Erschienen in:
01.01.2016 | Original Article
Race and Prevalence of Large Bowel Polyps Among the Low-Income and Uninsured in South Carolina
verfasst von:
Kristin Wallace, Heather M. Brandt, James D. Bearden, Bridgette F. Blankenship, Renay Caldwell, James Dunn, Patricia Hegedus, Brenda J. Hoffman, Courtney H. Marsh, William H. Marsh, Cathy L. Melvin, March E. Seabrook, Ronald E. Sterba, Mary Lou Stinson, Annie Thibault, Franklin G. Berger, Anthony J. Alberg
Erschienen in:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
|
Ausgabe 1/2016
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Compared to whites, blacks have higher colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates and are at greater risk for early-onset disease. The reasons for this racial disparity are poorly understood, but one contributing factor could be differences in access to high-quality screening and medical care.
Aims
The present study was carried out to assess whether a racial difference in prevalence of large bowel polyps persists within a poor and uninsured population (n = 233, 124 blacks, 91 whites, 18 other) undergoing screening colonoscopy.
Methods
Eligible patients were uninsured, asymptomatic, had no personal history of colorectal neoplasia, and were between the ages 45–64 years (blacks) or 50–64 years (whites, other). We examined the prevalence of any adenoma (conventional, serrated) and then difference in adenoma/polyp type by race and age categories.
Results
Prevalence for ≥1 adenoma was 37 % (95 % CI 31–43 %) for all races combined and 36 % in blacks <50 years, 38 % in blacks ≥50 years, and 35 % in whites. When stratified by race, blacks had a higher prevalence of large conventional proximal neoplasia (8 %) compared to whites (2 %) (p value = 0.06) but a lower prevalence of any serrated-like (blacks 18 %, whites 32 %; p value = 0.02) and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (blacks 2 %, whites 8 % Chi-square p value; p = 0.05).
Conclusions
Within this uninsured population, the overall prevalence of adenomas was high and nearly equal by race, but the racial differences observed between serrated and conventional polyp types emphasize the importance of taking polyp type into account in future research on this topic.