Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control 9/2007

01.11.2007 | Original Paper

Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men

verfasst von: Ilir Agalliu, Noel S. Weiss, Daniel W. Lin, Janet L. Stanford

Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control | Ausgabe 9/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although prostate cancer screening by measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) is common in clinical practice, the impact of such screening on prostate cancer-specific mortality remains uncertain.

Methods

Data from a population-based case–control study in King County, Washington, among men aged 50–64 years (706 cases, 645 controls) were used to examine the relationships between PSA and DRE screening and fatal prostate cancer and other-cause mortality. Incident cases were diagnosed in 1993–1996, identified via the Seattle-Puget Sound SEER cancer registry and followed for vital status through 1 June 2007. Controls were ascertained by random digit dialing and frequency age-matched to cases. The screening variable used in this analysis was self-reported receipt of one or more PSA and/or DRE tests performed as part of a routine checkup in the five-year period before diagnosis or reference date.

Results

A smaller proportion of men with fatal prostate cancer had one or more PSA and/or DRE screening tests compared to controls, resulting in an adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 0.38 (95% CI 0.19–0.77). There was no association, however, between PSA and/or DRE screening and other-cause mortality (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.51–2.02).

Conclusions

Results of this study suggest a reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality associated with PSA and/or DRE screening in middle-aged men. Findings should be interpreted cautiously, however, as results are based on observational data. Further, the study was not able to separate the relative efficacy of PSA versus DRE screening.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer Facts and Figures American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer Facts and Figures
2.
Zurück zum Zitat De Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, Calais da Silva F, Ciatto S et al (2002) Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer 97:237–244PubMedCrossRef De Koning HJ, Auvinen A, Berenguer Sanchez A, Calais da Silva F, Ciatto S et al (2002) Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial. Int J Cancer 97:237–244PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Andriole GL, Levin DL, Crawford ED, Gelmann EP, Pinsky PF et al (2005) Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 433–438PubMedCrossRef Andriole GL, Levin DL, Crawford ED, Gelmann EP, Pinsky PF et al (2005) Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 433–438PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV (1991) Case–control study of screening for prostate cancer by digital rectal examination. Lancet 337:1526–1529PubMedCrossRef Friedman GD, Hiatt RA, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV (1991) Case–control study of screening for prostate cancer by digital rectal examination. Lancet 337:1526–1529PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Katusic SK, Guess HA, Darby CH, Silverstein MD, Oesterling JE, Lieber MM (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a population-based case–control study. Urology 52:173–179PubMedCrossRef Jacobsen SJ, Bergstralh EJ, Katusic SK, Guess HA, Darby CH, Silverstein MD, Oesterling JE, Lieber MM (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a population-based case–control study. Urology 52:173–179PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Richert-Boe KE, Humphrey LL, Glass AG, Weiss NS (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. J Med Screen 5:99–103PubMed Richert-Boe KE, Humphrey LL, Glass AG, Weiss NS (1998) Screening digital rectal examination and prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. J Med Screen 5:99–103PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Perron L, Moore L, Bairati I, Bernard PM, Meyer F (2002) PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality. CMAJ 166:586–591PubMed Perron L, Moore L, Bairati I, Bernard PM, Meyer F (2002) PSA screening and prostate cancer mortality. CMAJ 166:586–591PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Glass AG, Weiss NS (2004) Prostate cancer screening and mortality: a case–control study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14:133–138CrossRef Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Glass AG, Weiss NS (2004) Prostate cancer screening and mortality: a case–control study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 14:133–138CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Van Den Eeden SK, Enger SM, Rybicki BA, Shapiro JA, Weiss NS (2005) Screening by prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in relation to prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. Epidemiology 16:367–376PubMedCrossRef Weinmann S, Richert-Boe KE, Van Den Eeden SK, Enger SM, Rybicki BA, Shapiro JA, Weiss NS (2005) Screening by prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination in relation to prostate cancer mortality: a case–control study. Epidemiology 16:367–376PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopec JA, Goel V, Bunting PS, Neuman J, Sayre EC, Warde P, Levers P, Fleshner N (2005) Screening with prostate specific antigen and metastatic prostate cancer risk: a population based case–control study. J Urol 174:495–449PubMedCrossRef Kopec JA, Goel V, Bunting PS, Neuman J, Sayre EC, Warde P, Levers P, Fleshner N (2005) Screening with prostate specific antigen and metastatic prostate cancer risk: a population based case–control study. J Urol 174:495–449PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartsch G, Horninger W, Klocker H, Reissigl A, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P (2001) Tyrol Prostate Cancer Screening Group. Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria. Urology 58:417–424 Bartsch G, Horninger W, Klocker H, Reissigl A, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P (2001) Tyrol Prostate Cancer Screening Group. Prostate cancer mortality after introduction of prostate-specific antigen mass screening in the Federal State of Tyrol, Austria. Urology 58:417–424
