Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports 1/2010

01.01.2010

Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Coronary Angiography

verfasst von: Brian P. Shapiro, Phillip M. Young, Birgit Kantor, Yeon Hyeon Choe, Cynthia H. McCollough, Thomas C. Gerber

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

During recent years, technologic advancements in computed tomography (CT) have allowed robust cardiac and coronary imaging. Small, mobile cardiac structures such as the coronary arteries can now be imaged directly and noninvasively with high precision. Given the fact that coronary CT angiography (CCTA) can detect preclinical calcified and noncalcified atherosclerosis, there is potential to revolutionize the management of ischemic heart disease by refining risk stratification and improving outcomes in various clinical settings. However, despite this progress, CT has come under scrutiny as concerns about the level and risk of the radiation exposure of the population grow. Although there are no data to support a direct association between CT imaging and risk of future cancer, health care practitioners should make every effort to minimize radiation exposure to their patients. The purpose of this article is to describe techniques that can reduce radiation dose to patients during CCTA but maintain diagnostic image quality.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2006, 113:e85–e151.CrossRefPubMed Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2006, 113:e85–e151.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al.: ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 33:1756–1824.CrossRefPubMed Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al.: ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 33:1756–1824.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al.: Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1896–1910.CrossRefPubMed Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al.: Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1896–1910.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, et al.: Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009, 119:1056–1065. This is the official document from the American Heart Association that discusses appropriate reporting of radiation dose and risks, provides a framework for addressing the risks and benefits of cardiac imaging with modalities that use ionizing radiation, and makes general recommendations for their safe use.CrossRefPubMed •• Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, et al.: Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009, 119:1056–1065. This is the official document from the American Heart Association that discusses appropriate reporting of radiation dose and risks, provides a framework for addressing the risks and benefits of cardiac imaging with modalities that use ionizing radiation, and makes general recommendations for their safe use.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat • Einstein AJ: Radiation protection of patients undergoing cardiac computed tomographic angiography. JAMA 2009, 301:545–547. This paper discusses potential barriers to the implementation of dose-sparing cardiac CT protocols.CrossRefPubMed • Einstein AJ: Radiation protection of patients undergoing cardiac computed tomographic angiography. JAMA 2009, 301:545–547. This paper discusses potential barriers to the implementation of dose-sparing cardiac CT protocols.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat • Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al.: Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:849–857. This paper discusses the cumulative effective radiation dose received from medical imaging in five major health care markets across the United States based on insurance claims.CrossRefPubMed • Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al.: Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:849–857. This paper discusses the cumulative effective radiation dose received from medical imaging in five major health care markets across the United States based on insurance claims.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al.: Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006, 113:1305–1310.CrossRefPubMed Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al.: Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006, 113:1305–1310.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanzonico P, Rothenberg LN, Strauss HW: Radiation exposure of computed tomography and direct intracoronary angiography: risk has its reward. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1846–1849.CrossRefPubMed Zanzonico P, Rothenberg LN, Strauss HW: Radiation exposure of computed tomography and direct intracoronary angiography: risk has its reward. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1846–1849.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al.: Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA 2009, 301:2340–2348. This article showed that education on the “best practice” model of CCTA can lower median CCTA radiation received at institutions that participated in an advanced imaging consortium.CrossRefPubMed •• Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al.: Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA 2009, 301:2340–2348. This article showed that education on the “best practice” model of CCTA can lower median CCTA radiation received at institutions that participated in an advanced imaging consortium.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KP, Einstein AJ, Berrington de Gonzalez A: Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169:1188–1194.CrossRefPubMed Kim KP, Einstein AJ, Berrington de Gonzalez A: Coronary artery calcification screening: estimated radiation dose and cancer risk. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169:1188–1194.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al.: Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009, 301:500–507. This article showed that CCTA radiation dose varies widely between institutions, and that the most potent radiation dose strategies were implemented in only a very small fraction of patients.CrossRefPubMed •• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al.: Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009, 301:500–507. This article showed that CCTA radiation dose varies widely between institutions, and that the most potent radiation dose strategies were implemented in only a very small fraction of patients.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S: Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007, 298:317–323. This paper provided estimates for lifetime attributable risk of cancer following coronary CT angiography based on the linear no-threshold hypothesis in men and women of varying ages.CrossRefPubMed •• Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S: Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007, 298:317–323. This paper provided estimates for lifetime attributable risk of cancer following coronary CT angiography based on the linear no-threshold hypothesis in men and women of varying ages.