Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012

01.05.2012 | Clinical trial

Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening

verfasst von: Daniela Bernardi, Stefano Ciatto, Marco Pellegrini, Paolina Tuttobene, Carmine Fanto’, Marvi Valentini, Stefano Di Michele, Paolo Peterlongo, Nehmat Houssami

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There is limited evidence on the role of 3D mammography with tomosynthesis in breast screening, although early studies suggest that it may improve specificity. We prospectively evaluated the effect of integrating 3D mammography as a triage to assessment in 158 consecutive recalls to assessment (recalled in standard 2D-mammographic screening) in asymptomatic subjects. Radiologists provided 3D mammography-based opinion as to whether recall/assessment was warranted or unnecessary, and all subjects proceeded to assessment. 3D triage was positive (confirmed the need for assessment) in all 21 subjects with breast cancer (there were no false negatives), and would have avoided recall in 102 of 137 (74.4%) subjects with a negative/benign final outcome in whom 3D triage did not recommend recall. Proportion of true negative 3D triage (as a proxy for potential reduction in recalls) was slightly higher in dense than non-dense breasts, did not differ across age-groups, but was significantly associated with the type of lesion seen on imaging (being highest for distortions, asymmetric densities, and lesions with ill-defined margins). While the simulation design may have over-estimated the potential for 3D mammography triage to reduce recalls, this study clearly demonstrates its capability to improve breast screening specificity and to reduce recall rates. Future studies of 3D mammography should further assess its role as a recall-reducing strategy in screening practice and should include formal cost-analysis.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL (1995) Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 273:149–154CrossRef Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL (1995) Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 273:149–154CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Laya MB, Larson EB, Taplin SH et al (1996) Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:643–649PubMedCrossRef Laya MB, Larson EB, Taplin SH et al (1996) Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:643–649PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, White E, Peacock S et al (1999) Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false positive findings. Am J Roentgenol 173:1651–1655 Lehman CD, White E, Peacock S et al (1999) Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false positive findings. Am J Roentgenol 173:1651–1655
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146:502–510PubMed Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE (2007) Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 146:502–510PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Giordano L, Giorgi D, Piccini P, Ventura L, Stefanini V, Senore C, Paci E, Segnan N (2008) Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes-1996–2005. Epidemiol Prev 32:23–36PubMed Giordano L, Giorgi D, Piccini P, Ventura L, Stefanini V, Senore C, Paci E, Segnan N (2008) Time trends of process and impact indicators in Italian breast screening programmes-1996–2005. Epidemiol Prev 32:23–36PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2009) BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2005–2006. Cancer series no. 48. Cat. no. CAN 44. Canberra: AIHW. http://www.aihw.gov.au. Accessed 10 Oct 2011 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2009) BreastScreen Australia monitoring report 2005–2006. Cancer series no. 48. Cat. no. CAN 44. Canberra: AIHW. http://​www.​aihw.​gov.​au. Accessed 10 Oct 2011
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zappa M, Spagnolo G, Ciatto S, Giorgi D, Paci E, Rosselli Del Turco M (1995) Measurement of the costs in two mammographic screening programmes in the province of Florence, Italy. J Med Screen 2:191–194PubMed Zappa M, Spagnolo G, Ciatto S, Giorgi D, Paci E, Rosselli Del Turco M (1995) Measurement of the costs in two mammographic screening programmes in the province of Florence, Italy. J Med Screen 2:191–194PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JM, Franken EA Jr, Garg M et al (2007) Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. Radiographics 27:S231–S240PubMedCrossRef Park JM, Franken EA Jr, Garg M et al (2007) Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. Radiographics 27:S231–S240PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital breast tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:25–31 Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital breast tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:25–31
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafferty EA, Georgian-Smith D, Kopans DB et al (2002) Comparison of full-field digital tomosynthesis with two view conventional film screen mammography in the prediction of lesion malignancy. Radiology 225:268 Rafferty EA, Georgian-Smith D, Kopans DB et al (2002) Comparison of full-field digital tomosynthesis with two view conventional film screen mammography in the prediction of lesion malignancy. Radiology 225:268
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol 20:16–24PubMedCrossRef Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol 20:16–24PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitka M (2008) New screening methods offer hope for more accurate breast cancer detection. J Am Med Assoc 299:397–398CrossRef Mitka M (2008) New screening methods offer hope for more accurate breast cancer detection. J Am Med Assoc 299:397–398CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gur D (2007) Tomosynthesis: potential clinical role in breast imaging. Am J Roentgenol 189:614–615CrossRef Gur D (2007) Tomosynthesis: potential clinical role in breast imaging. Am J Roentgenol 189:614–615CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 189:616–623CrossRef Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol 189:616–623CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM et al (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. Am J Roentgenol 193:586–591CrossRef Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM et al (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. Am J Roentgenol 193:586–591CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pellegrini M, Bernardi D, Di Michele S et al (2011) Analysis of proportional incidence and review of interval cancer cases observed within the mammography screening programme in Trento province, Italy. Radiol Med 116(8):1217–1225PubMedCrossRef Pellegrini M, Bernardi D, Di Michele S et al (2011) Analysis of proportional incidence and review of interval cancer cases observed within the mammography screening programme in Trento province, Italy. Radiol Med 116(8):1217–1225PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson I, Ikeda D, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Rad 18:2817–2825CrossRef Andersson I, Ikeda D, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Rad 18:2817–2825CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafferty EA, Smith AP, Niklason, LT (2009) Assessing radiologist performance in dense versus fatty breasts using combined full-field digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared to full-field digital mammography alone. Radiologic Society of North America 95th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL Rafferty EA, Smith AP, Niklason, LT (2009) Assessing radiologist performance in dense versus fatty breasts using combined full-field digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared to full-field digital mammography alone. Radiologic Society of North America 95th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RH, Boston MA, Kopans DB, et al (2007) Initial callback rates for conventional and digital breast tomosynthesis mammography comparison in the screening setting. Radiologic Society of North America 92nd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL Moore RH, Boston MA, Kopans DB, et al (2007) Initial callback rates for conventional and digital breast tomosynthesis mammography comparison in the screening setting. Radiologic Society of North America 92nd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Caumo F, Brunelli S, Tosi E et al (2011) On the role of arbitration of discordant double readings of screening mammography: experience from two Italian programmes. Radiol Med 116:84–91PubMedCrossRef Caumo F, Brunelli S, Tosi E et al (2011) On the role of arbitration of discordant double readings of screening mammography: experience from two Italian programmes. Radiol Med 116:84–91PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening
verfasst von
Daniela Bernardi
Stefano Ciatto
Marco Pellegrini
Paolina Tuttobene
Carmine Fanto’
Marvi Valentini
Stefano Di Michele
Paolo Peterlongo
Nehmat Houssami
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-1959-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.