Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 5/2007

01.05.2007 | Cardiac

Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI—comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences

verfasst von: Thomas Schlosser, Nasser Malyar, Markus Jochims, Frank Breuckmann, Peter Hunold, Oliver Bruder, Raimund Erbel, Jörg Barkhausen

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We compared two different magnetic resonance (MR) sequences [steady-state free precession (SSFP) and gradient echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH)] for the assessment of aortic valve areas in aortic stenosis using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the standard of reference. Thirty-two patients with known aortic stenosis underwent MR (1.5 T) using a cine SSFP sequence and a cine FLASH sequence. Planimetry was performed in cross-sectional images and compared to the results of the TEE. In seven patients the grade of stenosis was additionally assessed by invasive cardiac catheterization (ICC). The mean aortic valve area measured by TEE was 0.97±0.19 mm2, 1.00±0.25 mm2 for SSFP and 1.25±0.23 mm2 based on FLASH images. The mean difference between the valve areas assessed based on SSFP and TEE images was 0.15±0.13 cm2 (FLASH vs TEE: 0.29±0.17 cm2). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that measurements using FLASH images overestimated the aortic valve area compared to TEE. Comparing ICC with MRI and TEE, only a weak to moderate correlation was found (ICC vs TEE: R=0.52, p=0.22; ICC vs SSFP: R=0.20, p=0.65; ICC vs FLASH: R=0.16, p=0.70). Measurements of the aortic valve area based on SSFP images correlate better with TEE compared to FLASH images.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat (1995) Vital and health statistics. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, p 127 (1995) Vital and health statistics. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, p 127
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Selzer A (1987) Changing aspects of the natural history of valvular aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 317:91–98PubMedCrossRef Selzer A (1987) Changing aspects of the natural history of valvular aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 317:91–98PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith N, McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH (1978) Severe aortic stenosis with impaired left ventricular function and clinical heart failure: results of valve replacement. Circulation 58:255–264PubMed Smith N, McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH (1978) Severe aortic stenosis with impaired left ventricular function and clinical heart failure: results of valve replacement. Circulation 58:255–264PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC et al (1998) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). J Heart Valve Dis 7:672–707PubMed Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC et al (1998) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. Executive Summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease). J Heart Valve Dis 7:672–707PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL, Huntsman LL (1986) Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:509–517PubMedCrossRef Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL, Huntsman LL (1986) Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:509–517PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L (1985) Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 72:810–818PubMed Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L (1985) Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 72:810–818PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tardif JC, Miller DS, Pandian NG et al (1995) Effects of variations in flow on aortic valve area in aortic stenosis based on in vivo planimetry of aortic valve area by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 76:193–198PubMedCrossRef Tardif JC, Miller DS, Pandian NG et al (1995) Effects of variations in flow on aortic valve area in aortic stenosis based on in vivo planimetry of aortic valve area by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 76:193–198PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tardif JC, Rodrigues AG, Hardy JF et al (1997) Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1296–1302PubMedCrossRef Tardif JC, Rodrigues AG, Hardy JF et al (1997) Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1296–1302PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR et al (2003) Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 42:519–526PubMedCrossRef John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR et al (2003) Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 42:519–526PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P et al (2003) Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 108:2236–2243PubMedCrossRef Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P et al (2003) Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 108:2236–2243PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorlin R, Gorlin SG (1951) Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J 41:1–29PubMedCrossRef Gorlin R, Gorlin SG (1951) Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J 41:1–29PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahimtoola SH (1989) Perspective on valvular heart disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 14:1–23PubMed Rahimtoola SH (1989) Perspective on valvular heart disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 14:1–23PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedrich M, Schulz-Menger J, Dietz R (2004) Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2148; 2148–2149 author replyPubMedCrossRef Friedrich M, Schulz-Menger J, Dietz R (2004) Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:2148; 2148–2149 author replyPubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hildebrand LB, Buonocore MH (2002) Fully refocused gradient recalled echo (FRGRE): factors affecting flow and motion sensitivity in cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 4:211–222PubMedCrossRef Hildebrand LB, Buonocore MH (2002) Fully refocused gradient recalled echo (FRGRE): factors affecting flow and motion sensitivity in cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 4:211–222PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T, Pilz B, Uhlich F, Dietz R (2002) Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 144:329–334PubMedCrossRef Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T, Pilz B, Uhlich F, Dietz R (2002) Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 144:329–334PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF (2001) MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 219:264–269PubMed Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF (2001) MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 219:264–269PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ (2002) Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 223:789–797PubMedCrossRef Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ (2002) Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 223:789–797PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunz RP, Oellig F, Krummenauer F et al (2005) Assessment of left ventricular function by breath-hold cine MR imaging: comparison of different steady-state free precession sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:140–148PubMedCrossRef Kunz RP, Oellig F, Krummenauer F et al (2005) Assessment of left ventricular function by breath-hold cine MR imaging: comparison of different steady-state free precession sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:140–148PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M et al (2003) Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 361:1241–1246PubMedCrossRef Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M et al (2003) Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 361:1241–1246PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G (1999) “Overestimation” of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1655–1661PubMedCrossRef Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G (1999) “Overestimation” of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1655–1661PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia D, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, Kadem L, Pibarot P (2003) Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:435–442PubMedCrossRef Garcia D, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, Kadem L, Pibarot P (2003) Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:435–442PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH, Balgude A, Sachs PB (2006) MDCT evaluation of aortic valvular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:350–360PubMedCrossRef Gilkeson RC, Markowitz AH, Balgude A, Sachs PB (2006) MDCT evaluation of aortic valvular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:350–360PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al (2003) Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226:145–152PubMedCrossRef Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al (2003) Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226:145–152PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, Kramer U, Finn JP (2002) MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 223:263–269PubMedCrossRef Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, Kramer U, Finn JP (2002) MR Imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 223:263–269PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Waltering KU, Hunold P, Bruder O, Schlosser T, Jochims M, Barkhausen J (2004) Steady-state free precession CINE MR: influence of different reconstruction algorithms on image quality. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:407 Waltering KU, Hunold P, Bruder O, Schlosser T, Jochims M, Barkhausen J (2004) Steady-state free precession CINE MR: influence of different reconstruction algorithms on image quality. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:407
Metadaten
Titel
Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI—comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences
verfasst von
Thomas Schlosser
Nasser Malyar
Markus Jochims
Frank Breuckmann
Peter Hunold
Oliver Bruder
Raimund Erbel
Jörg Barkhausen
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0437-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2007

European Radiology 5/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.