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Horninger W, Berger A, Pelzer A, Klocker H, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P, Bartsch G (2005) Screening for prostate cancer: updated experience from the Tyrol study. Can J Urol 12(Suppl 1):7–13PubMed Horninger W, Berger A, Pelzer A, Klocker H, Oberaigner W, Schonitzer D, Severi G, Robertson C, Boyle P, Bartsch G (2005) Screening for prostate cancer: updated experience from the Tyrol study. Can J Urol 12(Suppl 1):7–13PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Oberaigner W, Horninger W, Klocker H, Schonitzer D, Stuhlinger W, Bartsch G (2006) Reduction of prostate cancer mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing. Am J Epidemiol 164:376–384PubMedCrossRef Oberaigner W, Horninger W, Klocker H, Schonitzer D, Stuhlinger W, Bartsch G (2006) Reduction of prostate cancer mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing. Am J Epidemiol 164:376–384PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Concato J, Wells CK, Horwitz RI, Penson D, Fincke G, Berlowitz DR, Froehlich G, Blake D, Vickers MA, Gehr GA, Raheb NH, Sullivan G, Peduzzi P (2006) The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case–control study. Arch Intern Med 166:38–43PubMedCrossRef Concato J, Wells CK, Horwitz RI, Penson D, Fincke G, Berlowitz DR, Froehlich G, Blake D, Vickers MA, Gehr GA, Raheb NH, Sullivan G, Peduzzi P (2006) The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case–control study. Arch Intern Med 166:38–43PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Labrie F, Candas B, Dupont A, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Suburu RE, Diamond P, Levesque J, Belanger A (1999) Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 38:83–91PubMedCrossRef Labrie F, Candas B, Dupont A, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Suburu RE, Diamond P, Levesque J, Belanger A (1999) Screening decreases prostate cancer death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 38:83–91PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Labrie F, Candas B, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Brousseau G, Chevrette E, Levesque J (2004) Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11-year follow-up of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 59:311–388PubMedCrossRef Labrie F, Candas B, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Brousseau G, Chevrette E, Levesque J (2004) Screening decreases prostate cancer mortality: 11-year follow-up of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. Prostate 59:311–388PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandblom G, Varenhorst E, Lofman O, Rosell J, Carlsson P (2004) Clinical consequences of screening for prostate cancer: 15 years follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in Sweden. Eur Urol 46:717–723; discussion 724PubMedCrossRef Sandblom G, Varenhorst E, Lofman O, Rosell J, Carlsson P (2004) Clinical consequences of screening for prostate cancer: 15 years follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in Sweden. Eur Urol 46:717–723; discussion 724PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schroder FH, Roobol MJ, Damhuis RA, de Koning HJ, Blijenberg BG, Van der Kwast TH, Kirkels WJ, Bangma CH (2005) Rotterdam randomized pilot studies of screening for prostate cancer—an overview after 10 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:696PubMedCrossRef Schroder FH, Roobol MJ, Damhuis RA, de Koning HJ, Blijenberg BG, Van der Kwast TH, Kirkels WJ, Bangma CH (2005) Rotterdam randomized pilot studies of screening for prostate cancer—an overview after 10 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:696PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciatto S, Gervasi G, Gorini G, Lombardi C, Zappa M, Crocetti E (2006) Prostate cancer specific mortality in the florence screening pilot study cohort 1992–1993. Eur J Cancer 42:1858–1862PubMedCrossRef Ciatto S, Gervasi G, Gorini G, Lombardi C, Zappa M, Crocetti E (2006) Prostate cancer specific mortality in the florence screening pilot study cohort 1992–1993. Eur J Cancer 42:1858–1862PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanford JL, Wicklund KG, McKnight B, Daling JR, Brawer MK (1999) Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:881–886PubMed Stanford JL, Wicklund KG, McKnight B, Daling JR, Brawer MK (1999) Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:881–886PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research, Volume 1. The analysis of case–control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research, Volume 1. The analysis of case–control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ (2005) American cancer society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55:31–44PubMedCrossRef Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ (2005) American cancer society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55:31–44PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss NS (1994) Application of the case–control method in the evaluation of screening. Am J Epidemiology 16:102–108 Weiss NS (1994) Application of the case–control method in the evaluation of screening. Am J Epidemiology 16:102–108
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss NS, Etzioni R (2002) Estimating the influence of rescreening interval on the benefits associated with cancer screening: approaches and limitation. Epidemiology 13:713–717PubMedCrossRef Weiss NS, Etzioni R (2002) Estimating the influence of rescreening interval on the benefits associated with cancer screening: approaches and limitation. Epidemiology 13:713–717PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss NS, Lazovich DA (1996) Case–control studies of screening efficacy: the use of persons newly diagnosed with cancer who later sustain an unfavorable outcome. Am J Epidemiol 143:319–322PubMed Weiss NS, Lazovich DA (1996) Case–control studies of screening efficacy: the use of persons newly diagnosed with cancer who later sustain an unfavorable outcome. Am J Epidemiol 143:319–322PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prostate cancer mortality in relation to screening by prostate-specific antigen testing and digital rectal examination: a population-based study in middle-aged men
verfasst von
Ilir Agalliu
Noel S. Weiss
Daniel W. Lin
Janet L. Stanford
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2007
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Cancer Causes & Control / Ausgabe 9/2007
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-007-9031-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2007

Cancer Causes & Control 9/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

13.05.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.

Viel pflanzliche Nahrung, seltener Prostata-Ca.-Progression

12.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Ein hoher Anteil pflanzlicher Nahrung trägt möglicherweise dazu bei, das Progressionsrisiko von Männern mit Prostatakarzinomen zu senken. In einer US-Studie war das Risiko bei ausgeprägter pflanzlicher Ernährung in etwa halbiert.

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.