed Kalita D, Pant L, Singh S et al (2013) Impact of routine histopathological examination of gall bladder specimens on early detection of malignancy – a study of 4,115 cholecystectomy specimens. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14:3315–3318CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clemente G, Nuzzo G, De Rose AM et al (2012) Unexpected gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a worrisome picture. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1462–1468CrossRefPubMed Clemente G, Nuzzo G, De Rose AM et al (2012) Unexpected gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a worrisome picture. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1462–1468CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bazoua G, Hamza N, Lazim T (2007) Do we need histology for a normal-looking gall bladder? J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 14:564–568CrossRef Bazoua G, Hamza N, Lazim T (2007) Do we need histology for a normal-looking gall bladder? J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 14:564–568CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghimire P, Yogi N, Shrestha BB (2011) Incidence of incidental carcinoma gall bladder in cases of routine cholecystectomy. Kathmandu Univ Med J 34:3–6 Ghimire P, Yogi N, Shrestha BB (2011) Incidence of incidental carcinoma gall bladder in cases of routine cholecystectomy. Kathmandu Univ Med J 34:3–6
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui FG, Memon AA, Abro AH, Sasoli NA, Ahmad L (2013) Routine histopathology of gallbladder after elective cholecystectomy for gallstones: waste of resources or a justified act? BMC Surg 13:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui FG, Memon AA, Abro AH, Sasoli NA, Ahmad L (2013) Routine histopathology of gallbladder after elective cholecystectomy for gallstones: waste of resources or a justified act? BMC Surg 13:26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffy A, Capanu M, Abou-Alfa GK, Huitzil D, Jarnagin W, Fong Y, D'Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, Blumgart LH, O'Reilly EM (2008) Gallbladder cancer (GBC): 10-year experience at memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). J Surg Oncol 98:485–489CrossRefPubMed Duffy A, Capanu M, Abou-Alfa GK, Huitzil D, Jarnagin W, Fong Y, D'Angelica M, DeMatteo RP, Blumgart LH, O'Reilly EM (2008) Gallbladder cancer (GBC): 10-year experience at memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). J Surg Oncol 98:485–489CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Machado M, Makdissi F, Surjan R (2015) Totally laparoscopic hepatic bisegmentectomy (s4b+s5) and hilar lymphadenectomy for incidental gallbladder cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:336–339CrossRef Machado M, Makdissi F, Surjan R (2015) Totally laparoscopic hepatic bisegmentectomy (s4b+s5) and hilar lymphadenectomy for incidental gallbladder cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:336–339CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayasundara JA, de Silva WM (2013) Histological assessment of cholecystectomy specimens performed for symptomatic cholelithiasis: routine or selective? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:317–322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jayasundara JA, de Silva WM (2013) Histological assessment of cholecystectomy specimens performed for symptomatic cholelithiasis: routine or selective? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95:317–322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng YL, Xiong XZ, Zhou Y, Shrestha A, Li FY, Cheng NS (2015) Selective histology of cholecystectomy specimens–is it justified? J Surg Res 193:196–201CrossRefPubMed Deng YL, Xiong XZ, Zhou Y, Shrestha A, Li FY, Cheng NS (2015) Selective histology of cholecystectomy specimens–is it justified? J Surg Res 193:196–201CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tayeb M, Rauf F, Ahmad K, Khan FM (2015) Is it necessary to submit grossly normal looking gall bladder specimens for histopathological examination? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16:1535–1538CrossRefPubMed Tayeb M, Rauf F, Ahmad K, Khan FM (2015) Is it necessary to submit grossly normal looking gall bladder specimens for histopathological examination? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16:1535–1538CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dix FP, Bruce IA, Krypcyzk A, Ravi S (2003) A selective approach to histopathology of the gallbladder is justifiable. Surgeon. 1:233–235CrossRefPubMed Dix FP, Bruce IA, Krypcyzk A, Ravi S (2003) A selective approach to histopathology of the gallbladder is justifiable. Surgeon. 1:233–235CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 211 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Springer-Verlag, New York, p 211
