Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

26.04.2017 | Original Article

Radical Treatment of Rectal Cancer in Elderly Is Feasible than Feared: Results from a Tertiary Care Centre

verfasst von: Madhu Muralee, Rajesh Singh, Arun Peter Mathew, Kurian Cherian, K. Chandramohan, Paul Augustine, S. Roshni, Iqbal Ahamed

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The thought of subjecting an elderly patient with rectal cancer to protocol-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACTRT), surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is sought with fear due to their multiple comorbidities and impaired functional status associated with the process of ageing. Hence, many a times the treatment is compromised and it is a fact that this subgroup of patients is underrepresented in most of the clinical trials. This study was aimed at analysing the perioperative and oncologic outcomes after protocol-based treatment of rectal cancer in the elderly patients, defined here as those with age ≥70 years. Prospective analysis of medical records of rectal cancer patients was done who were ≥70 years of age and were diagnosed and treated at Regional Cancer Centre (RCC), Thiruvanathapuram from 2008 to 2012. In this 5-year period, a total of 339 rectal cancer patients underwent surgery as part of multimodality treatment with curative intent. Of them, 75 patients were ≥70 years of age. Half of them had one or more comorbidities (54%) and majority were locally advanced at presentation (77%). Forty-seven (62%) cases received NACTRT and all of them tolerated RT dose (50.4 Gy) without modification. Anterior resection (AR) was performed in 48 (64%) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in remaining. Diverting stoma was made in four; of which three remained permanent. Two colostomies were performed for delayed leaks. Three patients (4%) died within 30 days due to leak, sepsis and cardiopulmonary causes. Two thirds (49/75) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) but only 55% of them (27/49) could complete all the cycles without dose modification. The median survival was 28 months. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall (OS) were 80.1 and 83.9%, respectively. There were 11 distant recurrences including two locoregional recurrences. The morbidity and mortality of multimodality therapy is reasonable to proceed with radical treatment with curative intent in the elderly patients with rectal cancer.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Population based Cancer Registry Report 2012, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvanathapuram, India Population based Cancer Registry Report 2012, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvanathapuram, India
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Manceau G, Karoui M, Mortensen NJ, Hannoun L (2012) Comparative outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between elderly and non elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 13:e526–e536CrossRef Manceau G, Karoui M, Mortensen NJ, Hannoun L (2012) Comparative outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between elderly and non elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 13:e526–e536CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shahir MA, Lemmens VE, van de Poll-Franse LV, Voogd AC, Martijn H, Janssen- Heijnen ML (2006) Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 42:3015–3021CrossRefPubMed Shahir MA, Lemmens VE, van de Poll-Franse LV, Voogd AC, Martijn H, Janssen- Heijnen ML (2006) Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 42:3015–3021CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JK, Yueh TC, Chang SC et al (2011) The influence of fecal diversion and anastomotic leakage on survival after resection of rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2251–2261CrossRefPubMed Lin JK, Yueh TC, Chang SC et al (2011) The influence of fecal diversion and anastomotic leakage on survival after resection of rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2251–2261CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chautard J, Alves A, Zalinski S, Bretagnol F, Valleur P, Panis Y (2008) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a matched case-control study in 178 patients. J Am Coll Surg 206:255–260CrossRefPubMed Chautard J, Alves A, Zalinski S, Bretagnol F, Valleur P, Panis Y (2008) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients: a matched case-control study in 178 patients. J Am Coll Surg 206:255–260CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lombardi R, Cuicchi D, Pinto C, Di Fabio F, Iacopino B, Cola B (2009) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer in patients aged 75 years or older. From XXI Annual Meeting of The Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery Terni, Italy. 4–6 December 2008. BMC Geriatr 9(Suppl 1):A2CrossRefPubMedCentral Lombardi R, Cuicchi D, Pinto C, Di Fabio F, Iacopino B, Cola B (2009) Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer in patients aged 75 years or older. From XXI Annual Meeting of The Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery Terni, Italy. 