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies: Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII-Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2006. This crucially important document summarizes current information on the risks of low-level radiation and endorses the linear no-threshold hypothesis. •• Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies: Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII-Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies; 2006. This crucially important document summarizes current information on the risks of low-level radiation and endorses the linear no-threshold hypothesis.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentin J: Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. Ann ICRP 2005, 35:1–140. Valentin J: Low-dose extrapolation of radiation-related cancer risk. Ann ICRP 2005, 35:1–140.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pepine CJ, Allen HD, Bashore TM, et al.: ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization. Circulation 1991, 84:2213–2247.PubMed Pepine CJ, Allen HD, Bashore TM, et al.: ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization. Circulation 1991, 84:2213–2247.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, et al.: ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:1587–1605.CrossRefPubMed Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Hendel RC, et al.: ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:1587–1605.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al.: ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1475–1497. This critical document highlights the primary appropriate criteria for ordering CCTA. •• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al.: ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1475–1497. This critical document highlights the primary appropriate criteria for ordering CCTA.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al.: Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation 2008, 118:586–606.CrossRefPubMed Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al.: Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation 2008, 118:586–606.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, et al.: Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007, 116:1290–1305.CrossRefPubMed Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, et al.: Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007, 116:1290–1305.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G: Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 2000, 217:430–435.PubMed Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G: Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 2000, 217:430–435.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Karstaedt N, et al.: Current results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 2002, 77:55–71.CrossRefPubMed Gerber TC, Kuzo RS, Karstaedt N, et al.: Current results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 2002, 77:55–71.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al.: Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol 2009, 16:15–21.CrossRefPubMed Herzog BA, Husmann L, Burkhard N, et al.: Low-dose CT coronary angiography using prospective ECG-triggering: impact of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Acad Radiol 2009, 16:15–21.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al.: Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 246:742–753.CrossRefPubMed Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al.: Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 246:742–753.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:424–430.CrossRefPubMed Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:424–430.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufmann PA: Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective triggering: a promise for the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1456–1457.CrossRefPubMed Kaufmann PA: Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective triggering: a promise for the future. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1456–1457.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:431–437.CrossRefPubMed Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:431–437.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA: Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1188–1198.CrossRefPubMed Achenbach S, Anders K, Kalender WA: Dual-source cardiac computed tomography: image quality and dose considerations. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1188–1198.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al.: Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 2007, 42:543–549.CrossRefPubMed Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, et al.: Image quality and reconstruction intervals of dual-source CT coronary angiography: recommendations for ECG-pulsing windowing. Invest Radiol 2007, 42:543–549.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al.: First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:256–268.CrossRefPubMed Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al.: First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:256–268.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hein PA, Romano VC, Lembcke A, et al.: Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT. Eur Radiol 2009, 19:1148–1155.CrossRefPubMed Hein PA, Romano VC, Lembcke A, et al.: Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT. Eur Radiol 2009, 19:1148–1155.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, et al.: Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1809–1817.CrossRefPubMed Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, et al.: Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1809–1817.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, et al. : Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1450–1455.CrossRefPubMed Maruyama T, Takada M, Hasuike T, et al. : Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1450–1455.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Coronary Angiography
verfasst von
Brian P. Shapiro
Phillip M. Young
Birgit Kantor
Yeon Hyeon Choe
Cynthia H. McCollough
Thomas C. Gerber
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2010
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-009-0074-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

Current Cardiology Reports 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

24.04.2024 Adipositas Nachrichten

Der als Antidiabetikum sowie zum Gewichtsmanagement zugelassene Wirkstoff Tirzepatid hat in Studien bei adipösen Patienten auch schlafbezogene Atmungsstörungen deutlich reduziert, informiert der Hersteller in einer Vorab-Meldung zum Studienausgang.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.