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Randi G, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C (2006) Gallbladder cancer worldwide: geographical distribution and risk factors. Int J Cancer 118:1591–1602CrossRefPubMed Randi G, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C (2006) Gallbladder cancer worldwide: geographical distribution and risk factors. Int J Cancer 118:1591–1602CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazcano-Ponce EC, Miquel JF, Muñoz N, Herrero R, Ferrecio C, Wistuba II, Alonso de Ruiz P, Aristi Urista G, Nervi F (2001) Epidemiology and molecular pathology of gallbladder cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 51:349–364CrossRefPubMed Lazcano-Ponce EC, Miquel JF, Muñoz N, Herrero R, Ferrecio C, Wistuba II, Alonso de Ruiz P, Aristi Urista G, Nervi F (2001) Epidemiology and molecular pathology of gallbladder cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 51:349–364CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandey M, Shukla VK (2002) Diet and gallbladder cancer: a case control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:365–368CrossRefPubMed Pandey M, Shukla VK (2002) Diet and gallbladder cancer: a case control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:365–368CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheth S, Bedford A, Chopra S (2000) Primary gallbladder cancer: recognition of risk factors and the role of prophylactic cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1402–1410CrossRefPubMed Sheth S, Bedford A, Chopra S (2000) Primary gallbladder cancer: recognition of risk factors and the role of prophylactic cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1402–1410CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Roa I, Ibacache G, Roa J, Araya J, de Aretxabala X, Muñoz S (2006) Gallstones and gallbladder cancer-volume and weight of gallstones are associated with gallbladder cancer: a case-control study. J Surg Oncol 93:624–628CrossRefPubMed Roa I, Ibacache G, Roa J, Araya J, de Aretxabala X, Muñoz S (2006) Gallstones and gallbladder cancer-volume and weight of gallstones are associated with gallbladder cancer: a case-control study. J Surg Oncol 93:624–628CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavallaro A, Piccolo G, Panebianco V, Lo Menzo E, Berretta M, Zanghì A, di Vita M, Cappellani A (2012) Incidental gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: managing an unexpected finding. World J Gastroenterol 18:4019–4027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cavallaro A, Piccolo G, Panebianco V, Lo Menzo E, Berretta M, Zanghì A, di Vita M, Cappellani A (2012) Incidental gallbladder cancer during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: managing an unexpected finding. World J Gastroenterol 18:4019–4027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Serra I, Calvo A, Baez S et al (1996) Risk factors for gallbladder cancer. An international collaborative case control study. Cancer. 78:1515–1517CrossRefPubMed Serra I, Calvo A, Baez S et al (1996) Risk factors for gallbladder cancer. An international collaborative case control study. Cancer. 78:1515–1517CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrestha R, Tiwari M, Ranabhat SK, Aryal G, Rauniyar SK, Shrestha HG (2010) Incidental gallbladder carcinoma: value of routine histological examination of cholecystectomy specimens. Nepal Med Coll J 12:90–94PubMed Shrestha R, Tiwari M, Ranabhat SK, Aryal G, Rauniyar SK, Shrestha HG (2010) Incidental gallbladder carcinoma: value of routine histological examination of cholecystectomy specimens. Nepal Med Coll J 12:90–94PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Pai SA, Bhat MG (2004) Selective histopathology of gall bladders is unscientific and dangerous. Surgeon. 2:241CrossRefPubMed Pai SA, Bhat MG (2004) Selective histopathology of gall bladders is unscientific and dangerous. Surgeon. 2:241CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoo JJ, Nurul AM (2008) A clinicopathological study of nine cases of gallbladder carcinoma in 1,122 cholecystectomies in Johor, Malaysia. Malays J Pathol 30:21–26PubMed Khoo JJ, Nurul AM (2008) A clinicopathological study of nine cases of gallbladder carcinoma in 1,122 cholecystectomies in Johor, Malaysia. Malays J Pathol 30:21–26PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CP, Chertow GM, Zenios SA (2009) An empiric estimate of the value of life: updating the renal dialysis cost-effectiveness standard. Value Health 12:80–87CrossRefPubMed Lee CP, Chertow GM, Zenios SA (2009) An empiric estimate of the value of life: updating the renal dialysis cost-effectiveness standard. Value Health 12:80–87CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian Y-H, Ji X, Liu B, Yang GY, Meng XF, Xia HT, Wang J, Huang ZQ, Dong JH (2015) Surgical treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer discovered during or following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 39:746–752CrossRefPubMed Tian Y-H, Ji X, Liu B, Yang GY, Meng XF, Xia HT, Wang J, Huang ZQ, Dong JH (2015) Surgical treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer discovered during or following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 39:746–752CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Swank HA, Mulder IM, Hop WC, van de Vijver MJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA (2013) Routine histopathology for carcinoma in cholecystectomy specimens not evidence based: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:4439–4448CrossRefPubMed Swank HA, Mulder IM, Hop WC, van de Vijver MJ, Lange JF, Bemelman WA (2013) Routine histopathology for carcinoma in cholecystectomy specimens not evidence based: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:4439–4448CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective multi-center study of surgeon’s assessment of the gallbladder compared to histopathological examination to detect incidental malignancy
verfasst von
Yurdakul Deniz Firat
Ufuk Oguz Idiz
Coskun Cakir
Erkan Yardimci
Pinar Yazici
Huseyin Bektasoglu
Emre Bozkurt
Ramazan Ucak
Zuhal Gucin
Taskin Uresin
Mustafa Hasbahceci
Publikationsdatum
11.07.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01800-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.