4–6 December 2008. BMC Geriatr 9(Suppl 1):A2CrossRefPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cagney DN, Cagney C, Gillham C (2011) Tolerance of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer in patients age 70 or older. 2011 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol 29(suppl):abstr e19565CrossRef Cagney DN, Cagney C, Gillham C (2011) Tolerance of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer in patients age 70 or older. 2011 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol 29(suppl):abstr e19565CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Choi HK, Ho JW, Lee YM, Seto CL (2006) Outcomes of surgery for mid and distal rectal cancer in the elderly. World J Surg 30:598–604CrossRefPubMed Law WL, Choi HK, Ho JW, Lee YM, Seto CL (2006) Outcomes of surgery for mid and distal rectal cancer in the elderly. World J Surg 30:598–604CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler H, Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H (1993) Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the German multicentre study. Int J Color Dis 8:158–166CrossRef Kessler H, Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H (1993) Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the German multicentre study. Int J Color Dis 8:158–166CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:297–303CrossRefPubMed Den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:297–303CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat David GG, Slavin JP, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Khan AU, Selvasekar CR (2010) Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary? Color Dis 12:428–432CrossRef David GG, Slavin JP, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Khan AU, Selvasekar CR (2010) Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary? Color Dis 12:428–432CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Khrizman P, Niland JC, ter Veer A, Milne D et al (2012) Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy use in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a National Comprehensive Cancer Network Analysis. J Clin Oncol 31:30–38CrossRefPubMed Khrizman P, Niland JC, ter Veer A, Milne D et al (2012) Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy use in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a National Comprehensive Cancer Network Analysis. J Clin Oncol 31:30–38CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung B, Pahlman L, Johansson R, Nilsson E (2009) Rectal cancer treatment and outcome in the elderly: an audit based on the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry 1995–2004. BMC Cancer 9:68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jung B, Pahlman L, Johansson R, Nilsson E (2009) Rectal cancer treatment and outcome in the elderly: an audit based on the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry 1995–2004. BMC Cancer 9:68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang GJ, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Rodriguez-Bigas M (2007) Are we undertreating rectal cancer in the elderly? An epidemiologic study. Ann Surg 246:215–221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang GJ, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Rodriguez-Bigas M (2007) Are we undertreating rectal cancer in the elderly? An epidemiologic study. Ann Surg 246:215–221CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollen RM, Damhuis RA, Coebergh JW (1997) Local recurrence and survival in patients with rectal cancer, diagnosed 1981–86: a community hospital-based study in the south-east Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 23:20–23CrossRefPubMed Mollen RM, Damhuis RA, Coebergh JW (1997) Local recurrence and survival in patients with rectal cancer, diagnosed 1981–86: a community hospital-based study in the south-east Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 23:20–23CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Damhuis RA, Wiggers T, Wereldsma JC (1997) Association between age and local recurrence of rectal cancer: results from a retrospective study of 902 patients. Int J Color Dis 12:235–239CrossRef Damhuis RA, Wiggers T, Wereldsma JC (1997) Association between age and local recurrence of rectal cancer: results from a retrospective study of 902 patients. Int J Color Dis 12:235–239CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Miguel I, Luis A, Fonseca R et al (2015) Rectal cancer management in elderly patients: experience of a single Portuguese institution. The Journal Of Community And Supportive Oncology 13:8–13CrossRefPubMed Miguel I, Luis A, Fonseca R et al (2015) Rectal cancer management in elderly patients: experience of a single Portuguese institution. The Journal Of Community And Supportive Oncology 13:8–13CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Radical Treatment of Rectal Cancer in Elderly Is Feasible than Feared: Results from a Tertiary Care Centre
verfasst von
Madhu Muralee
Rajesh Singh
Arun Peter Mathew
Kurian Cherian
K. Chandramohan
Paul Augustine
S. Roshni
Iqbal Ahamed
Publikationsdatum
26.04.2017
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0975-7651
Elektronische ISSN: 0976-6952
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0659-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.